Tisbury voters threw their overwhelming support behind a $55 million school renovation and addition project at a special town meeting Sunday afternoon, clearing the first of two hurdles needed.
Tisbury voters threw their overwhelming support behind a $55 million school renovation and addition project at a special town meeting Sunday afternoon, clearing the first of two hurdles needed before the long-planned project can begin on the 92-year-old town school.
“It’s gratifying to hear the support,” Tisbury School principal John Custer said after the 237-5 vote, which easily cleared a needed two-thirds majority. The measure now heads to the ballot box, with early voting June 17 and election day voting June 22.
Under a tent on the school grounds, a total of 275 Tisbury voters checked in for Sunday’s meeting, town clerk Hillary Conklin said. Some parents brought their children, who whiled away the time on the nearby playground, their voices mingling with the reedy creak of the swings.
There was only one article on the warrant: a bond borrowing question for the school overhaul, which has been on the drawing board for two years.
Voters, town officials and members of the school building committee all made the case for the plan to modernize and expand the Island’s oldest town school.
“First and foremost, this is a complete gut job. We will see the studs,” building committee chairman Harold Chapdelaine said.
Mr. Chapdelaine walked listeners through the schematic design approved by the building committee, in a process he said took more than 45 meetings over the past two years as building committee members hunted for ways to limit the cost to taxpayers.
“I want the community to know that this building committee looked at spaces carefully,” he said. “We looked at the guidelines, we looked at the codes and we looked at the cost.”
Select board chairman James Rogers, school committee chairman Amy Houghton and town finance director Jon Snyder also spoke.
“The board has voted unanimous support for this project on more than one occasion, and that support remains constant,” Mr. Rogers said.
“This is the biggest single capital project the town has ever undertaken — no surprise there,” said Mr. Snyder. Approving the bonds would add 10 per cent to annual property tax bills, he said, but he also said there are ways to reduce the cost, including grants — most of which require an approved project for an application — and bond premiums, a sort of rebate he said is currently running at about 3 to 4 per cent of project totals.
“If we do bring down the cost of the project, we’ll borrow less,” said Mr. Snyder. He also said there are ways for senior citizens to work off some of their tax burden by doing volunteer work in town hall.
Most voters who spoke supported the article, although Tisbury conservation commission member Lillian Robinson took the microphone to question the price tag and what she called the “conspicuous wastefulness” of the design.
Ms. Robinson said she felt the project and its financing could be better explained to voters, but Siobhan Mullen rose to say the full documentation has been readily available.
“I think there are a lot of people in this room who’ve done their due diligence,” Ms. Mullen said. “We’re prepared to vote today. This is real value for money.”
One by one, voters stood to show their support for the article.
Alex Meleney said he backed the hefty spending despite having no children or grandchildren at the school.
“Wherever they did go to school or do go to school, there are people like me, retirees that are paying their property taxes,” he said, adding: “Educating the children of our community is the most important job of government.”
Peter Goodale urged a yes vote, saying the cost of construction is only increasing while the existing school will continue to need repairs.
“If we don’t approve it now, we’re going to keep sinking money into this building,” he said.
Tisbury homeowner and school parent Anna Cotton sounded a cautionary note about property values.
“Our house is by far our largest asset,” she said. “It petrifies me to imagine living in a town that does not have a functioning school. The implications on my largest asset and the value of it — I’m petrified.”
The most heartfelt remarks of the day came from Mr. Custer, the longtime principal. He reminded voters of the school’s slogan: We Are the Tisbury School.
“Without a doubt the Tisbury School relies upon so many in our community, and this collective involvement and support is essential. Please know that is also sincerely appreciated and recognized,” he said. “Contributing to the success of one’s public school should result in pride, something we all benefit from as residents. Indeed, we all are the Tisbury School.”
Mr. Custer, who is 51, spoke about his own long history at the school, dating to the days when he was a student many years ago.
“Literally more than half my years have been spent at the Tisbury School. I’m incredibly proud of that,” he said.
