Voters rejected affordable housing plan by a vote of 24-80.
Voters rejected affordable housing plan by a vote of 24-80.
Zivah Solomon

West Tisbury Voters Reject Funding for Accessory Dwelling Unit Proposal

A long-planned program meant to encourage private affordable housing efforts in West Tisbury failed to get off the ground at a special town meeting Tuesday, when residents voted 24 to 80 against a $250,000 funding request.

A long-planned program meant to encourage private affordable housing efforts in West Tisbury failed to get off the ground at a special town meeting Tuesday, when residents voted against a $250,000 funding request for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) pilot program run by the affordable housing committee.

Town moderator Daniel Waters called the meeting to order at 6:19 p.m. with a quorum of 140 voters. The town speedily approved a series of minor funding articles before coming to the housing committee request.

Affordable housing committee chair Jefrey DuBard said the program aims to encourage town residents to construct affordable ADUs on their property, which might include garage apartments, basement apartments or similar dwellings. 

“It’s a really wonderful way for us each to be able to contribute,” he said. “But its generally very hard for an individual to do all the legwork.”

The $250,000 request, Mr. DuBard said, would supply forgivable loans of up to $25,000 for predevelopment costs of creating an ADU, as well as going toward hiring an administrator to manage the program.

Affordable housing committee chair Jefrey DuBard spoke in favor of the article.
Zivah Solomon
Affordable housing committee chair Jefrey DuBard spoke in favor of the article.
Zivah Solomon

But attendees at the meeting pointed to a lack of clarity in the plans.

“I am just very confused by this, and it sounds like, I’m sorry, [Mr. DuBard] is too,” said Harvey Garneau.

Kathy Logue, meanwhile, criticized the lack of public hearings and town board engagement in developing the program.

“I don’t think we have ever been a ‘vote now and figure it out later’... kind of town,” she said. “The potential for this program to be a really good and valuable one is there, I just don’t think it’s ready for prime time yet.”

Mr. DuBard argued that speedy action was required to tackle the town’s affordable housing shortage.

“It’s got to be progress, not perfection,” he said.

The article failed in a majority vote, with 24 in favor and 80 against.  

Earlier in the meeting, the town voted in favor of a home rule petition to allow the town to fund affordable housing projects for residents who make up to 150 per cent of the area median income.

The article passed unanimously, with an amendment that Community Preservation Act funds stay restricted to projects benefiting those earning up to 100 per cent of the median income.

An article that would have ended rules at Lambert’s Cove Beach restricting dogs after 10 a.m. on Labor Day, rather than Sept. 15, also failed by majority vote.   

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 11/15/2023 - 11:33

Permalink

Alan Thomas West Tisbury

Thank you to the voters for denying this ill conceived proposal. When building costs are a minimum of $500/sqft on this island, the only people building these accessory dwelling units are those with substantial financial resources to begin with. Why should taxpayers contribute 25k to those who can already afford to build anyway. Anyone allocating half a million dollars or more for a guest house/ADU doesn't need a 25k handout from hardworking tax payers, most of who can only dream of building such a structure at this time.

Optimist West Tisbury

Why? because it would help make year-round housing available.
Most can only dream, as you say, but some could possibly make it work should this subsidy be made available to them.
Taxpayers contribute to the town that has an elected Select Board and committees that we trust have the best interests of the community in mind; the same way people with no children contribute to the school system, or seasonal residents contribute to issues that benefit year-rounders.
Civic discourse, critical thinking, and healthy debate are privileges that we are lucky to have in our town. It's disheartening to hear arguments that are not thought out, but rather filled with dogwhistles and logical fallacies.

Ted WT

Because the units would be restricted for affordable housing and would be deeded that way. Do you think that the affluent are going to put deed restrictions on their property just to get $25k?

Alan Thomas West Tisbury

Anyone building a home of any size here is affluent and should not be consuming our tax dollars to make it happen. We need affordable housing badly, but trickle up economics is not the way to do it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/17/2023 - 09:58

Permalink

Ben I. Edg

Followed this closely and not surprised by the outcome. Did Mr. Dubard and the affordable housing committee even have a list of interested parties seeking the funds?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/17/2023 - 10:16

Permalink

Sam C West Tisbury

Wow a little tension and a belief of why those “Rich” would need a little 25k. I thought it was a good idea to seed money for people who want to build as they have a house lot. And starting with an apartment above a garage was good. And it could generate income after.
And I certainly am not spending $500 per square. The idea is has some merit. Yet please let’s not get into the “haves or have nots”.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.