Select board member Jeffrey “Skipper” Manter puts forth effort to reject the school budget.
Albert O. Fischer

Angry About Turf Lawsuit, West Tisbury Votes Down School Budget

The West Tisbury town meeting kicked off on a fiery note Tuesday with residents voting down the town’s portion of the regional high school operating budget in protest of the school’s ongoing legal battle over plans for an artificial turf field.

The West Tisbury town meeting kicked off on a fiery note Tuesday with residents voting down the town’s portion of the regional high school operating budget in protest of the school’s ongoing legal battle over plans for an artificial turf field.

But voters who gathered at the West Tisbury school readily approved the town’s portion of the $2 million Island-wide feasibility study that will look at potentially replacing or renovating the regional high school. They also agreed to a new regional funding agreement for the project.

“This is the culmination of two years of effort and a lot of hard work,” said high school administrator Sam Hart, in urging support for the study.

Spending issues were the centerpiece of discussion throughout the evening, with voters approving a $19.9 million town budget. If the town’s $3.4 million share of the high school operating budget had remained, the total would have been a 5.16 per cent increase over last year.

The town also approved a series of funding requests.

After some debate, voters agreed to spend $1.2 million to fix the library’s heating, ventilation and air conditioning system, and $400,000 to increase town employee salaries, proposed by the personnel board.

Adam Petkus speaks in favor of town employee raises.
Albert O. Fischer
Adam Petkus speaks in favor of town employee raises.
Albert O. Fischer

Select board member Cynthia Mitchell spoke against the salary increase, which represents a 10 per cent raise to town employee pay, on top of a 4.4 percent cost of living adjustment. The increase, Ms. Mitchell said, was implemented outside of normal personnel board procedures, and would be a significant town expenditure.

“I find this completely unsupportable,” she said.

Town resident Adam Petkus, however, said the article could improve employee retention in town, and provide high paying jobs to younger Islanders.

“Take a look around you. How many people my age do you see in this room?” he said.

Other speakers emphasized a sharp rise in the cost of living on the Island as justification for the increase. The article passed by majority vote.

Questions were also raised about the HVAC article, with voters asking how the relatively new system was already failing. Town administrator Jen Rand said the breakdown was due to an error from the company that manufactured certain fittings, a company which has since gone out of business.

Sam Hart urges voters to approve funding for high school feasibility study.
Albert O. Fischer
Sam Hart urges voters to approve funding for high school feasibility study.
Albert O. Fischer

Others cited the rising costs associated with the Chilmark School HVAC as a reason to approve the repairs now. Library director Alexandra Pratt spoke to the need for a working system.

“We’ve been limping along these past three years with space heaters and window A/C units,” she said. “It’s really hard to keep the library, which is our town cooling shelter, at the temperature it should be.”

The HVAC spending and the town’s contribution to the high school feasibil

ity study both need separate approval by voters at the town election Thursday.

An update to the town zoning for pools also got the thumbs up, after an amendment made on the floor by town energy committee chair Kate Warner. The proposed bylaw initially banned the use of fossil fuel heating in West Tisbury pools, but Ms. Warner moved that the requirement be changed to a recommendation after town counsel informed the committee that such a requirement would not be approved by the state attorney general.

“We are not allowed to surpass the state building code,” she explained.

A citizen petition that would have banned noise from construction and landscaping on Sundays and holidays was voted down.

The meeting was scheduled to begin at 6 p.m., but was delayed for lack of a quorum of 140 voters. At 6:21, moderator Dan Waters banged the gavel down when 141 voters were counted present.

The meeting opened with a moment of silence for community members who died in the past year, along with a poem by town poet laureate Tain Leonard Peck called Barnyard Emperor, read by last year’s laureate Spencer Thurlow.

The meeting quickly took an unexpected turn when the line item for West Tisbury’s share of the high school operating budget — $3.4 million — came up. Objections were raised to a recent decision by the school committee to continue funding litigation against the Oak Bluffs planning board, which denied a plan to use artificial turf on the school’s athletic fields. Select board member Jeffrey (Skipper) Manter noted that even though the objections related to the legal budget, the only way to lodge a protest was to amend the entire school budget line item to zero.

Doug Ruskin called the litigation an “egregious breach of fiduciary responsibility.”

“This is a financial argument,” he said. “This isn’t a threat to education in any way.”

Former school committee member and West Tisbury resident Kate DeVane also spoke in favor of denying the budget line.