He continued:
“What I’m most proud of today is the dedication of the Tisbury School staff to our children. We are limited in our efforts by our current school facility. The Tisbury School lacks the number of appropriate spaces for the programs that we need to best serve students. Creativity and flexibility can only take us so far. It is my belief that students deserve better than what we can now offer — if we want to best support their success, academic and social-emotional.”
He concluded:
“I believe there is no more important building in a town than its school. Tisbury needs a better building to support the learning and instructional needs for our children . . . It’s a tremendous and also a wonderful responsibility, and I’m excited to be a part of it. Thank you for being a part of it, and indeed showing that we all are a part of the Tisbury School.”
Retired trucker Trip Barnes brought down the house with his remarks.
“This is going to be very expensive,” Mr. Barnes said. “And you know what? I don’t care.”
After two hours of discussion, moderator Deborah Medders called the question and voting began, with the ayes a sea of standing voters.
School committee member Mike Watt was relieved, but resolute after the vote.
“Now the hard part starts,” he said.
Updated to include a full account of remarks on the town meeting floor.

Comments
WHAT A BEAUTIFUL GATHERING ON
GODSPAL MVWHAT A BEAUTIFUL GATHERING ON A SUNDAY AFTERNOON. I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE JOHN CUSTER FOR GOVERNOR.PLEASE TISBURY VOTERS GIVE YOUR BLESSING AND VOTE YES AT THE POLLS AND WATCH YOUR LIVES GET BETTER. JUST SAYIN. GOD BLESS ALL.
I don't understand why the
Don't get it Vineyard HavenI don't understand why the Tisbury conservation commission is against the school?
The speaker identified
A VH Voter Vineyard HavenThe speaker identified herself as a member of the Conservation Commission but was not speaking for the commission. It is not within the commission's jurisdiction to take any action on the school project.
Then why would she mention
Nancy TisburyThen why would she mention her affiliation? I heard her speak and it was clear to me she was implying her voice was the conservation commission’s voice. I view it as an abuse of power.
She stated she was
Don't get it Vineyard HavenShe stated she was Conservation Commission. In my short time at town meetings, if you stated your membership you were speaking for your members and if you did that mistakenly you specifically stated you were not speaking for the others members.
This was wrong and unethical.
So, six percent of the
Abby Normal The RockSo, six percent of the Tisbury population voted to support $55 million. Does that mean the town will vote to support it at the ballot box?
Was the low turn out due to Covid? Or was it due to people not wanting to suffer cancel culture by not supporting.
Not supporting does not mean not supporting education, which is always the first comment out of a "for the school" supporter's mouth. Or, you hate children.
The school has given and excellent education to children since it was built. Education is about teachers not buildings.
Yes, the building needs help, but who let it get in the condition it is in? Why was it not repaired over the years? Is that the selectmen, school committee, who?
Tisbury has demonstrated time and time again they do not maintain buildings.
It's is sad that the school building committee did not look at ideas offered by knowledgeable individuals in the community that would have saved money.
Will it pass at the ballot box? Will those that did not attend exercise their right to not spend money?
Time will tell.
You can play the blame game
James MVYou can play the blame game or be part of the solution. You say others offered alternate solutions but you don’t say who said them or what they are. It feels like you’re just continuing the tiresome game of “Drag your Feet”. Let’s be part of the solution and not whine about past leaders and their mistakes. Attitudes like yours cost us $14 million in State reimbursement. At what point do you believe things get cheaper on this island?
Actually, several people
Abby Normal The RockActually, several people uploaded documents to the school building committee websites. Those are ideas were not considered nor were those individuals allowed to present. So, information was supplied but relegated to the trash bin.
For Blame game, it is not game at all. It is serious when the powers that be ignore maintenance and allow a building to get in disrepair. Again, that is a huge issue in Tisbury. There was money available, on yearly basis, for large captial improvement projects. One year the roof could have been done, another year, the windows, another year the HVAC.
Again, what could have been done was not because of the singular focus on a new school in a new location. Then it was a new school in the worst location on the existing lot. Then it was a renovation and increase in size, by 50 percent, for what will be a declining student enrollment in future years.
Things won't get cheaper, but there are wiser ways to do this. Again, submitted by disregarded.
