A long trail of good intentions that began with a once-promising partnership between the state and Sheriff’s Meadow ended with an announcement that 25 miles of unpermitted trails would be closed.
In late 2019, the Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation — a venerable nonprofit land trust and leading conservation organization on Martha’s Vineyard — made an exciting announcement in its fall newsletter.
The organization had purchased a new trail cutting machine. Called the Toro Dingo Mini Skid Steer, the purchase was made possible by a generous grant from the Jesse and Betsy Fink Foundation — a philanthropic fund dedicated to promoting biodiversity and environmental stewardship.
In the newsletter announcement, Sheriff’s Meadow celebrated the machine’s arrival.
“This small, nimble, and versatile piece of machinery will make trail creation and maintenance work vastly more efficient,” the article said. “The foundation has already put the machine to good use on Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation trails and on trails in the Manuel F. Correllus State Forest, where we have been helping.”
Nearly 18 months later, the state Department of Conservation and Recreation will close almost 25 miles of new trails in the state forest that were cleared without permits. Although no penalties have been issued, Sheriff’s Meadow will be required to monitor the trail closures and pay for their restoration, which will take place over a period of at least five years.
The trails were carved through 32 acres of habitat for rare and endangered species — including buck moths and eastern whipoorwills — as well as ecologically sensitive frost pockets.
At a two-hour public information session last week, the state provided almost no timeline and took almost no responsibility for the trail clearing, saying DCR became aware of the problem in April 2020.
But interviews with Sheriff’s Meadow staff, board members and others familiar with the clearing, as well as an examination of public records and emails over the past three years, offer a more nuanced picture of the events that led to the announcement.
They reveal a long trail of good intentions that began with a once-promising partnership between the state and Sheriff’s Meadow to maintain a largely neglected, 5,000-acre state forest. Over time the relationship was hampered by miscommunication, lack of oversight by the state and inadequate attention to environmental impacts by Sheriff’s Meadow, highlighting the challenges of third-party land management.
Public records provided to the Gazette also suggest that state officials knew about at least some of the unpermitted trail cutting before April 2020, with a reference to illegally built trails as early as January of 2020, raising questions about DCR’s timeline of events. In a Jan. 7, 2020 email to another staff member, Paul Jahnige, trail section head for DCR, referenced the state forest project. “I understand there may be some trails on the ground that are not on our current map. These might be historic, or might have been built more recently with permission (although I don’t think we’ve got trail proposal forms on any of them) or there might or might not be illegally built trails,” he wrote.
•
According to a 90-page project narrative submitted by Sheriff’s Meadow to the state in July 2020, the trail work began in the southern forest in June 2018 and continued through February 2020, with most work occurring in January and November of 2019.
In an interview Wednesday and follow-up phone call Thursday, Sheriff’s Meadow executive director Adam Moore said the organization and DCR had signed a written stewardship agreement in April 2018 to conduct work in the forest. Mr. Moore read aloud an email from Chris Bruno, who was state forest superintendent at the time, confirming the agreement, which broadly focused on trail maintenance and said any new trail work would receive proper permitting from state agencies.
Mr. Moore said the work, and trails project, were spearheaded by former board member Michael Berwind, who led the foundation’s trails committee, although staff and other volunteers were also involved. Mr. Moore said he was aware of the new trails that were created dating to 2018, and he said he was told by Mr. Bruno that they had received proper approvals. Mr. Moore said when he asked about permits, Mr. Bruno said they would be provided, although ultimately they were not.
Mr. Bruno, who was hired in 2017, abruptly left his position in March 2020, a month before the state said it became aware of the clearing. He has since become the new park manager at Taylorsville Lake State Park in Kentucky. Contacted by phone and text message this week, Mr. Bruno declined to comment.
Mr. Berwind, who designed the trails and did a large portion of the clearing until December 2019, is no longer on the board of Sheriff’s Meadow, and also declined to comment.
But speaking to the Gazette this week, Mr. Moore took full responsibility for the missteps. He said in hindsight he was at fault for not asking to see official permitting documents before volunteers and board members conducted the trail work. He called his reliance on verbal commitments instead of documents a mistake, and he reaffirmed Sheriff Meadow’s steadfast commitment to land conservation and trail management.
