Tuesday's town meeting will be moderator Dan Water's final turn at the podium.
Albert O. Fischer

Short-Term Rentals Top West Tisbury Warrant

Short-term rental restrictions, a change in town energy policy and $1.8 million in library renovations all top the warrant for West Tisbury annual town meeting next week.

Short-term rental restrictions, a change in town energy policy and $1.8 million in library renovations all top the warrant for West Tisbury annual town meeting next week, along with a series of smaller funding articles and proposed revisions to the town zoning bylaws.

Voters will take up the 44-article warrant at 6 p.m. on Tuesday, April 9 at the West Tisbury School gymnasium, with the quorum set at 137 people. Free childcare will be available at the school from 5:45 to 9 p.m.

Town moderator Dan Waters will preside over the meeting, the last before his retirement.

In addition to the warrant articles, voters will be asked to approve a $25.6 million proposed budget, a 7.28 per cent increase over last year.

Higher town expenses and more common budget overrides have become the norm for many municipalities, said town administrator Jen Rand.

“Many towns are seeing somewhat regular overrides when they didn’t before because the cost of things is going up,” she said. “I would love to say it’s an aberration, and it used to be, but I think it’s becoming more common that we have overrides at this point.”

The proposed short-term rental bylaw ranks high among issues likely to generate debate, added Ms. Rand. The bylaw has already faced public scrutiny at a series of public meetings

Discussions to enact such regulations began in 2022 but were mostly developed last year, said short term rental bylaw committee chair Bea Phear

“Our goal is to continue to allow this customary accessory use, and to prevent investor purchases of real estate for short-term rental purposes,” Ms. Phear said. 

The regulation would restrict town residents to operating one short-term rental per owner, require owners to reside there for at least 30 days per year, create a minimum rental period of seven days and require renters to register their properties with the town. 

A previous draft of the bylaw restricted owners to only renting the properties for 12-weeks, but that stipulation was removed following public feedback, Ms. Phear said. 

“It was very hard to try to weave a path that we felt was fair and good for the community, but I think we’ve succeeded in doing that,” she said. “I’m delighted that it’s coming on to the floor.”

Ms. Phear added that she plans to make a last-minute amendment to the regulations on town-meeting floor, swapping the words “commercial use” to “accessory use.” The change, she said, will bring the regulations in line with the town zoning bylaw, and adhere to precedent set by a recent court decision involving a rental property on Nantucket.

The heftiest funding article on the warrant this year is a $1.8 million appropriation to pay for repairs of the heating, ventilation and air conditioning system at the library, adding to the $1.2 million appropriation made at last year’s town meeting. 

The increase, Ms. Rand said, is the result of the town getting more accurate cost estimates of the work required to do the project. 

“When we asked for the initial appropriation, we had no engineering done, we didn’t have any money to even get started,” she said. “It’s not as if we had a bid, and then the cost doubled. It didn’t. We had a couple people do a back of the envelope estimate.”

Ms. Rand likened the process to the Chilmark school HVAC project, which also faced unexpected price increases. 

“We should have taken a lesson from that and we didn’t,” she said. “We can talk all day about how it should still work. And it’s crazy that it didn’t last the 15 years it should have. But it doesn’t.”

If approved at town meeting, the funding for the library work would also have to pass at the April 11 annual town election because the town would exceed its tax levy limit. 

The ballot also includes a $720,000 request to bolster the Up-Island Regional School District budget, as increased labor and service costs have driven up school budgets across the Island

Two nonbinding resolutions asking voters opinions on turf fields at the high school will also appear on the ballot.

The planning board has also included an article on the warrant this year, designed to strengthen the town’s “big house bylaw,” said planning board chair Leah Smith. If passed, the new regulations would change how the town calculates floor space of attics and basements. Finished and unfinished attics would be included in the floor space equation, while some basements with visible exterior walls and windows will also be so designated.

“Every time there’s a new bylaw, there’s some bit of ambiguity that you weren’t aware of when it was written,” Ms. Smith said.

Also included on the warrant are articles on funding for a new multi-board administrator position to implement an energy efficient “specialized energy code,” and a proposal to change Columbus Day to Indigenous Peoples’ Day.

Town voters will also consider a series of minor funding articles to pay for the annual town employee cost of living increase, a dry hydrant on Tiah’s Cove Road and $100,000 for various building repairs and upgrades. 

To register for free childcare at the West Tisbury Library, call 508-693-3366 or email [email protected].

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/05/2024 - 06:14

Permalink

Michael edgartown

now we are getting people vote against people, and what they need to do, and how they can use their properties...this is wrong....regulating how long you need to live there and all that... absolutely wrong.....are we going to vote on how large families can be? the endless rules and regulations are ridiculous

Gail WT

This is out of control now! I do not rent my home, but you cannot tell a tax paying homeowner they cannot rent there place ?? We need Short term rentals! We are an Island and Tourists support our infrastructure.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/05/2024 - 11:10

Permalink

Nick Dean Oak Bluffs

Are we really going to make a law requiring homeowners to be at their property for 30 days a year instead of looking at solutions to build more sustainable housing? Multi family housing and expanded wastewater capabilities result in more housing supply and lower housing prices.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/05/2024 - 12:52

Permalink

Charlie west tisbury

We have never rented our home, short or long term, but many of our neighbors do so regularly. The Planning Board recommendations being considered seem unfair on so many levels...especially to those that rely on occasional rentals to provide the income necessary to ensure property upkeep, loan repayments, income supplements, etc. I understand the reasons why this has become an issue of concern, but I can not and will not support the regulations as written. Enforcement of these rules promises to be a nightmare for town government. I'm far more interested in giving my neighbors a helping hand; not standing in their way of their freedoms to do what they want or need to do with their properties. Limiting absentee landlords is one thing, this is not that, in spirit nor in practice. Perhaps you could consider "grandfathering" current property owns by letting them rent as they wish, while limiting or imposing new regulations on new homeowners' properties.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/05/2024 - 14:21

Permalink

Addy WT

I fully support the short term rental regulations. They do not prohibit renting a home as an accessory use to its use as a personal residence (including a summer residence). What the regulations prohibit is corporate ownership of property that is used essentially as a hotel in a residential neighborhood. Even if the regulations don’t pass this corporate type ownership for solely commercial use is likely illegal under existing residential zoning laws anyways so let’s vote to preserve our residential communities from becoming hotels.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/05/2024 - 18:01

Permalink

Tom Edgartown

Please don't let the short term rental create a smokescreen so you cannot see the implications of this specialized energy code. There is currently an energy code in effect now and this "new" set of regulations will cost homeowners more money with very little gain, our infrastructure cannot handle this additional usage and therefore all of us existing Eversource customers will foot the bill to replace our existing distribution system here and off island.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 04/06/2024 - 08:12

Permalink

Carl EC

So just a few years ago short term renters were the answer to so many problems by taxing them almost 12%. Now the powers that be want to do away with this revenue stream. Makes one think it was never about revenue and more about restricting who can and who can’t enjoy the island. Kind of elitist and privileged dont your think?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.