"At what point do you believe
Islander Too"At what point do you believe things get cheaper on this island?"
Maybe when we start to tap more of our local creativity and ingenuity.
Abby,
Really?! TisburyAbby,
Are you sure the committee did not look at the proposals? Did you ask any committee members it they were looked at? Were they integrated solutions to meet the education program described from town meeting? Did you attend a meeting and find out why they were not considered? Did you not hear the chairman give you enrollment data at town meeting? He gave you the source. Please provide your source for declining enrollment? This is another poke at that committee. It appears your base premise is that the school does not need to be bigger. It is a backward way to approach needs assessment and leads to misinformation.
It was not clear to me that
Anna V Cotton VINEYARD HAVENIt was not clear to me that she was speaking on behalf of the Conservation Commission or as an individual. I am confused over those that have complaints with the green or environmental considerations of this project. In Zooms and via email I have asked Chris Blessen from Tappe Architects about the Energy Use Intensity (EUI) Calculation, which is what is used for calculating Operational Carbon in a building. The Mass Save program, which includes the Cape Light Compact drives programs toward Zero net Energy and focuses on low EUI on operation. There are several pathways toward reimbursement at various stages in the process. The budget at this stage did not allow for a robust energy model which I know was a complaint. However Zero Net Energy was part of the process and conversation throughout the process. The projected EUI is below 25 which would make the project eligible for Mass Save money. The project is all air source heat pumps and all electric. To me this project fits well with Vineyard Sustainable Energy Committee and the island wide goals in response to the climate crisis to reduce fossil fuel use on Martha's Vineyard.
When is Lillian Robinson’s
Tina VIneyars HavenWhen is Lillian Robinson’s term up and how can she be replaced? I’m disgusted she has no solutions except to denigrate the fine work of many of our citizens.
If she's elected then it
Not soon enough. TisburyIf she's elected then it could be at the ballot in a week or so. If she's appointed they are yearly appointments up July.
I'm going to put my name in for another committee. I am done being led around by negative people that have zero solutions but point fingers at everyone after they've done all the hard work.
Case in point Lillian Robinson who had zero solutions and plenty of time to engage prior (as she stated in her rambling comments).
While I support a new
Jose Oak BluffsWhile I support a new building, I disagree with the energy neutral requirement. Green energy solutions for a building of this scale are still relatively new and the technology evolving. The voters have chosen a solution that is the most expensive from every standpoint - purchase, maintenance and even insurance. I think we could have made progress towards green solutions without going to a corner solution of energy neutrality and its enormous costs.
I live in OB but I care because any "solution" that places undue burdens on one of our towns puts other regional facilities at risk. There are only so many tax dollars taxpayers can pay. For example, the Regional High School has also aged beyond its useful life. When the time comes to replace this asset, where will the dollars come from?
While it is nice to get grants, we all know that our country is awash in unsustainable borrowing and government spending. With the resultant inflation that will follow, the "good news" is that any borrowing will cost the Town less and less in real dollars over time. Of course the real cost will be borne by bondholders like pension plans, foundations, endowments, etc. There is no free lunch. While it is nice to teach our children about green energy solutions, and to lead by example, it would also be nice to do the same with respect to fiscal responsibility.
Hey, Jose -- Let the citizens
Not Jose Oak BluffsHey, Jose -- Let the citizens of Tisbury pick the school that's right for them, ok?
Let me set the record
Thomas Robinson TisburyLet me set the record straight re: Lillian Robinson's Town meeting comments. She may have mentioned that she was a member of the Tisbury Conservation Commission. She Is. However, she was speaking for herself and not the Conservation Commission. The Conservation Commission has not discussed the school project, nor has it any jurisdiction over it.
Thomas Robinson
Chair, Tisbury Conservation Commission.
(No relation)
Thank you Mr. Robinson (no
Don't get it Vineyard HavenThank you Mr. Robinson (no relation).
Old saying for all the
JESSE Vineyard HavenOld saying for all the Boomers
"Those who don't participate in politics choose to be governed by their inferiors"
Add new comment