The regional high school has been trying to revamp its athletic facilities for several years.
Ray Ewing

Planning Board to Appeal Turf Decision

The legal battle over a turf field at the Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School will continue after the Oak Bluffs planning board voted Tuesday to appeal a recent state Land Court decision that allowed the field to bypass local zoning review. 

The legal battle over a turf field at the Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School will continue after the Oak Bluffs planning board voted Tuesday to appeal a recent state Land Court decision that allowed the field to bypass local zoning review. 

In a brief meeting, the board voted 2-1 in favor of filing an appeal with the state appeals court. Planning board chair Ewell Hopkins and Jojo Lambert voted in favor; Sean DeBettencourt was the lone nay vote. 

Member Erik Albert was not in attendance and Mark Crossland had recused himself. 

The high school has been trying to install a new turf field at its Oak Bluffs campus as part of a larger athletic facility overhaul. In 2022, the planning board denied the project over concerns that the field could pose a hazard to the area’s water quality. 

In November, Land Court judge Kevin Smith ruled the board did not have the authority to deny the project, saying it was protected under the Dover Amendment, a state law that exempts educational uses from some zoning restrictions. 

The decision meant the board no longer needed a special permit from the planning board. 

The planning board decision to appeal Tuesday came after the board met with the Oak Bluffs select board last week in a closed door session to talk about the lawsuit. The town has until Dec. 22 to file an appeal. 

There was no discussion during Tuesday’s meeting about the strategy for the appeal, though Mr. DeBettencourt expressed frustration over voting without Mr. Albert. 

“One member recusing and one member not being here means that potentially a minority of this planning board could vote for something that has been significantly divisive for the town,” he said. “I think that’s problematic. I understand that’s the process, but I don’t think that’s a good look.” 

He said he thought the vote should have been delayed, but Mr. Hopkins said that the timeline to appeal did not offer many options. 

“It is unfortunate,” Mr. Hopkins said. “Behind the scenes, I did everything in my power, as well as delayed this vote by 10 minutes, to give Erik an opportunity to take part.” 

The new field project has not made much forward movement since the judge’s decision just before Thanksgiving. The high school committee asked the superintendent to reach out to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission about the project’s approval before that body. The school would need a renewed approval to build anything.

The school committee is scheduled to discuss the appeal at a meeting Friday morning.

Michael Watts, a school committee member who was a liaison to the school’s attorney, said the planning board was within its rights to appeal, but he was frustrated that continued delays could come to the detriment of student athletes. 

The revamp of the athletic facilities would also include a new track. The existing track is continuing to deteriorate and, in a few years, it won’t be able to be repaired again, he said. 

“We’re getting to a place where we won’t be able to have track,” he said. “That’s sad.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 17:30

Permalink

Jeff OB

What is the budget for lawyers? Is this appeal going to cost taxpayers tens of thousands of dollars to satisfy the egos of 2 people?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 20:42

Permalink

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

Oh no, pretty soon we'll never have a track again unless we greenlight this stupid field. Spare me. Can we PLEASE move beyond these moronic arguments and build a grass field and a decent track. As a parent of a high school athlete I don't care if they eliminate all fields and the track. I want my children to be educated in the classrooms which are woefully inadequate. Spare me the "our kids won't get Division 1 scholarships" without plastic fields. Who cares. Let's focus on academic scholarships. Let's be that school that is known for it's academic achievement not it's fancy sports infrastructure. The support for these plastic fields is part of our communities transformation from a rural island culture to that of a wealthy suburban enclave.

William Oak Bluffs

This project is not an either or scenario as you suggest. Either a synthetic field/track OR academic achievement. The donors wish to support this project vs. possibly other academic programs for the high school. It is their money therefore their choice. The bottomline is that the student-athletes on Martha’s Vineyard are falling behind their peers. Synthetic surfaces at high schools are the standard these days. A synthetic field is not intended for only those going pro or aspiring for a Division 1 scholarship. Synthetic fields are the expectation. Why?? High schools with limited resources (field, manpower, funding, etc.) can play game after game after game on a synthetic surface. Teams can play during and after rain storms without worrying about destroying the field for the next team coming on the field.

