Questions about board governance, community relations and the relationship of the hospital to its parent company have come to the fore.
A concerned citizens group formed in response to the ouster of Joe Woodin vowed this week to press for more community involvement and transparency about how the hospital makes its decisions.
In a statement issued late last Saturday, hospital trustees said they stood by their decision to terminate the chief executive officer and president. “We know that our silence has caused the community great distress,” it said in part.
The statement followed a lengthy board meeting the same day. Reached by telephone this week, longtime board chairman Timothy Sweet said the meeting lasted for “a number of hours” and had been attended by all 15 hospital trustees, four of whom are appointed by Massachusetts General Hospital, the arm of Partners Health Care that has owned the Vineyard hospital for the past decade. Interim CEO Timothy Walsh and the hospital’s chief medical officer, Dr. Pieter Pil are also among the trustees.
Questions about board governance, community relations and the relationship of the Island’s only hospital to its parent company have come quickly to the fore since the sudden firing of Mr. Woodin early this month after just 13 months on the job.
“Are we a community hospital? Are we a rural hospital? There was a lot of discussion about that,” said Alan Brigish, a West Tisbury resident who hosted a meeting of the citizens group at his home Tuesday night
Speaking to the Gazette on Wednesday, Mr. Sweet said Partners played a role in the ouster of the CEO. “When it comes to this big a decision, part of what’s involved in being an affiliate is that both Partners and the Island board must agree that it’s the right thing to do. In this case we were shoulder to shoulder . . . the board wasn’t alone, this was a joint decision.” He continued: “Until this happened, I think everyone forgot we are part of a bigger institution . . . . and in many ways this is an assurance that you have neither the CEO or a board that is going rogue or running roughshod over the hospital.”
At the urging of the citizens group, Mr. Sweet said trustees have agreed to form a community advisory board and to add a person from the Island community to the hospital governance committee. He also said trustees have decided to hire an outside consultant to review hospital governance practices. No time frame has been set for the changes.
“We are working on it,” Mr. Sweet said. “Part of the [Saturday board] meeting was a reflection back on the process . . . . and we thought this particular process didn’t go very well and that we should take advantage of the opportunity to reach out and have someone look over our governance,” he added.
Experts in board governance interviewed by the Gazette cited term limits for board members as one important practice for keeping boards fresh and responsive to their constituencies.
“Term limits establish a minimal level of board revitalization and they ensure that organizations are bringing in new approaches and perspectives into the board room,” said Anne Wallestad, president and chief executive officer of BoardSource, a national nonprofit focused on building the effectiveness of nonprofit boards.
Leadership of the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital board of trustees has seen little turnover through the years, and a longstanding practice of having no term limits for officers on the board is being changed gradually, the result of a recent bylaw change.
The current chairman, Mr. Sweet, has been on the board for 20 years and has been chairman since 2010. Vice chairman Edward Miller has been on the board for 13 years. Treasurer Earle (Sandy) Ray has been on the board for 20 years. And secretary Mary (Polly) Brown has been on the board for 14 years. Under the bylaw change, the current officers will reach their new term limits in a staggered fashion starting with the secretary and ending with the chairman, who could stay on until 2021.
By comparison, Nantucket Cottage Hospital and Cooley Dickinson Hospital in Northampton, two MGH sister affiliates in the Partners network, have changed chairmen every two to four years.
According to BoardSource, 71 per cent of nonprofit boards have term limits for board members, with the most common being two consecutive three-year terms.
As for the relationship between boards and CEOs, while not commenting on the current situation, Ms. Wallestad said clear communication is essential to avoid mixed messages.
“To me there is a responsibility for the board to be engaged and supportive of an executive . . . and there’s a special responsibility with a new executive,” she said. “It starts with defining what success really looks like. And that is often where the wheels can really come off if there is not clarity, confidence and support from the board. Change is always hard and if a board doesn’t back a new executive up, suddenly that executive can find the plug pulled.”
More pointedly, Dan Salera, principal of Salera Consulting in Boston which works with nonprofits on strategic planning and governance, said the current controversy over Mr. Woodin’s ouster could be a red flag for the hospital.
