One of the largest housing proposals in recent memory, Green Villa has filed a lawsuit against the Martha’s Vineyard Commission that claims the regional planning agency should not be involved in permitting for "40B" affordable housing projects.
The developer behind one of the largest proposed housing projects in recent memory is attempting to upend decades of permitting precedent with a new lawsuit.
William Cumming’s Atwood company, which has been attempting to build the 100-unit Green Villa housing complex along Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road in Oak Bluffs, filed a complaint against the Martha’s Vineyard Commission last week. In it, he calls on the state Land Court to rule that the commission has no jurisdiction to review “40B” affordable housing projects.
“Instead, all such projects would be reviewed exclusively by the individual towns, with [zoning boards of appeals] authorized to issue all necessary development permits — including any approvals that would normally be issued by the MVC — consistent with state law across the Commonwealth’s 351 municipalities,” Green Villa wrote in a statement on Tuesday.
If successful, the suit could drastically change how permitting works on the Vineyard, cutting out the commission and its staff on some of the larger developments coming before towns.
The suit, filed on Sept. 4, largely hinges on a portion of state law that focuses on what boards are allowed to have permitting authority over affordable housing. The 40B law, so-named for its statute number, was enacted in 1969 in order to protect low- and moderate-income housing from exclusionary zoning practices.
Sometimes called “anti-snob” zoning, the law condenses almost all of the different permits normally needed for a large-scale development with the local zoning board of appeals, cutting down the red tape.
But on the Vineyard, the process has operated differently. Here, developers apply to the town zoning board, and projects that meet certain triggers are referred to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission.
Created by the legislature in 1974, the commission is one of the only regional planning agencies of its kind in the state, and it has been tasked with defending the ecological, historical and cultural values of the Island. The commission has a much broader review power than the municipalities, able to consider aspects outside of normal zoning.
Normally, after the MVC has made a decision, a project is sent back to the zoning board to go through that approval process.
Green Villa argues that this two-step process is not justified in the state law and has asked the court to bar the MVC from reviewing the project. The developer contends that the MVC is a “local board” and thereby should be lumped in with all other municipal boards in the streamlined zoning board application.
Green Villa is also arguing that the sentiment extends to any and all 40B projects, potentially cutting down on reviews if the argument finds favor with the court.
“MVC lacks jurisdiction to review any development project proposed under Chapter 40B in the Towns of Aquinnah, Chilmark, Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury, and West Tisbury,” the suit concludes.
This is not the first time Mr. Cumming has pushed back against the Island’s permitting process, and over whether the commission should have jurisdiction. In a technical skirmish with the Oak Bluffs zoning board, Mr. Cumming previously called on the state’s housing appeals committee to rule that the MVC doesn’t have the right to have a say.
In that fight, the state decided to stay out of the matter, instead ruling at the heart of the complaint, which had to do with the amount of affordable housing units in Oak Bluffs.
Peter Wharton, the chair of the commission, declined to comment on the specifics of the new lawsuit Tuesday, citing the pending litigation. But he did point to the act that created the commission and its five decades of work to protect the Island.
“That’s something I hope we do for the next 50 years,” he said.
The Oak Bluffs zoning board, for its part, has also said in the past that it wants the commission involved.
“Under the MVC Act, the board has no power to issue a development permit until the MVC has completed its review,” the zoning board wrote in a previous lawsuit over the development. “Consistent with the usual practice and procedure, the board wishes to have the MVC review the project first before the board conducts its own review.”
A similar challenge against the MVC power came in 2002 from a developer that sought to build a 366-unit housing project in the southern woodlands of Oak Bluffs. In that case, a state Land Court judge found that the act which created the MVC superseded 40B, cementing the commission’s right to review affordable housing projects.
“You could see why that may be something a developer may want to avoid,” said Fred Hancock, a former commissioner. “The crux of it is if the Martha’s Vineyard Commission is considered a local board.”
Green Villa points to a section in state law, amended after that decision, where regional entities are specifically mentioned as falling under the zoning board’s ability to issue a master permit.
Proposed to be built on an eight-acre parcel near the Martha’s Vineyard ice rink, the 100 ownership apartments would be for people making between 80 and 150 per cent of the area median income. Mr. Cumming has also talked about dedicating some of the housing to Island teachers.
An initial plan for four retail buildings at the development has also been withdrawn, according to the company.
Mr. Cumming is also proposing a controversial development near the Triangle in Edgartown, which is supposed to have a hearing with the MVC on Thursday.
The Green Villa case is scheduled to have a case management conference on Oct. 30.

Comments
The more we read about this
Bob EdgartownThe more we read about this developer along with seeing his actions it is apparent his no real friend Of Marthas Vineyard. Anyone doing business with this company is out to make money just like any other developer. They look for loopholes to increase their profits to the detriment of the communities they move into. They pushed the limit on density affecting our ground water. They pushed the limit on density affecting our traffic and they push the limit on density to make more money.