“We’re setting an unbelievably bad example for our children by suing ourselves, it’s the most idiotic thing I’ve ever heard of,” she said. “The school can’t keep shoving this down our throats.”

School district superintendent Richie Smith pushed back, saying this year’s budget increase was among the lowest in recent memory. Returning it to the school committee “will impact programming,” he said.

West Tisbury voters voted nearly unanimously by a show of hands against approving the money.

“It takes four out of six towns to approve the budget,” Mr. Manter noted. If at least four towns vote to approve their portion, he said, West Tisbury “will pay the assessed amount whether we like it or not.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2023 - 17:08

Permalink

Tom Engley West Tisbury

Richard Smith is clueless and over his head he tried to make a joke when addressing this issue at the town meeting. I asked him weeks ago about regionalization of the school system he laugh at me sad state of affairs. Proud of our WT voters and thank u skipper.

Elisha Wiesner Chilmark

Richie is an excellent educator who has dedicated his life to his profession. You're a newspaper comment section blowhard. There is one of you who's opinion I trust about the vineyard schools. Take a guess which one?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2023 - 18:23

Permalink

Daisy Martha's Vineyard

So if West Tisbury doesn't pay their fair share where will their high school kids go to school? Where I come from if you don't pay your tuition you don't go to school.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2023 - 23:16

Permalink

Jim WT

I really don’t see the big issue either way. Let’s decide and move on. There are pros and cons on both sides like every issue. Flip a coil or whatever, there are more important issues to deal with.

Robin OB

Yes, I wish folks showed the same energy and passion on what’s happening with real issues.
Inflation for starters.. look at the price of everything. It’s scary and it’s only getting worse.
I live on a tight budget, but this is out of control and we worry about a field??

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 08:57

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

These are the times we live in when we do not like a decision. The MVC made a decision on the turf issue one way then the OB board went another way. But what is before the judge now is something that needs to be resolved and that is the interpretation of the Dover amendment and that is worth the legal fees. If we do not get an answer to that now it will come up again so lets find the answer and stop playing games with bills you have to pay.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 10:04

Permalink

DB WH

Falmouth has declining enrollment and could use some students, give them a call.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 11:50

Permalink

Gabrielle West Tisbury

I applaud the leadership of West Tisbury for having the gumption to be consistent in their beliefs, even when inconvenient. Many could learn from their example.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 13:06

Permalink

Tisbury resident Tisbury

It is a waste of money for the high school to sue the OB planning board. Protecting water resources and the island's sole source aquifer is more important than a PFAS plastic turf. Spending tax money on education is more important than spending it on litigation. We already know the science so stop denying facts and get your priorities straight! Thank you West Tisbury voters.

Tisbury resident Tisbury

Here is a link to a verifiable scientific paper on the subject: https://www.turi.org/content/download/12963/201149/file/TURI+fact+sheet…. Here is a map of the PFAS contamination crisis across America. https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/. Scientists know the science. Chemical pesticides also do not need to be used to maintain a field. I'm shocked by science deniers like yourself. Perhaps you should go back to highschool?

Islander61 OB

I’m not sure you were watching the same meetings I was because the actual science says the aquifer would be safe. The independent contractors who the MVC hired said that PFAS was not present at levels that could leach into the aquifer. If you’re referring to the information that those who the Field Fund hired to testify, after not presenting any information about the tests that were actually done, as science, then you heard what you wanted to hear and not the actual science. The school committee member who engineered this vote should no longer be on the school committee. Rules of committee’s are, you argue your case with your committee, but win or lose, you support the decisions of your committee. This member violated that trust and just lost all credibility with his peers on the committee, good luck getting anything you want passed in the future.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 14:00

Permalink

Islander61 OB

It seems to me that West Tisbury threatening to not fund the high school just to "get their way", as it is related to the turf project, is childish. Grow up. The school committee has a valid and legal argument. I, for one, want them to follow through because it seems that their argument is a valid one. The Dover Amendment was written to help schools, not hurt towns, as the planning board chair would like you to believe. In addition, it should have never been NOT approved by the planning board. There was no expert testimony presented to convince a non-biased member of the board that the field would hurt the aquifer. I say non-biased because the two members who voted against it had already made their positions known prior to any testimony and they voted their bias and didn't listen to the experts, they made themselves the experts. The expert testimony and the $50,000.00 worth of testing proved, without a shadow of a doubt, that the field would not leach PFAS into the aquifer. Ironically, the testing done after the fact has thus proven that the turf field would actually be safer for the aquifer than what we presently have in the soils at both the high school and the Oak Bluffs school. So, the planning board chair should stop this law suit, not the high school, and approve the special permit. If he REALLY cared about the aquifer, then he would follow the science and remove the tainted soils at the high school and replace with a PFAS safe turf field. But, is it really about turf, or is it that he doesn't want to lose and he is willing to spend thousands of dollars fighting the Field Funds fight to fight the synthetic turf field, the field that they couldn't get denied at the MVC and the same exact field they had approval to replace with the grass they wanted but withdrew the money. West Tisbury, and any other town, please don't use the funding of our kids education as a pawn. Do the right thing and fund the school and pressure the Town of OB planning board chair to stop this fight and save us all money. The Town of OB could stop this now, and they should.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2023 - 14:07