Enough Already Oak Bluffs

Who are the donors and why aren't they publicly speaking out about how much they will donate? What's the story behind the money? Why don't they support education over sports?

William Oak Bluffs

Good questions. I don’t know the donors, but I know that the MVRHS has repeatedly stated this project would be privately funded. I can’t speak to the donor’s passions and why they might support this project over other initiatives. Perhaps they see that a project such as this would likely never be funded through the public school system and even if it was perhaps they foresaw the public outrage over using public funds for
athletics over academics. Perhaps they see that a project such as this when completed has the opportunity to expand opportunities of bringing the community together.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/19/2023 - 23:08

Permalink

George Stein OB

Having seen a proliferation of zoom participation in so many municipalities nationwide there is obviously no shame by the group to respect taxpayers. How dare anyone vote for such any individual being continually disrespectful to the constituents

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/20/2023 - 08:46

Permalink

Susan Desmarais Oak Bluffs

Irregardless of my thoughts on artificial turf, I find that shirking one’s responsibility as an elected official is offensive. Mr. Alpert, if you’re going to serve then show up and vote.

Perplexed MV

Dearest Susan,

Hope you are not actually believing what you have written. The chair has had this info for 25 days. Has had multi meetings and has not put it on the agenda. Then schedules a special meeting when he knows a member is traveling. How about knowingly scheduling a meeting when all members can be present? He had 25 days to do it. He also could have written his previous meeting to come out of the executive session for this vote. Why not? He likely knew he would lose the vote on a 2-2 tie. Nothing like waiting until a deadline when you know you can exclude a potential loss. Manipulation is an art form.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 12/22/2023 - 09:57

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Ted WT

When traveling, remote participation is accepted. A member could call in and vote.

The following are all acceptable reasons to do this:

Personal illness;
Personal disability;
Emergency;
Military service;
Geographic distance.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/20/2023 - 11:02

Permalink

Perplexed MV

A board chair knowingly excluding a member. Feigning waiting for the person you know will not be there is quite disingenuous. Perhaps the paper will follow up with that member to understand how they would have voted and see how egregious this really is. I do believe this same Chair was previously quoted as saying he would abide by the judges decision. I speculate that was a true statement made before being on the losing side of the decision. Not so true anymore. 2 blatant examples of a sore loser.

Bob OB

I agree with you, but Erik shouldn't get a pass for not being there for this vote, and Mark doesn't get a pass for abstaining. It's a five member board, and four of them have witnessed the actions of the board chair for the last two years on this. We didn't elect these people to turn their back on this kind of stuff. Simply voting "no" and wiping your hands won't cut it. They owe more than that to us, and themselves.

Ted WT

Crossland didn't abstain. He recused himself, meaning he had a conflict on interest in the matter. It is the proper and legal thing to do as if he had voted, the entire vote and process could (and should) be challenged in court. You shouldn't chastise a man for doing what is ethically and legally right.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/20/2023 - 11:22

Permalink

James Oak Bluffs

This really won’t cost the HS anything as they have plenty of donors for this project willing to pay for the latest appeal. The town of OB will be on the hook for their rogue Planning board chair. Anyone who sat in on the hearing before the judge knows the court is not going to grant the towns appeal.
The Chairman is only concerned with Delaying. Delaying is a win for them. Allows more time to think of the next obstacle to the school starting this project. Pretty sad situation that I hope the Towns people remember when they enter the ballot box.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/20/2023 - 23:06

Permalink

Joe Buti Boston

What an embarrassing situation. How long has this been going on? It reveals dysfunction on a massive scale.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 12/21/2023 - 16:49

Permalink

Ken Edg.

I see plastic siding, plastic decks, plastic everywhere. Where does all the fine sawdust go when cutting up these materials. I guess into the ground. Time to regulate this stuff.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.