“When I look back at this, I should have asked for the permits at the very start when we decided to sign an agreement with the state and started to work together,” Mr. Moore said. “We were working with trusted partners . . . but when I look back on it, that was a mistake that I admit and apologize for.”
Speaking to the Gazette by phone Wednesday, Sheriff’s Meadow board president Peter Getsinger added his own remarks.
“What has happened in the state forest is upsetting,” Mr. Getsinger said. “And I think we are all, as a board and an organization . . . wanting to redress the situation that has occurred, and to continue in our role as Martha’s Vineyard’s land conservation agency.”
Mr. Getsinger also said Mr. Moore had the full trust of his board, and that his primary goal was ensuring the Vineyard community could maintain its trust in Sheriff’s Meadow.
“We have continually tried to work with DCR and Natural Heritage to try to redress the wrongs that have been done, because . . . really without trust, we don’t exist,” he said.
At the meeting last Thursday, DCR officials said the state had never received a written request from Mr. Bruno or anyone else to conduct the trail clearing, and that written approval was never formally granted.
“We have no documentation to that effect,” said Eric Seaborn. “There’s really no way to know factually one way or the other.”
But Mr. Moore said if Sheriff’s Meadow had known the trail work was not permitted, the conservation organization would have never gotten involved. He said it did not become clear to him until the spring of 2020 that the trail clearing had not received approval from DCR and the Natural Heritage and Endangered Species Program. After it did become clear, he said a report was submitted to Natural Heritage that described the scope of the work. Mitigation planning began at the state level, which eventually led to last week’s announcement that the state would close the trails.
But the damage had been done.
“We want to work hard to restore trust in Sheriff’s Meadow Foundation,” Mr. Moore said. “And we’ll do whatever is necessary to do that. We take it very seriously.”
•
According to Mr. Moore, the 2018 stewardship agreement with the state forest came amid a variety of other contemporaneous developments for the foundation, which was begun by former Gazette editor Henry Beetle Hough in the 1950s and has since grown into one of the Island’s leading land trusts, holding nearly 3,000 acres in conservation that span the Vineyard, from Cedar Tree Neck Sanctuary to Quansoo Farm.
In 2017, Sheriff’s Meadow launched a strategic plan that included a goal of improving trail connectivity across the Island, Mr. Moore and Mr. Getsinger said. Part of that plan included the launch of the popular MV Trails App, which includes an interactive map of every walking, hiking or biking trail on the Vineyard.
At the same time, the state forest, a large wilderness located in the middle of the Island and criss-crossed by fire lanes, was facing challenges.
Severely short-staffed and low on funding and equipment, the forest management had seen turnover since the death of longtime superintendent John Varkonda. Mr. Bruno was the only full-time employee, and the state, citing legal reasons, did not allow him to live in a house on the property. Difficulties in finding and hiring seasonal labor were a constant thread in weekly reports from Mr. Bruno to DCR, records show.
“We have a great need for help here at Correllus,” Mr. Bruno wrote to south regional director Karl Pastore in the summer of 2019.
Meanwhile, Sheriff’s Meadow had stepped in to offer a hand, on a strictly volunteer basis.
After a spate of particularly vicious northeast storms in March 2018, Mr. Berwind provided equipment and assisted Mr. Bruno in milling dozens of trees that had fallen on state forest trails between 2018 and 2019, according to Mr. Moore and others familiar with the events. The trees were going to be used for a pavilion, designed by the high school; the Gazette ran a short story about the project.
In April 2018, with the stewardship agreement in place, Sheriff’s Meadow offered Mr. Bruno a tractor and volunteers to help with maintenance. The foundation had also begun a program where it placed wooden benches in the forest, and organized successful volunteer work days with a friends group.
Nearly a year later, in March 2019, Mr. Moore wrote a letter to DCR commissioner Leo Roy requesting a more formal, long-term partnership between Sheriff’s Meadow and DCR in the state forest. In the letter, he said Sheriff’s Meadow was interested in expanding the state’s centrally-located garage for winter equipment storage. As part of the agreement, Mr. Moore offered, Sheriff’s Meadow would maintain and monitor trails, help with forestry and catalog endangered species. The state replied with a thank you letter, Mr. Moore said.
