Supporters of new school project rallied outside the polls Tuesday, but voters said no to the project.
Jeanna Shepard

Tisbury School Project In Limbo After Voters Reject Spending Question

Turning out in large numbers at their annual town election Tuesday, Tisbury voters narrowly rejected the $46.6 million new school project.

Turning out in large numbers at their annual town election Tuesday, Tisbury voters narrowly rejected the $46.6 million new school project, throwing future plans for the school into limbo.

With key school vote on the ballot, voter turnout was strong.
Jeanna Shepard
With key school vote on the ballot, voter turnout was strong.
Jeanna Shepard

The hotly-debated school project had won approval by a wide margin at the annual town meeting in the second week of April. But in the end it failed to clear the ballot box, where voters rejected a Proposition 2 1/2 debt exemption question 567 to 546, a margin of 21 votes.

The next steps remain unclear, as millions of dollars in state funding for the project hang in the balance.

“I sufficiently prepared myself for either result, but I was certainly disappointed,” said school principal John Custer after the vote. “I had a feeling it was going to be a very close vote, and it was,” he added.

“The town spoke, but it was definitely disappointing,” said school building committee chairman Colleen McAndrews. “But we’ll keep moving along with the committee and see what happens.”

The building committee meets Monday at 5 p.m. in the school library to discuss the outcome and next steps. Other town officials are also expected to attend.

Led by its broad-based building committee, the town has been working under the wing of the Massachusetts School Building Authority for the past two years to develop the plan. It called for building a new 76,000-square-foot school on the existing site and housing students in the 1929 brick school during construction, before eventually demolishing that building. The town was eligible to receive $14.6 million in state reimbursement money for the project, leaving taxpayers responsible for $32 million.

Arnie Reisman finds creative way to display his I Voted sticker.
Jeanna Shepard
Arnie Reisman finds creative way to display his I Voted sticker.
Jeanna Shepard

The school question has divided the town and dominated community discussion for months.

On Tuesday voters streamed to the polls at the public safety building all afternoon on a sunny spring-like day.

Students played outside at the Tisbury School across the street, and parents and students gathered with signs encouraging a yes vote.

“I’ll stay as long as needed,” said Janet Cummings, mother of two Tisbury school students. “We’re here to give any positive reinforcements to get people to vote yes as they walk in.”

Casey Decker, a civil engineer in Tisbury, voted yes on the project.

“I’m concerned about property taxes,” he said as he left the polling place. “But it’s worth the investment.”

Other voters felt differently and were concerned about the impact on property taxes. Some vocal critics believe the old school should be renovated not demolished, an option the building committee explored at length but eventually decided against for a variety of reasons, including cost estimates that came in even higher than a new building.

Some voters at the polls said they were against the project but declined to give their names.

Eighth grader Jonathan Norton campaigns for school.
Jeanna Shepard
Eighth grader Jonathan Norton campaigns for school.
Jeanna Shepard

Emily Taylor voted yes on the school question. She handed her I Voted sticker to her two-year-old daughter Vianna Baird, who held the sticker on her thumb.

“The decision was easy,” Ms. Taylor said. “I went to the Tisbury School and I hope my daughter will also attend. It is much needed and it’s important to the youth of our community to have a new school.”

Total turnout was 1,120, about 32 per cent of the 3,529 registered voters in town.

A few minutes after the polls closed, election warden Mary Ellen Larsen read out the results.

“I’m very disappointed,” Vineyard schools superintendent Matthew D’Andrea said by telephone later. “I was more optimistic, I thought we’d have a better result. Now we’ll look at the next steps with the MSBA.”

Mr. Custer said he is an educator not an engineer, but after years of planning, he believes the project as proposed was the best option.

“A lot of those opposed believe there is a better project for this town. I hope there is. But in my opinion, thus far, there hasn’t been a better one than the one we‘ve been presented with,” he said.

The town has already invested in the early phases of the project. In 2016, voters appropriated $825,000 for a feasibility study. Most of that funding has been used to hire an owner’s project manager,

Daedelus Projects, and Turowski2 architects. Funding has been used to assess various options for school improvements, including building a new school on a different site and renovating the existing school.

