Just hours after his inauguration, President Donald Trump ordered the federal government to conduct a review of the “ecological, economic, and environmental necessity of terminating or amending any existing wind energy leases."
Offshore wind energy projects to the Vineyard’s south and across the country have come under fire just one day into the new presidential administration.
In an executive order on Monday, just hours after his inauguration, President Donald Trump ordered the federal government to conduct a review of the “ecological, economic, and environmental necessity of terminating or amending any existing wind energy leases” in order to identify any legal basis for their removal.
The President also ordered that all other areas be withdrawn from consideration for future leases, and paused any approvals and renewals for projects, leaving the multi-billion dollar industry in choppy regulatory waters.
President Trump has been a vociferous opponent of offshore wind energy, often claiming that wind turbines are driving whales crazy. During his campaign, he vowed to work against the nascent industry.
“We’re not going to do the wind thing. Big, ugly wind mills. They ruin your neighborhood,” the President said.
In the executive order, the administration cited “the need to foster an energy economy capable of meeting the country’s growing demand for reliable energy, the importance of marine life, impacts on ocean currents and wind patterns, effects on energy costs for Americans — especially those who can least afford it — and to ensure that the United States is able to maintain a robust fishing industry for future generations and provide low cost energy to its citizens.”
Proponents of offshore wind after the November election said that the Trump administration would likely target projects that had not yet been approved, though President Trump’s executive order goes a step further, putting existing projects into the regulatory crosshairs. Industry experts have said the alteration of existing leases would be tougher to do and likely be mired in legal challenges.
“Offshore wind is a critical part of our region’s efforts to reduce dirty, polluting fossil fuel, create good-paying jobs, and ensure long-term savings for families and businesses,” said Kate Sinding Daly, the senior vice president for law and policy at the Conservation Law Foundation. “The potential benefits for Massachusetts and the nation are enormous. We cannot afford to let misinformation undermine the future we value and are working toward.”
While noting that existing leases would not be touched in the withdrawal order, President Trump has tasked the Secretary of the Interior, along with the attorney general, to conduct the review of existing leases, and they will submit a report with recommendations to the President.
Under the order, approvals for wind farms, or even renewals, will not be allowed until an assessment by the Department of the Interior is done to review federal wind leasing and permitting practices.
The order does not apply to leasing for oil, gas, minerals and environmental conservation.
Offshore wind energy has been a cornerstone of the Biden Administration’s effort on renewable energy, and the projects in the 800,000-square acre area south of the Vineyard have been championed by Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey.
Kelt Wilska, the offshore wind director for the Environmental League of Massachusetts, said the decision would hurt the industry that’s built up around offshore wind, costing Americans jobs.
“We’ve already invested $25 billion in the offshore wind industry in the United States,” he said.
He expected that any effort to rollback already approved projects would result in lengthy litigation, but he said the renewable energy source has momentum and he believed it could continue despite the executive order.
“Offshore wind projects do not begin and end in four years,” he said. “Offshore wind is coming to New England and the United States and we are just going to have to move through some more obstacles.”
President Trump’s pick for Secretary of Interior Doug Burgum will be tasked with leading the reviews. Mr. Burgum was asked by Maine Sen. Angus King to try and convince President Trump that “wind power isn’t all bad,” during his confirmation hearing last week.
Mr. Burgum is the former governor of North Dakota, a state that produces a large chunk of its energy via land-based wind turbines. Mr. Burgum told lawmakers that projects that make sense would continue and the country needed an “all of the above strategy,” when it came to energy.
The executive order could be welcome news for those on the Island who have questioned the benefits of offshore wind energy.
John Osmers, an Island fisherman, has worried about the wind turbines effects on the ecosystem, as well as the damage to the seafloor from installing power cables for the wind farms.
He was heartened by the order from President Trump, saying it could slow down projects other parts of New England, such as the Gulf of Maine.
“I think it’s a good move for the fight against offshore wind,” Mr. Osmers said. “It might slow them down a little and it’s a good eye-opener for the movement.”
Cheryl Andrews-Maltais, the chairwoman of the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) tribal council, has argued that the Biden administration was moving too fast on approving projects.
Last year, Ms. Andrews-Maltais called on the federal government to stop all construction and operation of turbines until each blade was reinspected to prevent further breaks like the one that happened at Vineyard Wind this past summer.
Though she disagreed with many of Mr. Trump’s policies, Ms. Andrews-Maltais said in a November interview that she felt he understood the need to do more study on the implications of turbines.
“The incoming administration recognizes that offshore wind is not a panacea,” she said. “We are hoping that the new administration will hear us and work with us.”
All of the areas off the southern coast of the Island set aside for offshore wind projects are currently under a lease, though several projects have not yet been approved by the Bureau of Energy Management. Hundreds of turbines are planned for this area of the ocean; Vineyard Wind, Revolution Wind, SouthCoast Wind, New England Wind, Sunrise Wind and South Fork Wind have all already received federal approval.
Only South Fork Wind and Vineyard Wind are operational, though Vineyard Wind was dealt a major setback after one of its massive blades broke off into the ocean in July.
Vineyard Wind, the only project to have a major presence on the Vineyard, declined to comment on the executive order.
