The Edgartown conservation commission is considering new limits on oversand vehicle access on Chappaquiddick.
Ray Ewing

Edgartown Outlines Potential Rules for Chappy Oversand Vehicles

The draft regulations proposed no more than 200 oversand vehicles at a time on the Leland and Wasque properties, and no more than 30 on the Cape Pogue trails.

Edgartown may have its new rules of the road for oversand vehicles on Chappaquiddick.  

The town’s conservation commission voted to have staff review draft regulations for The Trustees of Reservations that would cap the number of cars for different properties. The regulations are scheduled to come back to the commission next month potentially for a vote.  

The new proposals come after two years of hearings about the oversand vehicle access on Chappaquiddick, a popular recreation activity managed by the Trustees that has been continuous with neighbors, fishermen and town officials.

The draft regulations proposed no more than 200 oversand vehicles at a time on the Leland and Wasque properties, and no more than 30 on the Cape Pogue trails. Residents and Trustees staff would not be included in the counts.

The conditions would also require the Trustees to come before the conservation commission monthly between May and November to give updates on how things were playing out.

The regular reports would cover monthly vehicle counts, the number and positions of staff on the property, trail conditions, and plans for seasonal events such as holiday weekends and the annual fishing derby. 

Other requirements for fencing of the vehicle corridor and other environmental protections that have previously been in place would remain in the new regulations, as well. 

A ban on issuing oversand vehicle permits to rental vehicles is also being considered. 

Conservation commissioner Geoff Kontje, who helped draft the regulations, felt the rules could increase transparency and help get the public out to Chappaquiddick for fishing season. 

“I think these monthly meetings will make a great difference that will allow us on the commission to stay in touch with what’s going on out there and it will allow some adaptive management on our part,” he said. “We’re going to learn as we go with this.”

Trustees Island portfolio manager Darci Schofield previously said the Trustees was hoping to have a cap of 300 vehicles for the area, but didn’t object at the meeting. Some Chappaquiddick residents felt that number was out of line. 

“I still think 200 is way too high when you consider what is left to drive on that parcel and when you also consider its use,” said Rachel Self of the Leland and Wasque limit. “I think that it’s more appropriate to have a number around 100 vehicles in that section.”

The Trustees split the applications for the Cape Pogue and Leland-Wasque parcels for fear that the Cape Pogue area could be contested in court, potentially endangering oversand vehicle access to all of its trails. 

Ms. Schofield only raised a few minor issues on the draft conditions. 

“I think that was very thoughtfully done,” she said. 

The new rules would not allow oversand vehicles to continue past the Cape Pogue lighthouse, an area that continues to be contested in a court battle between Cape Pogue residents and the Trustees.

Chappaquiddick residents in the past have called on the commission to deny the Trustees’ permits to sell oversand vehicle permits, claiming the organization’s handling of the vehicles has come to the detriment of the area’s delicate barrier dunes and wetlands. Cape Pogue, in particular, has been a flashpoint since the Trustees applied in 2022. 

The Cape Pogue regulations would allow drivers along bayside and oceanside when conditions allowed for it. Neither have been open since December, Ms. Schofield said. 

“But the beach conditions are going to change so we’d be happy to provide a monthly update to the commission on that,” she said. 

The commission is scheduled to consider the proposed regulations at a meeting on May 15. 

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 14:07

Permalink

John Chappy

30 cars for Cape Poge is way too low. I sure hope the Trustees push back. For residents of Chappy, that is our beach and now we will be essentially blocked from use during the peak season.

