<p>The United States Navy is set to open a public comment period on its proposed remedial action plan for Noman’s island— a 600-acre dot off the coast of Chilmark that was used as a naval gunnery range and aerial bombardment site for much of the 20th century.
The United States Navy is set to open a public comment period on its proposed remedial action plan for Noman’s island— a 600-acre dot off the coast of Chilmark that was used as a naval gunnery range and aerial bombardment site for much of the 20th century.
Although bombing operations ceased in 1996 and the island has since been turned into an unmanned wildlife refuge, Noman’s still contains nearly a half century of unexploded ordnance. That ordnance, according to the Navy, continues to pose a significant safety risk to the public.
In a plan released on August 28, the Navy has opted to forego removing the remaining ordnance because public access to the island is already restricted, instead proposing to engage in a heightened public awareness campaign about the island’s safety risks. The public awareness campaign includes increased signs and pamphleting, as well as strict enforcement of trespassing and land-use violations.
“Based on a series of site risk and safety assessments and prior remedial actions, that addressed potential chemical contamination, it was determined the site no longer poses a significant risk to human health, public welfare, and the environment, given the identified future use of the island as an unstaffed national wildlife refuge,” the remedial action report states. “However, the assessment of risk to public safety revealed that a potential explosives safety concern exists due to the presence of residual unexploded ordnance (UXO) on the island.”
The report states that if the Navy were to attempt a removal of all of the island’s unexploded ordnance, “a significant loss of habitat would occur.” The island is currently under the ownership and purview of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, serving primarily as a wildlife refuge for migratory birds, among other species.
The USFWS announced last year that it would be releasing a small population of endangered cottontail rabbits on the island in an effort to reestablish their population. The rabbits were transplanted from Cape Cod.
Before the war years, the island was used as a stopping-off point for rum-runners, according to legend, as well as codfishermen, who needed a space to salt and dry their catch. Small fishing shacks that used to line the shore are now mostly gone.
By 1943, the Navy had begun using the island as part of its aerial target practice regiment, which occurred on other less-inhabited spots across the Island, like Aquinnah and Cape Pogue. Live air-to-surface bombings occurred regularly at three specific target sites on Noman’s until 1996, with naval bombing and training operations managed from Naval Air Station South Weymouth.
In 1998, the Navy removed all surface-level ordnance on the site — although the report states that buried or newly exposed ordnance continues to pose a health risk.
The island is part of the town of Chilmark and is topographically similar to the Vineyard, with steep cliffs along its southern shoreline and sandy beaches along its north side. Two small ponds, home to a large population of turtles, dot the island’s marshy shrubland interior.
In more recent years, human contact with the island has become rare. The island officially became a wildlife refuge in 1998, and field officers with the USFWS conduct one to four yearly site visits to the island, according to the report. Since the beginning of the remedial action program, when the island came under USFWS ownership in 1997, there has been scant evidence of trespassing, according to the report.
But the report further says that should the proposed use of the island change, such as allowing the construction of residences, public access or other forms of development, it may be appropriate to take further action to remove the unexploded ordnance. For now, the Navy has proposed that the island remain as it currently stands.
“The selected remedial alternative of institutional controls/public awareness and enforcement was judged to be the best option for meeting the safety-related remedial goals,” the report states.
Public comment on the proposal is open from Sept. 15 through Oct. 14. Comments can be emailed to [email protected]. A virtual public hearing on the proposed remedial action has been scheduled for Sept. 29 at 7 p.m.

Comments
I will take the island should
Frank O’Rourke , MassI will take the island should the government ever want to relieve itself of the heavy burden of overseeing it.
It's a damn shame the mess
Roger S. MVIt's a damn shame the mess the Navy made of Nomans, they ought to clean it up.
We too had an island
Joanne Martin North Shore Oahu, HawaiiWe too had an island sacrificed to military use, with unexploded ordinance visible and buried. The military had to be forced, with many Native Hawaiian protests, to spend the money to remove the ordinance. This has to be done sometime, and now is better than letting corroded ordinance further poison the land/make it unusable. Once the ordinance was "fully" removed (a constant struggle with the military), inspection by environmental experts revealed dominance of non native animals and non-native vegetation, slowly exterminating endangered seabirds, turtles, and other animal and native (endemic) plant life. Slowly teams of volunteers (who have still to worry about encountering unexploded ordinance underground) have removed non-native animals and birds, and non-native vegetation. Using archival research at Bishop museum and other historical sources, they are working to make it a sanctuary for our island's original natural environment. Please don't let the military escape its responsibility to remove that visible and buried ordinance and fund the restoration of the island they pulverized?
Not sure how much more notice
June Manning AquinnahNot sure how much more notice must be given as it is pretty well known that there is still a lot of unexploded ordnance there. Still believe the ordnance creates either airborne or waterborne carcinogens into the environment especially along the south shore but particularly up island. At one time it was a great spot for codfishing but that has fallen by the wayside. So, just how are the endangered cottontail rabbits doing after a year over on Noman's Land ?
