Lost to the Breach, Wacks Home Comes Down
The Chappaquiddick summer home owned by Sue and Jerry Wacks that has been severely threatened by the recent breach along Norton Point was demolished over the weekend.
The Chappaquiddick summer home owned by Sue and Jerry Wacks that has been severely threatened by the recent breach along Norton Point was demolished over the weekend.
Perched at the edge of a bluff at Wasque Reservation, the house, built in 1984, could no longer be saved from the encroaching ocean.
Crews from the Vineyard construction crew Soly, owned by Solamina Silva, began their work demolishing the housing Friday evening. On Saturday morning, the crew used heavy equipment to take down the house, while a high tide lapped at the base of the collapsed bluff below. Tiny winter shorebirds skittered about the bluffs, foraging for food.
The Norton Point breach opened on Dec. 27 after a series of storms had battered the south-facing shore of Martha’s Vineyard. Norton Point is a roughly two-mile barrier beach that runs between Mattakeeset Creek on the Edgartown side and Wasque on the Chappy side.
Breaches are breaks that occur naturally in barrier beaches running between two bodies of water.
The current breach has been following an expected pattern of migrating slowly eastward, and while a long sand spit is forming on the eastern end, the opening remains.
Two Woods Hole senior scientists who have studied previous breaches at Norton Point told the Gazette last month that due to variables in the natural conditions, no one can predict with certainty when the breach will close.
Surrounded by some 200 acres of protected conservation land at Wasque, the Wacks house was the only house in the area.
Now that will change, as nature takes the upper hand.
Speaking to the Gazette by phone Monday, Edgartown conservation agent Jane Varkonda said the Wackses had come before the conservation commission in December after the storms, seeking an emergency permit to put boulders down on the beach. “That is not allowed under Wetlands Protection Act,” Ms. Varkonda explained. “Their only options were soft solutions — sand bags.”
Ms. Varkonda said sand bags were put down, but it was too little too late as the open breach allowed the waves to eat away the bluff.
“[The breach] just opened up their shoreline to the full brunt of the bay,” she said.
In the end parts of the house began falling over the cliff, and emergency removal was the only option. Ms. Varkonda said an after-the-fact demolition permit will be issued by the Edgartown building department.
No other regulatory permits are required, she said. “Everyone was aware of what was going on,” she said.
When it was first built, the house was located some 1,600 feet from the water, with a road running in front of the house, Ms. Varkonda said.
She reflected on how the dynamic conditions along the beach have taken a heavy toll. “That end of Wasque gets hammered any time the breach is opened,” Ms. Varkonda said. “It’s absolutely amazing, and too bad there weren’t any other options.”
In a prepared statement issued Monday, Trustees interim CEO and president Nicie Panetta lamented the loss.
“What’s happening with the Wacks’ house is heartbreaking and we understand what a difficult time this is for them,” the statement said. “We have kept in regular communication with the Wacks and have offered potential ways for The Trustees to assist the family during this very difficult situation. As a public nonprofit whose mission is to protect land for public use in perpetuity, we are unable to provide a private landowner with conservation land for their private home. We are genuinely sorry to see how the Wacks have been impacted. While The Trustees is always deepening its technical expertise in coastal adaption, managed retreat will unfortunately become increasingly common for many coastal properties.”
Sue and Jerry Wacks did not immediately return a phone call from the Gazette Monday seeking comment.

Comments
Very sad to see Wacks house
Jason Gruner ChappyVery sad to see Wacks house lost to Atlantic. I feel that the picture of the demolition crew on top of Jerry’s home was not appropriate. The picture reminded me of hunters standing by a dead in celebration. That animal/house represented 40 years of hand holding, sunsets and family. Do better please…
I was about to post the same.
John Smith EdgartownI was about to post the same. Well said.
If you look closely, the
Bill R. Vineyard HavenIf you look closely, the demolition crew is standing on the cliff at the waters edge, not the house they are in the process of demolishing.
Thanks for your Semantics...I
Jason Gruner ChappyThanks for your Semantics...I will drill down for you here…Showing smiling faces taking a break standing on the remains of family home/property that being ripped apart. The land that the demo crew is standing held Bday parties, a wedding and thousands of memories. Like I said prior to the Gazette. “ Do better…. “.
This is clearly a deeply
Me HereThis is clearly a deeply emotional issue for you, which is perhaps causing your mind to play tricks on you. The demolition crew was standing on the bluff in the photo, not on top of the house. I write merely in the hope that the correction can bring you some peace. My sympathies for what you have lost.