Mr. Custer said whatever happens, there appears to be agreement that the school is in need of serious improvements. For more than a decade, some classes have been taught in a modular unit outside the building. The small cafeteria with its limited capacity means students have extra short lunch periods. Mr. Custer said there is insufficient space for educational support services and special education.

“There’s no one that I’m aware of that’s questioning the need to do something,” he said. “That’s what’s disappointing. Because we had something.”

More results from the Tisbury annual town election.

More photos from the polls.

Comments

Mac VH

Is lowering Tisbury's commercial tax rate to equal the residential tax rate running business out of town? sewering the business district on State Road? using town funds to beautify downtown? twice voting to allow alcohol in restaurants? Who are you kidding. Tisbury is very pro business. The Stop and Shop design was ugly and out of character; it's good that they VOLUNTARILY withdrew their application. They will be back, and their next design should and will be properly scrutinized.

Darryl VH

S&S isn't coming back to VH any time soon. They moved their focus to Edgartown and in making that their flagship store on the Island. They'll probably keep VH to code, but little more. Tisbury is not a town with straight shooters as leaders, let alone leaders that can build a vision, so why try to deal with them? Don't just ask S&S, ask Ernie Boch, Jr. and Santander. Even Ernie trying to take a plot of land and turn it into a park had the town in an uproar. It's a laugh to think this town is business friendly. A handful of families control most of what happens in VH, and it's naive to think otherwise.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/25/2018 - 21:29

Permalink

Lynn V OB

If there's a lesson, or at least a conversation here for the students, I'd start with this: About 16% of the registered voters in the town of Tisbury made this decision. (Same statistic if the vote had tipped the other way.) Should we believe that about 68% of the registered voters in Tisbury were indifferent to the outcome of this ballot question? And if not, why didn't they cast a vote?

Who do you mean? MV

Do you mean all the permanent legal residents who are tax payers and can't vote? They have a ton of kids in the schools. They probably would have voted yes, but since they aren't citizens and are merely homeowners and taxpayers they can't vote.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/26/2018 - 09:25

Permalink

Really?! Vineyard Haven

Fascinating dialogue above. Truly! Here is an idea. Lots of banter about regionalization going on, so why don't we start small. I recommend starting with the Police departments. They falls directly under the Selectmen. Let's give them 6 months to reach out to the other towns, gauge their interests/willingness and see how they make out and report back to us. Won't need new buildings for that plan, just central management changes and a collective bargaining agreement that is in place if they exist for each town to be renegotiated, etc. Seems pretty simple. It could even be done in time for next year's town meetings with some earnest effort and willingness of all parties. Once we vote that in next year we can move to the DPWs the following year. Again, should be pretty easy as they are just slightly larger an expense than the police. 1 year and done for each. After we get all this cooperation island wide, I would tackle the larger school regionalization as we will have a good road map in place how to succeed at that point. I implore our selectmen/women to grab the low hanging fruit that is within their control and move forward without reservation. Please report back in 6 months on your progress.

WashAbhorred Edgartown

I think the regionalization you're talking about will be worked in a way where it costs more for some town's than it does now. We keep hearing how the current per-student formula for the High School isn't fair to some towns and it should be equally apportioned across all property owners (meaning Edgartown and West Tisbury would pay more per student than other towns).
There's also the issue of different towns having control over how they want their schools, and life-safety to be run and work with people.

Now, I do believe there are places where the towns could immediately safe money with things like combined purchasing departments.

Really?! Vineyard Haven

You are pretty much making my point about how ridiculously hard it would be to regionalize a middle school, etc. as our selectmen/women here in Tisbury have advocated for so openly. I like your idea. Let's start even smaller and have them begin the process for collective purchasing for municipalities. Again, could it be done before next year's town meetings. Let's skip my previous thought and start with even lower hanging fruit. Please, Tisbury selectmen/women, make this an agenda item as soon as possible and report on your progress in 6 months. As before, then we can move to bigger items. This savings will not even be noticeable on the annual budget pie chart presented at town meeting, but it is a start.