Ryan DC/OB

"Residents and Trustees staff would not be included in the counts." Although the article doesn't specify residents of where? Perhaps residents of Chappy are included, perhaps only residents of Cape Poge, who really knows?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 16:44

Permalink

Phil Edg

So car #201, who just waited in line for the Chappy Ferry for an hour (lol) paid the fare, drove out to Dike Bridge is denied access? This will only create - MORE - work for TTOR, let alone the Chappy Ferry who will undeniably have to over-communicate to their customers that status. Mr. Kontje respectfully has this strategy ill planned. This is a sad juncture for the fate of OSV on Chappy which has been functioning just fine for decades. Too many Chefs in the kitchen here. The solution is simple: 4WD only (No AWD), No Rental Cars, and the herd has been thinned naturally... (if that's the compromise towards the goal of OSV access going forward)

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 16:49

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

Guess I'll be going out there again with my friends from southie when they drive their boats over from Yarmouth and we raft up in front of that lawyers house again.More fun than driving out and they have no say over use of boats.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 17:03

Permalink

Brendan Karalekas West Tisbury

Absolutely Ludicrous
The pretentious people of cape Pogue must be stopped, who do they think they are to deny people, especially locals and fishermen beach access to these spots that have been part of life here for long before they were.
Disgusting to say the least.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 17:31

Permalink

Paul Carr Chelsea

Ban on home rental vehicles. No way. I've been renting here since 1992 in May and September and count on osv access. During derby time, most vehicles are from home rentals. This cannot happen.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 18:10

Permalink

Leah T. Edgartown

30-car limit, no driving beyond the light house. This creates a private playground on public land. Let’s get 10 people to appeal any such decision. The Conservation Commission shouldn’t be a vehicle to advance the interest of a select few.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 18:20

Permalink

Anonymous MV

The state owns Leland beach so the state should fight any limits on Leland as it restricts public access to otherwise inaccessible beach.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 18:39

Permalink

Nelly Block Chappaquiddick

First the Cape Poge property owners succeeded in banning anchoring in Cape Poge Bay. Now they have succeeded in blocking access beyond the light house. The town government has handed the owners a private playground. That’s not right.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 20:59

Permalink

Nick chappy

30 people? Is this a joke? Oh what basis are they making these regulations and what data are you using to come to these numbers? The person that is commenting on his island doesn’t even own the land she is restricting access to. Her family gave it away years ago.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/25/2024 - 23:10

Permalink

george esgartown

to all the “selfish” homeowners - you may win in your fight to turn cape pogue into your personal elitist playground, but literally nobody is fooled by your claims that this is about your concerns about the environment and conserving the landscape. you do know that right? all the thousands of people who are harmed by this and will never be able to drive to the guy again know exactly what this is about - a handful of filthy rich homeowners want to keep the hoi polloi out. reminds exactly me of the “selfish”(theres that word again) landowners in grapes of wrath

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 05:56

Permalink

Kevin Chappy

Congrats on limiting cars on these fragile barrier beaches. It is one of the most sensitive places for wildlife and particularly birds we have and we have trampled it with our cars for too long.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 07:16

Permalink

Kate Chappy

Way too many vehicles on that beautiful beach. What about the people who want to enjoy the views and nature? Instead we have to see a parking lot.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 08:31

Permalink

Chrislan Manuel Oak Bluffs

I’d like to know how many permits they will sell? Is the plan to sell as many permits as possible to keep revenue high and then deny physical entrance to the trails once the limit is reached? If so they need to go back to selling permits daily at the trail entrance so the public isn’t taken advantage of.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 10:10

Permalink

Thomas Griffith Vaughan Edgartown

Perhaps a categorized pricing strategy for OSVs would solve ‘some’ of the debated issues. The BEACHES on Chappy are a “treasure” we all want to preserve. ISLANDERS FIRST!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 12:37

Permalink

Mike B Upisland

Eliminate all OSV access, possesses and demolish the private homes, and make access on foot or professional tours only. This is one of the few pristine beach environments left on the East Coast. OSVs and private homes and extremely harmful to it. This is what happened on the national seashore and needless to say it worked. Just because people have been living there and driving on the beach for decades doers not mean it is their right and that they can continue to do so going forward. Save Chappy!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 13:01

Permalink

Heath T. Edgartown

If this is about protecting the environment, the town should use eminent domain to take the private property and houses on Cape Pouge and return the entire area to its natural state. The houses cause pollution to the environment from septic systems and destroy the scenic view more than any vehicles.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 13:36

