Travelers take a detour around the terminal construction in Woods Hole.
Ray Ewing

Woods Hole Terminal Construction Is Heavy Lift for All Involved

For the first time since the project started, construction on the new Woods Hole Steamship Authority terminal will continue through the busy season, forcing a game of musical chairs for the hundreds of thousands of passengers and motorists coming on and off the ferries. 

Choying Rangdol was waiting for his ferry in Woods Hole on a recent Friday when he turned his gaze towards the water.

Instead of seeing his ferry pull into the slip, the Oak Bluffs business owner looked over at men in hardhats walking along the top of a building shell located right in the middle of the Steamship Authority’s terminal property.

It will be a familiar sight for the hundreds of thousands of travelers who come to and from Martha’s Vineyard this summer. The Steamship Authority is in the homestretch of building a new, $32 million terminal and utility building in Woods Hole, capping off more than a decade of planning and construction. 

For the first time since the project started, the construction will continue through the busy season, forcing a game of musical chairs for the passengers and motorists coming on and off the ferries. 

The Steamship Authority hopes to have the new terminal done by next Memorial Day.
Ray Ewing
The Steamship Authority hopes to have the new terminal done by next Memorial Day.
Ray Ewing

“Right now, it’s confusing,” Mr. Rangdol said. “But in the process, that happens.”

The outlines of the new terminal have started to come into shape. As of earlier this month, walls had been built for the 5,418-square foot building, the initial stage of the foundation was laid, and workers put nail guns to the roof after the tongue-and-groove decking had been completed.

Plans for a new terminal weren’t actually based on a desire for a new terminal. The Steamship Authority started to consider building a new terminal ahead of a feasibility study in 2012, when the ferry line was facing the need to overhaul the ferry slips. 

During a tour of the construction with the Gazette earlier this month, Steamship general manager Robert Davis said the old white cinderblock terminal that used to be located along the waterfront until it was demolished in 2018 would have never survived the pile driving for the new slips, forcing the Steamship to look at options for a new ticket building. 

“The terminal building had to come down because it wouldn’t take the stress that was going to be caused by the pile driving,” Mr. Davis said. 

Settling on a design for the new building proved to be a monumental task. The Steamship Authority ran through more than 20 different schematics before landing on the one-level terminal of stone and glass that is being erected.

Woods Hole residents rebelled against the initial design — a three-story building fashioned after the Candle House building at the nearby Marine Biological Laboratory. Some likened the proposed terminal to an Aspen ski lodge that blocked views because it was too tall for the location.

After going back to the drawing board, the Steamship picked the current design, which splits the building in two, putting the utilities for the terminal in a separate building near the entrance and exit road. 

Islanders have long grumbled about the project, and those complaints grew louder as construction started and inconveniences for ferry riders increased. During Memorial Day Weekend, one of the busiest travel weekends of the year, several crossings were cancelled due to high winds. This caused an overflow of vehicles in the Woods Hole lot, with lines backed up onto Woods Hole Road. 

The terminal is one of the last major projects for general manager Bob Davis ahead of his retirement.
Ray Ewing
The terminal is one of the last major projects for general manager Bob Davis ahead of his retirement.
Ray Ewing

Steamship officials acknowledged the problem and are working on ways to ward off future backups. Potential solutions include hiring more traffic control staff to guide drivers once they get onto the terminal property, as well as staging vehicles at one of the parking lots in Falmouth or even Bourne if several boats are cancelled.

“We continue to learn how we can improve,” Mr. Davis said. 

But the issue has raised concerns for the Steamship board of governors. At the board meeting last week, Falmouth representative Peter Jeffrey raised the prospect of construction coming to a halt in the summer. Mr. Jeffrey called the traffic in Woods Hole an “abomination” and said it was a wonder that no one had been hurt at the now joint terminal-construction site. 

“We’re lucky we haven’t had an accident yet involving a car or a pedestrian or construction vehicle on that site,” he said. 

He floated the potential of stopping construction from July 1 through Labor Day. 

“Whatever we’re doing doesn’t seem to be working correctly,” he said.

The board took no action on the suggestion and Mr. Davis said that a stoppage wouldn’t do much for the traveling public, other than prolong the length of the project. 

“The work zone would remain so we wouldn’t be picking anything up by pausing the construction at this stage,” he said. 