This will either be tied into
Concerned MVThis will either be tied into sewer or be a very special system. Stop with the fear mongering. The island is gone for the middle income. This is their chance at ownership. Sorry its not what you want
What commercial businesses
Philip Cordella Oak Bluffs, MAWhat commercial businesses are going in the 4 retail buildings? As this area is zoned residential I am curious as to why this is being allowed. Please investigate and report on this aspect. Would the developers even build this project if the added income from the retail businesses were not allowed? Hmm.
At least 2 commenter's missed
Cynthia ANDERSON Salt Lake CityAt least 2 commenter's missed this: An initial plan for four retail buildings at the development has also been withdrawn, according to the company.
Question to Mr. Cumming.
Susan Desmarais Oak BluffsQuestion to Mr. Cumming.
Instead of tying yourself and the MVC up in litigation why not do the project minus the retail space, which would also negate the need for a lot of extra parking? Have housing and green space. It would be less contentious, better for the environment and those who will live there.
The retail space is
Concerned MVThe retail space is convenient for people who live here. They wouldn’t have to travel so far to get food or a meal? Seems like you want more traffic and food deserts…. Got it
Food, There are three
Susan Desmarais Oak BluffsFood, There are three supermarkets within 3 miles. Oak Bluffs isn’t a food desert by any stretch of the imagination.
Right, but the problem
Concerned MVRight, but the problem becomes how much TIME people who live here might spend going to the grocery store, driving a trip might just take 10 minutes each way, but if someone lives here and doesn’t have a car it might taken an hour or more via bus. Your concerns are fear to stop something you don’t thing should exist. If you don’t think the middle deserves to buy homes just come out and say it.
You misinterpret and
Susan Desmarais Oak BluffsYou misinterpret and misrepresent my words.
The initial plan for retail
Wendy Carroll West TisburyThe initial plan for retail space has been withdrawn.
Isn't this project next to
gina Menemsha/nycIsn't this project next to the current affordable housing complex OB is building next to the Y ?? If so that stretch of Edgartown-VH road is already extremely congested .. Add in a planned Y expansion & bigger HS , larger Community Services. where does this aggressive building stop ?? Next will be stop lights to allow traffic to exit & enter all developments .. Poor Martha ..
Where does it end? Have you
OB Resident OAK BLUFFSWhere does it end? Have you seen the clearing for the 60 unit development and now they want to clear another 8 acres right next to it for 100 more units. How many more developments with additional land clearing, traffic and increased population will it take until we're satisfied? What will the island look like then? And spare me the we need to "save our community"! If we end up as a community of people who worked their butts off to afford a home, well, I'm all for that.
Work your butt off to afford
Joe Oak BluffsWork your butt off to afford a home off island maybe... owning a home on the island we grew up on is a pipe dream for so many of us, no matter how hard you work.
Billy was born and raised on
John Stevens MenemshaBilly was born and raised on MV and graduated from MVRHS. Am surprised he's making these waves on the island he once called home.
Let's cut right to it, shall
BLLB Edgartown and nowhere elseLet's cut right to it, shall we....Since when does ANY developer or group have the ability to legally push ANY town around on where and when to do a development? ...in O.B., downtown Edgartown or anywhere else in the state? Home-rule is, should and always remain the purview of the local citizenry...by God!
It is interesting to see that
William Edg.It is interesting to see that most of the commenters of this article are against this project. It means that we don't need a tax for (Housing Bank) affordable housing since no one wants it. The state should listen to the locals opposing any sort of affordable housing such as this project. Clearly, Islanders do not want affordable housing. Clearly, the state courts (in the future) will rule in favor of the Martha's Vineyard Commission and be the only (and exclusive) place in the entire state of Massachusetts to disregard the law and intent of 40B which was enacted 56 years ago. How has it worked? Despite a law enacted 56 years ago, we still have an affordable housing crisis on the Vineyard and it is destined to continue indefinitely due to our exclusivity and the MVC process and expense. The state should be shameful for even considering a housing bank tax while preventing 40B developers (who do not need tax money) from building their projects.
You are creating a strawman
AL EdgartownYou are creating a strawman argument. Just because commenters are against retail space or even the location of this affordable housing doesn’t translate to being “against all affordable housing.” But kudos for trying to discourage people from sharing their opinions and seeking a middle ground. Not all affordable housing is good or bad. Each project should be looked at by its own merits.
Honestly, whatever comes of
Viva La Bill EdgHonestly, whatever comes of this, what’s apparent (to me) is the pure housing hypocrisy we face on this island. We legit had dozens of folks living in the - woods - out of desperation and they got the boot! Of course we can’t comprehend a project like this without pure meltdown of outcry. If anything Bill Cummings has shown the mirror up to the community and it’s cracking…
Anyone that has ever gone to
Mark Acker VHAnyone that has ever gone to the MVC would understand it is very frustrating trying to explain a project to 18 members where most have no experience in development. Furthermore, the MVC has no rules, any member can deny any project simply claiming it has no Benefit. That is not due process.
Add new comment