The board of assessors presented a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) program to the select board during a select board meeting Wednesday.
West Tisbury is considering a new program to address rising property taxes.
The board of assessors presented a payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) program to the select board during a select board meeting Wednesday. Under this program, tax-exempt organizations could opt in to make voluntary payments to the town in lieu of paying taxes.
Implementing this optional program would lower the burden of town taxpayers, according to town assessor MacGregor Anderson. In fiscal year 2025, town taxpayers paid an additional $1.7 million in property taxes.
“We were looking at tax policy starting two years ago and looking at a lot of different options,” he said. “PILOTs are just another thing to consider and to help the underlying problem.”
A letter will be sent out to organizations that fall under this category. These organizations include the Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation, the Martha’s Vineyard Agricultural Society and Polly Hill Arboretum. Religious institutions would be exempt from the program.
Mr. Anderson noted that Boston and other communities in the state implement this program. The board suggested organizations paying at 10 per cent of the organization’s assessed property value. That rate isn’t fixed and can be adjusted year by year.
Select board vice chair Jeffrey (Skipper) Manter voiced his support for the program.
“I think 10 per cent is a good place to start and see what happens,” he said. “We have to start looking for other revenue besides raising taxes every day.”
The board of assessors will host public information sessions to hear feedback and answer questions.

Comments
Seems unfair to ask random
Rick Vineyard HavenSeems unfair to ask random non-profits for 6-figure tax contributions, but if you are looking to change it up- consider taxing the churches, they are centuries in arrears.
How about some cut backs?
Tom WTHow about some cut backs?
Towns and municipalities don
Gary EdgartownTowns and municipalities don’t know the words cutbacks, unfortunately. The homeowner and business owners just pay up.
There are over 100 non
Jose Oak BluffsThere are over 100 non profits on MV servicing a year round community of 20,000. These organizations all consume public services (police, fire, roadways, etc.) but pay neither property taxes nor income taxes. It's time that they paid their fair share to the communities that make their existence possible, and the PILOT program is an important step in this direction.
and why is Now the time, Jose
Rick Vineyard Havenand why is Now the time, Jose?
and what about churches?
do you believe non-profits should exist?
I can understand a carve out
Jose Oak BluffsI can understand a carve out for churches and houses of worship. I also agree that there is an important role for non profits. but we should acknowledge that they consume local services without contributing to the cost of these local services. This places a greater tax burden on renters and homeowners to compensate. If our Island is becoming less affordable to live in, this is a contributing cause. I suspect that many of these non profits offer similar/overlapping services meaning that some consolidation of these organizations within the Island may be appropriate. If so, the result may be no significant impact on services, but a more equitable sharing of the property tax burden.
Why a carve out for churches?
Albert GosnoldWhy a carve out for churches?
About time someone suggested
Gary McGivney Vineyard HavenAbout time someone suggested this type of program. Every time a private property is bought by a non profit (MV Land Bank, Sheriff's Meadow etc) that tax income is taken away from the town and they have to replace it somehow. These proposals will get some of that money back and relieve some of the burden from the local taxpayer. Theoretically, the Land Bank could end up owning all of the Vineyard and not pay a dime of taxes to anyone.
It’s time for the land bank
Sara TisburyIt’s time for the land bank to give back. They should be taking 1% and giving the other 1% to the towns.
Add new comment