Firefighting foam is tested every six months at the airport, per FAA regulations. Chemicals from the foam has turned up in wells.
Timothy Johnson

Chemicals From Firefighting Foam Found in Wells Around Airport

<p>The Martha&rsquo;s Vineyard Airport is providing bottled water for some West Tisbury residents as a precaution after hazardous chemicals were detected in groundwater at and around the airport this week.</p>

The Martha’s Vineyard Airport is providing bottled water for some West Tisbury residents as a precaution after hazardous chemicals were detected in groundwater at and around the airport earlier this week.

Results from water sampling performed by Tetra Tech, an engineering services company hired by the Martha’s Vineyard Airport Commission, show that a private well located at 12 Waldron’s Bottom Road in West Tisbury exceeds Massachusetts safe drinking water guidelines of 70 parts per trillion for toxic Per and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Three other private drinking wells located south of the airport also showed concentrations of PFAS.

Residents of a wide swath of homes that lie south of the airport, including Waldron’s Bottom Road, Vineyard Meadow Farms Road, Charles Neck Road, Laurand Drive and Jackson Road were formally notified by letter yesterday that the chemicals pose a “potential imminent hazard to human health” if ingested.

“Please discontinue ingestion of water from the drinking water well at this time and use bottled water for consumption purposes,” the letter says in part.

The source of the chemical contamination is likely firefighting foam used at the Martha’s Vineyard Airport, airport director Ann Richart said Friday in a press statement and by telephone.

There are no federal safe standards for PFAS, but in guidelines issued in June, the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection website says exposure to elevated levels of the chemical can cause liver, kidney and immune system problems and could be unsafe for women who are pregnant.

Ms. Richart said the airport hired Tetra Tech this past spring to test the airport’s groundwater because of new research on health concerns associated with PFAS, a chemical in the FAA-mandated foam used for firefighting at the airport. After samples from monitoring wells installed in the business park showed PFAS concentrations above safe limits, additional sampling of private wells downgradient of the monitoring wells was required.

The DEP and West Tisbury health department have been notified.

“They’re basically in the direction of where the water is flowing,” said West Tisbury health agent Omar Johnson, referring to the residents south of the airport. “I would recommend that people err on the side of caution and drink bottled water until testing is completed.”

Ms. Richart the firefighting foam is tested every six months, as required by the FAA. She said airport managers have made changes in the testing procedures since they became aware of the matter last January.

“We used to spray out on a field but now we spray where it goes into a catch basin to collect it,” Ms. Richart said. “Every airport that serves airlines in the country is required to use this stuff. This isn’t just a Martha’s Vineyard issue, it’s an every airport issue.”

Ms. Richart said water testing remains ongoing and more residents could start receiving bottled water if additional samples show PFAS concentrations above safe levels in other locations.

All the actions at the moment are precautionary, Ms. Richart said.

“It’s not something where there is an immediate health risk,” she said.

The airport commission has scheduled a public briefing for Monday at 1 pm. at the airport firefighting and rescue building.

A copy of the letter that went to airport neighbors follows:

Dear Neighbor,

I write on behalf of the Martha’s Vineyard Airport Commission (MVAC) to inform you that the MVAC, through its consultant Tetra Tech, initiated a voluntary investigation to assess for the presence of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in groundwater at and around the Martha’s Vineyard Airport (MVY). PFAS includes compounds contained in the foam that has been required by FAA to fight aircraft fires. PFAS compounds are also commonly used in products including carpets, clothing, fabrics for furniture, paper packaging for food, cookware, and other materials that are resistant to water, grease, or stains. PFAS can enter the environment and impact groundwater from any of these and other sources through surface discharges or septic systems.

While federal and sate regulations do not currently require the MVAC to sample for PFAS in groundwater, and there are no federal or state drinking water standards established for PFAS the MVAC has chosen to be proactive and commenced this investigation based on guidance provided by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP).

The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the possible impact to groundwaters as a result of the usage of firefighting foam for FAA-required firefighting and safety purposes at MVY. Give the very low laboratory detection limits (less than 2 parts per trillion) for PFAS, and the numerous sources from which PFAS can enter the environment, we anticipate that detectable concentrations of PFAS will be identified in most wells. The initial sampling results for three private water supply wells located just south of MVY, where the highest concentrations would likely exist, identified target PFAS compounds in wells at concentrations ranging from 45.5 to 544 parts per trillion (ppt). The 554 ppt detection in one well did necessitate reporting to MassDEP and warrants further investigation in the southerly (down gradient) direction, which has included sampling of additional wells on Nov. 27, 2018 and will continue with additional sampling over the next few weeks.

