Following in West Tisbury’s footsteps, Chilmark amended its share of the regional high school budget from $1.06 million to zero.
Chilmark residents voted down the town's share of the Martha’s Vineyard Regional High School operating budget at annual town meeting Monday, the second town to do so in protest of the school’s ongoing lawsuit over an artificial turf field.
Following in West Tisbury’s footsteps, Chilmark voters amended the high school budget line from $1.06 million to zero. If a third town rejects the budget, the district will have to take the budget back to the school committee and come up with a new one.
Robert Lionette, a Chilmark resident and the chair of the regional high school school committee, made the motion to vote against the budget because of the lawsuit, though he acknowledged that high school prinicipal Sara Dingledy and her staff had otherwise done a "great job" with the financial plan.
The vote against the budget passed 114-71 after more than an hour of debate.
The school has been pursuing an artificial turf field as part of a revamp of the high school’s athletic facility.
The project, which also includes a new track and renovating several grass fields, was approved by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission in June 2021, but was later rejected by the Oak Bluffs planning board due to concerns over chemicals from the field potentially harming the area’s water quality.
The school then sued the town board, claiming the project was exempt from local zoning under state law.
Earlier this month, West Tisbury voters rejected the town’s portion of the regional high school operating budget in protest of the school’s continued legal spending on the turf suit.
If four towns approve the high school budget, the school isn’t required to make a change. Tisbury’s town meeting is Tuesday and Aquinnah is next month.
Susan Murphy, the chair of the Chilmark finance committee, said the school did a fabulous job from a fiscal standpoint on the budget, but she hadn’t realized that the school committee would later decide to take away a spending cap on the turf lawsuit.
The school committee initially committed $30,000 to the legal fight, but after learning that attorney fees had outstripped the initial estimate by more than $4,000, the high school committee voted earlier this month to continue funding the lawsuit until its conclusion.
Principal Dingledy stood up at the meeting and stated that a “no” vote would hurt school operations.
“The operating budget is a symbol of the fight but will not resolve the fight,” she said. “[This] will result in programmatic and staff cuts.”
Superintendent Richie Smith made a similar overture to voters, saying a rejection “could possibly threaten the daily work that we do with our children.”
“There are other ways to send a message to the school committee,” he said.
Some voters were not in support of voting the budget down, either.
“I think it’s foolish to take a flamethrower to the high school budget,” said board of health member Matt Poole.
A new wrinkle developed in the turf fight late last week, when the school committee scheduled an executive session to talk about potential settlement proposals. The meeting was scheduled for Monday, but was canceled without explanation on Sunday.
Mr. Lionette did not respond to a request for comment earlier Monday on why the meeting did not happen as originally scheduled.
The rest of the town's budget, which was projected to be $13.5 million before the amendment to the school spending, passed, as did a $2.2 debt exclusion for facilities upgrades at the Chilmark School. The debt exclusion, which will cover the costs for a new heating, ventilation and air conditioning system at the school, will also need to be approved at the ballot.
Voters also agreed to chip in on a $2 million feasibility study to look at renovating or replacing the aging regional high school building and approved a new funding agreement for the project. All six Island towns have been asked to help cover the costs of the study and sign on to the new regional agreement. Both haved passed in all four towns that have held their town meetings so far.
A petition article that would have allowed for four liquor licenses in Chilmark, the last remaining dry town on the Vineyard, was indefinitely postponed.
Monday’s town meeting in Chilmark was a packed affair. Additional chairs needed to be brought in and there was a line out the door more than 10 minutes after town meeting was scheduled to start.
The meeting, having no trouble reaching a quorum of 25 voters, was called to order at 7:12 p.m. and ended at 10:19 p.m. There was a total of 216 people present.
Warren Doty, at his last town meeting as a select board member before Wednesday’s election, received a standing ovation for his 24 years of service to the town.
"It's been a privilege," Mr. Doty told the crowd at the start of town meeting. "Now it's time for someone else to sit in this seat."

Comments
Thank you Chilmark!
Susan Desmarais Oak BluffsThank you Chilmark!
Maybe my grandchildren will
Laurence Vaughn EdgartownMaybe my grandchildren will be able to run on a proper track and have nice fields to play sports, be it grass or turf.
I do not expect to have school aged grandchildren for at least 20 years
There is no reason at all why
Nette Flikssen ChilmarkThere is no reason at all why a protest vote over the budget would result in cuts to staff or programs. That would be an active choice by school committees and administrators if it were to happen. Richie Smith and Sara Dingledy, who are saying now that staff and program cuts would be the result of this protest vote, have previously spoken in support of the artificial turf field in the hearings where it was debated. Their claims here should be considered in light of this.
Votes matter, Nette.
