Expansion plan for central transfer station in Edgartown has been on the drawing board since 2014.
Mark Lovewell

Refuse District Tries Again to Win Voter Approval for Expansion

<p>For the third time in as many years, the Martha&rsquo;s Vineyard Refuse District will seek funding at town meetings for a $2.5 million project to expand its transfer station in Edgartown.</p>

For the third time in as many years, the Martha’s Vineyard Refuse District will ask member towns to approve funding to expand its central transfer station in Edgartown.

The $2.5 million project, first proposed in 2014, would more than double the station’s operational footprint of about four acres off Edgartown-West Tisbury Road. The plans call for a new access road for residential traffic, a new dropoff area for residential trash and recycling, and a second garbage scale for vehicles and commercial use.

$2.5 million bond needs approval from four towns to pass.
Mark Lovewell
$2.5 million bond needs approval from four towns to pass.
Mark Lovewell

Chilmark and Aquinnah approved the request in 2014, with Edgartown and West Tisbury following suit the next year. But the refuse district committee later discovered it had missed a 45-day window to gather town votes following its own approval in 2014, so it returned to voters again last year.

In the meantime, enough questions had surfaced during a public review by the Martha’s Vineyard Commission that Edgartown changed its mind, voting to postpone a decision on its share of spending on the project. With the project essentially dead in the water, Chilmark and Aquinnah pulled the article from their town meeting warrants last year, although it had already passed in West Tisbury.

All four member towns (Edgartown, West Tisbury, Chilmark and Aquinnah) will be asked to vote again at their annual town meetings this spring. All four need to approve the article for it to pass. Oak Bluffs and Tisbury operate their own trash district.

As before, Edgartown would pay 69.5 per cent of the 20-year bond, with West Tisbury paying 15.5 per cent, Chilmark paying 12 per cent, and Aquinnah paying three per cent.

At public hearings two winters ago, concerns centered on increased noise and visibility, and a general lack of detail surrounding the proposal. There were questions about the district’s longer-term plans for the site, given the scale of the expansion, although district manager Don Hatch said the expansion would not lead to increased use. He said a more detailed plan would rely on the $2.5 million bond for funding.

Many tons of trash cross the scale at the transfer station every year.
Mark Lovewell
Many tons of trash cross the scale at the transfer station every year.
Mark Lovewell

The commission closed the public hearing early last year but never voted on the plan.

Reached by phone this week, Mr. Hatch said the plans have not changed since last year and traffic congestion remains a problem at the central transfer station in Edgartown. “It’s something we really need to do,” he said of the project. He added that a yearlong food-waste study has also shed new light on the expansion plans which could include space for municipal composting.

At around the time the refuse district announced its plans in 2014, a statewide law went into effect requiring businesses producing more than a ton of food waste per week to compost or repurpose the waste. Existing facilities in the state and on the Island fall well short of being able to handle that much material, and the food waste ban has yet to be enforced.

The Island food waste study began last March with funding from the Martha’s Vision Fellowship and aims to provide a starting point for future management on the Island. As part of the study, a pilot program was launched last summer with workers collecting food waste from six participating restaurants and taking it to Morning Glory Farm in Edgartown to be composted. The pilot will continue this summer under the management of the nonprofit Island Grown Initiative.

Sophie Abrams, a West Tisbury resident who is leading the study, said in January that managing the Island’s food waste throughout the year would likely boil down to an increased capacity for composting, and recycling in the form of animal feed. Neither refuse district has composting facilities, although both have shown interest in the idea.

Mr. Hatch said the study found that composting would be essential to the Island, with the district playing a role. “So this would free up some space for that,” he said of the expansion project.

The idea is still a concept since the current expansion plan does not include a composting facility. Mr. Hatch said previously that a second phase of the project could include a building for construction and wood waste and an area for composting.

“We didn’t have an answer last year,” the refuse district manager said of the questions surrounding future uses of the site and whether they might include composting. “This is a possibility.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/05/2017 - 10:00

Permalink

deshandra brown Edg

What a waste of money. Adding a second scale makes sense. But you don't need to double the 'footprint'. A very simple solution that would save LOTS of money would be a compactor. As it is now, garbage is tossed on the floor of a large building, and a front end loader picks it up and puts in an open top trailer. So the lightly loaded trailers make multiple trips off-island for disposal. A common sense expenditure would be to purchase a compactor, that would load COMPACTED trash into a fully enclosed trailer. Then 3 or 4 trips could be combined as ONE, thus saving taxpayers lots of money. Another option is a baler. It accomplished the same, and those bales get loaded on a flatbed, thus saving multiple trips. Not sure bailed trash is acceptable at the current off island incinerator, but perhaps looking at this as an alternate source of disposal can save taxpayers money. The only disagreement with the above would be the trucker who will lose a few more trips due to efficiency for the taxpayer.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/07/2017 - 11:46

Permalink

Islander On Island

Please do tell us Deshandra where will the trucking company get the permit to trailer the COMPACTED trash over the roads since it will now be much too heavy. The trailers now presently go off island at close to 100 tons per load which is close to the limit you can haul on the roadways, 60 Tons of that being MSW(Municipal Solid Waste). If we COMPACTED it and put 3 trailers worth of trash into one trailer, well you do the math and I think you see where I am going. As for bailing it, have you contacted the Incinerator Operator to see if it's acceptable to be delivered that way. Would we have to pay an alternate fee for the to Disband the bailed MSW.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 04/07/2017 - 12:13

Permalink

Tony B Edgartown

This is the same flawed plan that was tabled by us the voters last year as being too costly and completely out of step with the island's needs. The representations by Mr. Hatch don't hold up. I am at the dump weekly year round - mostly on the weekends - and never have to wait more then a short bit even at peak during the summer. 48 weeks of the year there is no congestion. Food waste composting is another example makes no sense next to an airport where birds are attracted. Maybe it is time to move the dump elsewhere if these are the needs of the future. I believe this is money wasted and voters should turn this request down again. TB

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 02/12/2018 - 07:20

Permalink

Jeff Baker Prospect Maine

Composting is a nice clean name for GARBAGE if you like rats have a garbage pile at your house,I remember my grandmother use to have a can in the ground and the food scraps went in to it i asked why she did that and she said it kept the rats away.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.