<p>A controversial plan to revamp the high school playing fields using artificial turf is on hold after a community group unveiled a detailed counter proposal this week to upgrade the fields using all grass instead.</p>
A controversial plan to revamp the high school playing fields using artificial turf is on hold after a community group unveiled a detailed counter proposal this week to upgrade the fields using all grass instead.
The five-page plan outlined by Vineyarders for Grass Fields was presented to the high school district committee at its meeting Monday night. Among other things, the group is offering to underwrite the cost of a new track and infield, upgrade all the playing fields on Martha’s Vineyard, buy new equipment and establish an endowed fund to pay for a permanent superintendent.
“We are really committed to this, we are completely on to do this,” said Mollie Doyle, who appeared before the committee Monday along with Rebekah Thompson and Dardanella Slavin.
The new plan potentially represents a significant shift in direction for the high school committee, which has already signed a license agreement with the community group MV@Play to overhaul the playing fields using some artificial turf, including the track infield. That plan has sparked wide-ranging debate in the Vineyard community and was under review by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission. A public hearing scheduled for May 11 will now be postponed.
Instead, the high school committee has scheduled a meeting for the same day at 5 p.m. in the school library to discuss the next steps in the process, given the new plan on the table. Among the items to be discussed is the status of the license agreement with MV@Play, which includes an opt-out clause.
In a statement issued Tuesday morning, leaders at MV@Play said they would immediately step aside to allow full vetting of the new grass fields proposal.
“We came together for one purpose — to restore the track and deliver a usable field inside the track to the high school and its student athletes,” MV@Play president David Wallis said in the statement. “Nonetheless this proposal . . . . could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for our kids and the community.”
The grass fields proposal outlines a detailed plan to upgrade, reseed, install irrigation and maintain playing fields around the Island. According to the plan, the group hired Jerad Minnick, a grass expert, to assess all the playing fields on the Island. The total initial cost estimate to upgrade 12 fields, including labor and equipment, is $1.18 million. A separate estimate for the track is still pending, according to the plan. The plan would eventually involve some kind of contribution from the school budgets; the amount has not yet been determined.
Speaking to the Gazette later by telephone, Ms. Thompson said ideas had been germinating among members of the group for some time, and finally came together about two weeks ago. “Since the get-go we have been wanting to not just obstruct and have been looking for ways to help,” she said. “We’ve been bringing in experts but we didn’t want to present anything half baked. We wanted to get a solid plan together that was financially viable and made sense.”
She said the catalyst came at a meeting of the high school facilities subcommittee last month that members of the grass fields group attended. There was discussion about the track, which the team can no longer use due to its deteriorated condition, and the urgent need to rebuild it before the 2018 spring sports season. “Then they started talking about the fields across the street, and how terrible the conditions are all around,” Ms. Thompson recalled. “We went back and had this moment where we realized that what we really needed was a much broader plan. It all kind of crystallized.”
She said the group’s grass expert Mr. Minnick spent a day on the Island visiting many of the playing fields on the Island, taking soil samples, meeting with the high school facilities manager and others. “He listened and assessed,” Ms. Thompson said. “He went to West Tisbury, Oak Bluffs, the Boys & Girls Club in Edgartown, Veterans park in Vineyard Haven. He was so enthusiastic and positive. He said we have perfect soil here. He said none of our fields are overused, but they are all under maintained.” She continued: “I said, based on what we’ve seen if we raised a few million dollars could we fix it? He said I don’t know if I could spend a million of your dollars. He gave us the hope and reality that grass can definitely work here and it’s not going to break the bank. It does require some soil testing and thoughtful execution. That’s when we decided to create an endowed position, a new job.”
She said the group plans to form a new entity called Grass for Life. A fund has already been set up with the Permanent Endowment for Martha’s Vineyard, and Ms. Thompson said the group already has donors lined up who intend to give money if the plan is approved. “Donors appreciate the [Permanent] Endowment too because it has an additional level of oversight,” she said.
The total fundraising goal for the group is roughly $5 million, including the track and an endowment fund. Overall estimates for the MV@Play plan are much higher. Working with Gale Associates of Weymouth, the group had proposed a three-phase project to develop a modern athletic complex at the high school to serve the whole Island. Phase one, estimated to cost $3.5 million, called for replacing and reconfiguring the track and field, using plastic turf and plant-based infill.
