Recent Norton Point breach has contributed to erosion near Wacks house, which was built in 1984.
Ray Ewing

Norton Point Breach Proves Again Nature Is in Charge

The Norton Point breach opened on Dec. 27 and followed a series of storms that had battered the south-facing shore of Martha’s Vineyard. The Chappaquiddick summer home owned by Sue and Jerry Wacks stands as a lonely sentinel by the sea these days.

The Chappaquiddick summer home owned by Sue and Jerry Wacks stands as a lonely sentinel by the sea these days. Perched atop a grassy bluff at the western edge of Wasque Reservation, the house is under siege on all sides by the powerful forces of nature that have shaped this dynamic barrier beach for centuries.

And with the recent breach that opened between the Atlantic Ocean and Katama Bay, those forces are now at full throttle.

On Tuesday afternoon this week, the wind blew hard from the west and the beach just below the parking lot at Wasque was deserted. A short distance to the west, flocks of birds swooped and dove over the ocean side of the breach, as fast-moving currents coursed through the opening into the upper eastern end of Katama Bay.

The Wacks house — unoccupied in the off-season — now has an unenviable front-row seat to it all. Just east of the house, the bluff is badly eroded and collapsing in places. On the west, the waters of the breach eat away the sandy beachfront below the house at a rapid clip. Nearby marshlands are inundated by a flood tide.

“I think the Wacks house is in a difficult position. We’ve been in touch with them about the situation and are having conversations about the future of the house,” said Darci Schofield, Islands portfolio manager for The Trustees of Reservations, speaking to the Gazette by phone this week. “A lot is changing very quickly.”

Contacted by the Gazette through a property caretaker, the Wackses declined to comment.

The Trustees own Wasque, a 200-acre conservation refuge at the southeastern tip of Chappy, as well as Cape Pogue Wildlife Refuge, a roughly 400-acre refuge on the northern tip.

Breaches are breaks that occur naturally in barrier beaches running between two bodies of water.

Breach began on Dec. 27.
Ray Ewing
Breach began on Dec. 27.
Ray Ewing

The Norton Point breach opened on Dec. 27 and followed a series of storms that had battered the south-facing shore of Martha’s Vineyard over Christmastime. Throughout the late fall there had been numerous ocean washovers at Norton Point — a roughly two-mile barrier beach that runs between Mattakeeset Creek on the Edgartown side and Wasque on the Chappy side — but no true breach.

Then in late December that changed.

Compared to the last breach, which occurred during a ferocious three-day gale in April 2007 that affected the entire eastern seaboard, this one appeared to tiptoe in overnight. The opening is in a different location, too; the last breach occurred near the western end of the barrier beach, later migrating slowly to the east before finally closing. That took eight years.

The new breach is on the eastern end, posing fresh questions for beach managers and scientists, including what will happen next.

“Based on what we saw happen in 2015, it will migrate eastward,” said Britt Raubenheimer, a senior scientist in applied ocean physics and engineering at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution who has studied breaches, including the last one at Katama, along with her husband Steve Elgar, also a senior scientist in applied ocean physics and engineering at WHOI.

Both spoke to the Gazette via Zoom from the West Coast this week.

“It’s natural, there’s nothing we can do about it,” Mr. Elgar said, speaking about the breach. “We’ve seen the natural cycle repeat itself. And it will happen again,” he said.

Life on the edge through the years.
Woods Hole Group.
Life on the edge through the years.
Woods Hole Group.

In recent weeks there has been widespread prognostication about when the breach will close. But with waves, tides and wind all variables, it’s difficult to accurately predict how the breach will behave, the two senior scientists said.

“We don’t know how deep it is . . . it might stay open as the spit gets longer,” Ms. Raubenheimer said, referring to the tail-like spit of sand that forms on the eastern side of the opening. “The spit will grow longer and the opening will grow narrower,” she continued. “But this location is different, the bluffs are unprotected so the bluff around the Wacks house is vulnerable . . . each storm is going to eat into that bluff a little more.”

And given the dynamic nature of the area, conditions can change quickly, the scientists said.

“During the last breach we could see it change sometimes a meter in an hour . . . Where it is now, I don’t know how long it will take it to close,” Ms. Raubenheimer said.