SouthCoast Wind had gained an initial approval from BOEM last year and had its construction and operations plan approval on Friday. In a statement this week, the company’s top executive noted the economic and energy benefits of offshore wind projects as the SouthCoast Wind looks to forge a path forward.
“In the United States, we believe in the potential of our offshore wind projects to create thousands of jobs, generate billions of dollars in economic activity, and provide new energy generation to meet rapidly growing demand,” SouthCoast Wind CEO Michael Brown said in a statement. “We will continue to assess the scope and implications of the executive orders on our three U.S. projects. Offshore wind farms are long term development projects, and we will keep on finding a path forward in coordination with all relevant authorities.”
A second project by Vineyard Wind, Beacon Wind and Bay State Wind are all still under review by BOEM and could be part of a regulatory grind, according to wind proponents.
Monday’s executive order also included limits for onshore wind projects, and specifically called out a project in Idaho.
Despite the current vocal opposition, the first Trump administration did move offshore wind off the coast of Massachusetts forward. In 2018, the administration touted a record grossing competitive lease process, netting $405 million in winning bids for about 390,000 acres of ocean, including a $135 million bid from Vineyard Wind for its planned second farm.

Comments
This is really good news!
Tim EdgartownThis is really good news!
Oil and coal companies are
Ed EdgartownOil and coal companies are certainly happy.
Let’s hope they remove them!
Ellen OBLet’s hope they remove them! No more! Save out whales and fishing .
Yes, I am all in favor of
Island girl OBYes, I am all in favor of this move!!
Good news the native born
Albert Hess New BedfordGood news the native born Islanders who are making 120K year working for Vineyard Wind?
Good news for the environment?
Good news for coal?
Trump issued these leases in
Bob GTrump issued these leases in his last administration. That should be part of the story.
It’s not all on the Biden or Healy administration.
https://www.doi.gov/pressreleases/bidding-bonanza-trump-administration-…
God bless Donald
Owen EdgartownGod bless Donald
The oil and coal companies
Ed EdgartownThe oil and coal companies are happy.
This is not good news. And
Susan Bucks County, PAThis is not good news. And it's Trump's fear of "the windmills!"
Trump just withdrew the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement.
The US now joins Iran, Libya, and Yemen as the only countries in the world not in the agreement.
Replace those windmills with
Steve OBReplace those windmills with safe, clean, whale pleasing oil platforms - and drill, baby, drill!
Trump's outright and absurd
Robert Skydell Antigua & EssaouiraTrump's outright and absurd lies about wind power are so numerous that it is hard to get a bead on what about wind power really irks him the most. Left with that, one can only conclude that his fossil fuel benefactors might have had a lot to do with it.
The United States is already the number one oil producing country in the world and 2023 was the best year ever. As of yesterday, "Drill Baby Drill" became the official mantra of the new administration and with it multiple executive orders were issued to pull back entirely on the reins of renewable energy in all forms. There are many things to be gravely concerned about in the emerging landscape and this is certainly on that long list.
And God bless the climate and
Chris EdgartownAnd God bless the climate and environment. It's going need all the help it can get now.
To all the nimbys who opposed
Barry EdgartownTo all the nimbys who opposed the development of these wind farms, this is your hero. Congrats on saving your precious ocean views while enriching the oil and gas industries and contributing to the negative impacts of climate change.
I'm always struck by how all
Me HereI'm always struck by how all those beautiful pastoral landscapes the impressionists painted had trains running through them. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and they found beauty in the juxtaposition of modern and idyll. A shame we cannot bring ourselves to learn a similar lesson for the sake of not boiling our oceans!
Energy, particularly
John Aldeborgh KatamaEnergy, particularly electricity, is a commodity and wind is rapidly becoming economically uncompetitive. As battery storage roadmaps are becoming increasingly affordable with greatly reduced dependence on rare earth metals and with solar already significantly cheaper than wind, along with it steadily coming down in cost, there are better long term alternatives to off shore wind farms. In my opinion the negatives with offshore wind far outweighed the positives. In this case Trump is right.
Let’s hope we can take a
Thomas EdgartownLet’s hope we can take a pause from any further windmills.
Despite what anti-wind folks
Michael EdgartownDespite what anti-wind folks say, Wind energy is economically competitive compared to new gas, coal and nuclear facilities. Further, large number of whales are injured and killed by ships every year but we don't get rid of freighters, cruise ships and other boats. These "environmental" concerns are pre-text for a new government policy that is anti-renewable energy without considering the very real fact that humankind continues to impact the planet in many negative ways. The demand for electricity is only growing so we need to get it from every source.
There’s a simple solution,
Capt Buddy AquinnahThere’s a simple solution,,put the wind farms on land! Stop destroying our oceans with the unsightly horrible wind farms in our backyard!!
Captain, You are so right.
Scott Prescott South CarolinaCaptain, You are so right. Put those big blades on land, not the ocean. Plenty of land to use.
With all due respect Capt.
mike SomewhereWith all due respect Capt. Buddy, Would you rather have oil drilling and pumping platforms that have a proven track record of leaking creating extremely toxic conditions - think Deep Horizon.
And BTW - on land the windmills - wind turbines will be in your backyard too.
I do not have a problem with them and consider them a move forward in energy production.
Add new comment