As the Vineyard and the rest of the United States consider how and when to begin a return to our pre-coronavirus lives, we must carefully consider our next steps.
As the Vineyard and the rest of the United States consider how and when to begin a return to our pre-coronavirus lives, we must carefully consider our next steps or risk a devastating resurgence of the disease.
The current limited testing for Covid-19 is the main problem. To find out the prevalence of the disease or percentage of the population infected, we need to test a large segment of the public — not just the symptomatic people. We have underestimated the true number of infections because an unknown portion of those infected have no symptoms, or when pre-symptomatic viral shedding occurs days before in a person who later presents with the typical symptoms of aches, pain, fever, and shortness of breath, etc.
This means that the contacts of an infected patient who is not ill at that time may not learn of their risk of infection for a week or more, even when they are in communication with the patient. The contact who has only a random interaction and no communication with the patient may be infected without warning. This potentially allows transmission to multiple other persons. That is why tracking contacts of known Covid-19 patients is critical: on our Island, in our state and around the world.
The countries that have been successful in reducing the rate of infection have done large numbers of tests, allowing them to come closer to estimating the prevalence of Covid-19 or accurately gauge the true percentage of the population infected. Without this data we cannot assess the pandemic and limit the spread. Increased testing, early supportive treatment of the ill, and isolation of the minimally symptomatic and asymptomatic infected patients is essential. It must not only flatten the curve of symptomatic infections but start a downward slope in the true incidence of disease for 14 to 28 days, if a region is to have a chance of success in ending this pandemic.
We already have information that shows we should not reopen the economy because many people who have been working continuously in health care, public service, transportation, the supply chain (e.g. truckers, meat packers, grocery store workers, etc.) have recently been infected at an increasing rate. They have not been well-protected (inadequate personal protection equipment, social distancing, etc.) during what is really a limited shutdown.
Many of the supply chain workers have lower incomes and an inability to distance themselves from others. It is clear that some of those pushing for early reopening of the economy are not as aware of the health risks of this population (especially as it impacts blacks, Latinos, immigrants, the elderly and other lower income citizens). They are driven by financial stress and financial interests while not realizing that everyone is more likely to be infected if the viral infection rate increases. This speaks to racial and social class bias within the society. (The South Dakota meat packing industry is one glaring example.)
Our patience is being tested, given the crushing economic and social effects of isolation. Many who are presently healthy and clamoring to open the economy early are in desperate financial condition, fighting to survive. Everyone is trying to survive the impact of the shutdown.
Better access to government assistance is essential during this time for small businesses and workers.
But there are others who don’t understand or believe in the science of public health, and are less concerned about the disproportionate pandemic effect on them compared to others, particularly minority and lower income citizens. They believe in the mixed messages coming from some of our leaders pushing for the premature opening of the economy. This places business and economic concerns above the health of the population. Poor compliance with the shutdown prolongs the pandemic.
The price of a premature reopening will be paid by everyone. There will be more infection, second and third peaks of the epidemic, and prolonged viral presence resulting in catastrophic shutdowns. More time in the current shutdown now allows the health care system to compensate through more testing, tracking, and possibly achieving new results on current treatment trials. A careful, staged and gradual reopening of essential services is going on in the parts of the world that have limited or stopped the pandemic. We can learn from their experience in the next few weeks.
A uniform national strategy is needed. Uneven early opening of economies around the country will allow new peaks in viral infection which will spread to other neighboring states, given how connected our country is. Areas currently minimally infected will miss out on the chance to dramatically limit viral spread and prevent local epidemics.
We are all interconnected for various public health and economic reasons. This is the time for consistent messaging based on science and the public needs from our leaders. The window for a change and a national policy for testing leading to the end of this pandemic is closing. We cannot afford to miss our best opportunity to control it.
Dr. Ron Dunlap is a cardiologist and seasonal resident of the Island. He is a member of the Martha’s Vineyard Community Services board of directors.

Comments
So, we have close to the
Bobbie WtSo, we have close to the highest number os cases so far, and WE ARE GOING TO BEGIN OPENINGS, AGAINT ALLLL MEDICAL ADVISE....watch what happens...soooo very SAD
The Dr. is correct, don't
Mong Mong VHThe Dr. is correct, don't listen to non medical experts like subcontractors, office workers, truckers, bankers and the like. Look into the CDC or the WHO.
While we are all bored and locked up inside, Google countries that have curbed the epidemic and learn how it was done. We don't have to invent the wheel here again and again.
With due respect, his essay
Joseph EdgartownWith due respect, his essay offers little in the way of practical guidance. A “premature” reopening will not be borne by everyone. Overwhelmingly the data shows that the virus targets older people and those with underlying conditions. To the contrary, many in our population may be much better off from an earlier reopening of the economy both in terms of access to public health (e.g., being able to access health care for something other than Covid19), and the ability to put food on the table.
If we continue this shutdown for much longer, the economic costs WILL be borne by everyone. Localities and states are already facing huge and unsustainable budgetary shortfalls. Even the federal government, with all of its national wealth, cannot borrow without end. Our country is becoming unrecognizable (20% unemployment rates!) and increasingly risks being targeted by bad actors and nation states who seek to advantage from our sudden poverty.
