Old whaling captain home in Edgartown.
Tim Johnson

MVC Policy Emphasizes Historic Preservation

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission has adopted a new demolition policy for historic buildings as it rethinks its role in preserving the diverse architecture of the Island.

The Martha’s Vineyard Commission has adopted a new demolition policy for historic buildings as it rethinks its role in preserving the diverse architecture that is a hallmark of the Island’s history.

“It is the commission’s policy that historic buildings on Martha’s Vineyard should be preserved to the greatest extent possible, and that demolition should be considered only as an extreme last resort,” the policy reads in part.

Adopted last Thursday night, the new policy is the work of an eight-member commission subcommittee and has been under discussion for months. In the past year the MVC has seen a flood demolition requests, reviewing six requests alone in the past six month with varying outcomes. A hearing is set for next month on another demolition request at 7 Arlington avenue in Oak Bluffs.

An inventory done by the policy subcommittee found that roughly 60 per cent of historic buildings lie outside designated historic districts, and are not subject to review by town historic commissions.

Commission review is required for buildings that are 100 years old or listed in MACRIS, the state database of historic buildings.

“We are taking the premise that all buildings, no matter what condition, can be rehabilitated,” said commissioner Michael Kim, who served on the subcommittee that developed the policy.

The policy asks applicants to consider five alternatives to demolition, which include preserving, rehabilitating, restoring, relocating or rebuilding the existing structure. Demolition will be considered only once all alternatives are exhausted. Ideally multiple alternatives would be proposed, said commissioner Fred Hancock, who gave a presentation on the policy.

“A solution in many cases would involve parts of all four solutions, perhaps maybe even all five. It doesn’t have to be a single solution,” Mr. Hancock said.

A small language change in the policy speaks to the overall goal, Mr. Hancock said. Previously, applications were called demolitions, while now they are called demolitions and alterations.

“Our preference is for people not to demolish, but to try these alternatives,” Mr. Hancock said.

The policy also gives the commission the option to seek the advice of independent experts to peer review any part of a proposal.

“[It is] so that we’re not just relying on the applicant’s testimony about the physical condition of the structure,” Mr. Hancock said.

A scoring system will help commissioners evaluate the historical significance of the building. Factors for consideration include the building’s age, condition, historic designation and association with important people or events. A higher score means the building is historically significant, but scores will not be tallied as part of the commission’s decision, Mr. Hancock said. Instead they are meant to be a tool to help guide thinking.

“It’s not a hard and fast rule, but I think it’s helpful to have some idea where a project falls on this sort of continuum,” Mr. Hancock said.

There have been recent instances where historic buildings have been demolished without MVC approval, which Mr. Hancock chalked up to a lack of awareness on the part of town architects and building inspectors. The commission plans to host information sessions with Island building inspectors, architects and real estate agents to educate and create awareness about the new policy.

“It’s not demolition. It’s preservation that the commission cares about,” commissioner Christina Brown said.

The vote to adopt the policy was 13-1 with one abstention. Commissioner Brian Smith voted against the policy while commissioner Trip Barnes abstained. Commissioners Kate Putnam and Joan Malkin were not present for the vote.

In other business Thursday, commissioners closed a public hearing on a proposal from Main Street Medicinals to convert a former auto repair shop into a marijuana dispensary on Mechanic’s Street in Vineyard Haven. As with the first public hearing, traffic continued to be a point of discussion.

The commission also continued to another session a public hearing on the proposed redevelopment and expansion of the former Edu Comp building in Vineyard Haven. Developer Xerxes Agassi wants to convert the distinctive red brick building at the head of Main street into residential condominiums and some commercial space. Revisions discussed last week centered on landscaping, parking and draft lease arrangements for renting the apartments to Vineyard Wind and the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital.

In his report to commissioners at the start of the meeting, executive director Adam Turner praised climate change planner Liz Durkee for her work leading the climate action week activities around the Island.

He also said there are currently 30 active applications for developments of regional impact (DRI) in various stages of review.

“It’s a very busy time,” Mr. Turner said.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/16/2022 - 07:52

Permalink

here we go again edg

Just flexing their muscles. The MVC was created to stop over-development. Each town has residents on their boards and historical commissions (as we do in Edg) that can make proper decisions on what is appropriate for that town's architecture and character. Very soon every home will be subject to this over-reach, and many old homes here belong in a dumpster.

Jeff Morrissey Vernon,CT

Some newer ones also. Every time I drive down Cooke St by and look across from the cemetary to where a small historically significant cottage once stood in the history of Black History in Edgartown I can't help but think that its place in time is lost forever. It was a beautifully restored cottage, inside and out, far from the end of its life. Oh well. Money talks, History walks. At least there is a Historical Society.....until someone buys that.

Lorraine Edgartown

Jeff, indeed. Also, one of the oldest structures, Cooke St, was the barn that was torn down with no regard to the history of the village. In addition, we are supplanting native plant species with the constant planting of arbor vitae, which enables a go around for fence height. It appears that picking and choosing is the practice of preservation in the village.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/16/2022 - 08:44

Permalink

Thomas Hodgson WT

"TRAFFIC!"
That concern is too often no more than a smokescreen, and seems to be what "antis" go to say when what their real reason is only "I don't like it."

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/19/2022 - 18:58

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Christopher Lyons West Tisbury

Impossible for traffic to get worse there… lame excuse…
Been using that excuse for years over many different business ideas.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/16/2022 - 10:08

Permalink

Pam Edgartown

I hope this happens… because the way it is now you can hire an Island Architect and do whatever you want… pay a small token fine…
And call in the wrecking ball…

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/17/2022 - 09:18

Permalink

JG OB

This is good news, and I hope that the commission will follow through to stop the acceleration of demolitions. The number of old, and sometimes modest houses is what makes MV the unique place that it is, and the reason why people love it. Every demolition is a degradation of the historic fabric of the Island, especially when the result is a new, mega sized trophy house. For people who want to build for the maximum square footage possible, there are always many options, the East end of Long Island comes to mind, where this type of development is welcome. Again, I applaud the Commission for finally taking this step, and I can only hope that it will help to keep the character that defines MV intact.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/17/2022 - 09:58

Permalink

Carol Oak Bluffs/NYC

One marijuana dispensary on Island is enough. It is a small island. Plan your week/do your chores. Not everyone wants to see this. We do not need more liquor stores, nor vape stores or cigarette sales.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/17/2022 - 17:22

Permalink

Johanna Hynes

Would love to see historic heritage trees given similar consideration - would be a nice way to preserve the natural beauty and texture of the island’s unique landscape.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/20/2022 - 10:21

Permalink

beatrice Boston

I suggest that MVC contact Boston Preservation aiance re demolition delays and other measures to protect historic resources

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/02/2022 - 11:28

Permalink

LWS OB/MD

Every old MV house does not have historical significance. Many are also out of code and have become dangerous for their inhabitants, enjoyable as they are for the dog walking public and tourists. Unfortunately, some of us actually live in these structures!

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.