“After a year if he’s unfit, the question is what was the board doing over the last year?” he said. “There’s a question of the board’s fiduciary responsibility in not doing anything for a year. If it wasn’t the right fit, then why did they allow someone to be a CEO for a full year?” He continued:
“There should have been milestones. There should have been some calendar check in. Generally it’s every three months for the first year. It can be an informal conversation but it’s often around the same three or four questions : how’s it going with the staff, the stakeholders, what surprises have you encountered and what have you done about those? There must have been warning signs at six months and what were they doing to either coach him or begin moving to terminate him?”
Mr. Sweet said two planned changes on the board of trustees will take effect in July if approved by Partners. Dr. O’Neill Britton, chief medical officer and senior vice president at MGH, and Bill Roman, manager of the Edgartown Yacht Club, will join the board.
Mr. Sweet said Dr. Britton will replace Brent Henry, general counsel for MGH and a Partners appointee on the board. Mr. Roman was recruited by the hospital governance committee to replace Warren Spector, a longtime Chilmark summer resident, he said. Mr. Roman lives year-round in West Tisbury.
The names of the new trustees were posted prematurely this week on the hospital website. Mr. Sweet expressed chagrin at the error.
“That will be my first call after we finish,” he told the Gazette. The next day the website had been changed to reflect the old list of trustees.
•
Hospital Conflicts Are Disclosed
In addition to federal Internal Revenue Service reporting requirements, nonprofit organizations in Massachusetts that take in more than $5,000 in revenue are required to file an annual 24-question form with the state Attorney General’s Office. Among other things, the form requires the organization to disclose what are termed related party transactions.
In the most recent available filing, the Martha’s Vineyard Hospital reported the following relationships between board members and key employees for the year ending Sept. 30, 2015:
• Edward Olivier, chief financial officer, has a family member identified as C. Olivier who provided services to the hospital equaling $108,000 in fiscal year 2015.
• Dr. Pieter Pil, chief of medicine and a trustee, is married to another physician at the hospital. Dr. Karen Casper, listed at the time as the head of the hospital’s emergency room, was paid $280,854. Dr. Pil, not the highest paid physician, had a total compensation package worth $557,321, according to public documents.
• Earle Ray, the longstanding board treasurer, has a family member identified as J. Ray who is a hospital employee who was paid $56,553 in fiscal year 2015.
• Tim Sweet, the board chairman, is married to Rachel Vanderhoop, the director of development, who was paid $158,497 in fiscal year 2015.
• Dr. Jeffrey Zack leased space to the hospital in 2015 for which he received rent totaling $26,600.
The filing notes that Partners Healthcare System Inc., the hospital’s parent organization, has a conflict of interest policy designed to identify relationships that may create conflicts, establish a system for disclosing and resolving any conflicts and ensure that transactions “are negotiated at arms length and that payments are at fair market value.”
“Under our policy, when a conflict arises, the individual associated with the outside entity in question must provide full disclosure and completely recuse him/herself from any institutional decision-making about the transaction,” the filing said in part.

Comments
I'm he gazett needs to stop
Unhappy Oak bluffsI'm he gazett needs to stop
No mention that Joe Woodin's
Lucky EDGNo mention that Joe Woodin's son works at the hospital too? I guess that's not really a conflict anymore though, huh? All of these articles are a tick slanted don't ya think?
"Tick" is the right word. The
Luckier Chilmark"Tick" is the right word. The insider club at the Board is sucking the life out of the community and spitting outsiders like Woodin out who try to bring needed change. A CFO with a family member making $100k? The wife of the Chairman making $150k? How do I sign up for this gravy train? Oh, I guess relatives only.
Gravy train? Where? You have
Still Employed EDGGravy train? Where? You have no idea what roles these employees even play(ed). But you DO know the cost of living on the island so I think your "gravy train" comment is pretty dramatic. "Sucking the life out of the community"? How? Such flare. We are a small community and for an employer as large as MVH it's near impossible not to hire a family member of someone already working there. This goes from every level from Housekeepers to Administration level staff. Family members who work alongside one another or just at the same place doesn't automatically constitute nepotism. (Google: nepotism). Also, I would bet that most of the "pro joe" commenters here have a previous beef with the hospital and are jumping on this "community outrage" train because it gives them a platform.
At least they've backed off
Linn ChilmarkAt least they've backed off reinstating this guy. I heard he was a nightmare.
Nothing in this article
Islander Martha's Vineyard, MassachusettsNothing in this article addresses how the Board intends to resolve the inappropriate dismissal of Mr. Woodin or the punishment of the perpetrator.