There are many details yet to flesh out with the Grass for Life group plan, and numerous hurdles to clear with the high school committee and also possibly the MVC. A more formal presentation of the plan is expected at the meeting May 11, Ms. Thompson said. And she expressed gratitude to the leaders at MV@Play for their willingness to step back while the new plan is vetted. Among other things, the turf group has also offered to share its designs for the new track from Gale Associates. “That’s a gift — so generous and we really appreciate it,” she said.
In a phone conversation with the Gazette mid-week, David Wallis, president of MV@Play, said the two groups share an obvious common goal, and he praised the idea of a broad plan that reaches beyond the high school playing fields. “That’s an exciting thing,” he said, adding: “We’re not going away, but we are not going to stand in their way. We will allow them time to bring their ideas to fruition.”
On Monday night school committee members received the new plan with cautious optimism.
Committee chairman Robert Lionette called it “exciting and nerve wracking,” stressing the need for community involvement given heated opinions on both sides of the issue.
Committee member Theresa Manning agreed. “Many members of our community are very concerned about the turf project, but we weren’t presented with a feasible alternative [until now],” she said.
In a statement issued Tuesday afternoon, Vineyard schools superintendent Matthew D’Andrea struck a conciliatory note. “We appreciate the gesture of partnership that MV@Play has made,” he said.

Comments
Although I initially agreed
Mark Lucier edgartownAlthough I initially agreed with MV@Play, and hopes for synthetic fields, if this is true, and people people are committed; I say go with real grass. However, perhaps some of the practice fields could go with synthetic to avoid injuries during those practices. Regardless, Kudos to those financing new fields. They are in desperate want.
Great news, and a positive
Vineyard Conservation SocietyGreat news, and a positive step in the right direction. VCS had previously expressed concerns about the project, primarily the use and periodic replacement and disposal of such a large amount of plastic, especially in light the recent efforts by the community to reduce plastic waste. Yet we also recognized that the current state of the fields was a real problem, so we are truly heartened to see this plan move forward. Thanks to all who are working to create safe playing fields for our kids that can finally stand up to the heavy use that we all want to see them get!
We would like to thank MV
Rebekah Thomson West TisburyWe would like to thank MV@Play their hard work over the last two years, bringing the poor field conditions to the public's attention and working to improve athletic facilities for Island youth. David Wallis, Terry Donahue, Spike Smith, and Matt Poole were the first to advocate for better fields, and they spent countless hours on their plan. We are also very grateful for their generous offer to share their engineering designs which will enable us to move the project forward all the faster. Going forward, we are excited to build on their vision, working with schools and towns to upgrade and better maintain all the Island's fields.
Go Rebekah and all your
Nigel Maguire UKGo Rebekah and all your colleagues. I sincerely hope and pray that you succeed. This is really exciting news. So very well done.
