Timothy Johnson

Kent State: the First School Shooting

<p>It was May 4, 1970 when the unthinkable happened. It&rsquo;s preserved as a single searing image: a young woman, semi-kneeling before a man lying face down on the pavement.</p>

It was May 4, 1970 when the unthinkable happened. It’s preserved as a single searing image: a photograph of a young woman, semi-kneeling before a man lying face down on the pavement. The woman’s arms are extended, imploring, distraught, frozen in time forever. The onlookers seem oddly calm and distracted, immobile. The contrasting themes of the photograph are still vivid nearly 50 years later.

Kent State. Just hearing those two words conjures the image every time. I just learned that the woman in the image indelibly etched in my memory was a 14-year-old runaway who had joined the campus demonstration against the U.S. bombing in Cambodia. I suspect that the moment the photographer pressed the shutter it coincided exactly with the end of her childhood.

Most young people today can’t accurately tell you what if anything happened at Kent State the day the Ohio National Guard fired 67 rounds of live ammunition into a crowd of unarmed campus protesters. Nearly half the regiment of guardsmen armed with M-1 rifles and fixed bayonets fired into the crowd. Two of the four people killed were students hundreds of yards away from the mayhem walking to class. It used to trouble me that so few college age students today have any knowledge of what happened that day. The student protesters at Kent State that day were derided as un-American by Gov. James Rhodes. Dissidents and revolutionaries and 58 per cent of Americans polled at the time felt that the students were responsible. Even stranger, 31 per cent of people polled had no opinion at all.

The horror of what happened that day at Kent State has been eclipsed many times over in the decades since. The words “shooting” and “school” didn’t used to appear in the same sentence, but sadly it has become commonplace, even ordinary. The same story, the same news flash, another school shooting . . . the eventual body count and then we move on. We have become inured to it and feel helpless. The pure absurdity of young people being murdered while attending school is so bizarre that we can’t react properly. We can’t express our outrage and instead we are subjected to solutions as incomprehensible as arming teachers, encouraging students to learn CPR and similar blather. More words are spent on the rights of the gun owners than on the rights of the murdered. And the politicians seem able to remain oddly detached from the whole thing.

Even a call to begin discussing sensible measures to stem the flow of innocent blood from the veins of mere children gets stonewalled and stopped in its tracks. Thoughts and prayers are the standard offering instead. The pattern is curiously drawn entirely along party lines. An overwhelming number of Republican elected officials simply refuse to engage in any discussion at all that might lead to restricting the rights of unfit individuals no matter what sort of carnage keeps occurring. But it is no surprise when you follow the money, the lifeblood of today’s politics, since these people are paid factotums of the NRA and are even rated for their compliance.

I was 18 when the law was changed that allowed me to vote. I was already carrying a draft card in my wallet. The war in Vietnam raged. It is incomprehensible to me that young people today largely don’t exercise their right to vote. Until now. In the wake of the shooting in Parkland, Fla., events of recent weeks have signaled that the issue of school shootings has galvanized America’s youth and they will never be the same. They’ve cottoned on to the fact that no one is going to do it for them. They are just discovering their voice and turning the grief, the fear and the pure outrage that they feel into a force for change. We should all feel those same feelings, raw and undiluted. Our conscious dictates it. We should all be calling for change so that one day the words school and shooting won’t ever need to appear side by side. These young people’s voices will be heard, and their votes will be counted.

Separating mentally unstable individuals from military-style weapons designed for one purpose only will ultimately be achieved and the argument that those protected rights are being violated will be relegated to the trash bin of history. I looked again at the photograph of the young girl kneeling before her slain friend that day nearly 50 years ago. I’ve carried it for most of my life. Then I looked at the faces of the slain at Parkland, Columbine, Sandy Hook . . . class photos, yearbook portraits, smiling kids just starting out on the road of life. The youth that I had once derided for their lack of interest have already endured far worse than I could ever imagine.

The forces that currently wield power will not cede it willingly. They’ll do whatever they can to marginalize these new voices rising above the din of their specious rhetoric. They will marshal all the resources they have to make sure that there will be no change to the gun laws in the United States. They will fight dirty, you can count on it. And they will ultimately lose.