Pending our further investigation of PFAS in groundwater near MVY, and in an abundance of caution, the MVAC will provide bottled water for those homes where the detected concentrations of the five specific PFAS compounds are approaching or exceed the 70 ppt guideline value. Based on MassDEP’s recommendations in the attached fact sheet, you may also decide to consume bottled water while this investigation is occurring until the PFAS concentrations in the down gradient area are further understood. As discussed above, we will also continue to refine and adjust our investigation in the southerly direction and will contact you directly if we believe that sampling of your well water is recommended. If you would like to request to have your well sampled sooner or if you would like to have your name added to the email distribution list for updates on the investigation, please email MVAC’s environmental consultant , Ron Myrick, at [email protected] with your home address and preferred email address.

Very truly yours,
Ann Richart

 

Comments

MikeD WT

All residences that have wells in any of the named areas should be mandatorily tested.
A bench mark should be established within at least a two mile radius, with regular testing there after.
What were they thinking by allowing these chemicals to leech into the aquifer.
Is the runoff now contained and disposed of properly or just collected by runoff culverts and then dumped into the ground.
This kind of demands a better plan of short term and long term action if these chemicals are dangerous to our and our environments health.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 12/01/2018 - 13:21

Permalink

Mr. B Chilmark

I am not sure that spraying it so that it flows into a catch basin to collect it completes the picture. Having collected it, what do you do with it?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 12/01/2018 - 15:21

Permalink

Matthew Sudarsky West Tisbury

Thank you for bringing this to our attention.I saw nothing about it in The Times.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 12/01/2018 - 18:27

Permalink

Don Edgar Oak Bluffs

Does this have the potential to effect Martha's Vineyards' sole source aquifer? Especially with more air traffic and larger planes which I believe is in the future. Ms Richart, this is a Martha's Vineyard problem, a extremely serious one if you can't drink the water.I would demand a plan to be already in the works with expert solutions from a outside source.Bottled water? I sure hope I'm totally wrong.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/02/2018 - 08:18

Permalink

David Damroth Chilmark

Households now endangered. What about The Tisbury Great Pond and its' oyster and clam fishery?
What are we doing to our planet?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/02/2018 - 09:26

Permalink

Jeanette Pilansky Waldrons bottom rd

What is the shelf life of this compound. Even after modifications to spraying the foam have been made how long does this stuff stay in the ground as some chemicals have a very long shelf life.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/02/2018 - 10:02

Permalink

Mary Jane Nevin Quansoo

Further expansion of the airport should be permanently off the table until this situation is fully reversed. Its time to hold all businesses accountable for any pollution they create.

laura roebuck san francisco, chilmark

i strongly agree. and why is it expanding regardless? there is already too much air traffic all summer. is there a group involved in opposing this?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/02/2018 - 14:25

Permalink

here we go again edg

I didn't notice the same 'concern' when the former dry cleaning plant was alleged to have done the same..

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 12/02/2018 - 18:59

Permalink

TAD Chappy

First the statistic about record vehicle traffic coming to MV and now this. We need to hold our governing boards accountable as life (both human and otherwise) on this very fragile island is now visibly exhibiting the ill effects of growth. Eyes wide open people.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/03/2018 - 12:45

Permalink

Mi&Li WT

We live on VMFR and no notices have been received.
Where are the notices being mailed?
This demands an answer, more information, and a solution.
NOW!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 12/03/2018 - 13:09

Permalink

Rebekah Thomson West Tisbury

Deeply concerning. Thank you to The Gazette for covering. The Intercept also published another study about the impacts of these endocrine disrupting chemicals just a few days ago. Link: https://theintercept.com/2018/11/30/pfoa-and-pfos-cause-lower-sperm-cou…

It also states, "PFOS and PFOA can stay in the human body for years and persist in the environment indefinitely... PFOA and PFOS have been linked to numerous other health problems, including reduced immune function, obesity, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, and increased cholesterol levels." UGH.

As a start, hopefully our fire departments can take advantage of the State "Take Back Initiative" for stockpiles of fire fighting foam that predates the ban on these chemicals. Since they have a long shelf life, departments often keep them around. https://chemicalwatch.com/67536/massachusetts-introduces-firefighting-f…

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 12/04/2018 - 09:52

Permalink

David Nash Edgartown

Hopefully while all aspects of this are being thoroughly investigated, the integrity of the storage tank has been assured as they are looking at disposal options. Time to revisit all the potential "benefits" of airport expansion?

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.