Proposed development would include 36 two-bedroom condos and 24 one-bedroom units.

Edgartown Gardens Development Begins MVC Hearing Process

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission heard plans last week for Edgartown Gardens, a proposed 60-unit condominium complex on Upper Main street restricted to residents 55 and older.

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission heard plans last week for Edgartown Gardens, a proposed 60-unit condominium complex on Upper Main street restricted to residents 55 and older.

The project, planned for four acres of land used by Donaroma’s landscaping and plant nursery business, drew complaints from some neighbors who worried about an increase in traffic.

As designed, the complex has 36 two-bedroom condos and 24 one-bedroom units, with 88 automobile parking places in all, according to the application from developer William Cumming’s Edgartown Gardens LLC.

Twenty per cent of the condominiums would be deed-restricted to owners earning up to half the median income for Martha’s Vineyard, and the other 80 per cent would be sold at market rate.

Attorney Jay Talerman, representing the applicant at the MVC hearing March 6, said the market-rate units are expected to sell for $950,000 for one bedroom and $1.1 million for two bedrooms.

Proposed area is on land used Donaroma's landscaping and plant nursery business.
Ray Ewing
Proposed area is on land used Donaroma's landscaping and plant nursery business.
Ray Ewing

Edgartown Gardens expects to sell the affordable units at $83,000 for one bedroom and $92,000 for two bedrooms, he said.

Condo fees are expected to be $400 for a one-bedroom apartment and $450 for a two-bedroom unit per month, regardless of deed restrictions, Mr. Talerman said.

Mr. Cumming’s company also is proposing a local preference of up to 70 per cent of the units for Edgartown residents.

The amount of lower-income housing in the plan qualifies Edgartown Gardens to seek a comprehensive permit from the town’s zoning board of appeals under Chapter 40B, a state statute allowing affordable projects to skirt some local zoning requirements.

“There’s a lot of nuances to it, because it is all of the permitting in one spot,” Mr. Talerman said.

The Edgartown Gardens property extends from Upper Main street, between the Bad Martha’s brew pub and the restaurant site formerly home to Sharky’s, to Chase Road.

The proposed subdivision also abuts both the municipal parking lot on Dark Woods Road and the Dark Woods residential subdivision, where the homeowners’ association does not want any vehicle access from and to Edgartown Gardens.

“Such access would overburden Dark Woods Road, create hazards for residents in the event of emergencies, and increase the existing costs associated with maintaining the road,” wrote Robert Schlein, attorney for the subdivision, whose letter made clear that the organization is not against the Edgartown Gardens project itself.

The Dark Woods association does support a locked gate for emergency responders between Edgartown Gardens and the municipal parking lot, Mr. Schlein said at the March 6 meeting.

A peer-reviewed traffic study of the proposed development concluded that it would generate fewer vehicle trips than had been produced by the landscaping and nursery operations, which Donaroma’s is moving to the Edgartown-Vineyard Haven Road in Oak Bluffs.

Residents of Chase Road and other nearby streets have expressed strong opposition to the project, saying their neighborhood’s narrow roadways would be overwhelmed by traffic from the condominium complex.

Opponents also voiced concern about congestion at the intersection of Upper Main, Pinehurst Road and the Stop & Shop parking lot.

“It’s mayhem. It makes Five Corners look good. It’s a four-way free-for-all,” Dark Woods resident Fred Fournier said at the MVC hearing.

The traffic at Upper Main street will lead Edgartown Gardens residents to use the Chase Road exit instead, worsening traffic on the winding street, Mr. Fournier said.

“Chase Road at its widest point is 22 feet wide. No sidewalks, no lighting, no [town] restrictions as far as vehicle size or weight, three S-turns … [it’s] extremely, extremely dangerous,” he said.

Longtime Chase Road resident Richard Heller, participating by Zoom, cited a 1980s court case he believes still blocks access to Chase Road from the former Donaroma’s property.

The town building inspector and zoning board of appeals had approved Donaroma’s use of the Chase Road exit for heavy trucks, Mr. Heller said, but a Dukes County Superior Court judge in 1985 annulled the town officials’ decisions.

“Mr. [Michael] Donaroma was instructed to fence that off and close it up. It took him three years and we had to go back to court to get another judgment to force him to finally close the road down,” Mr. Heller said.

Mr. Donaroma, a longtime Edgartown select board member, was present at the March 6 hearing, but did not speak.

Mr. Heller said he would provide the court documents to the MVC.

Nitrogen output from Edgartown Gardens is another area of concern for the commission: While the project site is in the Eel Pond watershed, the development is intended to connect with the town sewer system, which affects the already-impaired Edgartown Great Pond watershed.

Edgartown Gardens’ wastewater would exceed the allowable nitrogen limit, requiring additional mitigation that could see the developer financing advanced septic systems elsewhere in the watershed.