“It’s something that we were excited about, and hoped that this could turn into a good relationship for both organizations, and the community,” he recalled Wednesday.
The formal partnership never materialized.
•
The Sheriff’s Meadow project narrative shows that work began in the southern forest later that spring and continued through 2019, occurring alongside permitted work to restore, trim, mow and maintain existing trails. Mr. Moore said Sheriff’s Meadow was open about the work throughout the process, pointing by example to the September 2019 newsletter announcement, and was operating under the belief it had been approved.
But Mr. Moore confirmed that he never saw official permits, and reiterated that Sheriff’s Meadow was working with trusted partners.
“We had permission from DCR to do work in the forest on trails,” he said. “We had a good relationship with DCR and didn’t have any indication of a problem, up until more recently.”
Tom Robinson, a Sheriff’s Meadow board member and chairman of the Tisbury conservation commission who helped with some of the trail cutting in January 2019, offered a similar account. He said Mr. Bruno had helped Mr. Berwind brush cut roots in the southern forest, and Mr. Robinson was under the belief the superintendent had received encouragement from his superiors at DCR about the trail creation.
“Chris was all gung-ho about this,” Mr. Robinson said. “It was in the back of my mind, that this was too good to be true. But the reality, historically, is that [the state forest] is like the forgotten child of DCR . . . for them to say that Sheriff’s Meadow did this all in a vacuum, is somewhat disingenuous on DCR’s part.”
Tim Simmons, a restoration ecologist who was executive director of Sheriff’s Meadow in the 1980s and later worked for the state Natural Heritage program, told the Gazette in an interview that he came to the Island in late 2019 as part of an unrelated project and was told by Mr. Bruno about the trail clearing.
“It was sort of offhand,” Mr. Simmons said. “Somebody mentioned that Sheriff’s Meadow was cutting trails. And I said, Chris, what are you talking about? Who’s reviewing these trails? He said nobody is reviewing the trails, they are just cutting them. And I go, what is this?”
Several months later Mr. Bruno had left his job and the Island. “I was surprised when he left,” Mr. Robinson said. “But the reality was he wasn’t getting paid much. He was living on Chappy. His wife went back to school . . . it may have been coincidence, or it may have been cause and effect. I don’t know.”
Mr. Simmons expressed frustration that it took the state as long as it did to close the trails. Like Mr. Robinson, he pointed to the state’s lack of interest in the forest as a primary factor that led to the unintended violations.
“Here’s one of the most significant and neglected places in the state. Without presence, these things are going to happen. And clearly this time, even with presence, these things are going to happen,” he said. “Maybe they just failed to give Chris the appropriate training. I don’t know.”
Mr. Moore said he plans to meet with the state next Tuesday to discuss the mitigation plan. He said there no price estimate yet for the restoration, which he said will involve a combination of active monitoring and work to ensure the trails are closed to the public. Mr. Moore said over time, the trails will become overgrown, and will need to be monitored for invasive species.
The state decision to close the trails has carved its own divisions through the Vineyard’s conservation and recreation community, with debate over the severity of the violations and whether there is a need to shut down the trails now that they exist. The trails have become popular among some members of the Island mountain biking community.
Reflecting on the past months, Mr. Moore agreed that ultimately the main problem likely came down to miscommunication, and what he called a “gray area” between lines of authority.
“Those are things that need to be fixed,” Mr. Moore said. “We’re all part of this community here . . . and at the heart of it is a beautiful, 5,000-acre forest. And it’s important to everyone who is here. And it’s very important to Sheriff’s Meadow. And it’s very important to Sheriff’s Meadow to correct the errors we made, and to make sure they don’t happen again.”
Mr. Robinson added that he hoped the forest was important for one other stakeholder as well: the state.
“If anything good comes out of this, maybe they’ll pay a little more attention to their forest down here,” he said.

Comments
Remember; no good deed goes
Michael OBRemember; no good deed goes unpunished.
Remember: Good deeds need
Kenny Oak BluffsRemember: Good deeds need permission first.
Bingo! No one is saying
MTBerBingo! No one is saying trails are bad. Just illegally cutting them with no permits or public process is bad.