Islander Too

I think the discussion should head for regional Middle School right now.
The Mass School Building Authority seems to incentivize creating regions. Of course; the savings. But in addition there are strong developmental and pedagogical as well as fiscal arguments for regionalized middle school right now. Junior high students belong with each other. And their educational programs are also more expensive (need for science labs, better athletic equipment, etc.).

The iron is hot. The time to strike is now. Not hold regionalized middle school hostage to other, unrelated departments.

Really Vineyard Haven

Quick math on regional middle school. Based upon the MVRHS website they have 700 kids...that translates to a school that holds 525 for a middle school. You saw the price tag proposed for the Tisbury school to house 2/3 of that. We need all towns to agree to build that, plus new buses, plus new administration, plus annual heating/lighting, I could go on. And if you live in Tisbury, you still need to renovate the old school. None of the problems went away. You just added expense. I am not saying you are wrong....but it may actually cost you more in the long run. Be careful what you ask for!

really Edgartown

It will never happen. A middle school that is. Clear evidence shows no support from Edgartown, why would they? You really don't know what you're talking about when you talk about a middle school will save money . create regionalization and promote better learning for growing middle aged kids. It will cost you a fortune. If you think 32 million is a lot. enjoy the price tag on a middle school. The tisbury school still needs work regardless.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/26/2018 - 19:24

Permalink

Blegh West Tisbury

I am gobsmacked at the selfish shortsightedness of this vote. After years of discussion, do people really not understand what a great deal that grant money was? Do they not understand how important a thriving school is to their own property values? How did they walk past that decrepit trailer outside the school and cast a vote against the future? Tisbury, you just cut your nose off to spite your face. Good luck.

Islander Too

The grant money was not a great deal.
The price was already high, and the interest on the town's portion, ca. $13.5 million, eats up the grant.
The state money also would not cover many additional expensese. People did understand the math, and a lot more besides. Tisbury just dodged a bullet.

Emily

It's not All or Nothing. The school needs expansion and additions to the solid old main building which need to be planned. It's called common sense.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/26/2018 - 19:30

Permalink

Wesley Jenkinsen Tisbury

OK- Time for that "splash of cold water on the face", people. 1)We are now going to hear the same old rusty croaking about "Regionalization", and it'll never happen. 2)People will say "it's for the kids" when the last 25 years of education has really been about the adults- unionized jobs for liberal arts majors. 3)There are a lot of people who just can't stomach a monster tax hike on top of an already painful tax burden. There ya' go, folks.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/27/2018 - 04:47

Permalink

Richard Barbieri Oak Bluffs

In The Rise of Selfishness in America, James Collier wrote “A people who will not sacrifice for the common good should not expect to have any common good.” I fear that as the island ages this sort of shortsighted behavior will increase. SAD!

Islander Too

Let's bear in mind the facts before anyone dissolves in a puddle of sadness!
Tisbury currently spends $27,000 annually per student for the education of its children.
The highest in the state. Over 50% of its budget.

Islander Also Vineyard Haven

First of all why do you say that like it's a bad thing? Further if you look at the Tisbury School report card vs the rest of the state Tisbury does pretty well, despite some challenges. And for context how does the island do one everything for costs? How are our hospital costs vs the state? Airport? EMS? Police? Fire? Housing? It doesn't surprise me at all that MV spends a lot on things we need. Let's also keep in mind we have one of the lowest tax rates in the state before we continue to claim how much money we spend and how poor off we are. Would have been nice to get millions from the state for once.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/27/2018 - 14:57

Permalink

Really?! Vineyard Haven

Please quote your source.......or check this published by the state. http://www.doe.mass.edu/finance/statistics/ppx12-16.html download the spread sheet. Tisbury is indeed high line 210 on the excel file.....but up island (line 303) significantly outspent Tisbury. 2017 Oak Bluff and Edgartown not reported. 2015/2016 http://profiles.doe.mass.edu/statereport/ppx.aspx Tisbury was outspent by Edgartown and Up island. Please stop slanting facts by only stating what narrowly favors your single argument. Yes, it is expense to educate children on the island and yes, Tisbury has higher taxes than other island towns, but move off Island and check the facts about tax rates. As was stated by our town finance at town meeting, we are 30th lowest in the state. That is of 351 cities and towns. You could have it a lot worse.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/27/2018 - 22:54

