Tisbury’s select board has approved a dozen draft articles for the Sept. 30 special town meeting warrant, which the board will finalize at its Sept. 2 meeting.
Tisbury’s select board has approved a dozen draft articles for the Sept. 30 special town meeting warrant, which the board will finalize at its Sept. 2 meeting.
Proposed expenditures range from $10,300 for a set of three solar-powered speed-reading traffic signs to more than $1 million the town has already earmarked for a fire department pumper engine.
Voters also will be asked to approve $45,000 for an expert analysis of Tisbury’s financial capacity to manage its debt from current and upcoming capital projects.
If approved, the money also would fund a five-year financial forecast, a five-year capital improvement plan and a debt analysis, according to the draft article reviewed at last Tuesday’s board meeting.
While the draft referred specifically to the town’s share of costs for the proposed Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School construction project, that language was cut from the article after strong objections from select board member Roy Cutrer.
“The way it’s written, it feels to me like someone is fishing for reasons to stop the high school project,” Mr. Cutrer said.
“As far as I’m concerned, it’s unacceptable,” he said.
The draft language also didn’t match up with the proposal for the financial assessment, to be performed by the Edward J. Collins, Jr. Center for Public Management at Boston University, town administrator Joseph LaCivita told the board.
“There’s not one mention of the school project in the overall proposal,” said Mr. LaCivita, who apologized for the misleading draft.
Board members voted to edit the article so that it refers generally to major upcoming capital improvement projects.
Along with its share of the high school costs, Tisbury also faces a still-unknown amount of borrowing to fund a consolidated municipal services center, for which a $600,000, voter-approved feasibility study of town property is under way to identify potential building sites.
Tisbury taxpayers already are paying for the town school’s $81 million renovation and addition, and last December agreed to borrow $4.8 million to renovate and expand the Vineyard Haven Public Library.
Other draft warrant articles reviewed Tuesday include a new bylaw prohibiting unattached trailers from on-street parking and assessing fines for violations.
“Hopefully the winter months will not see any trailers or boats left on our streets,” said Mr. LaCivita, noting that the unhooked equipment interferes with street cleaning and road management.
Last week’s votes were not the final word on the special town meeting warrant: The select board has an opportunity to amend or delete articles when it meets to close the warrant next Tuesday at 4 p.m.

Comments
Voters are being asked to
Here we go again Vineyard HavenVoters are being asked to approve $45,000 for an “expert analysis” of Tisbury’s financial capacity to manage its debt. But where has our treasurer been for the past five years? The state offers these services free of charge. The town already pays an auditor to provide this exact information. Why should taxpayers foot the bill again?
If approved, the money would fund a five-year financial forecast, a five-year capital plan, and a debt analysis. And yet, after years of assuring us “we’ve got this,” the town is finally admitting it doesn’t.
Look at what’s been approved: a new fire station, a new Tisbury School ( for 40 million dollars above with no State building fund money), Spring building rehabilitation, a new water department building, countless sewer system upgrades and expansion, countless vehicles ( electric ones that are sitting there inoperable, and an expensive Owen Park redesign. All sold to voters as if they’d add only “pennies” to our tax bills. Now we find out no one ever bothered to measure what these projects really mean for our debt and future payments. That’s not just mismanagement! it’s actually a betrayal of trust.
Enough is enough. Going forward, voters must reject unnecessary projects. Tisbury’s priorities should be crystal clear:
• A new regional high school.
• A fully funded, properly trained police department.
• A Department of Public Works that can actually maintain our roads and infrastructure.
• A fire department that protects our homes and families.
• And a strong Council on Aging and senior center to keep our aging population engaged and active.
Anything less is politics as usual and taxpayers can’t afford it.
It’s always hard for me to
Jeannie Clement Vineyard HavenIt’s always hard for me to swallow/comprehend the cost of these things - thousands and thousands of dollars spent to figure out how to spend thousands and thousands more! I agree with your sentiments. I don’t know if buying the new fire equipment fits into the basic priorities you listed.
Why exclude the enormous high
Why?Why exclude the enormous high school expenditure? As Tisbury taxpayers we are drowning in the highest tax rate. Why not be transparent?
Add new comment