25 miles of trails in a 5,000
august west edgartown25 miles of trails in a 5,000 acre forest are being closed. Everyone chirping from their couch should go out and take a look at the trials and see what the impact actually looks like. Another question to ask is what species are being impacted, and how they’re being impacted enough to close the trails.
If they use those trails they
Fred TisburyIf they use those trails they are breaking the law. Why don't we let the professionals do their job?
I do not need to complete my
MarieI do not need to complete my own assessment of the trails. . I enjoy The hiking trails On MV but my background is in Computer Science not Environmental Assessment.
I will leave this to the experts.
Why is it always
Miss Communication EdgrtownWhy is it always "miscommunications" vs intentional?
It was intentional. Sheriff’s
Mr. CommunicationIt was intentional. Sheriff’s Meadow is spinning this thing hard to throw the blame on the state, and this article is all to eager to help them do it. Whatever miscommunications there were, SMF knew the work was illegal when they did it. It’s too bad the departed superintendent didn’t want to give his side of the story, but he probably figured it was safer for him to just keep quiet.
This continues to be nothing
John Aldeborgh EdgartownThis continues to be nothing short of crazy, there wasn’t one word in the article about if the trails are hurting the environment, given they were designed by the Sheriffs Meadows organization I would believe they were done with great sensitivity to the environment. Also, no discussion on if the public is getting use/benefit from the new network. What else is a public forest to be used for other than to benefit the people and manage the forest. Let’s ask the basic question, are the trails hurting the environment, if the answer is basically no, then leave the trails open and under the stewardship of the Sheriffs Meadows organization as the State clearly doesn’t intend to do anything. The bickering over how we got to something that’s seems basically good seems fairly nuts. Why fix something that sounds much better than it was.
Yes, I agree. These trails
Annelie Vineyard HavenYes, I agree. These trails are there for people to enjoy. It’s nuts to think they have to spend money to restore them! Let nature take over.
Its nuts to think a
Island Resident EdgartownIts nuts to think a conservation land trust didn't follow environmental laws!!! If you want trails so bad ask for them the right way sheesh.
The idea that these trails
Bill McCarthy EdgartownThe idea that these trails were "done with great sensitivity" is a real howler. The ten miles of new trails that accordian through the eastern third of the forest are sensitive to one purpose only--to simulating the twists and turns and switchbacks that add to the challenge and rhythm and “flow” that bikers seek from their rides. And I'll be happy to show you the several places were paths were cut, but then thought better of, and covered up with brush and downed trees. That's how much sensitive care and planning when into their execution. Those trails went up in a great hurry, before anyone could call them out.
Also, I question the notion that a public forest must be "used to benefit people." Which people? What benefit?--aye, there's the rub! There's no end to the uses that men will make of nature when they view it as some sort of storehouse whose goods they are entitled to. Maybe one of the purposes of a public forest is to prevent man's myopic abuse of nature.
Well said, Mr. McCarthy
ginny west tisbury and NYWell said, Mr. McCarthy
I’ve been trail riding my
Slater MVI’ve been trail riding my bike on this island for over 20 years now and never once thought we needed more trails in the state forest. Plenty of bike accessible trails already here.
Having walked many of the
Chris Mara EdgartownHaving walked many of the trails I have to disagree. The layout of the trails doesn't follow the State Forest topography. The layout was for mountain bikers, giving them twists and turns in an otherwise fairly level part of the island. It's as if a private entrepreneur was laying a track purely for one activity. As far as managing the forest, minimal access is one key component. These trails double up the distance to travel by creating unnecessary twists and turns. These trails are a blight on the land frankly. As for leaving them under the stewardship of the SMF, ahhhh...no thank you.
Sometimes we need to gather
MarieSometimes we need to gather information from more than one source. The Gazette can’t spoon feed the readers. This is a report from the State of Massachusetts that has a thorough review of the forest. There are other articles on the Web. It is a good start.
https://www.mass.gov/doc/section-10-manuel-f-correllus-state-forest/dow…
When I tripped upon these
Vincent West TisburyWhen I tripped upon these trails it was a pleasant surprise. I'd donate time to make more. What a wonderful way for people to be able to see the natural beautiful forest rather than a road that it intended to be a firebreak. All involved keep up the good work.
Thanks for clarifying the
Judith Spruance DelawareThanks for clarifying the situation in this excellent piece of reporting.
