Teachers demonstrated at the Tisbury School Thursday afternoon, as contract talks grow tense.
Ray Ewing

Richie Smith Named Next School Superintendent

The newly appointed superintendent of Martha’s Vineyard schools will have a full plate when he begins work July 1.

With contract talks with teachers headed to arbitration and a legal battle looming over the high school playing fields, the newly appointed superintendent of Martha’s Vineyard schools will have a full plate when he begins work July 1.

But Richie Smith appeared eager for the challenge Thursday as the all-Island school committee voted 11-3 to appoint him to succeed Dr. Matthew D’Andrea, who is resigning to take the superintendent’s job in Wareham.

“My intention would be working hand in hand with the school committee. It’s going to take all of us to really move to succeed,” Mr. Smith said, adding that he would like to make some changes at the district’s central office — including leaving his current position as assistant superintendent unfilled.

“Being a superintendent allows you to be visionary,” he told the committee. “Part of the vision would be to slow down on filling the position that I would vacate, and really consider a restructuring of the central office . . . based on principals’ and school needs.”

The committee’s vote ends the need to form a search committee for Mr. D’Andrea’s replacement. Earlier, the committee had voted 7-5 to make Mr. Smith the acting superintendent, but he declined to take the job on an interim basis.

While assistant superintendents are optional, state law prohibits school districts from operating without a superintendent in place.

The former principal of the Oak Bluffs School, Mr. Smith had been a finalist for superintendent in 2015 when Mr. D’Andrea, then assistant superintendent, was given the top job. Shortly after his appointment, Mr. D’Andrea brought Mr. Smith on as assistant superintendent.

Mr. Smith’s two-year appointment is subject to contract negotiations, and the committee said it would evaluate his performance at the end of one year.

“He has a leg up,” said Amy Houghton, who chairs the personnel subcommittee, and was among those who voted in favor of his appointment. Others committee members voting in favor were Roxane Ackerman, Jen Cutrer, Kate DeVane, Robert Lionette, Rizwan Malik, Kris O’Brien, Alex Salop, Laura Seguin, Kathryn Shertzer and Mike Watts.

Voting against his appointment were Kimberly Kirk, Louis Paciello and Skipper Manter.

Following the vote, chairwoman Kate DeVane told the school committee that contract negotiations with the teachers union have come to a standstill with state arbitration the only way forward.

Members of the Martha’s Vineyard Educators Association, a local chapter of the Massachusetts Teachers Association, held signs and protested at the start and end of the school day Thursday after rejecting the latest of three offers from the district.

“We have reached an impasse, which we tried to get by three times,” Ms. DeVane told the committee during an hour-long Zoom meeting that drew more than 120 participants early Thursday evening.

“We’ve tried really hard. They’ve tried really hard. We’re now moving to the first step of arbitration, which is called fact finding,” she said.

Teachers and a negotiating committee made up of representatives from the all-Island committee have been in talks over a new three-year contract for Island teachers.

Mike Watts, who with Ms. DeVane represented the district in negotiations, said despite two rounds of state mediation, the two sides have been unable to agree on the annual percentage rate of raises for teachers

The district’s proposed compensation package relies on other factors as well, including longevity and education levels, Mr. Watts said.

“There’s a larger compensation piece that’s connected,” he told committee members.

Ms. DeVane said she would have more information on the fact-finding phase of arbitration next week.

“We are in this impossible position,” she said.

“We understand that it has been incredibly hard for teachers over the last two years. We also understand that they do amazing work every day . . . We don’t relish this,” she continued. “It’s just that we also have a responsibility to the people who have jobs at the supermarket, and the [teaching assistants] and the custodians and the food service workers, and we have a responsibility to taxpayers — that’s really our job,” she said.

“This is our fiduciary duty to the towns we represent, and it’s very, very hard.”

The task became even more complicated this week with a new agreement among all six Island towns that the high school budget increase by no more than 2.5 per cent each year, or seek voter approval to go above that threshold.

The discussion was scheduled to be held in executive session, but Mr. Manter and Ms. Houghton urged that the meeting take place in public.