These are pretty
Alan NYC/ChilmarkThese are pretty insignificant changes, I don't see how they will prevent further abuse from the current board, and I don't think they are enough to make any candidates for CEO feel comfortable enough to enter such a potentially toxic situation. It is also quite unsettling that Tim's wife is being paid 3X the national average for her current position.
Superb reporting. Steps must
Susan West tisburySuperb reporting. Steps must be taken to fix the governance and end nepotism.
Joe Woodin's son works here.
Martha Up IslandJoe Woodin's son works here.
Yawn.I could have googled all
Clayton WTYawn.I could have googled all of this info.
The smoke is thick and the
Rob Burnside Kingston, PAThe smoke is thick and the mirrors many, but in my "from away" point of view, Joe Woodin may simply be the Island's most prominent repeal and replace casualty. I hope this isn't the case, because if it can happen on Martha's Vineyard, it can happen anywhere. And that bodes poorly for the future of healthcare administration everywhere.
It's the roundabout all over
Mary VHIt's the roundabout all over again! Maybe someone will write a poem about it.
So the Board Chair is the
Jeanie Vineyard HavenSo the Board Chair is the CEOs boss. And the CEO is the boss of his wife?!?! So was she one of the employees who might have left if Wooden stayed on? Seems like Sweet might be looking out for his own bank account.
Rachel works her tail off for
Hospital donor EdgartownRachel works her tail off for the hospital. Leave her alone
...and makes over 3x the
Slater MV...and makes over 3x the national average for her position.
Slater...everyone here makes
Lucky EDGSlater...everyone here makes a significantly higher rate due to the cost of living being at a level that is not consistent with the majority of the US. Your "logic" in irrelevant.
Who approved her last 3 pay
Another Hospital Donor MVYWho approved her last 3 pay raises? Did her husband, Mr. Sweet, recuse himself from her executive compensation reviews? From what I understand Mr. Woodin worked his tail off for the hospital. And they didn't leave him alone. Time for some succession planning to clean up this mess.
Not everyone makes more at
Employee 13Not everyone makes more at the MVH. Nurses get paid more off island. Do you realize non-union hospital employees do not get raises? They get cost of living increases which amounts to pennies, but not raises, bonus, or even a holiday party. I am valued the same as the day I started.
"A concerned citizens group
Becky Chilmark"A concerned citizens group formed"
How does one get invited to this meeting?
I would like to be part of
Joe Oak BluffsI would like to be part of this committee or at least attend one of the meetings.
When and where is your next meeting ?
Based on inadequate
Jan C EdgartownBased on inadequate performance, transition of Board officers needs to begin immediately. It shouldn't take 4 years to elect a new chairman. It is so obvious that having the same people in power on the Board for so many years is not in the interest of the Hospital. Just goes to show their lack of judgement and self-interest. Also, what does Bill Roman bring to the Board? who chose him and why? I don't know Mr Roman but with the assortment of people who have amazing backgrounds and who live here on the Vineyard, why was Mr. Roman chosen as a new member of the Board?
Thank you Gazette editors,
Alan Brigish Vineyard HavenThank you Gazette editors, for some excellent reporting. At the meeting held by the citizen's group last week, several specific issues were raised:
• The role that Mass General Hospital, ‘the ‘sole member’ of Martha’s Vineyard Hospital Corporation, according to the by-laws, plays in the hospital’s governance in general and the termination of Woodin in particular;
• The continued absence of any statement of vision by the hospital Board or Mass General Hospital, and how or why their vision differed from Mr. Woodin’s. What is the MVH Board’s vision for MVH?
• The unanimous agreement among those attending the meeting that transparency, accountability, and responsiveness to community needs are core elements of a ‘community vision’ and appeared to be embodied in Woodin’s approach to managing the hospital;
• The fact that our group of concerned residents did not represent all island interests, and the responsibility of the hospital board to establish a way, such as a series of community meetings, to better understand what island residents expect from their community hospital in return for support of the hospital.
• The role that MVH and Nantucket Cottage Hospital’s ‘critical care access ‘status plays in Federal reimbursement rates for the Mass General Hospital system.