Permalink

Moretoconsider Vh

I wonder how much an 18,000 sq ft town hall will cost for 23 people. Seems that is what I heard Jay Grande say when asking to irchase the land acrossed the street. Perhaps it's time to dissect cost per person/sq. Footage. YIKeS

Woah woah woah VH

New town hall? Will it have a 30% match from the state? Will it be using fossil fuels all the way into the year 2040? No way. I gotta vote no. This town has no money for projects. People can't afford to live here. I gotta vote no. I'm voting no on all town projects until the school gets built up to modern standards because first things are first and we need to save up our money to have the things other towns have.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/28/2018 - 09:25

Permalink

Mike C. VH

Vineyard haven is such a disappointment. The stop n shop
Is one perfect example. Now we have a grocery store that is a disgrace... and thanks to Cronigs buying the adjacent property we are left with an eye sore.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/28/2018 - 20:58

Permalink

Our Vote Counted Tisbury

We could not be happier, our Vote counted to kill the bill.
First clean up our town especially the entire beach road area so our town can become more attractive and just maybe our property might be worth more. The Post Office looks terrible, the crumbling Black Dog properties are sickening and that ugly deteroting ghost ship at Packers must disappear completely. That disgraceful mess has been appearing all over the beach road area for years now.
Get your priorities straight and in order and hopefully with Jimmy Rogers as our new selectmen the other two will replaced so we can have all new faces as the ones that have been onboard running the show and also running our police department has accomplished absolutely nothing positive.
It all needs to change direction 360 degrees before we start building a McMansion elementary school!

What? Tisbury

What on Earth does a ghost ship and the Black Dog have to do with building a new school? What on Earth is Jimmy Rogers supposed to do? Is he supposed to go to the Black Dog and be like "Hey could you paint the outside of the bakery? I got people that don't want to vote for the school till the Black Dog looks nicer."

Kenny L, VH

Well said. The limitations in the bylands regarding the types of businesses that can be along harbor are too restrictive, and have held our Town hostage since their passage in the ‘90s. I am counting on Jimmy Rogers as the first of the new leaders in Town that will set a vision for Beach Road, and find a balance between a “working harbor”, and businesses that take advantage of the natural beauty to bring in tourists. Packer’s fuel tanks along with just about every other property along beach road are eye sores. Let’s add restaurants & shops, where people will wish to come and spend an evening. Do the same for a Main Street. Easing the liqueur laws doesn’t mean you invite lawlessness people. Guess what?, those new revenues help the commercial tax base, and in turn will give us the opportunity to improve our infrastructure without substantial tax increases. Vineyard Haven could & should be so much more than the place to catch the ferry.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/30/2018 - 11:27

Permalink

Really?! Vineyard Haven

Where is the public outcry regarding potential demolition of the old historic building located at 55 West William street. It was built in 1880 and it looks like the town is going to tear it down for a new town hall. Our selectmen/women already approved the demolition. All of you who opposed tearing down the stately Tisbury school built 49 years later should be up in arms. The MVC will require a public hearing to tear it down. I expect massive opposition from all you we "must preserve the past" voters.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/30/2018 - 14:51

Permalink

WashAbhorred Edgartown

Buildings don't teach kids. I have seen school districts spend tens and hundreds of millions on buildings and then find themselves in trouble with increased maintenance costs (yes, new buildings need maintenance).
You can then look at some very old school buildings where the schools are rated among the best in the country.
Yes, Tisbury probably needs to be renovated. I bet a realistic plan and estimate on doing that would probably be acceptable to taxpayers. It also won't put the town in a situation where they are going to have to choose between teachers and building maintenance down the road.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.