Selectmen in Oak Bluffs and Edgartown are within their rights to make new appointments to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, but their process and choices suggest special interests are at play.
Selectmen in Oak Bluffs and Edgartown are within their rights to make new appointments to the Martha’s Vineyard Commission, but their process and choices suggest special interests are at play.
The unexpected naming of Brian Packish from Oak Bluffs and Ted Rosbeck from Edgartown, both businessmen closely aligned with real estate and development interests, was clearly a fait accompli by the time the selectmen met in public to announce their decisions.
In Oak Bluffs, selectman Brian Packish is a businessman who dabbles in real estate development and is part owner of the building that houses a prominent downtown restaurant. His Red Cat Restaurant redevelopment project was before the commission last year.
In Edgartown, Ted Rosbeck is the owner of a pool and spa construction company and a member of the Martha’s Vineyard Builders Association, a local lobby group for the construction trades. Late last year the builders association openly railed against the recent changes to the commission’s so-called development of regional impact checklist that will give the commission wider latitude in reviewing developments on the Vineyard.
It is difficult to see their appointments as anything but a not-so-subtle attempt to stack the deck at the regional planning agency, whose central mandate is to protect the unique resources on a fragile Island.
As the commission convenes a new year, it is facing a heavy docket of development projects. In Edgartown, major expansions of the Harbor View Hotel and Hob Knob Inn are riling neighbors who have deep concerns about commercial creep in the downtown historic village. In Vineyard Haven, the traditional working waterfront on Beach Road flanked by the deep-water harbor on one side and Lagoon Pond on the other is slated for much potential new development — from a massive commercial housing project at the old Hinckley’s lumberyard to a multi-million-dollar expansion at the Martha’s Vineyard Shipyard.
All in various stages of planning, these projects will eventually land in front of the commission for review. And when they do, commissioners will be faced with nuanced evaluations and tough decision-making, always keeping the broader interests of the Vineyard in mind.
Nearly 50 years ago, the architects of the commission, established by the Massachusetts state legislature, wisely structured it to be a diverse mix of elected and appointed members. The nine members who are elected at large by Island voters every two years comprise the core of the regional body, followed by seven who are appointed annually, one by the selectmen in each of the six Island towns, and one by the Dukes County commission. One member is appointed by the Massachusetts governor.
In reviewing projects, every member is responsible for representing the whole Island — not a specific town or government agency. And while promoting sound Island economies is one factor commissioners must weigh, it is not the only one.
Can Mr. Packish and Mr. Rosbeck put aside personal interests to consider the greater good of the Island? Time will tell.

Comments
Interesting opinion but if
Bob EdgartownInteresting opinion but if you look at the overall make up of the current commissioners they are not a pro business group. So with your thinking that these two gentlemen are more business orientated it would be a welcome breath of fresh air as that opinion is a minority on the commission right now. So diversity is achieved. It does not serve the public well to have monolithic thinking in any of the committees.
I don’t agree that the
Nelson Sigelman Vineyard HavenI don’t agree that the appointments of Brian Packish of Oak Bluffs and Ted Rosbeck of Edgartown is an effort to “stack the deck” at the Martha’s Vineyard Commission (MVC).
Four of the nine elected members of the MVC are retired. Three have served more than twenty years. Of the sixteen current elected and appointed Island commissioners, all but four have served on the commission multiple terms. Prior to these appointments only one member of the MVC worked in the construction trade, a linchpin of the Vineyard economy.
An Island civil engineer who had been through the MVC’s costly and time-consuming regulatory process said to me that no one should serve on the MVC who had not experienced it as an applicant. The MVC may well benefit from new perspectives and fresh blood.
That is some good research
Bob EdgartownThat is some good research Nelson and it’s a real eye-opener with three commissioners on there for over 20 years. If that is the case Time to put in term limits for all public positions. Not just local but state and national as well. All you public officials either appointed or elected across the island for any length of time trust me the island will survive if you retire or do not run again. change is good.
The article mentions a
Jean Wong EdgartownThe article mentions a massive expansion at Harbor View Hotel which is inaccurate. The proposed spa would be in the same location as an existing cottage with lower impact than the originally approved plans for the spa. If you would like more information, please feel free to contact [email protected].
Your "lower impact" does not
Cynthia OHara EdgartownYour "lower impact" does not take into consideration the increased traffic congestion and pollution the enlarged, open to the public, spa would generate throughout the adjacent residential neighborhood. With no way to change traffic patterns, residents on N. Water St., Morse, Cottage, Fuller and Peases Point Way N would all be impacted, as will all the walkers and cyclists who already fill those streets.
It’s interesting that there
Fact checker Oak bluffsIt’s interesting that there are two architects and real estate agents on the MVC and no issues with them deriving their income from their decisions. It’s also interesting that a commissioner wrote a letter of opposition to a project and donated money to the opposition of the project yet still intends on voting on the application for said project. A small amount of transparency and integrity at the MVC would be refreshing
Add new comment