The project design for Edgartown Gardens shows 10 apartment buildings around a central, sunken garden. A community building and a plunge pool area are planned for the west end of the development.

There also will be six charging stations for electric vehicles and parking space for 20 bicycles, according to the plan.

The hearing on the project will continue at the April 17 commission meeting.

Among other business March 6, commissioners closed their public hearing on a proposed demolition on Massasoit avenue in Vineyard Haven and continued to April 10 a hearing on Millers Professionals’ expansion plans at the Martha’s Vineyard Airport business park.

Liz Durkee, the commission’s climate planner, spoke briefly on the $400,000 municipal preparedness grant recently awarded to the MVC by the state’s Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs.

“Each town will get $50,000 in seed money to implement one of their priority projects, or to at least start implementing it,” Ms. Durkee said.

The MVC will use the remaining $100,000 to work with and support the town projects, which are intended to make Island communities less vulnerable to the effects of climate change.

Also March 6, chair Peter Wharton reminded commissioners that MVC policy asks them to be present for meetings unless they are unwell or off-Island, and announced the return of the commission’s planning and economic development committee with co-chairs Kate Putnam and Brian Smith.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/10/2025 - 17:58

Permalink

Ted Edgartown

This is a nightmare now! Imagine with this 60 unit project!! Wow!
Police, fire and ambulances now have a difficult time navigating the triangle..
Yikes !

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/10/2025 - 18:55

Permalink

mark acker VH

What a traffic nightmare this will be. A project like this should be in a rural area, not downtown. But I see some big Island names here, so it should sneak through the MV commission. How about 80% for seniors and 20% at market rate?

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

Did you read the article? This will actually reduce traffic in the area. Donaroma's has over 100 employees who report to this site each day for work. That element of traffic goes away under this plan.

Live there Edgartown

I live by the Triangle and the congestion getting into Stop and Shop is downright dangerous. I rarely see Donorama trucks pulling in and out. Probably because they leave early in the morning to do their landscaping. Also, when was the traffic study done? I’m guessing not at the end of July or August, which means it doesn’t capture the true traffic patterns. But I guess it easy for someone living in OB to say it is a good idea.

JD Edgartown

Donorama may employ up to 100 people during peak season, but how many actually drive their own cars to work each day? I’ve never seen traffic volumes anywhere near what the proposed 88 parking spaces would generate. The promises of reduced traffic and the inclusion of low-income housing seem more like tactics to secure approval rather than genuine benefits.

Criticism of this project will likely be dismissed as resistance to change, but that would be an unfair assumption. Many of us fully support responsible development and expanding affordable housing for island residents—including in Edgartown. However, this project should either be scaled down and made entirely affordable housing or relocated to an area with less traffic impact.

The Triangle is already a traffic nightmare, and despite any claims from traffic studies, this development will only make it worse.

Bob Edgartown

Not correct, Most of Donaromas 100 employees did not show up at the triangle.
Most workers go directly to the job sites or to the airport.
This project will be a traffic nightmare!

MC Edgartown

Anyone who thinks that this project would reduce traffic is living in an alternate universe. I wonder what he author would think if this type of project was planned for the area near the top of Circuit Ave!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/10/2025 - 19:40

Permalink

A step forward

Projects like these will always be controversial. They all come with pros and cons. The MVC has the task of finding balance and moving them forward. This is exactly what we need, private money and not subsidizing with a transfer tax. It’s projects like this that keep the fabric of our community living here without impacting the tourism based economy that our young people desperately rely on.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/10/2025 - 21:41

Permalink

Mr. B Chilmark

I imagine that the next step will be to try to make Chase Road a one-way street (from the S&S parking lot towards the EDG/WT Road).

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 03/10/2025 - 23:22

Permalink

George Stein OB

The specifics of alleged residents being fixated on Edgartown only is troubling. The necessity of civil servant opportunities having their pool of candidates restricted by housing issues could be addressed too. A locked gate for first responders with a radio controlled devise should be mandatory. Giving seniors a walking distance chance at shopping is admirable

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 05:20

Permalink

Christine Senge

Yes, we need more housing, but over $900,000 for just a 1 bedroom condo!
These will not be purchased by year-round folks, but by investors who will market them on AirB&B. And the location will be a traffic nightmare.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 07:17

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

No No No. this will exacerbate an already terrible traffic situation.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 09:45

Permalink

Carol Oak Bluffs

The HUGE new Navigator Homes has not come on line yet, we have the Stop and Shop expansion, the increased boat traffic from OB into EDG and now this. We are being crushed by developement and traffic congestion. We need more green spaces in EDG not more cars.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 10:11