The author says we need a “uniform” national strategy. Why a uniform strategy? The data shows that the impact of this virus has been anything but uniform. What is necessary to manage the situation in NY and NJ, which combined account for 50% of US deaths, is clearly different than what may be necessary in the other 48 states. What is called for is more LOCAL decision making, all as informed by national guidance. National guidance should reflect our intelligence about what works and does not work in various states and countries, so as best to inform local policy and decision making.
Finally, we should stop making believe that the best way to resolve this pandemic has some undisputed scientific basis. While that may be true in the future, it is not so today. The best scientific minds in the world are still dealing with models that have enormously wide confidence intervals and sparse data. Some of the earlier models which suggested draconian death rates and which informed our shutdown strategy, and maybe made it too severe, have already been adjusted downwards materially. Covid 19 science is still evolving and so intelligent risk/reward judgments by politically accountable policy makers, all informed by scientific debate, will be required. If we wait for the science to be settled before we decide to move forward as a nation to exit this self-induced coma, we won’t have much of a country left. Through our own hands, we will inflect enormous economic damage which will take decades to repair while ceding more geopolitical control to ruthless countries like China and Russia.
Well said, albeit we share
Joseph Vineyard HavenWell said, albeit we share the same name and the same logical, practical view, I however have been in health care over 40 years and very close to many professionals, we share the same view, thanks for your well written comments!
Can we see your medical
Carla Cooper EdgartownCan we see your medical degree?
Can we see yours?
Shelley EdgartownCan we see yours?
PhD, MD and research
Joseph Vineyard HavenPhD, MD and research epidemiologist !
With all due respect, while
Cindy BerkshiresWith all due respect, while deaths are occurring mainly in elderly and those with co-morbidities, dying isn’t the only negative potential outcome from having the virus. Do a search for “long term effects of Covid-19 infection.” Doctors are reporting that even in mild and moderate cases some patients’ organ functions are not returning to normal, which can leave them vulnerable for months or years. It not only damages lungs, but can impact liver, heart, kidneys, brain, endocrine system, and blood system. There are no long term survivors of this illness yet. The earliest recovered patients are barely three months out. There is so much we do not know yet. These statistics (below) from the Massachusetts DPH surprised me. They show the break down by age of cases (not deaths) of Covid-19 in our state. I’m in my early 50’s - the age group with most cases. I hope widespread testing, or better yet, a vaccine is on the horizon.
Age 19 or younger : 1,394 cases
Age 20-29 : 6,030 cases
Age 30-39 : 7,357 cases
Age 40-49 : 7,442 cases
Age 50-59 : 8,729 cases
Age 60-69 : 7,034 cases
Age 70-79 : 4,933 cases
Age 80 and over: 7,738 cases
Those with one or more of the
Shelley EdgartownThose with one or more of the known risk factors can opt to self quarantine or social distance, or not. People whose immune system’s are compromised due to chemotherapy or organ transplant have always had to do this. Those with diabetes, both type one and type two, obesity and high blood pressure are most at risk from Covid 19. What is needed now is truth in reporting and an end to fear mongering. Doctors should be reaching out to their patients who are most at risk and educating them about how to stay safe.
Time to reopen. There are
Ken KatamaTime to reopen. There are zero cases on the Island far different than what the Cassandras were claiming last month. Meanwhile, how many more deaths from stress, depression ,etc. from those unemployed and going bankrupt? Those are so easily counted are they. Time to use common sense and get the Island open in time for summer before we really kill our economy.
These are all really great
Tim VermontThese are all really great comments and I was hoping to add another perspective. As a practicing ER physician in rural Vermont who is fortunate to have a small place on Chappy, I would never imagine coming to MV now and putting the true islanders at risk. Here in Vermont I have seen multiple folks from MA, NY, CT coming to their summer homes or renting places in order to "shelter" in place. While well intentioned, I don't think they realize that we simply do not have the resources to accommodate all of them in our critical access hospital, even if our Covid census is low. For every trip to the ED requires the use of limited PPE for the staff as we must practice strict universal precautions - even if it is for a sprained ankle, cut finger, etc. As such, I think what people don't realize is just being present on the Vineyard puts everyone at risk because life happens and seemingly innocuous events do stress that hospital more than you know.
If I were one of the town selectman, I would really discourage all non-permanent residents from coming to the island until mid June and ask anyone who is there now who is not a permanent resident to return home. Let the curve flatten for six weeks with only islanders there - that is truly a gift of thanks that all of us "seasonal" residents can give. That would allow the island to open slowly facing not as much stress, allow the hospital to be more prepared for the summer, and let businesses become accustomed to social distancing.
All of us want to be on the this summer but no matter how many years I have been going there every summer, how much I pay in property taxes, how may friends I have there, the health of the islanders must come first. It is their home, not mine.
I will be making trips to my
JMI will be making trips to my MV home in the summer and fall. Work prevents me from going sooner. I bring almost everything that I need. Restaurants and shopping are not important to me.
I do not rent my house but I think that the economy on MV needs tourists. State and local benefits will not last Until next summer.
Add new comment