Thank you for your note. I
Jason Gruner ChappyThank you for your note. I did not know The Wachs personally. They were neighbors with my in-laws and whenever I would see them walking I would say Hello. My house is 2k’ to the north of this house.
Sue and Jerry are lovely and
Robin BrusselsSue and Jerry are lovely and very generous people. Too sad the way the news is treated here.
Imagine a world, or place,
Stanley ChappyImagine a world, or place, where an excavator could have placed large boulders on the shoreline to help stop erosion and protect the house from the storm surge... wouldn't that have been a better outcome for both the residents and to help protect Chappy from further destruction ? Why weren't they allowed to put more than sand bags? When will people become smart enough to realize that sand alone can not protect the island from a bad storm surge, rocks(large rocks) are what is needed to combat such a problem. To the people who let this happen, shame on you.
Rock seawall barriers prevent
Danny East ChopRock seawall barriers prevent the full force of the wave from hitting the coast, but they also prevent energy absorption. Rock seawalls must redirect the unabsorbed energy in one of two paths — downward to water’s bottom or sideways to neighboring properties. Either direction can lead to *increased* erosion rates and ultimately make the problem worse.
The Rocks work, if they didn
Stanely ChappyThe Rocks work, if they didn't, you wouldn't see them lining the shores of East Chop, as well as Nantucket. Put a pile of sand on the ground, and a pile of rocks, dump a bucket of water on top, and see which reacts better to being inundated with water. JS Rocks would have prevented the destruction of the home as well as the island. Facts.
Sadly, this property was
MWG EDGSadly, this property was developed after August 10, 1978, and is therefore ineligible for a coastal erosion structure.
This is the face of our new
Tom Engley West TisburyThis is the face of our new reality. For erosion and our work force. Get used to it.
Tom, I agree. What was really
Islander TooTom, I agree. What was really the point of that picture? It added nothing to the actual story.
Whether the crew is standing
Christine Burke TisburyWhether the crew is standing on the house or on the cliff, there is a celebratory feeling transmitted by the photo. Sensitivity toward the family, and, by extension, to Chappy itself, is needed here.
I agree the photo looks like
Jill Good,an ChilmarkI agree the photo looks like a celebration. Sad for the owners who just lost not only a house, but a lot of memories.
The trustees raison d'etre,
allyne schwartz 41 Jeremiah Way ChappyThe trustees raison d'etre, is protection and preservation, yet they should have included a possible "land swap" for the small amount of acreage the Wacks needed to move their home backwards to a safer location. I understood the Trustees refused this request when the original first" Break" occured.
A donation of comparable land , may have been possible , if we, the readents of Chappy, ,had been nade aware of the siuation.
Massachusetts is the only
here we go again edgartownMassachusetts is the only state on the east coast that does not allow the army corps of engineers to do beach 'replinishment, simply pumping sand back where it originated. No different then the continuous dredging of channels, which is regular maintenance. When I grew up here South beach was 100s of feet wide and the bunker was on the beach
Didn’t they try replenishing
Questionable ChilmarkDidn’t they try replenishing Squibby a few years back? My understanding is that, sadly, beach replenishment is almost never a viable long term solution.
It’s amazing what the ocean
Tom Engley West TisburyIt’s amazing what the ocean can do. Over night it can add or subtract sand that would take the army corp 3 months to add or subtract. Ever wonder why on Philbin beach is all rocks in the winter and silky sand in the summer. The rocks stay and the sand shifts. Read the 1960s book These fragile outposts. By Chamberlin.
And the picture was a mistake.
The South Beach is migrating
Joe EdgartownThe South Beach is migrating west and where it is a barrier beach the beach breaks regularly. Big rocks help when a house is built on granites. When it is sand or dirt, the ocean wins. The N.E. coast is series of scoops and points. The points are granite. On MV, we all face this prospect as the seas rise and the storms get worse.
One thing that hasn’t been
Susan Desmarais Oak BluffsOne thing that hasn’t been mentioned. The memories of times spent in that home are contained in the hearts and minds of the family. Nothing can take those away.
I am heartbroken for Jerry
Sue Schindler DallasI am heartbroken for Jerry and Sue. Having spent time there with them and other dear friends I do have lovely memories but wished for them to be able to make many more via a reasonable deal with the Trustees. They were stewards of the land and so generous in sharing the beauty and serenity of the property with others. Instead the Trustees decision was not to help them. The picture of the smiling workers is out of place in this sad story. They may not have known the full story of this demolition but the people who decided to print the picture showed no compassion.
Add new comment