After failing to get off the runway two years ago, the Martha’s Vineyard Airport has filed a scaled-down capital improvement plan with the state and Federal Aviation Administration.
After failing to get off the runway two years ago, the Martha’s Vineyard Airport has filed a scaled-down capital improvement plan with the state and Federal Aviation Administration that includes far fewer parking spots but a slate of other significant renovation projects in response to shifting airport demand and use.
Still in its early stages and phased over the next decade, the $40 million plan focuses on the leasing of two new hangars, runway reconstruction, a terminal renovation and expansion, airplane parking and the installation of a right turn lane onto the Edgartown-West Tisbury Road to alleviate traffic congestion.
A 450-page final environmental impact report was submitted to the state Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs and the FAA in May of this year, with a public comment period ending July 9. All projects still need approval and funding.
“None of the projects are proposed to increase or change the number, kinds, or flight patterns of aircraft using the airport,” a statement on the Martha’s Vineyard Airport website says.
The latest in a string of early-concept airport redevelopment proposals, the recent capital plan comes after the airport filed an environmental notification form in 2019 that proposed conceptual-level projects to double the airport terminal size, as well as the possible siting of 530 additional parking spaces at the facility, among other improvements.
But that plan never took off, facing public criticism about the expansion given a long-term, downward trend in airport traffic over the past two decades. Former airport director Ann Richart, who aggressively pursued funding for the projects, retired in 2020.
Under new leadership, the airport has significantly downsized the capital improvement plan, proposing about 500 fewer parking spots and limiting the proposed terminal building expansion to 9,000 additional square feet. The plan focuses on air-side redevelopments that include two new hangars, expanded aircraft parking and a runway rebuild.
At a recent meeting, Dukes County commissioners also cleared the way for a $6.8 million low-interest loan application to renovate the aging wastewater facility that services the airport and business park — a crucial part of any redevelopment plan.
A March letter to state Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs Kathleen Theoharides said the plan changes were partly a response to significant public concern in 2019 that the projects intended to expand airport operations to accommodate an increased number of flights and passengers.
In an interview, airport director Geoff Freeman, who was hired in 2020, said the new concept plans responded to broader changes in airport use and demand.
In airport terminology, enplanements refers to the number of passengers boarding flights, while operations refers to the number of distinct aircraft takeoffs or landings.
While the number of planes landing at the airport has nosedived since the late 20th century, from approximately 40,000 to 50,000 operations in the 1990s to current numbers in the mid-30,000s, the number of passengers arriving has remained steady at around 50,000 annual enplanements — about 10 per cent of all ferry-based Vineyard arrivals and departures.
Mr. Freeman said he doesn’t expect that number to grow significantly. In fact, he said that July 2021 operations numbers were down seven per cent from the same month in 2019.
“That will definitely cause pause to people, because obviously we’ve been very busy here,” Mr. Freeman said. “But the dynamics within those numbers have changed. We’re seeing fewer smaller, piston-type aircraft, and an uptick in the number of turbine and jet operations.”
The increased jet presence, as well as a requirement by the FAA for airports to create additional revenue sources, have prompted the need for the airport to improve access to its fuel farm, as well as release land for the private development of two hangars, according to the FAA filing. The hangars would be 9,200 and 15,234 square feet.
“There is a need for hangars, like garages for a home for a vehicle,” Mr. Freeman said. He also said jet fuel is one of the airport’s largest income sources during the summer, particularly in recent years. “Fuel sales have been on an uptick this season,” Mr. Freeman said.
And while operations have decreased overall, Mr. Freeman explained, the transition from a larger number of smaller planes to a smaller number of larger planes has meant that more passengers are arriving at the airport at the same time, straining terminal facilities during peak summer months, when the airport handles passenger overflow with a tent.
Built in 1999 — just prior to the creation of the TSA in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks — the airport terminal is currently 13,000 square feet and was not designed to accommodate modern security, baggage claim and waiting area facilities, according to Mr. Freeman.