It took years to settle on a final design for the terminal.
Ray Ewing
It took years to settle on a final design for the terminal.
Ray Ewing

But aside from plans to pour concrete, the Steamship Authority is limiting work during the summer months to only the interiors of the building so no major equipment will be on site as tourists try to make their way to the ferries. This strategy of continuing at least some of the project during the summer would shorten the overall construction of the project by a year and a half, according to Mr. Davis.

Steamship staff hope to complete the utility building by December and the terminal building by next Memorial Day.

When the terminal is finished, the flow of vehicles to the ferry will mirror the current model. 

Vehicles headed to the Vineyard will line up behind the new terminal building, and drive around the terminal — either to the left or right — depending on which of the three slips their ferry is in. Buses will park in a lane to the back of the terminal.

The location of the new terminal, as well as the need for something new at all, has been the cause of consternation on the Vineyard. A common refrain has been to just continue using the temporary ticket building at the back of the Steamship lot. 

“The most prevalent opinion from the public is that the ticket building wasn’t even needed,” the steering committee of the new Steamship Authority citizen’s action group, which formed to push for changes at the ferry line, recently wrote to the Gazette. “The temporary ticket building, which has served the public for the past seven years, simply needed a bit more seating, especially with increased modern reliance on e-ticketing, to be reinforced to last, and to be raised to meet floodplain requirements.”

But, as Mr. Davis has said in the past, the Steamship is legally only allowed to use the temporary building while it builds the new one. A permanent building would have to meet more stringent standards for flooding and storm proofing, he said. 

“It was sufficient during construction, but for a long-term solution, it’s not,” he said. “It’s not a full option.”

During a tour of the construction with the Gazette, Mr. Davis said the location of the new terminal in the middle of the property was picked out of convenience for travelers.

“The engineers had originally wanted the terminal building to be back in this area,” Mr. Davis said, gesturing to the back of the property. “But the Falmouth board member and the Vineyard board member voiced concerns over the distance that people were going to be going from the terminal building to the slips.”

After a subsequent study, the Steamship realized the central site would be the best location to withstand any future flooding in the area. 

The temporary terminal currently in use will be demolished after construction is complete.
Ray Ewing
The temporary terminal currently in use will be demolished after construction is complete.
Ray Ewing

“When we did the flood study afterwards, it turns out that was the last site on the property that would be flooded,” Mr. Davis said.

Though there are many detractors, Janet MacCallum, a Falmouth homeowner, came down to the village to take in a summer’s day and see the work. She used to work at the Landfall restaurant and was well-aware of the congestion that can ensue during the summer.  

As Ms. MacCallum watched boats come and go, she said she was impressed. 

“Hats off to the Steamship Authority,” she said. “They seem to do a really good job…They keep expanding as needed. I’m pleased with them.”

The project will be one of the last major initiatives in Mr. Davis’ tenure, along with bringing on a third new freight ferry — the M/V Monomoy. He is set to step down as general manager in October, but will stay on in an advisory capacity.

“We’ve never been in a position where we’ve been bringing three new boats online, and rebuilding a terminal,” Mr. Davis said. “...These projects take some time, but at the end, we’re designing these to improve our operations; it’d be irresponsible for us not to take into account that we need to have facilities that are safe.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/26/2025 - 21:41

Permalink

Bill Ryan Edgartown/New Jersey

The first highlight of any trip across to the Vineyard is sitting in line, windows down, watching the boats coming and going. The new terminal's location---despite the reasoning from Mr. Davis---is an abomination. Right in the middle of the lot, blocking the sight lines? What a terrible idea! With regard to not being able to use the temporary building longterm? Then it should have been built to meet the necessary specs OR build the temporary one where the new terminal is being built while the permanent one was being built at the back. As "Skate" says, "What's wrong with a little walk?" And by the way, it isn't that far. TERRIBLE waste of money!

Sarah F South Shore & OB

I completely agree; it's disheartening to be staring at a building instead of at the boat slips and the water. I understand why the SSA might not want the liability of a potential pedestrian accident if the terminal were located further back, but couldn't it have been placed in the general vicinity of the old one??

Cally G Edgartown

I also completely agree. The new Ticket Office building completely blocks all sightlines. Walk-ons may be closer to the slips, but the cars are blindly following each other around the new building hoping they are going to the correct slip. Upgrading the Temporary ticket building would have saved money and maintained the view.