Permalink

Pam MVY

Norton Point has no limit on OSVs so a limit at Cape Poge and Leland is an unequal application of the law. The town can’t apply unequal treatment to two otherwise similar properties.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 15:51

Permalink

Randy Connecticut

My wife and I have been coming to Chappy for over 25 years to enjoy the derby and all that MV has to offer. We rent on Chappy and feel very fortunate to be able to fish, relax and meet other fisherman. In all the years we have been to the derby we have never witnessed anyone doing damage to this pristine beach during the tournament. We hope that all parties can come to a sensible resolution so that MV and Chappy residents will continue to share with fishermen this beautiful and unique place.
Thank you.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/26/2024 - 16:09

Permalink

Norma Edgartown

The 04/24/2024 meeting was well advertised and attended by about 70 members of the public. We all heard the description of the 'boots on the ground' conditions of the Cape Pogue area for OSV driving. It's quite sad really. We've lost so much. There are only 15 parking spots and very little left to drive on. Where there was once 3 trails (Pond side, middle, and East Beach) all that remains is one, with a few turnouts for cars coming from the opposite direction. While I understand the anger and sadness over losing this precious resource full of great fishing and amazing outdoor fun, blaming the homeowners out at Cape Pogue is silly. Just get out there and walk the OSV trail. I did. The beaches, both the Pond side and East Beach have mostly disappeared. The higher sea level and more frequent and powerful storm erosion are taking their toll. Even the owner of the windmill house (between the lighthouse and the gut) is not able to drive a vehicle to his house - due to extremely little beach area. Though I hate to admit it, these natural conditions are something we have no control over, and they're changing much to fast. I'm glad we can still enjoy the bathing beach at East Beach. Perhaps it's time to spend our outdoor time with our friends and families enjoying the ever-expanding trail network across the island. Even Sheriff's Meadow is putting in Handicapped access trails for those who want to enjoy them. We live in an amazing part of the world, let's appreciate and enjoy all the areas that remain for us, places that so many people have put so much work into setting aside and managing for our recreation and relaxation. Happy Spring. https://www.mvlandbank.com/properties/guide https://sheriffsmeadow.org/trailsmv-app/ https://thetrustees.org/trustees-on-marthas-vineyard/
PS. In the meantime - The Trustees could employ their very reliable and successful Long Point Visitor Reservation system to the Cape Pogue Area, thus reducing the pressure on visitors and staff.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/27/2024 - 09:26

Permalink

John D Edgartown

This is impossible to assess without knowing what the current volume of vehicles is. Is the proposal a huge decrease? I can’t tell.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/27/2024 - 11:19

Permalink

Tom Engley West Tisbury

I drove out to Katama yesterday with a friend. It’s been a few years since I’ve been out there. I was impressed by the amount of work to restore dunes and the planting of beach grass. People should go out and see it. Since I was a teen which is 50 plus years 100s of yards of shore line is gone. The bunker was on the beach now it’s way off shore it hasn’t moved the shore has. You can not rule over our shores and I read that we need to start driving on the beach to teach the shore bird to nest in the beach grass really. It’s become a party out on our fragile outpost. Fishing and fowling it is not. The whole south shore is evolving get used to it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/27/2024 - 23:14

Permalink

Jake Chappy

While these restrictions are a massive overreach which only serve a few wealthy landowners out on Cape Pogue versus the public access rights of many, ultimately it really doesn’t matter. Dike Bridge will be washed out in two years, and these folks will be stranded. Karma always finds its way!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 04/28/2024 - 09:29

Permalink

Mark VH

The still unaddressed "elephant in the room" here is gaining resolution between the Town of Edgartown and TTOR on payment for the replacement of the Dike Bridge bulkhead. Its state of disrepair will naturally limit vehicle access to Wasque and Cape Pogue.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 04/30/2024 - 10:38

Permalink

Rob OB

Until last year I bought my Trustees sticker every year for the last 18 years. This will be the second year in a row I'll pass on buying one. What a mess.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.