“There’s a lot we still don’t understand about these cycles,” she added.

One factor will be the size of the ebb shoal — a shoal of sand that forms on the ocean side of the breach, Ms. Raubenheimer explained. “The waves put the sand back into the opening during a flood tide,” she said.



The rapidly-changing conditions at Norton Point and Wasque come precisely at a time when the landscape is also changing for how the beach will be managed, beginning this spring. Spurred by the town of Edgartown, the Trustees decided late last year to not renew their longstanding contract with the county to manage Norton Point beach. After March 31, the town intends to take over management of the beach, although the details have not been finalized.

It’s even unclear at the moment whether the breach lies on property owned by the Trustees or the county.

“There’s a question about where the boundary line is,” said Cynthia Dittbrenner, director of coast and natural resources for the Trustees. “We will work with Edgartown to figure out who’s responsible, and if work can even be done out there,” she added.

Breaches have become more common in the last decade.
Woods Hole Group
Breaches have become more common in the last decade.
Woods Hole Group

Ms. Dittbrenner underscored the unique nature of the beach.

“Norton Point Beach is one of the most dynamic beaches in all of New England,” she said. “It’s constantly changing.”

And migrating.

A climate change study commissioned by the Trustees with the Woods Hole Group in 2021 mapped the historic northward migration at Norton Point, showing that the beach has migrated 1,500 feet to the north over the past 125 years. That’s a distance greater than the Empire State Building if it was laid on its side, Ms. Dittbrenner said.

The beach is also prime habitat for migratory nesting shorebirds, many of them endangered. Last summer there were 3,000 roseate terns roosting at Norton Point — 80 per cent of the U.S. population for the federally endangered species, according to Ms. Dittbrenner.

Meanwhile, Ms. Schofield said the Trustees have begun planning for summer with the breach in mind.

“Right now we are planning . . . for the breach to be in place,” she said. “We are thinking about new strategies to increase safety for people swimming in Katama Bay, and helping to elevate visitor safety in that area.”

As for the Wacks house, which was built in 1984 according to town assessors records, Mr. Elgar said it’s inevitable that nature will have the upper hand.

“If not this storm, then the next storm, or the next one,” he said. “Eventually it will happen. The Wackses are really nice people, but they built their house on a pile of sand. It’s a good reminder that the Islands were formed by glaciers 10,000 years ago . . . they are all sand. The storms come, and the sand moves around.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/27/2023 - 03:33

Permalink

Resident Chappy

Sell it now while you can and get something before it gets swallowed up. Someone will buy it and move it back.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/27/2023 - 05:41

Permalink

Jim Chappy

Once again The Trustees appear to be tone-deaf or incapable to remember their own history….during the 2007 breach the Wacks repeatedly asked the Trustees for help in securing a bit more land to respond to the changing dynamic and secure their homestead. They were rebuffed. Ms. Schofields comments on how thebTrustees are now reaching out to the Wacks strikes one as incredibly disingenuous. What ideas or potential scenarios are they offering to help these Islanders out?

William Edg.

My reading of the history, the Trustee Lands were purchased by concerned individuals to protect these lands from development from the 50's-70's. Why now, do some feel contracts and donors intentions should be ignored.
You may have an axe with the Trustees, you have no right to take my right to use these lands as they are public.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/27/2023 - 09:03

Permalink

matt child of gay head

The trustees should have made an act of god exception for the Wacks fifteen years ago and let them move house back some...and they still can.They can afford to spare an acre or two.........

Jim Chappy

Great point — 15 years of ignoring and remaining indifferent to this situation — where is the Trustee’ self-acclaimed high science and expertise in proposing a solution or response for this family? Surely in the last 15 years they must have conceived of something that would offer the Wacks a way forward or even a graceful exit strategy?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/27/2023 - 10:31

Permalink

Mike Chappy

I agree that the trustees should allow them to move the house back/provision some land for them and help this great couple save their home. They are the nicest people in the world and love their home and Chappy. This is not what the island stands for! Please help the Wacks save their home. If it was my house, I would have dumped some loads of rocks onto the shoreline to protect it from erosion and would probably do that now if it was me. This is not about letting nature take it's course and saying oh well, it's not my home who cares? They are good, honest people who have helped others with mental issues, who have paid their taxes/fees and have been good islanders. Come on, approve an emergency exception for the Wacks. Trustees should provision some land to them and allow them to move their home back!! Please have some mercy for them as if it was your home!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/27/2023 - 12:51