Older visitor Edgartown

"what's a little walk?" Just wait until you get older, or get a sports injury, or develop a medical issue... Which will happen to most of us. Then you will appreciate the cluelessness of the Terminal's design. Not to mention the roofed structures next to the slips, which may be architecturally interesting but which are angled perfect so as to not provide shelter from the rain in windy conditions. Or the long walk in the rain or snow from the terminal and bus dropoff to the freight cart (assuming that the SSA has decided again to not have a freight cart so that they can squeeze one more car onboard).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 02:14

Permalink

GDog! Aquinnah

Remember the 'Good Ole Days' when the ticket office was right on the dock, one could see the ferry's coming and going, the ferry's 'were' coming and going?.... Having to park such a long distance from the docks... older, handicapped, and the men and women who have to carry heavy tool bags back and forth.... having to lug their 'stuff' such a distance? what in heavens name is going on with the SSA????? I'm sure the powers that be are well taken care of, compensation, location, etc. etc. etc. C'mon people let's get it together!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 08:22

Permalink

Beatrice Phear West Tisbury

Mr. Davis says “we continue to learn how we can improve“;unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 08:40

Permalink

Jim Edgartown

This building in shear size alone is a colossal edifice of failure to a once well run institution.

The whole ticketing should have been moved to Palmer Ave and/or a kiosk or e ticketing. Creating a much smaller building in the back with restrooms was all that was needed. Every Engineer and Steamship Leader or board member should lose their license or be fired over this waste of our money.
The only good that will come of this project is continued fare hikes that will eventually kill tourism and reduce the need for summer workers.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 08:43

Permalink

Rick Aquinnah

Once again a major "job" is scheduled for the busiest time of year. Back ups, delays and confusion...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 12:41

Permalink

RC DC/OB

If there's a flood that threatens the new terminal would the boats even be able to use the slips? Would the water not be too high?

Sara Falmouth

The facility can't operate during a storm, but the building still has to meet building code requirements for its flood zone. They're trying to minimize damage and meet regulatory requirements, which is probably part of why the building was not placed at the water's edge (in a worse flood zone) like the old old ticket office. Side note-- Mr. Davis' statement that the new ticket office location is the last place on the property that would flood is hilariously wrong, I have no idea why he would even say that.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 13:11

Permalink

Doug Mashpee

Seems that it's very popular to disparage the new ferry terminal if you want to be with the 'in-crowd' but I think the new one will be a major improvement over the old cinder block eyesore that blocked the view.

Bill Ryan Edgartown/New Jersey

The old cinder block building that you state "blocked the view" was way off to the side and blocked almost NONE of the view compared to this monstrosity right in the middle of the lot that blocks 80% of the view. Have you seen this eyesore?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 14:34

Permalink

E Cape Cod

As with everything "managed" by the current SSA manager and the group in charge of operations, the terminal project is an abject failure: unnecessary, poorly designed, over budget and a hazard. Why did the Governors approve this wasteful spending? Time for an investigation.

Albert Gosnold

Who owns the SSA?
Who appointed the Governors?
Who voted for the the people who appointed for the Governors?
Whose fault?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 16:02

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

That building cutting off the beautiful water views of ferries coming and going is an abomination. There has to be something done. It simply cannot stand there and be a thorn in the side to people who understand waterfronts and views and working waterfronts. I am so gobsmacked, I am almost out of words, which my late, lamented husband would say is an impossibility. The prime mover of a ferry service is to transport people and goods SAFELY. That building has NOTHING to do with that mandate. It appears the engineers had the final word on the building, engineers make things work, often at the expense of the sensibilities. People, rise up, there has to be something we can do. Are you all telling me are saddled with that undgodly edifice? Abandon hope, if so.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 18:17

Permalink

KIM O'CALLAGHAN Vineyard Haven

Does the Steamship Authority have a generous advertising budget? Because the photos accompanying this article certainly don’t reflect the chaos most of us have experienced in Woods Hole in recent months. Where are the images of the long vehicle lines stretching past the check-in booth and up toward the new condos on the hill? Or the impatient drivers crossing double yellow lines to bypass traffic? What about the crowds of pedestrians stuck in long lines for delayed boats? Instead, your photos show a calm scene—cyclists with helmets, empty lines, and pedestrians far from traffic. This picture-perfect version of Woods Hole doesn’t match the reality we’ve been living.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 21:27

Permalink

Quinn Wadsworth Aquinnah/Manhattan

You’ll get your beautiful ferry views once you board the ferry. Cry me a river while we let the SSA cook.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 22:11

Permalink

George Stein OB

The facility went through the hearing process quite a while ago. Quite pleased with the progress so far. Hysterical remarks duly noted

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/27/2025 - 23:16

Permalink

Up Island Girl Chilmark

Just shocking… Where is the old New England feel? The classic weathered shingles with white paned window frames? Woods Hole and Falmouth should be angry. These buildings are not in keeping and the large plate glass windows will be a maintenance nightmae - salt water spray requires constant cleaning and large windows are proven to tax heating and cooling - not to say the least a death trap for unsuspecting birds in flight. Why do either buildings need to have large floor to ceiling windows? Such an outrage and waste of money.