The proposed renovation and expansion would add 9,000 square feet to the rear of the building for baggage facilities, security and waiting areas. The building’s exterior would not be significantly altered.
“We’re not going to be enlarging this building to accommodate more passengers. It’s just to really be able to facilitate a smooth operation for the passengers that we are experiencing now,” Mr. Freeman said.
According to the phased plan, improvements to the fuel farm and hangar additions could start as early as 2022, pending regulatory approvals and funding, with runway reconstruction occurring in 2023. The terminal building renovation is not slated until 2028 — two years after the airport is scheduled to begin an update to its master plan.
The final aspects of the capital improvement, scheduled preliminarily for 2029 and 2030, include an additional 47 aircraft parking spaces and traffic improvements to the airport’s access road that intersects with the state-owned Edgartown-West Tisbury Road — an area that has seen considerable recent congestion as Island traffic increases more broadly. The airport has stationed a traffic officer at the intersection for peak times this summer.
While a roundabout would have the greatest impact on traffic, the filing states, it would also be the most expensive alternative. A dedicated right turn lane out of the access road was deemed more appropriate, considering its cost effectiveness.
“We’re looking . . . for an investment to fix an issue that runs maybe two months, to two and a half months, out of the year,” Mr. Freeman said. “But we’re constantly evaluating these processes . . . and we’ll be evaluating a lot of these issues once again.”
He emphasized that aspects of the plan remain preliminary and will only come to fruition depending on need and funding. And he noted that there were lessons learned from the 2019 capital improvement plan.
“What we did in our last public review was look at what we needed in a very simplistic, responsible manner,” Mr. Freeman said. “We don’t need a large terminal. But we need something that can adapt easily to the summer months.”

Comments
If the Steamship Authority
Schools Out Oak BluffsIf the Steamship Authority proposed this it would easily balloon to $100 million by the time it was done.
Please say no to any airport
Jim S EdgPlease say no to any airport expansion, this island is being overrun with people and rapid development, and accommodating the jet setting crowd, especially with the proliferation of private jets, only damages our island, its ecosystems and its culture.
People don't come here for
just a thought edgPeople don't come here for the airport. Its not like some rich family says 'lets go visit a nice new airport'. It simply allows the airport to operate more efficiently.
You missed my point entirely.
Jim S EdgYou missed my point entirely. Back in the 70s we had a movement to ban all jet traffic to mv. Think of what sort of message that would have sent to people who would rather see the vineyard turn into the Hampton’s. By making that type of travel here less convenient, we would be left with only the people who really care about this place, who understand that the remote natural beauty here is a huge part of what makes this place special.
Jim i remember those bumper
just a thought edgJim i remember those bumper stickers. Unfortunately MVY is part of the national airspace system, fully funded by its own operations and FAA user taxes on tickets and fuel. Part of the deal is to protect the United States from each local jurisdiction having their politicians impose rules that contradict a federal system. It would be like a local municipality putting a 25 mph zone on the mass pike. People are coming here and this project is NOT going to attract any further air traffic. People are coming whether they have a new terminal or no terminal. If there are more parking spaces that would allow travelers to come and park vs having someone drop them off and pick them up, thus saving a few trips which equals less traffic on the road. And to your comment about those who 'really care about this place'.... I can assure you those who have the means to travel by private jet are those who are the most generous with their wallets when it comes time to fund the various charities here. Don't worry nobody comes here for the airport. (or any airport)
Jim, I agree with you
Molly WTJim, I agree with you absolutely.
A right turn lane out of the
Bob EdgartownA right turn lane out of the airport is long overdue and no study is needed just do it. A roundabout at Barns and Edgartown-West Tisbury road is needed and long over due get started on design. And last add an entrance to the airport off Barns road and we will have fixed the summer nightmare of traffic in this area. As well as reducing the carbon footprint of all the cars waiting to move with the ac on.
I actually agree with you,
T Bone Oak BluffsI actually agree with you, Bob, on all 3 recommendations.
