Plan to overhaul main athletic field at the high school remains mired in debate, while planning funds run out.
Ray Ewing

Track and Field Review Drains High School Funds

The regional high school has run out of money for planning and design work on the new track and field at the school, after an exhaustive review by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission.

The regional high school has run out of money for planning and design work on the new track and field at the school, after an exhaustive review by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission last year drained the funds, school leaders said.

At a meeting of the regional high school district committee Monday night, finance manager Mark Friedman reported that the initial planning and design fund of $350,000 for the track and field project is down to less than $5,000.

The MVC approved the project as a development of regional impact (DRI) in August, after a public hearing process that stretched on for months, requiring expert testimony and additional work by consultants. The architect for the project is Chris Huntress of Huntress Designs. The project is now under review at the local level, with a special permit application pending in front of the Oak Bluffs planning board.

On Monday high school committee member Kris O’Brien said more funds are needed to get the regulatory review to the finish line.

“After the most exhaustive review in the history of the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, we’ve exhausted our resources,” said Ms. O’Brien, who moved to transfer $66,200 from surplus funds to keep the project on track.

The $7 million project is phase one of an $11 million overhaul of the athletic field complex. Money for construction is planned to come from private donors, but the $350,000 planning and design phase has been funded by taxpayers using surplus funds from the high school budget. The funding was approved by Island voters at town meetings more than two years ago.

But the project has become deeply bogged down in bitter debate over the plan to rebuild the main playing field using artificial turf.

More debate and complications cropped up recently when the Oak Bluffs board of health began discussing a possible ban on artificial turf in town out of concern over PFAS chemicals. Deliberations on the proposed ban are expected to continue this month.

At the meeting Monday night school committee members split along up-Island down-Island lines over whether to approve the added funding.

“This is not what the contingency fund was created for,” said committee member Skip Manter from West Tisbury.

But committee chairman Amy Houghton argued that the $66,200 expense is within the scope of the contract with designers for the project.

Ms. Houghton also said whatever the outcome at the board of health, the school will still need a special permit from the planning board to build the track.

“Regardless of where things end up for the Oak Bluffs board of health . . . we have to put this up for the track itself,” she said.

Attempts by some committee members to steer discussion into debate over synthetic turf were shot down by Ms. Houghton, who suggested members call for the topic to be added to a future meeting if they wish to discuss it.

Ms. O’Brien agreed.

“This isn’t about whether there’s a grass infield or a synthetic infield,” she said. “We need to get the kids a track.”

In the end the committee voted to approve the $66,200 transfer. Mr. Manter and committee members Roxanne Ackerman and Robert Lionette from Aquinnah and Chilmark voted no.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/05/2022 - 09:49

Permalink

Bob Edgartown

Fantasy island again shows how out of touch we are in reality. We are finding the true cost of trying to live a Utopian dream all at the taxpayers expense. It seems none of these groups and the various boards have real concern over how taxpayer money is wasted as they know it’s a bottomless pit and we can always get more. Someday that will not be the case.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/05/2022 - 20:53

Permalink

Susan Desmarais Oak Bluffs

As a taxpayer in Oak Bluffs I ask our board of select persons to take a stand against using public money out of the school budget towards a project that has been described as funded by private donors. I’m talking about the track and field project at the high school. The sheer amount of dodgy language, half promises and lack of financial transparency coming from the superintendents office is absurd. If the supposed donors who are backing this project are so committed that will write seven figure checks why aren’t they involved in this aspect of the project?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/06/2022 - 12:16

Permalink

Schools Out Vineyard Haven

Let's just be honest. Most adults don't want the current playing fields for our kids. Suspend all team sports played on the current fields until something safe replaces them. Maybe taking outdoor sports away will get a final decision, one way or the other. And it will save a lot of money in the meantime.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/06/2022 - 15:33

Permalink

Islander61 OB

As an Oak Bluffs taxpayer I suggest that the town approve this project without further testing or permitting, as it has been tested to death. The monstrosity that is going up on the VH harbor will dump more into the water than this project ever will and that went through with NO testing of any materials. The results of said testing by the experts who did the testing have all reported that this project is safe. The naysayers have done NO testing on THESE materials but they say that they aren’t safe. They bring up PFAS as if they are pouring them into the ground, that’s been proven not the case. Test the material the Town poured around Sunset Lake. Those containers said poison right on them but they were used anyway. The naysayers have driven the costs up not the school. The naysayers are hoping that if they drive the costs up high enough they’ll stop the project. Don’t let that happen. Get it done.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 01/06/2022 - 16:43

Permalink

Really?! Tisbury

Banging the same false drum is getting tiring. All the minutes are available for voting related to this project by the school committee. Why don’t you ask for them and read them before making these claims. Why do you keep claiming something is amiss. Back it up with evidence. Bang bang bang goes the drum! But nothing of substance. I read the response to the records request on the field fund website. I guess you are saying that the legal counsel for the school system is lying? That must be your conclusion. Good thing they don’t waste their energy on defamation suits over people who don’t like the answer they received and still stay in attack mode. Too bad, as those suits would be good reading!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/07/2022 - 14:51

Permalink

OB Lilly Oak BLUFFS

I’m starting to think that there are only three reasons why certain people join committees these days. To either hear themselves speak and feel self important and to align themselves with certain people with the hope of it being beneficial somehow. The fact that that amount of money was wasted is actually the problem beyond the field. Since the field is such an issue then we should ban all plastic containers all together on this island because lord knows we could have made our own field with the amount of plastic that’s been disposed of and sits in the sun for who knows how long.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.