Ms. Houghton argued that the labor dispute had already become a public matter with the morning demonstrations by teachers.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/03/2022 - 08:24

Permalink

Susan Desmarais Oak Bluffs

This is a bad look school committee, you’ll quickly decide to spend significant money on lawyers to litigate a field but won’t pay teachers? Not ok.

Islander61 OB

Please note, it is the All Island School Committee who negotiates teacher contracts, not the High School School Committee. The High School School Committee has every right, and should, appeal the planning board decision. It is clear to many of us islanders who support the field project that the bias against the field project superseded the science. The science, which the planning board was required to follow, said this project will not "poison" the aquifer but it seams they ignored the testing results and testimony by the experts who they paid and said the field will be safe. If they were going to ignore that science because they didn't like the result, why did they require all this testing to be done? That was a waste of money then, why didn't you object to that? I, however, do agree with you on one point, we do need to pay the teachers appropriate wages but please don't link teacher pay with the field project, they are not the same thing and are not negotiated by the same elected officials.

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

Exactly! Millions to spend on lawyers but can’t even raise wages above inflation rate? Shows their claims of lack of funds are complete BS! Just wait until we see the compensation contract for the new superintendent

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/03/2022 - 09:18

Permalink

mike Somewhere

Congratulations to Mr. Smith.
Someone who knows the system here, and still wants the job.
Kudo's to you Ritchie, and thank you.
Next note: I did not see what the percentage requested and offered for Teacher compensation negotiations. Or the current salary range. We all know its expensive to live here. Are teachers making a living wage here?

Rational Person Oak Bluffs

$108K a year for working 30 hours a week 40 weeks a year is not a bad start to a "living wage". Especially when you include the awesome benefits including great medical, dental and pension. If a teacher anticipates being able to live here working only one job then they are sorely misguided. They, more than most, have ample time to augment their compensation by working a second job at night, on weekends and during the summer.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/03/2022 - 11:07

Permalink

Ken Edg.

We were lucky someone was here to replace the super. I think since 2008 the only ones able to buy houses here are investers.Decades ago there was housing at the airport, we should build more there.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/03/2022 - 11:19

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

If we want a fair conservation about the issue tell us what the current teachers make and their benefits. And then what they are asking for. It seems the press is never open and honest and print this or the teachers do not want us to see. Sometimes we see the entry level pay but never how many actually make that and we never see the upper end and how many are there. Word on the street is many of these teachers make over $80K for working part of the year. Pre school teachers are under paid not sure high school teachers are. But everyone always wants more of tax payer money. The high school is ranked #165 in the state.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 06/06/2022 - 19:13

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Bruce EDGARTOWN

Bob, the state average is around $80,000. The current Island average is a little over $98,000 per year.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/03/2022 - 12:02

Permalink

Janet packer Tisbury

Congratulations to Richie Smith on becoming our next superintendent! As the new head of our school districts I wish you nothing but the best. These are tumultuous times on MV. Your knowledge of our towns and leadership skills already on display at last night AISC meeting. Your thoughtful approach to restructuring central office is timely. Your idea to listen to school districts and their needs and utilize central office to work with them is inspiring. It’s time for you to shine as all our school districts leader!!! So shine away !!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/04/2022 - 01:54

Permalink

Sara Dario Tisbury

I look forward to Ritchie’s diplomatic and decisive professional leadership. I know he will solve the blatant problems facing our students. Congratulations

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/04/2022 - 08:52

Permalink

Schools Out Tisbury

Any quotes available from Kirk, Paciello and Manter as to why they voted "NO" for the new superintendent?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/04/2022 - 12:25

Permalink

TRIP BARNES VINEYARD HAVEN

WOW!! GOOD LUCK RITCHIE...LETS PUT 2 FLOORS OF APARTMENTS ON TOP OF THE NEW SCHOOL TO RENT TO HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS OR DORMITORY STYLE ROOMS AND THEY CAN EAT IN THE SCHOOL KITCHEN BETTER THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX..CHANGE ZONING TO FIT AND BUILD A SEWER PLANT