We agreed that a smaller number of those in attendance, report the discussion and themes back to a meeting of the MVH Board, that included the Mass General ‘sole member’ of the corporation. It was further agreed that consideration of an advisory committee and other accommodations were premature, pending understanding of potential redundancy with the board and roles of the Mass General Hospital ‘sole member’. This meeting is currently being set up.
Performance Reviews. This
Marina TisburyPerformance Reviews. This incident has triggered a serious, albeit informal and non-binding community performance review of the CEO, the Hospital, its ownership/governance structure and of the MVH Board of Trustees. This review is ongoing. It should not and will not "blow over" if we care about our hospital as an essential part of our community: we are the so-called "stakeholders". We should ALL be engaged, residents, visitors, staff. I can only speak from my experience. As a resident of MV, and someone who works with (not in) the Hospital, what I saw was very good-to-excellent performance from Joe Woodin. The performance of the Board, however, is looking much, much less impressive, isn't it? “If it wasn’t the right fit, then why did they allow someone to be a CEO for a full year?” He continued: “There should have been milestones. There should have been some calendar check in. Generally it’s every three months for the first year. It can be an informal conversation but it’s often around the same three or four questions : how’s it going with the staff, the stakeholders, what surprises have you encountered and what have you done about those? There must have been warning signs at six months and what were they doing to either coach him or begin moving to terminate him?” Embarrassing. Poor Performance. And if Joe Woodin is as good as I think he is, it's cost us a heavy price.
I find it very interesting
KEM West TisburyI find it very interesting that I wrote a comment the other day and it was not posted.. The comment was Mr Sweet I beleive is the husband of the head of the MVH development department Ms Vanderhoop was she the one who was going to quit if they didn't get rid of Mr Woodin ?? The comment about family members working at MVH together I know several families who work at MVH. This is a small Comunity who all work hard to make MVH a great place for patients and employees . I have married into a large family if I was to walk into a place to apply for a job and they saw my last name I would be jobless forever we have close and distant relatives all over the island. So the BS of family working for the same employer the island would have to hire everyone from the mainland and the islanders would be jobless. Mr Woodin's son Tim is a amazing asset to MVH I have the pleasure of seeing him weekly.
I had the same thing happen
John B. TisburyI had the same thing happen to my almost identical comment last week on another Gazette MVH article. Hmmm, I wonder what that's about. Also, I wholeheartedly agree with your comment about Tim Woodin, there is a great example of someone getting where they are by hard work and integrity, NOT nepotism.
When an organization is
Very Concerned Boston/EdgartownWhen an organization is facing a crisis, good governance and communication is paramount. On both counts MVH's performance has been inadequate. A board chair firing the CEO without prior warning or explicit prior board approval, and an opaque and shifting message - not malfeasance, a vision difference, actually more a process difference, we were very surprised the community cared; has had a disastrous impact of the image of MVH. None of this even deals with the merits of firing Mr. Woodin. It is a sad reflection that the only insights I have been able to clean on why this happened is from the comments section of the various articles the Gazette had published. I have recently observed how a New England college handled a crisis. Their excellent governance, transparent communications and proactive outreach to solicit opinions on the issue and how they were handling it, stands in stark contrast to MVH. Continuing board renewal is important in any nonprofit. The steps the MVH board has taken so far seem far too little, and too late. Alan Brigish's group raises some excellent questions. Many thanks to the Gazette for their excellent reporting on this important issue. Please keep it up.
I think the Board should be
Down IslanderI think the Board should be prevented from thinking that with this new little "process" they can avoid facing the issue of reinstating Woodin.
The evidence is overwhelming that it is the board that has acted unprofessionally, cluelessly, arrogantly, and possibly illegally.
Not Woodin. So why does Woodin still leave and the Board still stays???/
So, the dismissal of Woodin has to be sorted out before anything else.
The issue of his reinstatement should be the first order of business of the community.
It is absurd that this Keystone Kops board gets to stay on for another four years. They should ALL be terminated and a new board slowly rebuilt. If Walsh can jump in as temp. CEO, then I think others can just as easily jump in as board members.
More easily. And Walsh can jump out.
Because the current board is a disgrace.
Isn't it convenient that Mr.
Kathryn OBIsn't it convenient that Mr. Sweet doesn't rotate off the Board until 2021? In the meantime, at $160k salary per year, his wife will collect another $700,000 between now and then. I'm not sure what the odor is, but it's spreading.
Add new comment