How much unexploded ordinance
JAH GosnoldHow much unexploded ordinance is there?
I have been there at least a dozen times, I never saw any.
Codfish have been on the decline in Massachusetts for decades, not just around Noman's.
Great point June! Can we get
T.R. USAGreat point June! Can we get some credible water testing of Nomans ground water? How about the nearby towns of Chilmark and Aquinnah? We all know about the nasty chemicals those bombs leak...and are still leaking?
Clean it up
Jim Kelleher EdgartownClean it up
Leave the bombs. Keeps
Carol formerly ChilmarkLeave the bombs. Keeps people away; it's the only chance the wildlife there has. I really wish this damned article hadn't mentioned the turtles.
Whatever habitat is there,
Kevin C. ChappaquiddickWhatever habitat is there, became habitat after the target practice ended. If it must get disrupted to remove the ordnance, then so be it: the habitat will regrow again. By contrast, that ordnance will remain dangerous, as a source of contamination and as an explosion risk, for far longer. Noman's should get cleaned up as though we intend to reoccupy it, even if we never do, and it won't get any easier to clean up if we continue to put it off.
Over the years I have worked
Jack RobbinsOver the years I have worked at submarine bases and US Army property in New England you have the money funded by the US tax payer. Quit kicking the ball down the road and clean up your mess boys no more excuses
June, we can only hope the
Dick AquinnahJune, we can only hope the cottontail numbers aren't exploding.
I would really like to hear
Dan Carnazza EdgartownI would really like to hear exactly why it is if the Navy were to attempt a removal of all of the island’s unexploded ordnance, “a significant loss of habitat would occur.” Does this mean they would be using additional ordinance in an attempt to detonate the hazardous ones??
I think they are probably
Slater MVI think they are probably referring to the building of roads and facilities involved with such a large operation. I read it to be just an attempt to justify not having to clean up their mess.
Waste of time and money to
Tom AquinnahWaste of time and money to clean it up. Nobody is going to live there. It's a bird, rabbit and turtle sanctuary. Leave it be. Spend your money on more important things.
No matter how many warnings
Alice West TisburyNo matter how many warnings in the form of signs and other public messaging, I suspect that there will always be young adventurers who hop on sailboats to go exploring. That there is little sign of human presence on the island speaks to these sailors’ good manners as much as to their absence. I’m not saying that such people (assuming I’m right) are justified in ignoring the warnings, but that there will always be people who do so. Yes, you can reason that they will get what they deserve, but isn’t it better form to clean up the messes you make? Next will be rusting and abandoned ocean windmills, sunken and out of site, with warning signs of boaters beware.
No matter how many warnings
Alice West TisburyNo matter how many warnings in the form of signs and other public messaging, I suspect that there will always be young adventurers who hop on sailboats to go exploring. That there is little sign of human presence on the island speaks to these sailors’ good manners as much as to their absence. I’m not saying that such people (assuming I’m right) are justified in ignoring the warnings, but that there will always be people who do so. Yes, you can reason that they will get what they deserve, but isn’t it better form to clean up the messes you make? Next will be rusting and abandoned ocean windmills, sunken and out of site, with warning signs of boaters beware.
All sorts of rumors are
grayfield EdgartownAll sorts of rumors are thrown around that toxic chemicals must be on Nomans as a result of the bombing with practice bombs during WWII and after. Note that as far has been said, those munitions were not actual full power bombs, but rather practice round with enough explosives to mark the impact point with smoke (still very dangerous to be around if they explode). As for claims that the A-10s Warthogs that used to practice strafing there were using depleted uranium shells, step one in a decision process would be to determine if depleted uranium anti tank canon rounds were actually ever use for practice strafing there. I am not in favor of remediation. that would involve digging up the whole island. And there goes the habitat. I remember reading an article in the Gazette years ago about Gus Ben David's assessment trip to Nomans. Expecting to find devastation, they found an abundant ecosystem of native plants and animals unlike anything the island has had for hundreds of years (Vineyard Gazette, please republish that article). If the island is cleaned up there will be irresistible pressure to let people visit, then pressure to put in sanitary facilities, then overnight housing for caretakers, then mountain biking, then... you get the idea, a slippery slope on which there will be no stopping. All a moot point after remediation, since that would require digging up the whole island and trashing the ecosystem. First do the research on what toxic chemicals might be there, then decide, but I vote for let it be.
I agree with Tom. When we
Charlie Oak BluffsI agree with Tom. When we were kids, we collected 2 bombs found on South Beach, and we're still alive. Leave it be.
7 feet of sea level rise by
Emily L. Ferguson Falmouth7 feet of sea level rise by 2050. Leave it be. It'll be under water soon enough.
For anything under $100.00
Joe Sliwkowski ChappyFor anything under $100.00 clean it up
otherwise leave it for the wildlife
Slik
Add new comment