The Oak Bluffs planning board took final comments Thursday night on the proposed turf field project and will deliberate and potentially vote at a meeting next Wednesday.
The Oak Bluffs planning board took final comments Thursday night on the proposed turf field project at the regional high school and will deliberate and potentially vote at a meeting next Wednesday.
Representatives for the regional high school made a final presentation Thursday, with Steven LaRosa from the engineering firm Weston and Sampson speaking on behalf of the school.
“You really have gone to great lengths to evaluate what the components are of your turf field and what the potential effects would be,” he said.
Mr. LaRosa cited Tetra Tech materials testing done by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission during its review, and a conclusion that the proposed turf field would propose no significant PFAS risk.
“Weston and Sampson agrees with Tetra Tech’s conclusions,” he said. Phase one of the project has been before the planning board since February for a special permit as the proposed turf field is located in the Oak Bluffs water resource protection overlay district. Opponents of the project have pushed for a grass field as a preferable alternative, arguing that water contamination from PFAS in the turf field is a significant risk.
Mr. LaRosa conceded that trace amounts of PFAS have been found in materials for the turf field, but argued they don’t exceed baseline levels present in the environment.
“Unfortunately these compounds are ubiquitous,” he said.
Weston and Sampson toxicologist Marie Rudiman further argued that the presence of a chemical does not necessarily pose a threat.
“The basic principle of toxicology is that the mere presence of a chemical does not constitute a health risk,” she said.
The planning board decided to continue the hearing in advance of its regularly scheduled meeting to next Wednesday at 5 p.m., when they plan to deliberate and potentially vote on the special permit.
“I would prefer not to wait until the next scheduled meeting,” board chairman Ewell Hopkins said.

Comments
Does anybody really care? it
Sam EdgartownDoes anybody really care? it should be left up to the coaches and players decide.
Acres of existing grass
Johanna HAcres of existing grass fields act as a carbon sink - a community asset that mitigates against the negative impacts of climate change. Destroying real grass and soil and replacing it with fake plastic carpet that can never be recycled is a disservice to everyone - athletes and coaches included. And this whole notion that fake plastic grass is better is a bunch of BS. In order to get the 2026 World Cup to consider playing at Gillette Stadium Bob Kraft has agreed to rip out the artificial turf field and replace with REAL grass because that’s what professional athletes want.
Add new comment