Island officials hope a new Martha's Vineyard Commission report that explores ways to cut down the amount of nitrogen pollution in up-Island ponds could serve as a blueprint for local planners.
Island officials hope a new report that explores ways to cut down the amount of nitrogen pollution in up-Island ponds could serve as a blueprint for local planners.
While there is no “magic bullet” for handling the degraded water quality in West Tisbury, Chilmark and Aquinnah, the new Martha’s Vineyard Commission report, titled “Potential Solutions,” offers several options to clean the watershed. Upgraded septic systems, pond openings and aquaculture are all floated as possibilities.
“We like to think of it as a menu of potential solutions,” said Dr. Rachel Sorrentino, an environmental consultant who worked with commission water resource planner Sheri Caseau on the report.
The report is the second phase of a larger up-Island watershed plan, a critical step in planning and funding local nitrogen mitigation efforts. The project started in January 2021, focusing on Chilmark Pond, James Pond, Squibnocket Pond, Menemsha Pond and Tisbury Great Pond.
Runoff from on-site septic systems has long been known to be the primary source of nitrogen pollution in many up-Island ponds, but the region’s rural nature represents a major hurdle. While down-Island towns can use centralized sewering to deal with nitrogen from wastewater, such systems are infeasible in the less-dense up-Island towns.
“Their conditions are pretty similar, they’re rural and they’re spread out, so their options are going to be much different than the ones from the down-Island towns,” Ms. Caseau said.
The high volume of septic systems up-Island caused significant nitrogen pollution in some area watersheds, leading to toxic cyanobacteria blooms and environmental degradation. A bloom in Chilmark Pond triggered a “red grade” notice that warned people from going into the pond or eating any seafood from the waters. James Pond and Squibnocket Pond both had lower-level warnings.
One of the major takeaways from their most recent report, Ms. Sorrentino said, is the importance of upgrading to “innovative/alternative” (I/A) septic systems which remove more nitrogen.
Ms. Sorrentino proposed that up-Island towns might take a cue from Tisbury, which now requires an I/A system to be installed any time a septic system fails or a new home is built.
Certain dense pockets of habitation in West Tisbury and Chilmark could also be considered for “package plants,” smaller centralized wastewater processing facilities that can serve communities in lieu of a larger sewer, she said.
Other common mitigation methods, like the practice of digging beach channels to allow ponds to flush out pollution to the ocean, might be impacted by climate change.
A lack of rain in recent summers has lowered pond water levels, making it more difficult to establish an outward flow.
“If the ocean is higher, you’re not going to get that flush that clears out a channel for you,” she said.
Squibnocket Pond and James Pond, meanwhile, don’t have regular openings, and aren’t in heavily populated areas. Most of their nitrogen pollution, Ms. Caseau said, comes from the atmosphere, originating with coal burning plants.
Growing oysters and seaweed, which consume the nitrogen as they grow before being removed from the pond ecosystem, might provide a solution for those bodies, she said.
With the new report out, Ms. Sorrentino and Ms. Caseau are now beginning work on the next phase of a larger regional watershed plan. The next phase will provide quantified data for towns to make decisions about the proposed technologies.
Completing a regional watershed plan is essential for the up-Island towns, said Ms. Caseau, explaining that individual towns without sewers cannot undertake the same conventional planning process that the down-Island towns are working on. In addition to giving them direction, she said, the towns will be able to use this management plan to unlock new avenues of state funding.
“Right now, there’s a lot of money out there with the current administration,” she said.

Comments
I’ll assume the Martha’s
Nelson Sigelman Vineyard HavenI’ll assume the Martha’s Vineyard Commission report’s “possible solutions” do not include obsolete dams that block the free flow of water and passage of fish, artificial impoundments that act as heat sinks in which water temperature approach ninety degrees, poorly placed culverts that constrict water flow and effectively create a dam when water levels are low, and withdrawals and diversions that slow stream velocity. Any discussion of poor water quality and the Tisbury Great Pond watershed should include Mill Brook, which originates in Chilmark and flows through the heart of West Tisbury to Tisbury Great Pond. The Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation’s nine-year effort to replace a failed culvert at the headwaters of Mill Brook, supported by the state Division of Ecological Restoration but opposed by the Island Grown Initiative in Superior Court, offers an example of how even one small step for the watershed can turn into one giant step for the lawyers. Possible solutions are fine; action is better.
Excellent point Nelson. Start
Ebba Rene Hierta EdgartownExcellent point Nelson. Start at the source. Improve the water quality flowing into the pond.
Seems like a no-brainer.
title 5 septic regulations
Michael edgartowntitle 5 septic regulations are saying ONLY cape cod septics are an issue? something fishy with that .....
another keen observer says if septics are polluting the ground, and streams, etc., why aren't our well waters being polluted?
Add new comment