Nat Trumbull Woods Hole

Woods Hole and Falmouth are angry. We organized and signed petition after petition, objected at each and every public meeting organized by the SSA, and appealed to our elected officials at all levels. At least one of the petitions collected more than 1,500 signatures objecting to the size of the ticket office and its location. The Steamship Authority and its architect ignored the public at every turn. We objected vociferously at Port Council and Board meetings. The sole concession on the part of the SSA was to lower the (largely unjustified-in-size) ticket office by a single floor. And then a second utility building simply sprang up. We still lost large parts of our water views from Crane St. bridge, the library, and the Water St. wall. It's been the same architect Bia.studio all along and their work for the SSA now includes the $16 million new admin. building on Palmer Ave., the $5 million dysfunctional awnings at Woods Hole terminal, the new utility building with large plate glass windows, and now the extremely poorly located ticket office with five ticket windows. The latter is coming in at $32 million. The Enabling Act gives the Steamship Authority the right to ignore all local zoning and review. Woods Hole and Falmouth never had a meaningful say.

Up Island Girl Chilmark, MA

Well shame on SSA. And what a sad lesson to us all - your collective voice and efforts were unheard. Thank you for trying. Im so surprised that Woods Hole doesnt have an architectural review committee - the practicality of the placement is yet to be seen but the renderings of the buildings that are sprouting up are clear aesthetic intrusions. And the accompanying pricetag is outrageous. People should boycott that architect. Beyond shameful.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/28/2025 - 15:06

Permalink

Amy Cody Chilmark

Steamship officials say that have acknowledged the problem and are working on ways to ward off future backups. They list potential solutions including hiring more traffic control staff to guide drivers once they get onto the terminal property, as well as staging vehicles at one of the parking lots in Falmouth or even Bourne if several boats are cancelled. However, they don't do it! They don't have a plan to change anything, they don't respond to the requests of frustrated citizens with action that counts, and they don't seem to learn how they can improve. There was a previous commitment to stopping work at the site if it was disruptive to citizens during the busy summer months. The excuses given that it is only interior work and the work zone would still remain are superficial. Perhaps it would prolong the construction but at least it would save the chaotic and hazardous situation during summer months. It almost appears that Mr. Davis wants the work to continue so he can be front and center at the ribbon-cutting before he retires. Stop the construction during the height of the season, hire more traffic control staff, start staging cars and trucks at Palmer - do something! Because this is not working.

Darrell King Edgartown

The shuttle buses coming from remote parking lots should NEVER have to wait in line behind the cars and trucks checking in for their reservations. The buses should be able to drive around that lane and go directly to the drop off area. Traffic coming off the ferry could exit on the other side. It is especially frustrating for folks who have to buy tickets and the departure time is close. This should NEVER happen.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/28/2025 - 20:25

Permalink

James Edgartown

Aside from the view issue, one can already notice that the new building sabotages the primary function of the Woods Hole facility — safe, efficient ingress and egress of thousands of passengers and vehicles each week. Traffic flow should feel intuitive, but instead the building screams “OBSTACLE” to newcomers and daily commuters alike. The location is a total fail that will hinder operations for 2 generations at least.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/29/2025 - 14:24

Permalink

Amy Edgartown

It is laughable. I've lived year round on MV since 2001 - utilizing the steamship for a car reservation, at minimum, once monthly for 20 yrs+. The past 3-4 years have been simply atrocious. I had no idea how good we had it all those years. Staging at Palmer during construction seems like a no brainer - and separate travel lanes for passenger drop off vs vehicle reservations. Come on SSA - this is middle school level logistics.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 06/29/2025 - 19:01

Permalink

Frances McGuire Oak Bluffs and New York

The new building is atrocious. Whoever designed the siting was absolutely clueless and disrespectful to the historic maritime seascape. No celebration of the sky, the water and the ships. It’s an eyesore and depressing.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.