What a way to spin thing and
W.W.W. Vineyard HavenWhat a way to spin thing and pass the buck, The Trail Clearing Was Marked by Miscommunications, Lack of Oversight, a long trail of good intentions.
Why cant people just tell just be honest and the truth anymore?
Guess just because they can get away with it!
Yep. Honesty and good human
John West TisburyYep. Honesty and good human nature out the window. Let's just lie and cheat because we are too lazy to do things the right way. SMF knew this wrong. Berwind knew this was wrong. Local mountain bikers knew this wrong. Everyone knew how to do it the right way. They were just lazy and did not want the PUBLIC to have input on PUBLIC LANDS. This is an example of wealthy people abusing public lands and getting away with it because of money and power. Disgusting.
Funny, when I told local
RiderFunny, when I told local mountain bikers these trails were illegal they told me "who cares Berwind gets stuff done". All it seems he got done was making mountain bikers look bad and breaking a few laws. Plus closing down existing trails. Of course the mountain bikers sre doing a fine job and looking entitled and showing their true colors; they don't care about the environment or the community or lass.
In reply to John and Rider:
Bill McCarthy EdgartownIn reply to John and Rider: Eric Seaborn seemed to say that the DCR might be keeping Twisty as a kind of sop to the biking interests, who are aggrieved at the loss of the vast theme park that these illegal trails established for them in the eastern third of the forest.
I walked most of Twisty the other day. It wickedly lives up to its name. It's clearly a single-use, bike-only trail. (Walkers might hike it as a novelty or because it's convenient, but will shortly start to groan at the prospect of trudging its mechanical mazes yet again.)
If the DCR keeps Twisty, it should straighten out these egregious zig-zags, so that all may use it. Hikers, bikers, and horse riders should be able to share forest trails in an egalitarian spirit. (And if Twisty’s zig-zags epitomize the kind of redundancy the DCR sought to eliminate in their “full review” of forest trails, why allow this vacuum-abhorring bike trail to eat up so much terrain?)
A chilling thought occurs to me when I contemplate that four miles of Twisty might survive "as is": Michael Berwind won. He hacked up 25 miles of forest trails in order to secure four: four miles of bike park in the northeast corner of the forest that likely wouldn’t have withstood the normal vetting and approval process. DCR shouldn't provide him this victory: they might retain Twisty, but straighten it out so that all may use it.
Puts me in mind of my plan,
Sara Oak BluffsPuts me in mind of my plan, while I worked at the Gazette, to put window boxes on the side of the building, and also (horrors!) on the upstairs front. I was quickly disabused of this possibility by the Edgartown Historical Society. Are we too regulated? Or is it just that "the best laid plans ... gang aft agley"? Guess we'll (sob) stay safely on the macadam roads and gaze yearningly into the interior.
You're trying to compare
Jason Oak BluffsYou're trying to compare window boxes to 25 miles of illegally carved trails? Window boxes come down easily. It's taking at least 5 years to return these trails to where they were. I don't follow your logic.
Oh the horror. A place out in
Joe Some where on a trailOh the horror. A place out in the woods to enjoy nature and physical fitness. Can anyone explain the “harm” being done? The article certainly doesn’t.
Much to do about nothing and
Bob EdgartownMuch to do about nothing and I think more of a power control issue over other people and organizations. Lets waste more private donations and taxpayers money unnecessarily. Leave the trails as is and move on.
A knee-jerk reaction to
Judy Pennington, NJ and MVA knee-jerk reaction to restoring all of these trails may not be the smartest environmental decision. The State and SMF need to realistically look at how much it will cost to restore every illegal trail vs. carefully choosing those most critical to habitat and diversity. Nature abhors a vacuum as they say, and restoration takes constant monitoring ($$$) to make sure more advantageous and aggressive invasive species do not take over - and once they get a foothold, spread. Sadly the forest will not just heal itself.
Good explanation, Judy. They
John Slingerlands, NY and Oak BluffsGood explanation, Judy. They should have had this reason in the article.
Funny, I was told my SMF
IslanderFunny, I was told my SMF board members they wanted to do this under the radar to avoid this very issue. I guess they misjudged that! Maybe next time follow the laws eh?