Robert Skydell lives in Chilmark and Granada, Nicaragua.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 06:57

Permalink

John Chivers Edgartown

Well said Bob.
4 dead in Ohio
67 rounds
31% no opinion
Too scared to speak freely?
Back in the goog old days when America was a free country.
At least we thought so.
That is what we were told anyway.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 07:38

Permalink

John Abrams West Tisbury

This is a superb essay, Bob; one of the strongest commentaries on our current times I’ve read. Thank you for connecting these two epochs in our history. I share your optimism about the ultimate result.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 08:07

Permalink

Nancy Florida

I was there, at Kent State. I lived in southwest Pennsylvania as a child. My best friend Barbara had a sister who was a student at Kent State. I had joined their family to visit the Kent State student when the shootings occurred. I developed a distrust of government then, and now.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 09:46

Permalink

charlie callahan so boston /edgrtown

What happened at Kent state was nothing compared to what happened to those innocent little kids in Fla,conn and Columbine. At Kent state those college kids were taunting the Natl Guard troops many who had come back from Vietnam, the students would spit on them, call them baby killers and throw rocks and bottles. Both were unfortunate things, but also totally different

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 10:52

Permalink

Susanna J. Sturgis West Tisbury

Odd, until I read this I never thought of Kent State as a "school shooting." In a way it was, but in other ways not: The dead are still dead, the wounded still wounded, but men armed and commanded by the state are not the same as rogue individuals with too easy access to too powerful firearms.

In 1970 I helped organize the student strike that followed the Kent State shooting. Even then many of us noticed how comparatively little coverage the shootings at Jackson State received 10 days later. If Kent State is at best dimly remembered, Jackson State is truly forgotten.

I agree, the Parkland students are amazing. Their apparently excellent school prepared them for this moment with no inkling that it was coming, and their class privilege gave them connections that most high school students don't have. What makes them even more worthy of celebration is that their vision encompasses young people who don't have their access, like the young people of Black Lives Matter who have been organizing and speaking out for years but whose voices have been easier for the powers that be to ignore.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 12:30

Permalink

Jack Stacey East Haven, CT

I was stationed at Camp Lejeune, NC when I heard about the shooting. I was only home from Vietnam about 2 months. I just remember thinking, "Oh my God, now we're killing each other!"

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 15:52

Permalink

Arnie Reisman Vineyard Haven

Right on the button, Bob. Excellently thought out and executed. I only hope your optimism pays off and young people rescue us and their future.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/04/2018 - 17:18

Permalink

pablo austin tx.

I remember posters seen around the vineyard after that urging people to demonstrate on upcoming memorial day saying...
'for the 4 dead
the war dead
and your own head'.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/06/2018 - 17:42

Permalink

BS Oak Bluffs

There were well over 100 school shootings in the US before Kent State dating back to 1764. This is nothing new. We need to stop violent people, not just violent weapons.

robert skydell chilmark

You are correct. My intention in writing the piece was to forge a connection between events separated by many years and compare how they shaped history and galvanized the people most affected. Vietnam shaped my generation in a big way. Massive public protest played a major role in ending the war. Parkland seems to represent a historical turning point in the epidemic of public school shootings. Violent behavior directed at innocent people is certainly not new. Allowing critically unstable individuals to have free access to modern military assault weapons is more recent development. The best defense is a well-informed, involved electorate i.e, a true democracy, engagement and civil discourse.
I would also like to thank all the readers who commented on the piece.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/07/2018 - 09:08

Permalink

michael j. oak bluffs/san francisco

No it was not: University of Texaas Shooting August 1, 1966
On August 1, 1966, after stabbing his mother and his wife to death, Charles Whitman, a former Marine, took rifles and other weapons to the observation deck atop the Main Building tower at the University of Texas at Austin, then opened fire on persons indiscriminately on the surrounding campus and streets. Over the next 90 minutes he shot and killed 16 people (including one unborn child) and injured 31 others; while a final victim died in 2001 from the lingering effects of his wounds. The incident ended when a policeman and a civilian reached Whitman and shot him dead. Before the attack, Whitman had sought professional help for "overwhelming violent impulses", including fantasies about shooting people from the tower. An autopsy after his death revealed a brain tumor.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2018 - 01:37

Permalink

Christine Powers Waltham

I was a 17-year-old freshman in college in Washington, D.C. when Kent State occurred in 1970. I had skipped my senior year in high school. Within days, I took part in a demonstration in D.C. to protest the bombing in Cambodia. We carried wet washcloths to cover our faces if we were tear-gassed, but that did not happen, as we were peaceful. My parents, rabid Nixonian Republicans, were horrified, but by then I was independent.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/08/2018 - 03:49

Permalink

Rob Burnside Kingston, PA

I could well be wrong, but I think the Parkland kids are also reacting to what has happened to the Dreamers, just as the Kent State kids were also reacting to all the sad events of 1968.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/10/2018 - 12:19

Permalink

peter robb oak bluffs and holliston, ma

Great piece.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.