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/04/2022 - 21:27

Permalink

Incompatible Phil

I know the opinions of know-it-all commenters on a newspaper website are worth as much as you pay for them, but I just have to say something about that batch of misinformation from "Rational person" above: almost every single they said is factually incorrect (there's one exception, the "awesome . . . pension" is pretty much true - it's a traditional pension plan, and that's a thing of the past for most Americans, for sure). I'd like to see the teacher who works 30 hours a week for 40 weeks a year, just so I can ask them how they've managed to do it. Cool trick! More seriously though, the whole teacher's contract (complete with the pay scale, which people are so darn interested in) is a public document, easily found with a little googling. Why not start with real facts, instead of just making stuff up?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 05:45

Permalink

Frederick Rundlet Tisbury, MA

For the benefit to enhance our kid's educational experience and to maximize individual student performance we should have a Middle School on the high school campus! Now is the time to seriously consider this as the high school is considering major renovation. This would also then reduce the present elementary school population by 25% allowing for future growth and negating the need for more costly expansion. Will the new administrator support this approach as most communities have done for years?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 08:10

Permalink

DAJ Oak Bluffs

I understand why there are times when two parties ( in this case the Teachers Union and the School Committee) may disagree and seek outside arbitration to help resolve a matter. Totally understandable. However - the photo of a teacher walking in front of the school carrying a sign only serves to dig the hole deeper and wider. Union teachers - arbitrate, debate, argue if you must but please consider keeping our students away from the public display of disunity. In juxtaposition read the article on the graduation of the Charter School where kindness and a focus on the students was paramount. When teachers unions start parading signs in front of schools nothing good comes of it. Students view it as another squabble between the adults that are suppose to teach them tolerance and an approach to solving disagreements. Signs and parading are intended to humiliate one party to the disagreement which is not a useful path to an agreement nor a lesson to young people. Go to arbitration - solve the matter of dispute- and move forward. Unions need to move beyond the shame and blame tactics long employed and adopt new approaches to resolve disagreements; approaches that we would all want to have our children emulate. Teacher in the photo - please put your sign away and support your colleagues through a quiet and dignified process of arbitration.

Peter Palches Oak Bluffs

Kids learn by watching adults. In this case kids are watching their teachers stand up for themselves and their families. I like it. This is the real world. It will not help children to hide them from the realities of labor negotiations. For a parent, and I'm assuming DAJ is a parent, this picketing teacher is offering a here-and-now family learning opportunity.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 09:51

Permalink

Inde West tisbury

It’s rare that a teacher works just 30 hrs in a week, but everyone loves to point them out. Many teachers work 60+ hours! (Grading, prep, after school activities). I personally would support significantly higher pay with an easier path to getting rid of a teacher who everyone knows is not (or is no longer?) doing an adequate job. But I suppose unions won’t let that happen. Too bad for the great teachers out there, who will continue to be dragged down by those very rare 30 hour a week ones. Great teachers are the best of the best of all human beings as far as I am concerned.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 15:12

Permalink

Resident Edgartown

Would everyone please just THINK about the work teachers do ….and forget it’s “only” ten months. In those ten months they are responsible for many students…children!! Each and everyone is an individual with all kinds of personalities, issues, strengths, weaknesses and levels of learnig. So, each one gets the attention they need through that teacher. Five days a week for eight hours, one teacher is responsible for her class. They take work home. They have many meetings. They have conferences with parents….sometimes very contentious ones. Their role is multi- faceted in so many ways. They have state standards to go by. Etc, etc, etc. How can anyone deny them a salary that is commensurate with their profession? If they worked in a corporation their salary would be rwice what it is. They are due this pay raise

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 18:00

Permalink

Lynn Ditchfield Edgartown

It is a wonderful thing to celebrate Richie Smith as Superintendent. He will lead with integrity in the caring way he has always displayed in his long history of service to MV schools.
As far as the misconceptions about teachers stated in some of these comments, I will write a letter to the editor to try to debunk myths.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/07/2022 - 20:31

Permalink

Tisbury resident VH

Where is the support for teachers that everyone gushed about the past two years?
Meanwhile, the school committee is willing to spend monies on fighting legal battles, and on a building that is already behind schedule and over budget.
Tisbury students can’t even use drinking fountains due to LEAD in the water. Perhaps the School Committee could expend their energy on addressing that instead?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.