Brilliant…yes please!
Kristen KatamaBrilliant…yes please!
We have way way way way too
TisKid VHWe have way way way way too many people on this island already. It's not just the traffic or the super markets that can't keep their shelves stocked. It's not just the septic and sewers. Or the hospital situation (multiple hours wait in the ER). It's not that we have trash everywhere and significant numbers of homeless in the woods. It's not the constant sirens if you're near emergency buildings. It's all of this combined and our water shed. Please don't expand. Contract. Too many. Way too many.
Well said……Stop the madness…
Marie EdgartownWell said……Stop the madness….Think infrastructure, not dollars first.
Yes yes yes.
Molly WTYes yes yes.
Then stop building houses.
MarieThen stop building houses. Limit commercial building. The number of homeowners has increased and we all want/need the associated amenities
You can’t have it both ways.
“None of the projects are
Thomas Hodgson WT“None of the projects are proposed to increase or change the number, kinds, or flight patterns of aircraft using the airport,” a statement on the Martha’s Vineyard Airport website says.
Then why spend forty million dollars?
Remember when the SSA got their second slip in VH by promising not to use both slips at once?
Well said, Jim.
Jesse Chase Martha's VineyardWell said, Jim.
Having been stuck sitting in
MattHaving been stuck sitting in a sweltering hot tent for 3 hours this summer - please for the love of all things holy - build a climate-controlled waiting area.
During peak times for both
David AquinnahDuring peak times for both air traffic and the pandemic, the excessive crowding of people in the airport terminal building for extended periods of time could very well be a super-spreader event. Social distancing and masking requirements are not well enforced, and the space and staffing to effectively protect public health seem woefully inadequate. As long as Covid variants are a highly contagious problem, more surge space for peak times to accommodate passengers and their companions, and more staff to enforce distancing and making mandates are essential. Hopefully any new airport renovation plan will deal with these issues and the sooner the better!
The most important thing on
Eduardo Marques EdgThe most important thing on this project is the terminal, the only thing that will change in the terminal is they will add a TSA and a secure room with A/C and heating system with that people will not wait in a hot tent for hours if their flight is delayed. This is what a real airport terminal is like Hyannis, Nantucket, even New Bedford have all those items in the terminal and we don't. For example, you're going off-island and get the Steamship Authority and there is not a place no stay inside on a rainy day would like to wait outside in the rain if the ferry gets delay? "no" This is the same thing happening at the airport. There will be no change to the airport terminal by the cub side so don't worry you will not see anything happening, every change will be to the field side or inside.
Mr. Freeman is a breath of
William ExPBA CHILMARKMr. Freeman is a breath of fresh air at the MVA. Plan sounds smart, thought thru, and in the interest of all. Please expedite this plan.
Perhaps we don't need a $40
Peter Bruce ChilmarkPerhaps we don't need a $40 million expansion, but the post-security conditions at the airport right now are third-world. No flush toilets, no reliable drinking water, no food, crowds tightly packed behind chain-link fences, agents from multiple airlines bellowing through bullhorns. Could we at least put in a drinking fountain while this gets sorted, since we have to dump all our water before going through security?
Peter is 100% correct. The
Ex TSA EdgPeter is 100% correct. The plan isn't to accommodate "more people" it is to accommodate the people that for 10 plus yrs have been sitting outside in hot sun, rainy days, flooded enclosed area with no drinking water, and Portable toilets for bathrooms as they wait to board there plane, which can be hrs at times. Security expansion should be #1 on the list. TSA has one lane, I repeat one lane for all these airlines passengers to go through, one baggage area, that's close to the size of the airport bathroom. TSA can't go any faster because when they do there's a backnup of passengers. There's nowhere for them to go because the tent is full once thru sercurity, causing security to have to stop until passengers can procede out under a tent. As Mr Freeman said, any improvements will be to accommodate the people we already have, not to allow more. TSA's area was never built for today's security. It was added to an existing area of the airport 20 yrs ago. There should be no question in anyone's mind that TSA needs proper accommodations for security area, baggage area, and passenger area. You will only see these improvements if you fly out of MV airport. You will also appreciate these neccessary changes as a passenger yourself, when you travel, not just visitors.
