The Edgartown conservation commission was unsure about plans to make a new trail near the Point on Cape Pogue.
Ray Ewing

Sea Level Rise Forces Trustees Into Retreat

The nonprofit, which oversees miles of oversand vehicle trails on Chappaquiddick, is proposing to retire about 1,300 feet of trail along the bayside of Cape Pogue because it now regularly becomes inundated by Cape Pogue Bay. 

Rising tides and shifting sands have The Trustees of Reservations in retreat on Cape Pogue.

The nonprofit, which oversees miles of oversand vehicle trails on Chappaquiddick, is proposing to retire about 1,300 feet of trail along the bayside of Cape Pogue because it now regularly becomes inundated by Cape Pogue Bay. 

A popular spot with fishermen and beachgoers known as the Point, the section of trail is across from Tom’s Neck. But access is almost entirely cut off as high tides, persistent winds and sea level rise routinely flood the oversand vehicle trail. 

In order to allow at least some traffic, the Trustees applied to the Edgartown conservation commission to cut about 600 feet of new trail further inland.

The Trustees are asking to retire an existing trail and cut a new one on Cape Pogue.
Courtesy of the Trustees of Reservations
The Trustees are asking to retire an existing trail and cut a new one on Cape Pogue.
Courtesy of the Trustees of Reservations

“In recent years, this crossover has become a pathway for flooding and storm surge, and it is becoming more difficult to designate an [oversand vehicle] corridor above the high tide line,” the Trustees wrote in an application to the Edgartown conservation commission. “The changing climate, and particularly increases in sea level rise, will likely accelerate future erosion at this location and without the proposed [oversand vehicle] trail modification, [oversand] vehicle access to the popular Point will be lost.” 

But not everyone is on board. 

The Trustees co-own the land with Chappy residents Bill Brine and Richard Brown. Both men objected to the application. 

“We’re against it because we’re disturbing the land to get a road to nowhere,” Mr. Brine said at the June 26 conservation commission meeting. “If this could work, I’m all for it. I’ll say to anybody and everybody, this is my favorite place to go in the world and I wish everybody could go there and enjoy it. But it’s just gone, there’s nothing there.”

That two owners of the property were against the idea gave the conservation commission pause and the board vowed to check in with its attorney on the legality of the request and voted to continue the hearing to July 24, as well as schedule a trip to the area.

The Trustees maintain they are allowed to make the changes as the majority stakeholder.

“The other landowners certainly have the right to appeal, but we are the majority ownership of that land and we have the right to do the work, according to our counsel,” said Darci Schofield, the Islands portfolio director for the Trustees. 

Legality aside, the Trustees said that the trail changes would be a net benefit and that this was an example of the organization’s belief in adaptive management — basically rolling with the punches dealt out by mother nature. Access would be preserved but there would be a smaller stretch of oversand vehicle trails. Any trees that need to be removed to build the new trail would be replaced twice over in the area.

The Trustees had an ally in the Martha’s Vineyard Beachgoers Association at last week’s meeting. The organization felt the change would be a help in getting people out to the Chappy beaches.

“Bayside access is so fundamental,” said president Peter Slikowski.

Some commissioners were unsure if the area could support more traffic. 

“We all know it’s very dynamic,” said commission member Lillian Province. “I feel we have to be honest about this....I also don’t want to give false hope to the public.” 

The application comes as much of the Trustees operations on Chappaquiddick are in limbo. In May, the conservation commission installed new vehicle limits on the oversand vehicle trails. Those limits are being challenged by the Trustees, which claims the caps are too low, as well as several Chappy residents, who claim they are too high. 

The Trustees are also in the middle of a lawsuit with Cape Pogue land owner Victor Colantonio, and the nonprofit itself is suing the conservation commission. 

Added to the mix, the town’s zoning board of appeal recently ruled that the Trustees have to reapply for a special permit or halt operations on Cape Pogue, adding another layer of scrutiny.

The twists and turns of the regulatory process have some would-be beachgoers wondering if it’s worth paying the $200-plus for an oversand vehicle sticker to get out on the sands. After going out on the trails for years with family, seasonal Vineyard Haven resident Skip MacElhannon was on the fence. 

“I thought about buying one and then ran into the confusion,” he said. “At this point, until things get resolved, I don’t think I will.”

It’s unclear if the regulatory hoops have affected the Trustees sticker sales on the beach. Stickers skyrocketed during the pandemic, but the Trustees do not have to tell the town the number of stickers that are sold, town officials have said. 

When asked about the number of permits that have been sold so far this year compared to the past, the Trustees declined to give too many details.

“It is difficult to compare this year’s sales to last year’s due to the fact we got a late start on OSV permit sales this season because of the long public hearing process by the Edgartown Conservation Commission,” spokesperson Mary Detloff said. “What is important is that we continue to sell permits and have taken great pride in watching Martha’s Vineyard residents and visitors enjoy the spectacular beaches and special places we steward on Chappaquiddick.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 07/04/2024 - 11:20

Permalink

RB Eastville

So if I have the timeline correct, the trustees sue the ConCom and suddenly the 30 year old permit that allows them to operate on Chappy can't be found? Interesting. Also, the trustees co-own this parcel? How did that come to be? At some point, this mess has to be worked out once and for all.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 07/04/2024 - 13:16

Permalink

Thomas Edgartown

This is a great compromise . That is a very special place, even magical . The landowners that object are flat out selfish.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 07/04/2024 - 14:58

Permalink

Lillian T. Chappy

The Trustees are fighting for continued public access. The other co-owners are simply trying to block public access to create a private playground in the name of climate change.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/05/2024 - 06:59

Permalink

Peter Sliwkowski, President of MV Beachgoers Access Group (MVBAG) Edgartown

Bayside access is crucial for the elderly, disabled, and families with small children, as it ensures a calm and safe beach experience. The MVBAG supports both the closure of existing trails and the proposal to reconfigure new ones to enhance bayside access.

This initiative is part of The Trustees' adaptive management strategy and is funded by a grant awarded to The Trustees by the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) for "Marsh Restoration Across Islands.

Here is a link to the press release -https://thetrustees.org/press-release/the-trustees-awarded-nfwf-grant-f…

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 07/05/2024 - 15:14

Permalink

John Piekos Edgartown

Access to Poge Bay is now very very limited. Poge Bay (and this point particuarly) is great shellfishing, fishing (a popular fly fishing spot too), and beach access (no waves, fun for young and old alike). The sand on this point grows and shrinks, like all beaches do. This is a special spot to float in or out in the tidal current, or to just rest and bird watch (or see the dolphin that was recently spotted in this area). This is not a "road to nowhere". The agreement (during the monthly TTOTR stakeholders meeting) with the trustees was to retire one trail (which eliminated access to this historic spot) and create another access to the bay and this spot especially. The plan is a great one, a win-win. The state even granted funds for it. Enough is enough with these petty objections. I get it, people hate the Trustees. You aren't an islander (or islander wannabe like me) if you don't hate the SSA, the Chappy Ferry (and line), the Trustees, the Tourists, and the ridiculous high price of gas on the island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 07/30/2024 - 18:30

Permalink

Fey Adelstein Chappy

Well if it's "going to no where" on it's way to being "gone" then, why NOT let people enjoy it ?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.