Permalink

Chris Mara Edgartown

It's the start of a idea in the wrong place. Mr Donaroma wants to maximize the value on his property at the island's expense. Until the triangle is completely redesigned it can't handle any more traffic. That redesign would require either purchase or by eminent domain the taking of private property.Traffic on Chase road and the West Tisbury road grows every year because drivers are avoiding the triangle bottleneck. I truly can't think of a worse location for a project like this.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 11:15

Permalink

Jim fulton Off-island

I watch Vineyard development from afar (beyond Woods Hole) and often wonder why Vineyarders don't just move to Cape Cod instead of moving Cape Cod to the Vineyard.
The cherished myth of island bucolic splendor is getting harder to imagine, even in March. Build away.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 11:58

Permalink

Jesse W Dennerlein Clearwater

Boy, that is going to be interesting. People who can afford million dollar condos right next do to people who can only afford 100,000 dollar condo's. There will likely be some interesting clashes there.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 15:24

Permalink

Lenny Edg

No more building. The island is becoming overdeveloped with no clear benefit for residents or visitors. To those who think more building will help affordability, you need only look at New York City. There is plenty of housing there, but it’s not exactly an affordable place to live.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 16:57

Permalink

Al MV

Are the 88 parking places exclusive to the condos? If they are, will the two restaurant sites be eliminated, or will their customers park at the park and ride, Stop and Shop, and the neighboring strip mall?
When it is determined that Chase Road is unsafe and not usable to the project, will that cause more traffic on Main St?
We absolutely need the housing for workers, but many workers 55 bought houses here in the 90s and will only downsize after retirement.

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

And those over 55 downsizing will open up more opportunities for young people to buy the houses they are downsizing from. It's a win-win!

AR Edgartown

No one is selling their Vineyard house for a million dollar condo with a monthly fee of $400. That makes no financial sense. Wealthy out of towners are the only ones that can afford to spend this kind of money.

Al Edgartown

I think most homes are bought by LLC, investment groups, corporations, and people looking to diversify into short-term rentals. Not a whole lot of year-round workers buying expensive 3-4 bedroom starter homes on the Vineyard, but plenty of corporations and second homeowners.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 03/11/2025 - 22:32

Permalink

MICHAEL MCKEE BOULDER

Would the project be more appealing to the community if 40 percent of the units were Market, with the remaining 60 percent deed restricted. Even better, could a portion of the project include a dormitory house wing for seasonal workers. In its current structure, the project has the appearance of a high end project for the wealthy. Good luck. A good balance can be found.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/12/2025 - 05:45

Permalink

Joseph Buti Boston.

No, I don’t live on the Island, but have been going there for more years than I care to remember. If I had to describe Martha’s Vineyard with one word what immediately now comes to mind is ‘conflicted’.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/12/2025 - 06:46

Permalink

George Stein OB

The credibility of comments is easily dismissed by no actual identity attached to them. The policy here allowing secrecy is long overdue to be abolished.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/12/2025 - 09:31

Permalink

Ken Rusczyk OB

What a beautiful name....Edgartown Gardens. I looked at the plan...but I see ONLY pavement and buildings...No gardens, but hey, it sounds so bucolic and peaceful. Where do I sign up???

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 03/12/2025 - 21:29

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

It's never enough,keep building. We need housing and new roads. Build an intersecting road through the state forest from Edgartown to the airport and the Edgartown Vineyard Haven road. The island is history so they might as well make travel easier, that'll make muffy and buffy happy.I'm selling my little house and moving back to southie,this place is a bigger joke than where I grew up in Boston

Jack Boston, Edgartown

Charlie, you in for a rude awakening. Southie is gone long gone.
Unfortunately it is everywhere. Bottom line is the population is increasing.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 08:46

Permalink

John L Burritt Jr Edgartown

Although I rarely comment on another individual's development projects as the Edgartown/Island regulatory process usually does the right thing. However, as an urban planner with over 35 years of experience in site plan review on large scale project development I have never seen such a bad site plan and such a blatant attempt to jam as much development as possible on a site that is already severely traffic challenged. I surely do not begrudge the owner the right to utilize the site for a higher and better use than storing plants and fertilizer, but don't be so greedy - reduce the density and improve the site plan to something that makes sense for you and the community/neighborhood.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 03/14/2025 - 14:48

Permalink

David Nash Edgartown

The trade-off that this project would demand of Edgartown's infrastructure is simply not worth the 12 units of affordable housing. Would jamming 100 units of housing into 4 acres be a sensible use of land? Is there any parcel of land anywhere on this island that is developed to that level right now? This project does not belong anywhere on Martha's Vineyard unless we are all ready for this to be the model for the future. Seems like a massive money grab. Is that a new "restaurant/retail" building set off to the side? Maybe this entire project should be redesigned to permit 5 or 6 story buildings?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.