I find it so perplexing of
Sue EdgartownI find it so perplexing of the naysayers to continually harp on “too many people,, we don’t need more people.” Actually, this plan is trying to accomodate any/all people who come to the island…for vacation, work, family visits. Why is that such a bad thing? People come here because it’s beautiful, welcoming, and has so much to offer in ALL things. People are what keep this island self-supporting, supporting businesses, culture, restaurants, entertainment, farms, artists, and the beaches, bike paths, etc etc. I hope his plan goes forward.
The question needs to be
TisKid VHThe question needs to be asked and answered "What is MV's capacity? Are we beyond that now? How is it calculated? Is there a way to reduce or expand it?" Just because somebody wants to come here doesn't mean we should spend money to make it happen. We already have serious nitrogen problems and quite a few others. If you love the beauty of this island, then you have to do things to protect it. One of those things is limiting people. Because too many people will absolutely destroy it.
True it’s numbers and
Marie EdgartownTrue it’s numbers and infrastructure. Again, we have to protect not promote.
Islanders do not stand to
Molly WTIslanders do not stand to gain much from any expansion of the airport. The traffic in and out of there is already insane. Please, please, be smart and let's not do this.
The increase in air traffic
Linda Calabrese OB and Tolland CTThe increase in air traffic is particularly notable in my neighborhood in Oak Bluffs. I realize we’re in the flight path from Boston but the plane come in so low, so frequently, so loudly that conversation is nearly impossible. Is there a less populated area that wouldn’t also have fragile wildlife that could be designated? I know we’re not the fanciest town but, in the 33 years we’ve been here this issue has become far worse.
There is an initiative just
Alan West TisburyThere is an initiative just getting under way, to form a "concerned citizens" committee to deal with some of these issues. The committee is working with Geoff Freeman, airport manager, the Airport Commission and the FAA on the subjects of noise abatement and air traffic expansion. If you wish to know more about this and are interested in participating, please send an email to [email protected]
Are the proposed 2 new
Alex M EdgartownAre the proposed 2 new hangers for corporate jets? I don't see the need to spend our tax dollars to further coddle the ultra rich
Its not 'your tax dollars'.
be accurate edgIts not 'your tax dollars'. The airport operates on its own profit from fuel sales and ticket taxes and landing fees, along with rent from the business park which benefits the tenants. Any hangar would be a land lease, where the airport gets revenue. Construction costs of the hangar are paid for by the entity leasing the land.
The airplane noise is just
Steve ChilmarkThe airplane noise is just about constant these days. Surprisingly, the private jets are the least bothersome - they quickly (& relatively quietly) get out over the ocean. Small prop planes are the worst and it seems most frequent. Commercial jets are somewhere in the middle - they're noisy but there's fewer of them.
So on balance between "enplanements" and "operations", please keep peace and quiet in mind. Perhaps the wealthy private jet owners could take on a few hitch hikers to lower the prop plane takeoffs.
At this point, it's appropriate to quote the Simpsons with "Old man yells at cloud" (go ahead and google it).
"If you build it, they will
Mr. B Chilmark"If you build it, they will come." The law/likelihood of unintended consequences.
Nantucket spent $40 million
Elliott Sullivan HyannisNantucket spent $40 million dollars, for terminal improvements, about 15 years ago and they still have sweltering tents without bathrooms during the busy season. How will MVY avoid that scenario?
Too bad the airport doesn't
Charlie Callahan So Boston/EdgartownToo bad the airport doesn't donate some of their land for affordable housing. We have more than enough of the silver spooned muffies and buffies,now we need homes for the real WORKING people at a fair price.And we don't need any more planes
Add new comment