Who really cares??? Folks get
Tim OBWho really cares??? Folks get to enjoy a nice walk in the forest...
It’s a Forest for us to enjoy...
I walk the forest trails
islanddogs EdgartownI walk the forest trails every day with my dog. I have seen and walked on some of these "new trails". If they don't want them, just let nature take it's course and they will grow back in with time.
Ok we now know that some
Brenda OBOk we now know that some trails are not in the correct place.
Will correcting the obvious accidental or purposeful blunder cause more harm to the living plants etc ?
Should that be most important ?
Hello,
Mary McC ChilmarkHello,
I am a 20 year resident of Chilmark and regular trail user of the State Forest. My husband, an island native, and I are both frustrated to hear the decision to eliminate these new trails. After sitting through and listening to the entire meeting, comments and responses, we feel there are other important aspects to consider, before just eliminating these trails - for the health of our community!
As career mountain bike racers, trail access has been an important part of our needs as athletes, not just for fitness, but for mental well being. It was a JOY to discover the new trails in the State Forest this past year!
While I believe it is imperative to properly protect our natural spaces and take care of the special flora and fauna that thrive here, especially the endangered species… I think there are some bigger picture things to consider alongside all this, with regards to the health and trail access opportunities for our growing community.
In the time of Covid, I would like to hope we are all looking for answers to stay healthy and strong. Many people are turning to outdoor exercise and the forests, now bringing their young families with them - hiking, biking or walking the dog. It is great to see the increase of trail use. This is just the beginning… of a greater need for open spaces and trails.
…While I do not condone the side ways approach and past lack of management, nor the talk of potential endangered species and habitats being disrupted… I do, however, from personal experience, think these existing “unauthorized” trails are a spectacular and positive addition to our state forest trail system!
These new forest paths are not just blasted straight thru, they have “flow” (as we call it) and are fun and challenging. They meander with artfully carved corners, utilizing the natural contours of the landscape, often highlighting special tree stands and beautiful overlooks. It is an incredible and satisfying natural experience to ride through these varied sections of paths in our beautiful State Forest woodlands!
I think that just eliminating those 26 miles of existing beautiful trails (and then some) is a pity and frustrating to me. I believe my husband and I are not the only ones who feel this way.
While I am all for protecting endangered species, I urge you all to consider looking deeper into the repercussions of taking away these trails. I understand that nature heals and we could really use better trail loops (already created) on the south western and south eastern reaches of the Park. Accessibility for getting to a nature loop near home (without driving!) creates healthy community. Already parking lots at up island reservations are at capacity during holidays and summer time.
My understanding that part of the reason why these new trails in the state forest are being eliminated is because the State Department of Endangered Species has designated our forest to be “low density” for trails.
The fact that all the fire roads are included as part of our low density trail designation makes it so we cannot have any more trails in this massive swath of land that is our State Forest .
WHIle the fire roads serve a purpose, most of them are not really the natural trail experience that inspires. Long straight sand pits....
In just looking at both before and after maps - anyone could see the new trails offer better cross island travel and more interesting options to get out on longer loops.
Is there a way we can please consider keeping some more of these trails?
Wondering if there could be a reconsideration of this designation…allowing medium trail density?
Or if not, maybe Not consider all the fire access roads as part of our low density trail allotment?
Or let a few of the fire roads grow back and use a helicopter to control fire? I know many parts of the nation are revisiting zoning and public use spaces as our populations grow.
In this time more than ever, we need outdoor recreation opportunities!
Also eliminating “redundant” section seems a frustrating misunderstanding of user preference. Getting into the forest, even if it is paralleling the paved bike path is so nice - any nature lover, dog walker, mountain biker, equestrian or hiker appreciates and uses these - we all don’t just want to ride the straight paved bike path - especially as things start to get busier with more people living here year round and as we approach the summer months again.
With trail use exploding this year, keeping more trails open in the state forest will take pressure off the other trail systems and allow people the opportunity to get into the solitude of nature.
I feel we need to consider the endangered condition of a healthy humanity and maybe reconsider keeping a few sections of those awesome trails.
We are battling looming health issues in our community… from Covid to substance abuse, depression, obesity…just to name a few - I believe all could be positively influenced if we just decided to go ride a bike or walk… regularly.