I think this is great that
Matt Malowski Oak BluffsI think this is great that Vineyarders for Grass Fields has put forth a proposal, which has been one of my biggest complaints about their opposition to MV@Play's proposal. Too bad this has come to a debate that if you are for MV@Play's proposal that one must be against natural grass - I don't believe that to be the case. MV@Play is about safe and durable fields that can maintain the current use, but also sustain the proposed plans that many of our youth athletic organizations hope for the future. Future planning for the various organizations is not just what they've done in the past, but they look to grow their programs, grow enrollment, host tournaments, clinics, and camps on the island, and have a place suitable for year round use. I still believe there is a place for both natural grass and synthetic grass fields. I am grateful that Vineyarders for Grass (VFGF) will contribute and be part of the solution to the long standing athletic field issues on the Island. I still have serious concerns our community can maintain and preserve the integrity of natural grass. Our towns and tax payers have not been kind to our current natural grass fields for at least the 17 years I've been here. So I am bit cautious of the follow through once the investment is made. I would love to play and coach on fields similar to those my daughter has played on at Progin Park in Lancaster, MA. For those of you who have not seen or know about Progin Park, it is the home of Massachusetts Youth Soccer and that place is absolutely amazing. There they have a combination of natural and synthetic grass fields. VFGF's proposal still has not changed my stance that the Vineyard needs a synthetic grass field . . . yet. As a father, coach, player, and board member of MV United I still have not been convinced that a natural grass field can withstand year round use and handle the demands we will ask of it with our current use and with our future event planning, i.e. tournaments, camps, clinics, etc. Having access to a field for training in February and March is still a concern for me. Having access to fields in inclement weather is still a concern. This spring soccer season alone I (and MV United) has had nearly every Tuesday (and most Wed or Thursday) practices canceled due to flooded and soggy fields at Veterans Park. Natural grass fields will continue to be closed due to inclement weather in the future otherwise the 1.18 million dollar investment is at risk of being ruined by use during wet conditions, consequently prohibiting our athletes from training. We need BOTH types of fields. VFGF still continues to make this issue an ALL OR NOTHING debate and I don't believe that to be true. I thank both MV@Play and VFGF for this work, research and effort and especially the care of our kids and athletic programs. My vote is for both proposals. I'd like to see well maintained natural grass fields and at least one, if not two multi-use synthetic grass fields to help support or programs and take the pressure off our natural grass fields in order to keep them pristine and safe.
Sadly, Veterans Field was
geraldine brooks West TisburySadly, Veterans Field was built in a wetland and no amount of renovation seems to be able to remedy that. Even a synthetic field would flood in that spot.
All due respect Ms. Brooks,
Matt Malowski Oak BluffsAll due respect Ms. Brooks, but I didn't say the turf field should be at Veterans. Also, with respect, your mention of a lacrosse game in NH with similar climate still does not negate the fact our athletic community on Martha's Vineyard needs a synthetic grass field to handle the programming we require. I would like VFGF to expand their view beyond their campaign of anti plastic and look at ALL the things our athletic organizations hope to accomplish and offer for our children, teenagers and young adults. I still doubt our watershed and aquifer can handle the amount of watering grass fields require. Currently many of our athletic fields all around the island are not watered properly due to the demand on our aquifer, especially during July and August when the grass needs the water the most and does not get it. Again, I ask VFGF to look at this problem not just as an anti plastic campaign but ensure our athletic programs that a natural grass field can handle clinics, camps, jamborees, tournaments, home games, daily practices in soccer, lacrosse, field hockey, football, softball, baseball in both men and women's and in all ages from age 5 through adult leagues and host exhibition games from professional teams like the Boston Breakers or NE Revolution. Our kids deserve to have the same competitive edge off island kids have and our poor facilities deprive our kids from proper development.
Thank you for this well
Cynthia Flanders EdgartownThank you for this well-thought out response. I couldn't agree more with this assessment. I look forward to seeing a proposal from VFGF that will address the accessibility, viability, maintenance, and use needs of fields for our growing athletic programs. We need fields that are safe, well-maintained and that we can use year round if we intend to support our student athletes competing at their highest level in both our high school and our recreational programs. As the parent of student athletes, I thank the MV@Play folks for bringing the issue to the forefront; its clear to me that they are committed to finding a solution to the deplorable state of our fields. Lets hope the next proposal does that.
This seems like a win win
Michael marcus West TisburyThis seems like a win win outcome!! Greatly appreciate the effort and commitment that you have all made. I hope everyone comes together and gets behind this project on behalf of all the Island youth!! With deep gratitude...thank you
I have observed the use of
Roger Maxwell Windsor Heights, IowaI have observed the use of artificial turf at West Des Moines Valley High School's Football Stadium. Valley high school is the largest high school in the state of Iowa.Our son is the Associate Principal at the high school. In speaking with him he indicated there have been fewer injuries on the new field versus injuries on the old field. Moreover, large marching band contests continue to use the field during marching season. Approximately one month ago, the University of Iowa football team came to Valley Stadium to hold a light scrimmage. This has been an annual event for at least the past 5 years. It is my understanding that another high school in the area is planning to use artificial turf beginning in the 2017-18 season. The upkeep is cheaper than using natural grass. Give it a try, You will be glad you did. Do listen to voices outside the island. We/They would not steer you wrong.
