Red Cat Demolition Plan Sparks Debate

The MVC last week grappled with a proposal to demolish the historic building that houses the Red Cat Kitchen restaurant.

In a tense public hearing Thursday night, members of Martha’s Vineyard Commission grappled with both themselves and a developer over a proposal to demolish the historic building in downtown Oak Bluffs housing the Red Cat Kitchen restaurant.

The old wooden bungalow, known as the Menotomy building at 14 Kennebec avenue, dates to the 19th century and has housed numerous businesses over its 100-plus years, including a paint shop, Zapotec restaurant, and now the Red Cat. It also includes a second-floor apartment space that has been historically used as a rental.

The building was purchased late last year for $690,000 by an LLC that lists Chilmark resident Gary Jones as its principal and includes Oak Bluffs selectman Brian Packish as a partner in the transaction. Mr. Packish has submitted a plan to raze the building and replace it with a three-story structure that would house the restaurant on the first floor and four apartments on the two top floors.

The proposed building would cover most of the property’s .05-acre lot, and would have a small porch, gabled roof and two-story turret. The plan calls for increasing the square footage of the building by approximately 2,500 square feet. Chuck Sullivan is the architect.

During a public hearing with the commission Thursday night, Mr. Packish said the decrepit state of the current building and its non-compliance with modern codes and ADA regulations necessitated a full demolition.

“As we went through bathrooms and we went through ADA accessibility, it became very obvious that the existing structure couldn’t accommodate today’s code as well as structural loading, things of that nature,” Mr. Packish told commissioners. “That’s what moved us quickly into a demolition position.”

In their analysis of the building’s historic relevance, commission staff scored the building a seven out of 13 on their scale and determined that the building had “limited significance,” with no distinguishing design or historic architectural features of note. The Oak Bluffs historic district commission has determined the project is not significant.

The sticking point for commissioners and members of the public on Thursday was not the historic significance of the old building, but the proposed use of the new one. The plan to add four one-bedroom market-rate apartments aims to make the project commercially viable. It also provoked spirited discussion about affordable housing.

The commission, which has long had a policy requiring affordable housing contributions on development projects, recently adopted a complicated revised formula for determining housing mitigation for mixed-use commercial structures. The formula takes into account variables like added square footage of commercial space and the number of market-rate units. The Menotomy building will be the first mixed-use commercial development to test the new formula.

According to testimony, the current building has one apartment with three bedrooms that share a kitchen and living space. While Mr. Packish felt the three separate bedrooms constituted three “units” because historically they had been rented out separately, many commissioners thought otherwise and saw the apartment as a single unit with three bedrooms.

Because the commission formula is dependent on the change of units used as a multiplier on the overall value of the property, the difference between one and three units could be quite expensive. Mr. Packish has offered to provide the commission with a one-time fee of $50,000 for affordable housing mitigation. But the commission estimated the mitigation to be somewhere between $150,000 and $250,000.

“There’s a problem in the way the intensity factor is laid out,” Mr. Packish said. “That is what is occurring here . . . we have to figure out how to navigate that.”

The issue prompted some sparring between commissioners Linda Sibley and Clarence A. (Trip) Barnes 3rd before more pointed questioning from other commissioners. Gail Barmakian asked whether the units could be affordable; Mr. Packish responded that he would have to change his entire business plan and turn the building into a hotel. Commissioner Ernie Thomas told Mr. Packish he felt that the units should be used for affordable or workforce housing. Commissioner Josh Goldstein asked Mr. Packish where the employees of the restaurant would live if the apartments were market-rate, sparking a testy personal exchange.

“Wherever they choose to rent,” Mr. Packish responded. “Where do you house your employees?” he asked Mr. Goldstein, whose family owns the Mansion House in Vineyard Haven.

“I don’t appreciate that attack,” Mr. Goldstein replied.

Tempers cooled momentarily, but members of the public had mixed feelings about the proposed use of the units, prompting further discussion. Oak Bluffs resident Mark Leonard said he felt the units should go to affordable or workforce housing as well, citing the commission’s charter and mandate to preserve diverse communities.

“This really adds stress on the community and the low, moderate income and year-round residents, because what is being proposed is nothing but short term rentals,” Mr. Leonard said. “We all know the challenges people are facing in trying to find housing here.”

But Jim Bishop, who is chairman of the Oak Bluffs affordable housing committee, defended the new plan, noting that the commission had recently waived affordable housing mitigation for the Martha’s Vineyard Community Services campus expansion plan.

“It’s a derelict building. Someone wants to step up and build something, and we’re grinding about one unit,” Mr. Bishop said. “I find that ludicrous.”

Red Cat Kitchen chef and co-owner Ben DeForest spoke in support of the plan, citing excitement at the prospect of a larger kitchen and saying he felt using the upstairs apartments as work force housing would be a “slippery slope.”

“[The owners] have come forward to take that building to a new place,” Mr. DeForest said. “This building is no treasure. It needs to be replaced.”

After an hour and a half of discussion, commissioners closed the public hearing. A vote is expected in two weeks.

In other business, commissioners unanimously approved a renovation to a barn on the site of the Mill House property in Vineyard Haven. Architect Patrick Ahearn showed plans that would turn the barn into a two-car garage with a workshop, storage and gym in the basement. The building would maintain its current dormers and front-facing barn double-doors.

As part of the commission’s after-the-fact review of the Mill House demolition decision last year, the applicant was required to return for approval of any proposed changes to the barn.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/22/2020 - 00:31

Permalink

Born here Oak bluffs

Seriously my packing? The rules don’t apply to u but all others? Lucky for us u r up for re-election .. good luck

Gotmyvote Oak bluffs

This is exactly why we love him in OB, He stands up for what’s right for all of us. The extortion is ruthless. The project and Brian have my vote!