I would like to see a reconsideration of the current plan and ask for more ideas and/or studies to be considered before closing these gems.
Thanks for considering my input.
Here’s to health and preserving our access to special places and being good stewards of this incredible land!
Looking forward to being involved where I can!
Mary McConneloug
OLY
Athens 2004
Beijing 2008
How many times must it be
MTBer Oak BluffsHow many times must it be said!?!?! No one is denying the benefit of trails. Heck I wanted new trails! What people are mad about is the ILLEGAL nature in which these trails were built. To make it worse those responsible kept it in the dark on purpose. Malicious intent to avoid environmental laws and public process. Why when they were approached by other riders with concerns did SMF ignore them? This is not difficult to understand. MANY MANY communities in this country are building MILES of trails. How? Following laws and rules. This is an easy concept. And a word of wisdom, no one feels bad for your illegal trails losses when all you local mountain bikers are still riding the closest trails and still not comprehending the laws and regulations to create trails on DCR lands. Do the hard work or get your trails taken away.
HI MTBer, I just wanted to
Mary McCHI MTBer, I just wanted to voice my opinion as this may still be a public process.. Maybe I came off wrong. I repeat - I do not condone the side ways, mismanaged approach in which these trails arrived here. and I am 100 percent all about following the laws which protect the land and endangered species! I agree it is wrong how these trails went in.. But now that they are here - Im saying leave them. And let's look to future peaceful and lawful proceedings which do not harm the community's trust of the land management. Glad you want new trails too.
Mary, if you feel trails are
Island ResidentMary, if you feel trails are so important I suggest you call Mr. Berwind and ask why he chose this route instead of the right one. Then get in touch with the local mountain bikers who support him, still even after all this is coming to light. Then I suggest you do some research about how trails are created legally and public lands management. There are those who wanted to see more trails but were ostracized by the community for wanting it done right and well. The continued entitlement of mountain bikers and their use of the illegal trails must also stop. Sadly, the community has likely ruined any chances for something different in the state forest. Live and learn as they say!
As someone who has worked
DCRUSeriousAs someone who has worked directly with the DCR for years on trail maintenance and building new trails I can completely understand why someone on the island would take it upon themselves to create new trails with out the proper permissions. The DCR has had their budget slashed year after year and at this point are working on a skeleton crew. They do not want to entertain the idea of new trails as it means more work for them, despite having numerous offers from volunteers to do the labor and provide the materials. I've seen the DCR act in this way before, they are a sneaky bunch, so it doesn't surprise me they pulled this business. I would encourage locals to keep on keeping on. Truth be told even if the DCR wanted to step in and be the big tough guy, they just don't have the resources to.
Mary, I appreciate that you
Chris Mara EdgartownMary, I appreciate that you're a mountain biker but for use as walking trails they're just plain madness. They don't follow the topography of the land and are laid out for one purpose, mountain biking. They constantly twist back on themselves and for people using their feet to discover the State Forest, really frustrating. Constantly you find yourself within yards of another part of the same trail. For those looking to discover the State Forest this is plain annoying. I'm sorry but your view isn't very singular in it's viewpoint.
Mary - couldn’t agree more
John Vineyard HavenMary - couldn’t agree more with your point about the fire roads being considered “trails” - and if that is the reason for the Forrest being “too dense with trails” - that’s ridiculous. The fire roads obviously serve a purpose - but they are not an enjoyable way to do anything except perhaps travel in a motorized vehicle.
I’ve been respectfully riding the trails on MV for over 20 years - and these new trails are wonderful and many don’t seem to really be doing anything harmful - in fact they help keep bikes off the roads - which seems to be a local hot button as well.
And still no one has explained exactly what specific enviornmental issue the trails have created (Beyond moths that is?) which is odd because I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone say “what we need around here is more moths.”
Thanks for posting your thoughtful message and hope to see you out on the trails sometime.
John, no one can tell you
EnvironmentalistJohn, no one can tell you what harm the trails may have because no one did the permitting. Thats not how this works. When you break a law do you ask the judge who you harmed and to prove it? No. You get a penalty for breaking the law.