Bob OBVotes matter, Nette. Especially when there's only 185 people voting. You would like to characterize your vote as a symbolic gesture of protest after the fact, but it's too late for that. If Tisbury or Aquinnah voters take the same path of casting "protest" votes, then the high school budget fails. Your vote will have helped to enable that. This was a real vote, with real consequences.
I’m proud of West Tisbury
Tom Engley West TisburyI’m proud of West Tisbury voters and also glad Chilmark had the courage to do the right thing and vote this down. There will be no disruption of education and services to our children. Superintendent Richie Smith needs to figure this out he knows that he’s in trouble. The state can and will step in and tell the towns how much to pay.
I think the voters made the
John Aldeborgh KatamaI think the voters made the correct decision by voting to not approve the school budget. The system isn’t working when it comes to resolving the artificial turf field issue. Sometimes a “flamethrower” is the right tool and the powers that be haven’t gotten the message, fix the problem. To say the town’s people don’t support the students isn’t accurate, it’s the leadership that’s failing and the current conundrum is the outcome.
Thank you Chilmark and West
Martha Magee Mother EarthThank you Chilmark and West Tisbury for standing up for GAIA!
Nette & Tom
Terry Donahue EdgartownNette & Tom
Richie Smith & Sarah Dingledy have a much better understanding of this budget failing than we do. What I have heard is it will mean teacher cuts which does affect the kids. It also means the cost of reworking the budget. I am very sorry you felt this was necessary. My opinion is this is just another example of the opponents of the turf field not caring about the children just their own interests.
Their opposition has delayed the fields being improrved for nine years. They said they would redo the fields six years ago but walk away from that promise.
Richie Smith and Sarah
Tom Engley West TisburyRichie Smith and Sarah Dingledy need to get to work and figure this out. Spending is out of control on many fronts. Tisbury School. High school millions will be spent before a shovel is put in the ground. Tax and spend here’s a suggestion give up this nonsense and educate our children. Too many working parts. Too many committees too many meetings. Less and less people care about going to town meetings at west Tisbury meeting u could see people leaving after the article they were interested in single article voters. People were delighted for once to have the opportunity to make a difference and voted to send it back to committee my guess your supporting the superintendent because he’s supporting your interest.
Can the kids of a town that
TisKid MVCan the kids of a town that zero funds the budget go to the school? Why would the high school accept kids from a town that zero funds them?
The whole lawsuit is about
Dover RiverThe whole lawsuit is about Dover amendment. Without that clarified what does that mean for the new building? MSBA funds seem at risk without that clarification accomplished
Good work, Chilmark. This is
Carol formerly ChilmarkGood work, Chilmark. This is the only way to send the strongest message to Richie Smith and the school board that you do not sue the planning board - using taxpayer dollars - when you don't get your way. Accept the loss and move on. I attended MVRHS with grass fields and they were FINE.
Let me try this again. I
Islander61 OBLet me try this again. I find the use of the words "when you don't get your way" and "Accept the loss and move on" extremely hypocritical. When the MVC approved the project, the opposition didn't "Accept the loss and move on". When the School Committee voted to appeal the decision, (which is what this is, the school isn't suing the town of Oak Bluffs), Robert and Skipper "didn't get their way" so they motioned to zero fund the school's budget. A move completely against all decorum when serving on a committee. You argue your case with your committee, but if you lose, you live with your committee's decision and support it, as Amy Houghton said in VH.
About the field itself. I don't know when you went to the HS but when I attended in the '70s only one team used the game field, football. Now 2 football teams, 2 soccer teams, 4 lacrosse teams, all use the field. Field hockey, which is completely different now, with basically at every level, the game is played on turf. A huge disadvantage for our team as most of the schools they play now are playing on turf. The MIAA tournament semi-finals and finals mandate that it is played on turf. As I mention that, all the state semi-finals and finals in all square field sports are mandated to play on turf. The grass fields here are not fine, and it isn't because of lack of maintenance, it is over use. The experts hired or brought in to testify by the MVC all said the exact same thing, especially when you have the nitrogen limits we have due to our ponds.
Lastly, Dr. Smith, you should address his title with respect. Dr. Smith knows more about the school and the needs of the kids than any commenter here. What Mr. Lionette and Mr. Manter did was out of line, especially since one is the Chair of the committee of which voted for the budget. No one should be giving them accolades for what they did, they should be ashamed and apologize to everyone else on the school committee and the school administration, who makes hard decisions every year regarding the school budget, for their actions. If the appeal is successful, which I hope it is, I hope all the opposition can "accept the loss, and move on", but I doubt they will as witnessed with this last ditch effort to "win at all costs".
How can this be happening
Lawrence ObHow can this be happening over a field. We know will have to cut back programs and teachers??
Add new comment