How do you void a signed
George Steim EdgartownHow do you void a signed contract ? A bit late in the game
RAH RAH! Here's to us working
Thomas Bena ChilmarkRAH RAH! Here's to us working together--as a community. THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH!
Grass. It's not like you've
rick heath maspeeGrass. It's not like you've got 350 line backers and the like digging up the fields.
It's very obvious you have
Donald Herman Oak BluffsIt's very obvious you have never seen these fields.
Maybe not 350 linebackers.
Cynthia Flanders EdgartownMaybe not 350 linebackers. But we do have upwards of 50 soccer players and 30 football players in the fall, and 50 lacrosse players in the spring. The stadium field is in constant use mid-August to mid-November and mid March to mid June. That's a lot of cleats on the field...and no place else to play to let the field rest or reseed.
Kudos to MV@Play for
Geraldine Brooks West TisburyKudos to MV@Play for willingness to entertain an alternative plan. I hope the whole community can now come together and give our kids great grass fields that are properly maintained. I was in NH last month for a youth lacrosse tournament and noted that their healthy grass fields had just been thoroughly aerated. They looked good and played beautifully, and their growing conditions and soils are worse than ours.
With hunger and homelessness
charlie callahan so boston/edgartownWith hunger and homelessness at a high rate on this island who cares about artificial turf or grass, guess those real issues aren't important anymore
This means more bake sales to
PaulliD EdgartownThis means more bake sales to sustain the funds to sustain the grass. the artificial turf when installed right will provide the protection for the athletes and cost much less. Talk to BC high they have it and it has been a great investment
I must start by saying that I
Devin Healy, RN, M.Ed. Tampa, FloridaI must start by saying that I have not been paying close attention and am probably without information that many of you have. Reading this however sparked my interest being a former high school athlete at MVRHS and former collegiate athlete who has played on grass and turf. I am also an athletic trainer and registered nurse so I have the unique ability to think form an athletic and safety viewpoint.
That all being said my thoughts are mostly on athlete safety. Evidence has seen an increase in athletic overuse injuries on turf fields that are not made from the best material and not maintained. You will also see many overuse injuries occur in athletes that change from grass to turf as the impact on athletes changes in their feet, transferring up their legs to their lower back which increases the incidence of injuries, mostly foot, shin and low back. Also, athletes who do not practice on turf and only play on turf suffer more ACL and knee injuries. However, if grass fields are not maintained and become flooded, you will see a grossly significant increase in injuries.
Monetarily I agree with Mr. Maxwell that it may cost a little more upfront to install a high quality turf field, but given the weather I played in on the Vineyard, the upkeep over time will be significantly less than a grass field.
In the fields that I work in I look at evidence based practice, and I urge you to do the same. Look at the evidence found in research on athlete injuries and cost of turf fields versus grass fields. In my opinion, if the WHOLE COMPLEX goes to turf, a high grade turf from a reputable company that will not be going out of business in the next decade, and is open to the outside public, that is the best option both from a monetary and injury prevention standpoint. Grass can not sustain almost year round use in the Northeast, and the upkeep is very expensive, as Mr. Malowski pointed out, if you are looking at high volume use and injury prevention.
It is nice to see that the Community id working together and look forward to seeing whatever the choice is when completed.
I really want to know the
Donald Herman Oak BluffsI really want to know the grass experts definition of "overused fields" if he doesn't think ours are. Unless you build enough fields for each sport to have their own practice and game field, grass will not hold up at MVRHS. One football game played in the rain and the field is trashed for the rest of the year. And, how do you repair a school years long usage in just 10-12 weeks, summertime?
What about the softball field that also triples as a football practice and junior high football practice field. No overuse there, right?
Great! If the funding is
Mark Lucier edgartownGreat! If the funding is there to revamp these fields, to make them the best possible grass fields, I say go ahead. This will be an experiment funded not by us. Should they fail in the future, we can re-visit the issue. I still believe there should be practice fields of turf, not only to familiarize our teams upon surfaces they may play upon away, but to preserve what now might be great grass fields.