Permalink

Sal Ob

I live outside NYC and we had a similar debate… the bottom line is less water and fertilizer on synthetic turf. It’s a no brainer.
We all need to move on. What a waste of time and resources. Do people have anything better to worry about? Inflation, economy world affairs ti name a few?? We should be more concerned about the economy and the price of fuel and goods… I can barely survive.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 05:26

Permalink

Carol formerly Chilmark

Kate DeVane is exactly right. Suing ourselves IS idiotic - and insanely expensive. Bow to the will of your neighbors on the plastic turf issue and just move on. Good job, Skipper.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 07:07

Permalink

Tim OB

I don’t understand this long drawn out debate. I like the idea of synthetic. Less chemicals and watering. We need to move on. There are more important issues like climate change for one.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 10:51

Permalink

Oak Bluffs Resident Oak Bluffs

The planning board is doing its job protecting Oak Bluffs residents, all of them and the whole island water supply. Having a plastic field for a few student athletes is selfish and hurts the whole island. We need to think bigger than ourselves and about the next generations.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 10:51

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

So much money on this dysfunctional drug and alcohol addicted island and no one gets along because of small brains and overinflated egos. I know for a fact the shrinks here are having a field day,along with all the lawyers.What a waste!

Be respectful VH

So, what is your idea to get along? I don't like your cynical stance without any clear and feasible solution from you. Why don't you get familiar with what has happened and what has been said from both sides, chronologically?

Think of the priority of the matter, then, you will know which is the right direction.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 14:01

Permalink

Islander Too

I applaud the OB Planning Board for keeping focus on its job.
It is not a rubber-stamping outfit.
Furthermore, the MVC decision and the MVC's decision-making process were deeply flawed. I watched some of the discussion online and I was appalled at the fecklessness I saw on show.
Furthermore, there are other problems with the high school's plan.
The design/layout is poor.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/14/2023 - 21:51

Permalink

Curious West Tisbury

Thanks to Cynthia Mitchell for the constructive criticism of the pay increase for town employees. When a town’s bylaws are being overridden, the public deserves a chance to consider matters and a chance to weigh in before town meeting. There was no proper discourse on this issue. The meeting barely held a quorum. The Finance Committee set a bad precedent and the Moderator was particularly considerate and in respectful good humor as Mr. Petkus aired out his rage. Thanks for the contrast, Mr. Moderator.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 04/17/2023 - 17:44

Permalink

Doug Ruskin West Tisbury

To those deflecting by suggesting West Tisbury's vote is intended to threaten funding or education: In fact, the same town meeting voted nearly unanimously for the feasibility study to upgrade the school. Taxpayers have only one method to let a school committee know how they feel when direct discourse is ignored. They vote with their wallets, and state law allows for no nuanced vote, like a reduction to the budget; it's either "yes" or "no". The high school committee members are not even directly elected, so we have no real say in who represents us (they are appointed by their local school committee; when you vote for those, you have no idea who will end up at the high school). The state mandates education and will not allow localities to prevent it. Town rejection of a school budget has been done before. The School committee can revise the budget which then goes back to the towns for a vote (yes, Special Town meetings). If that fails, state law requires use of the prior year's budget until agreement is reached. If there is no agreement by December 1st , the state effectively takes over: “In the event a budget is not adopted by December first in any year, the department shall assume operation of the district… “ https://malegislature.gov/Laws/GeneralLaws/PartI/TitleXII/Chapter71/Sec….
As a side effect, students get educated in democracy in action.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/09/2023 - 13:47

Permalink

Islander OB

Shame on you Mr Manter. You defund the high school budget to "send a message" yet in the past are on record suing the MVC's decision to support the roundabout... So which is it? How is it ok for your town to sue the MVC but the high school can't appeal the planning board's decision? Shameful behavior.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.