Ollie Oak Bluffs

He stands up for you unless you are a fulltime resident that needs year round housing. More interested in making a another buck. Time for change!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/22/2020 - 07:26

Permalink

Facts not fiction MV

The MVC is overstepping its bounds. This is a local OB issue and should be left to the town. The MVC should stick to the mission it was created for... large developments affecting the REGION. Let these people demolish this dump and put up a nice new building that complies with current building codes and handicapped access.

BillyT Up Isle

The busy bodies at the MVC need to feel important. Like the SSA they take a life of their own and answer to no one. I agree this was not a project any of us envisioned the MVC would be chasing when they were originally chartered.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 02/23/2020 - 02:54

Permalink

Island resident Tisbury

It really seems like Brian Packish is trying to use his influence to bully the MVC into submission. The MVC has always been a strong proponent of affordable housing, please don’t give in to Brian’s latest charade.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 02/23/2020 - 11:55

Permalink

Lisa OB

The design is beautiful but the zoning board needs to inforce the 5' setback requirement. The plans have the proposed building at 18" from the road. We all know how dangerous it is getting into Red Cat & 20 by 9 without have a sidewalk.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 02/23/2020 - 16:03

Permalink

George Fitton Worcester

As soon as the smoke clears it 9will be 4 summer rentals making the build financially viable and no sidewalk. Let the visitors walk on the street at the mercy of the drivers.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 02/23/2020 - 21:33

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

It’s almost comical that someone willing to put real money on the line to invest in a business and rebuild a dilapidated building is getting dragged through the mud. Anyone with an issue had the right to outbid Brian for the property and purpose it for their desired use in line with code.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/24/2020 - 05:40

Permalink

J Klingensmith Naples Florida

I have known the Packish Family for many years and I can say without a doubt Brian would never try to use his influence to bully the MVC into submission. He is a good friend and one of the best selectmen Oak Bluffs will ever have. He has stuck up for Oak Bluffs many times and voiced what the community wanted.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/24/2020 - 07:31

Permalink

William Edg

That is one heck of a formula to whack a whopping $62,500 per apartment fee/tax that the MVC imposes. Since the MVC has no actual taxing authority, let’s call it what it really is: Extortion. You will get the project if you agree up front to pay $250,000. Someone should challenge the MVC on this extortion policy in a court of law.

Tisbury is just as bad Tisbury

The MVC acts as a broker to the wealthy and has met their goals of preserving land. They’re primary purpose now seems to be to allow the Uber wealthy the ability to purchase up land around their properties and turn them into tax sheltered forever wild properties, meanwhile year round islanders, who are the lifeblood of this community, get slapped with commission fees if they ever sell and buy a different home on MV. They need to redefine their mission and stop extorting money from islanders.
Let Packish fix up that area. He would be doing the town a favor. Just make sure he follows setbacks.

Bob Edgartown

You are correct Martha’s Vineyard Commission did not invent quid pro quo but it sure does relish in it. If you think this is bad start reviewing the new rules to the development of regional impact guidelines. They want to take over the island right down to a 4000 square-foot house.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/24/2020 - 12:53

Permalink

Annie Oak Bluffs

I love the Red Cat. But since my hip replacement I haven't been able to go to some of my favorite places. I'm thrilled the "New" Red Cat will be accessible to me and my older friends.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 08:41

Permalink

John West Tisbury

The building is a mess in need of replacement. I trust the plan presented will be approved for the good of the Island community.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 08:44

Permalink

Terry Oak Bluffs

Why not replace the building as it is with 3 bedrooms and a shared kitchen and bath? Put in a sidewalk for safety. Keep with the towns height restrictions. If you wanted to build expensive seasonal rental units, you should have checked into what was allowable before you purchased the property and then try to push YOUR agenda through

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 08:48

Permalink

T Bone OB

Any future commission or “authority” should have a 10 year sunset provision. If after 10 years they haven’t met the island’s needs they should be forced to disband.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 10:28

Permalink

Chris Edg

Could a compromise be reached where the apartments are market rate but required to be annual leases with no weekly rentals? Even in a brand new building, living in that location above the Red Cat seems unlikely to be an ultra high end rental, and the impact on the neighborhood would be significantly diminished if you didn't have folks moving in and out every week (some of whom might not have realized how busy/noisy a location it is).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 10:39

Permalink

AB OB

We have a purchaser who would like to build a brand new building in place of a run down, not up to code building. To make this financially viable, he needs 4 market rate apartments. Instead of helping him, the powers that be want the apartments to be affordable. Just think what a new restaurant with a commercial kitchen will cost. Then there's the cost of 4 kitchens and bathrooms in the apartments. Why is he expected to put in affordable housing. The Island needs lots of affordable housing. A town could designate land for a tiny house community. The land could be rented. A one time buy in could pay for the cost of installing the utilities. New buy ins could pay for the maintenance. I don't know if this is plausible, but the Island needs to start thinking out of the box. The Island needs lots of apartments.I'm not sure that Main Street in OB is the place.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 11:27

Permalink

Margaret Vero Beach

Please excuse my ignorance, am I getting this right.... The new building won't be accepted unless the owner puts in affordable rate housing? Is that legal? Shouldn't that be HIS choice?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 17:07

Permalink

Susan of OB West Hartford

Sidewalk for sure -- rentals market rate? based on summer market rate? Do you know how many properties have been sold in OB recently to provide housing for Inns/Hotels? If this keeps up, OB won't have anyone needing to rent, as you won't have any summer visitors. Let the dilapidated building be replaced., just make it look like it belongs. and put in the dang sidewalk!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 02/25/2020 - 20:31

Permalink

Really? OB

Find some parking before allowing a single bedroom. How many bedrooms have been added within 100 feet of this building with not one additional parking space?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.