Massachusetts attorney general Andrea Campbell filed a suit in Boston on Monday.
Ray Ewing

Massachusetts Sues Over Trump’s Offshore Wind Executive Order

Massachusetts has joined forces with 16 other states to push back against the Trump administration’s executive order that halted the permitting of offshore wind energy projects. 

Massachusetts has joined forces with 16 other states to push back against the Trump administration’s executive order that halted the permitting of offshore wind energy projects. 

The state’s attorney general filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Boston on Monday, arguing the administration has unlawfully attempted to freeze development of the emerging industry – a large portion of which has taken root in the waters south of the Vineyard. 

“Massachusetts has invested hundreds of millions of dollars into offshore wind to ensure our residents have access to well-paying green jobs and reliable, affordable energy that helps meet our clean energy and climate goals,” attorney general Andrea Campbell said in a statement. “The President’s attempts to stop homegrown wind energy development directly contradict his claims that there is a growing need for reliable domestic energy.”

President Donald Trump signed an executive order on the first day of his administration, putting all federal permitting for offshore wind projects on hold while the Department of Interior conducts a review of the ecological, economic and environmental effects of offshore leases. 

There has been no timeline given for the review, and the order has had a ripple effect on projects that were still in the regulatory pipeline.

“My colleagues and I will continue to challenge this administration’s unlawful actions to chill investment and growth of this critical industry,” Ms. Campbell said.

Even projects that had been approved have come under threat. On April 16, the Department of the Interior halted construction on Empire Wind, an already approved project off the coast of New York. 

In the lawsuit, the states argue that the executive order has no reasoned explanation for the indefinite halt and offered no justification to explain the abrupt change in federal policy. Stopping the permitting process also contradicts the Trump administration’s past declaration of an energy emergency, according to the 100-page complaint. 

Ms. Campbell and the other attorneys general allege that President Trump’s directives harm the states attempts to secure reliable and renewable energy sources, and endanger billions of dollars in investment in the offshore wind industry. 

Massachusetts has been counting on offshore wind to help the state meet its climate goals, and the state’s attorney general’s office said that without offshore wind energy, the cost of energy in New England is expected to increase by about 50 per cent by 2050. So far, the state has invested more than $330 million in infrastructure, workforce training, supply chains and research for the new renewable energy industry. 

The waters south of the Island are the epicenter of the offshore wind energy industry, with nine projects planned for an 800,000 square-acre area. Vineyard Wind, which has its operations headquarters in Vineyard Haven, was the first utility-scale offshore wind project to be approved in the U.S. and several more projects were following in its wake until the permitting freeze. 

The lawsuit asks the U.S. District Court to declare the directive illegal and prevent the administration from delaying any more wind development. The claim comes just days after Secretary of the Interior Doug Burgum said that American tax dollars would no longer be used on wind energy projects. 

“The offshore wind industry has relied on tax subsidies for 30 years – not anymore,” Mr. Burgum wrote on social media Sunday. 

President Trump also made several threats to offshore wind during his campaign. 

The federal government has yet to respond officially to the lawsuit in court, and an initial hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 09:20

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

Good idea. Now build gas,oil,nuke and coal plants and use what's worked for over 130 years

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 10:07

Permalink

William Edg.

Good. Offshore wind is not financially viable. This is proven because the wind farms are not paying for a bond to take them down at the end of their usable life. Wind Farms cost more, are not particularly environmentally friendly for the environment or sea life as they use thousands of gallons of oil products to lubricate and are quite frankly an eyesore that will last beyond our lifetime because there is no money to take them down when they are finished with their usefull life. This whole thing is a government sponsored rip off (via tax credits) to taxpayers to "go green". Meanwhile do you want brown outs and blackouts? They are coming to MA. Imagine you are an investor and you see that MA needs more electricity. (As I do). Would you invest in a fossil fuel electric generation project that the state government is against? (I wouldn't). And either would any other reasonable thinking person. So, as electricity demands increase and power generation decreases what do you think will happen? Solar and wind are good when it is light out and windy, otherwise, they are useless. (Never mind the investment cost to produce them). If you don't have fossil fuel plants to back it up, you have no electricity. Welcome to the brown/Blackouts sure to come to MA. Reasonable people will admit that the green movement can get started, but, will not be completed for decades because it is just not possible. And I am just talking about here in the US, the richest country in the world. The environmental movement only plays out well if everyone does it. We could lead it, but if no one else joins, what is the point?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 11:06

Permalink

Ron Edgartown

Your Massachusetts tax dollars at work fighting for an inefficient and cost-inefficient system that is destructive of the environment and destroys the natural beauty of the area.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 11:52

Permalink

Mary Chalke Nantucket Island

Vineyard Wind failed to deliver on their promises. No functioning ADLS lighting and instead Vineyard Wind’s flashing red lights have destroyed our historic view shed. Vineyard Wind installed 66 defective blades which still require removal and replacement before operation. Vineyard Wind polluted our water and beaches with 60 tons of fiberglass and microplastics.

Hazel Edgartown

Perhaps you would ban ocean shipping, which also creates flashing red lights on the "historic view shed", and dumps hundreds of tons of particulate matter pollution into our lungs every year?

Windmills are graceful, majestic, placid, and much better for all of us than the gas fired plants which the will displace. It's about time the US started to catch up to other parts of the world which use this beautiful resource.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 13:37

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

The only way to decarbonize the grid is with nuclear power, anything else is a waste of time and money. Glad the state continues to waste our tax dollars. What a clown show.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/06/2025 - 21:44

Permalink

Sara Piazza Edgartown

So great to see so many people speaking out about the green new scam. Now, how to get rid of these useless monstrosities?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/08/2025 - 10:38

Permalink

Carl van Warmerdam Rhode Island

After years of renewable energy harvesting industrialization - solar and wind infrastructure – the world used more fossil fuels in 2023 than it did in 2022, as it did the year before that and the year before that. We are in fact using more fossil fuel than ever before.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.