The DCR session on March 4
SteveP EdgartownThe DCR session on March 4 was disheartening. They did a respectable job of clarifying the ecological challenges and priorities, They followed that with only superficial explanation of their selection of which trails to keep and which to shut. Some of the keeper legacy trails haven’t been viable trails for years, and some of the shut trails will eliminate valuable connections with adjacent conservation areas. It suggests a lack of understanding of how the forest participates in the island’s greater trail network. I would have traded the couple of new mtb trails they are keeping for others that they are closing, trails that offer pathways across the forest and that are not as concentrated near forest headquarters. This is not at odds with ecological priorities.
Also, this follow up article is a bit overdue in reporting more of the context of how this situation developed, circumstances not represented in earlier articles.
Equally torn as others -
Chris K Edg and CTEqually torn as others - enjoyed some of these trails immensely when I stumbled upon them on my bike, but am also deeply appreciative of the need to protect flora and fauna within the rules.
Question now is: How do we start the process to have them properly vetted and approved rather than eliminated forever?
Finally a rider with a little
John EdgartownFinally a rider with a little perspective and ethics. Sadly, many of the mountain bikers on the island do not hold your views so I doubt much will be done. 5heyve certainly done a good job breaking trust and making a bad name for themselves.
Anybody remember when Sheriff
Elizabeth EdgartownAnybody remember when Sheriff Meadow burned Caroline Tutill without doing proper research and planning? Not that long ago. Sorry, but this is another example of apologize later as opposed to ask first.
It is time for Sheriff Meadow
Jonathan Oak BluffsIt is time for Sheriff Meadow board to take responsibility and find a new ED and perhaps some new board members - not just to replace Berwind. They have failed miserably in their mission on this - in every possible sense of failure - again. Remember the Hancock Preserve disaster? And Caroline Tutill? These are HUGE and repeated failures and they have lost the trust of the environmentalists, the Commonwealth and the residents of Martha's Vineyard - cheering from the mountain bikers is not going to be enough to get a pass this time.
Amen!
Phillip Oak BluffsAmen!
I agree completely and maybe
Up Islander AquinnahI agree completely and maybe from this third debacle involving Sherrif's Meadow Foundation some positive outcomes will result. We live in a place where every bit of construction, even building a small shed on a homeowners property, requires a permit and an inspection. The idea that SMF allowed a massive trail cutting project to occur without written approvals is either outrageous for negligence or audacity. With this, the third incident involving SMF in a short time I think it's time for real accountability. To label it as a " communication breakdown " is a whitewash of the events that have occurred.
Second, It would be helpful if the Gazette will do a follow up article with a broader perspective for the " Outrageous " behavior of one of MV's leading environmental organizations. What would HBH do ?
Finally, the State Forest is a Fire Hazard full of Pitch Pine just waiting to ignite. Maybe now with increased focus on the property here a management plan will be developed. It could even include some trails for mountain bikers. There are certainly lots of diverse options for hiking trails in every town on the island.
well said.
Gabrielle West Tisburywell said.
For those of us who do not
Norman EdgartownFor those of us who do not remember can you point us to what was the Hancock and Caroline Tutill "disasters" you speak of? I was in Tuthill this summer past and it seemed fine.
I have known Adam Moore for
Chris Kennedy ChappaquiddickI have known Adam Moore for more than two decades and worked with him on many conservation projects on this island. I can assure you that no one feels worse about this outcome than Adam. Over the last three decades on this island, working as a conservation leader, I can tell you that we all make mistakes. Everyone reading this newspaper makes mistakes. Let's give Sheriff's Meadow the benefit of the doubt. It takes two to Tango and we know that the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation, for all their blame shifting, owns a huge piece of this. What really impressed me about this article is that Adam Moore did not try and duck responsibility. Good for Adam for standing up and taking his share of the blame but let's be honest. He, alone, does not own this.
In the future I expect to see that SMF will be much more careful to vet all proposals involving conservation lands: 1. Are permits required? 2. Do we have the permits in hand? 3. Have we confirmed with the Commonwealth that this project is covered and we have the greenlight from Natural Heritage to proceed?
Here's hoping that DCR will likewise follow the laws that govern the development of rare species habitat and will work closely with Mass Natural Heritage to ensure that our rare wildlife resources are fully protected.
We need to do better than this.
Add new comment