It's a disgrace and a farce
Ron Rankowski EdgartownIt's a disgrace and a farce that this island can't figure out how to grow a grass field with all the landscaping "knowledge"( aka how to bill out to wealthy homeowners enough to pay for condos in Florida and SUVs for the wife) and a fully funded horticulture program on the MVRHS premises. Lord knows, maybe we should ask all the burnt out hippies who certainly had no trouble getting "grass" to grow in difficult environments.
Has any of you ever walked
WHS ChilmarkHas any of you ever walked across Ocean Park after a winter of being a sanctuary for underpressured Canada Geese? I defy anyone to walk across the football field in any direction without stepping on a ridiculous amount of goose guano. Our children must play on a feted cesspool all year. Just how do you propose to stop that little item? The geese are eating the grass on the field. And our kids are grinding the excrement into every open wound, cut and bit of clothing every time they play. At least a synthetic field will be unappetizing to animals. And perhaps a bit more sanitary.
It is great to see
Charles Oak BluffsIt is great to see Vineyarders working together for a common goal, sharing ideas, and politely and passionately debating options. The result of this discussion will be a better solution for our kids, and maybe even a good example for all on how to work together.
In an earlier submittal I
Roger Maxwell Windsor Heights, IowaIn an earlier submittal I failed to mention that Dowling Catholic High School, Iowa's largest Catholic High School, uses West Des Moines Valley Stadium on the nights when Valley High School plays it's away football games. The high school band practices on the field every morning during the football season as the high school is located approximately two miles from the stadium. This morning I learned that the Des Moines Menance mens professional soccer team uses the stadium for its home games. Again, this supports in my judgment how the field with it's artificial turf serves the needs of many athletic events, including music, in the Greater Des Moines area. I am not aware of any events being cancelled because of a poor playing surface. Valley students, students from other schools and the men's soccer team are the winners using the field with its artificial turf.
First off I would like to
Larry Greenberg, PT, MS, M.Ed., CSCC, former ATC. West TisburyFirst off I would like to applaud both natural grass and synthetic turf groups for community service and their civic mindedness. They have put their time, effort and money where their mouths are. As a sports and orthopedic physical therapist in practice on M.V. for the past 22 years, and nearly 40 years overall, and trainer for the football team for 7 years here, and having had 3 kids go through sports on the fields of MVRHS, I think I have something to add to the conversation which I've held back on now for several months trying to hear both sides of the issue. Contrary to the comments made above by Mr. Healy, the literature and evidence based research is indisputably on the side of WELL MAINTAINED natural grass fields vs. synthetic fields. There is also no question a poorly maintained grass/dirt field can be a dangerous environment to play sports. The evidence for ACL injuries in adolescent girls soccer players is quite well documented on turf fields. The body secretions from sweat glands, nasal and oral mucous membranes, open skin wounds, and excretion orifices, and various other human matter such as hair, skin sluffage, etc, that goes into plasticized fields is also well documented. Turf requires solvent solution to disperse and disinfect this organic matter, all of which would drain into the aquifer. Pardon the pun, but between the grass field fertilizers and synthetic turf cleaning solvents, even the "biosolvents", the effect on the ground water would be a "wash." Originally, I was on the natural grass bend of the curve on this debate. After researching and speaking to turf proponents, I could see the positive effects of turf fields, especially if the school and communities were not going to appropriate the money to care for the natural fields, as the synthetic turf group had the financial backing to care, maintain and upgrade the synthetic surfaces properly. However, now that the natural grass folks have similarly gone through due diligence, have some financial backing and could propose natural grass fields and irrigation systems that would weather the island climate year round, and would provide GUARANTEED maintenance through a variety of parties, I would prefer the natural grass for our Vineyard athletes. Again, I'm a sports physical therapist and have seen 2-3 x the number of injuries of off island sportsters who summer here from synthetic turf vs. grass turf. It's a limited number each year, but over 22 years, nonetheless significant. I could get behind a combination of both surfaces for practice and non-contacts sports games since our kids would be on these surfaces in competitions off island. I do feel contact sports have more implications of various injuries on turf, for eg., concussion, fracture, ligament and joint injuries. There is certainly no debate over the chemical rubber used on these fields all over the country and the undeniable harm it has caused millions. It will be the basis of a class action suit in the future, as the famous class action attorney, and summer resident Jim Ferraro, Esq. eloquently wrote about some months ago in the newspapers here, all but guaranteeing a class action suit. I also have concerns on the breakdown of the re-proposed organic fills that would leach into the water with biosolvents. So, my advice, for what it's worth, would be to try to combine the assets of both organizations to work together to form a hybrid plan utilizing both ground surfaces, taking the advantage of both. Turf for overuse practices, and game prep. for upcoming contests, and natural grass for safety, hygiene. Perhaps a rotation of surface usage by various team sports/season. Both groups would commit to uphold financial responsibility for their fields' maintenance and eventual replacement. There is a "middle ground" here. Let's see if we can make a perfect union of "both our fields of dreams" on our island and keep everyone safer in the process. That's my only goal in this discussion.
