Ferry travel between the Islands and Cape Cod will cost more for nearly everyone next year, after the Steamship Authority board of governors voted 3-1 Tuesday morning to approve the 2025 operating budget.
Ferry travel between the Islands and Cape Cod will cost more for nearly everyone next year, after the Steamship Authority board of governors voted 3-1 Tuesday morning to approve the 2025 operating budget.
Year-round Island residents with vehicles will not see an immediate increase in their low-cost, round-trip excursion fares, available only to members of the SSA’s excursion-rate programs.
But every other fare category is going up in January — and Islanders can expect to see their preferential rates go up in the coming years.
“We’re going to have to pivot and raise the excursion fare if we stay on a fare box-driven [basis],” said Falmouth board member Peter Jeffrey, who called his dissenting vote a “placeholder” for next year’s budget talks.
“I understand the political pressures of not raising the excursion rate, but … we’re relying on the standard [automobile rate] to make up 43 per cent of the additional revenue that we need to balance this budget,” Mr. Jeffrey said.
The Steamship Authority, which is required by state law to fund its service with revenue from fares, is raising rates to cover a projected $3.5 million operating loss in 2025.
Higher payroll, training and information technology expenses are among the main drivers that have pushed the boat line’s operating budget to more than $150.7 million in 2025, up from $137.7 million this year.
Standard-rate vehicles under 20 feet in length will cost between $6 and $21 more, depending on day and date, for one-way passage on the Vineyard route in 2025.
Single-trip passenger tickets are going up by 50 cents for adults, to $10.50, and by 25 cents for children, seniors and active members of the military, who will pay $5.50.
Multi-ride passes are rising by $4 for 10 adult rides, $2 for 10 child rides and $10.50 for the 46-ride commuter pass.
Daily parking in Falmouth is going up between $2 to $7, depending on the season and day of the week, and annual parking at the Woods Hole lot is increasing by $200.
The annual parking pass for the Palmer avenue lot in Falmouth also was slated for a triple-digit increase, but after Island residents pushed back at a recent budget forum in Vineyard Haven, the hike was trimmed to $50.
Freight truck fares are going up by 10 per cent.
Along with rising expenses, the Steamship Authority also is experiencing a shift in the proportion of motorists who pay the full standard automobile rate — generally visitors — and Islanders who use the preferred and excursion rates.
Year-round residency on Martha’s Vineyard has grown over the past five years, and with it the number of drivers who can take advantage of the low-cost fares by registering with the Steamship Authority.
At the same time, fewer motorists have been booking at the full standard rate, which in 2022 and 2023 brought in revenue averaging more than 132 per cent of the Steamship Authority’s cost to carry the vehicles.
Excursion fares, which include tickets for two adults and two children, now cover just 32 per cent of what it costs the SSA to carry a car and four passengers across the sound, treasurer Mark Rozum told the board.
Also Tuesday, the board approved a 90-day trial of a new day-of-sailing policy for Woods Hole and Vineyard Haven that eliminates the standby line for visiting motorists, starting Jan. 4.
Only Islanders who are registered with the Steamship Authority’s preferred and excursion-rate programs will be able to seek same-day passage via what’s called the “blue line,” a rotating set of at least 12 standby spaces at each terminal.
Tuesday’s vote also ended a former SSA policy that Islanders could use the blue line only if they had no other reservation.
Head start reservations, which allow members of the preferred and excursion-rate programs to book up to 10 trips in advance for summer travel, are set to begin in mid-January following another board vote Tuesday.
Up to five head start reservations may be made in another driver’s name, and up to three of the five may be transferred after the fact.
For the Vineyard route, head start bookings made from Jan. 14 through Jan. 20 will be non-transferable, reservations director Angela Campbell told the board.
Both transferable and non-transferable head start reservations can be made Jan. 21 through Jan. 27, she said.
The general opening for summer 2025 Vineyard reservations begins online Feb. 4 through Feb. 10, with the phone lines opening Feb. 11, Ms. Campbell said.

Comments
So excursion fares are sold
Jim BostonSo excursion fares are sold at 32 cents on the dollar, are increasing in frequency, and yet those are the only fares that are not increasing. Everyone else is subsidizing those lucky enough to live on the island full time. I’ll be sure to raise this blatant fare discrimination with my state representative next time the SSA comes before the legislature—time to eliminate local control of a state agency.
Yes Jim. Because it's more
TisKid MVYes Jim. Because it's more important for people that live here to be able to get off to a cancer appointment than for you to come here to buy a Tshirt. Sorta like how I don't complain about parking policies in Boston.
Tiskid, it's very important
tom BostonTiskid, it's very important for someone with cancer to get a ferry to get to a doctor's appointment (regardless of whether that person is a year-rounder, a seasonal resident or even a tourist). But what does subsidizing the cost of that ferry ride have to do with it??
Jim, if you decide not to
Tom Vineyard HavenJim, if you decide not to come visit because the boat is too expensive don’t worry someone else will be glad to fill your space on the ferry. The fare for year rounders is reduced because the steamship authority is our lifeline for living not for vacation and or fun.
True Tom. But you have chosen
tom BostonTrue Tom. But you have chosen to live on the island. You shouldn't be asking others to subsidize a choice you made.
Sorry Tom Boston, I have no
Tom Vineyard HavenSorry Tom Boston, I have no trouble asking you to offset the ferry costs, I help pay for the MBTA, Logan, SeaPort and so much more that makes Boston run, what really is your “point “ can’t afford a second home down here?
Tom, VH, I have a second home
Jillian VHTom, VH, I have a second home on MV, which I can afford, but what I cannot afford is subsidizing other people to travel (many of whom have more money than me).
We are being steamrolled by
What a JokeWe are being steamrolled by the authority of pure and blatant fiscal negligence. Oh vey.
Higher cost less service way
Jeff Baker Prospect MaineHigher cost less service way to go SSA !
Put in a tunnel it would cost less than the SSA 1 year budget IMO !
Much less pollution also !
No, Jeff. A 7 mile tunnel
David OBNo, Jeff. A 7 mile tunnel would cost $ Billions; way more than the "SSA 1 year budget". And that's no IMO, it's a fact. Also, where does your tunnel start, and where does it stop? Always nice to hear from Mainers on Island issues.
A person who lives on island
AllyA person who lives on island for 51% of the year (and therefore registers their car on island) pays 32 cents, but a person who lives on island 49% of the year (and therefore registers their vehicle off island) pays one dollar and 32 cents. Both people need to go off island for medical appoints. How is that fair and equitable?
SSA is an “Authority”. So is
Rick Oak BluffsSSA is an “Authority”. So is the MBTA. “Authorities” in MA equal mismanagement, patronage, high union obligations and government bailouts.
the anti tourism talk on the
Michael edgartownthe anti tourism talk on the island, and nothing from business owners, who are going to be hurting with this anti tourist movement
A side effect of subsidizing
Nelson B. OB/NYA side effect of subsidizing fares for island residents and charging less than the market rate is that it causes residents to use the ferry more than they otherwise would. This causes supply and demand imbalances and causes shortages of available ferry spots. It’s no different than subsidizing the price of gas; bad for the free market and bad for the environment.
Add new comment