Permalink

Allyne Schwartz 41 Jeremiah Way Chappy

I too feel the Trustees or whomeve, should donate a small piece of land behind the Wacks' home to enable the home to move to a safer location.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/28/2023 - 03:18

Permalink

David Original settlers of Edgartown descendent

While I certainly empathize with the Wachs, the trustees mission is not to provide land for moving houses inland. It is a sad tale for all the families who own land that is being eroded on the East Coast and around the world. There is a time to weep.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/28/2023 - 07:58

Permalink

Marie Edgartown

Who ever gave a building permit is responsible for helping these people. The house should never have been built. Now what, no need for land that will in time erode. A buy out by the Trustees and the town is the only option. Stop building on sensitive ground. Expensive lesson learned….Trustees are a major joke. Edgartown take back your land and figure out how to manage it…..Egartown has to realize it’s more than a couple of streets downtown and we need to take control of the town and infrastructure. We have some good people in place to start a change in thinking and town culture. Let’s go Egartown, let’s look at the whole town, lots of new jobs and opportunities await for our island people. Start with highway pick up of trash. Our road sides are a mess and the management of signage on businesses is a disgrace. .There must be laws in place for businesses to maintain there properties etc. etc….Step it up Start a town cleanup campaign.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/28/2023 - 12:34

Permalink

Harold Constance Edg.

To everyone saying the trustees should give them land, what about all the houses along stonewall in Chilmark that are falling into the ocean? This isn’t an isolated incident that one act of largess will solve. Think about where you are building/buying or be at peace with the ephemerality of it all.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 01/28/2023 - 15:26

Permalink

Chappy type

When the house was build 40 years ago it was a quarter of a mile from water with large sand dunes in front.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 01/29/2023 - 07:57

Permalink

here we go again edg

Why do not we avail ourselves of the army corps of engineers for beach replenishment? All over the east coast this is done, except here. Just like doing dredging, its a reality that must be dealt with. As a child I remember a nice wide south beach, with the bunker above the sand. Any day atlantic drive will be washed away

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/30/2023 - 19:50

Permalink

Elliott Edgartown

One good deed deserves another!When the Wacks' built the house in 1984 they were 500 yards from the beach. As a neighborly gesture of good will they allowed the trustees access to part of their land for a road to Norton's Point.The trustees benefited handsomely as they collected OSV permit and pedestian fees for decades.What is more gracious than the Wacks giving residents and tourists access to our beautiful beaches? To think that the trustees turned their back on a neighbor in need shows that they don't care equally for people as they do for plovers. I ask that you imagine walking in the Wack's shoes for a moment. As the saying goes: "No man is an island."

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/31/2023 - 00:34

Permalink

Reid Far away

Laughing at the first world problem of nature vrs beach front summer home. I give you the vineyard in a clam shell.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/31/2023 - 08:44

Permalink

Lorraine Edgartown

It is a mystery to me how these types of properties can get Homeowners Insurance, unless they don't.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 02/01/2023 - 08:26

Permalink

Jim Chappy

Its encouraging to see amid the outcry of people proclaiming the sanctity of public lands and the danger of setting precedents that some sense and sensibility emerges and hopefully will prevail. The Wacks are long established Chappaquiddickers and as such Islanders. They have been gracious in their allowances over the years to the Trustees and to many many other Islanders and visitors. They are in need. They need a rescue. On this Island time and time again that rescue almost always comes from your neighbors. It’s high time the Trustees can demonstrate some initiative and capability to think, talk, and most importantly act like a good neighbor. What are the Trustees proposing to help out this neighbor in need?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 02/01/2023 - 12:24

Permalink

Peggy Walbridge summer in chilmark

When my parents bought their land in Chilmark in the early 1950's, they half-jokingly half-seriously said that the land would be beach front property in their grandchildren' lifetimes. It hasn't happened yet but it will. It is the nature of the land and the sea.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.