I worked for the last 25
Mr. B ChilmarkI worked for the last 25 years of my career in a boarding school, with its typically heavy focus on team sports. They made the smart move, the one you describe, a hybrid move: one fine all-weather field that was lined for multiple sports and otherwise had grass fields. The all-weather field saved many rain outs. and it reduced overuse of the grass fields, allowing them to recover and prosper.
The plan for natural grass
Kyle Fiore Oak Bluffs, MAThe plan for natural grass sounds great in theory, but in reality I just don't think it can work in the long run and the fields will all end up exactly how they are now...horrible and dangerous. Between MVRHS and youth baseball, I have coached on this island for 20+ years and not one time have I been on a field where I wasn't worried about injuries to the kids. Seriously, not once. A superintendent to oversee is great, but turf management is a full time job for a large crew-not one person. The high school baseball field is in my opinion the best field on the island by far, and that is maintained by the MV Sharks Collegiate Baseball team, not the high school. AND, it is a pretty big staff working on it EVERY DAY. It has taken an army of staff and volunteers to build and maintain that field. I have a hard time believing it is at all possible that every field on the island can be given the same attention.
After all these years it really is nice to see that people are finally interested in the safety of our kids on the athletic fields. It has been a long time coming. My biggest fear is that now it will become a legal battle and drag on forever. Lawyers will emerge from the shadows to fight the synthetic turf, and everything will stall. I love natural grass, I really do, but it simply isn't realistic that there will ever be a staff and budget big enough to properly maintain these fields on a daily basis.
Kyle- I couldn’t agree more.
SF VHKyle- I couldn’t agree more. Regardless of turf or grass, an adequate budget and maintenance crew must be put in place to ensure student athletes will be playing on the safest fields possible. The baseball team is very lucky to have the Sharks organization maintaining their field. The girls softball field has a new infield that is a supposed to be a similar consistency to the Red Sox infield. A significant amount of money went into the field. Unfortunately, without proper upkeep, the infield has become packed and is not loose soil, which players need for slide safely. This is a safety issue for our softball team and visiting teams. This is one field, how will several fields be maintained? A plan/budget for continual care of the fields for the safety of our athletes must not be overlooked or underfunded.
Yesterday the high school
John Zarba Oak BluffsYesterday the high school boys lacrosse teams played in a torrential downpour at Nauset. They have an amazing, safe, state of the art turf field there, and the game was able to be played as scheduled. A couple hundred hard working and dedicated student athletes didn't have to have their game cancelled or rescheduled because the field was not "playable." (The Vineyard LAX teams currently have only been able to play half their games this season due to rain) It is simply shameful that even though there is an opportunity for the island to have a completely safe and state of the art artificial surface facility, it is "on hold" because grass is a "better" option debate that has been going on. In my opinion a better option would be supporting all our students and athletes with a playing surface that allows them all to play safely, and play when the games are scheduled. Teams that travel here often seem to cancel early if there is even a threat of bad weather - knowing our fields are likely not going be able to handle the weather. It's simply time to get this improvement done.
Haven't we seen this movie
Donald Herman Oak BluffsHaven't we seen this movie before? The grass people coming in again at the 11th hour. Last time this happened, nothing happened. Will history repeat itself? Regardless of your position we need a new track. One turf field is also badly needed. Yes, our grass fields are overused. One turf field will go a long way in remedying this situation.
I have a question for the grass people. Still want the E and D money going back to the towns?
Add new comment