Morgan Woods, an affordable housing complex in Edgartown.
Alison L. Mead

Housing Struggle on Martha's Vineyard Spans Decades

<p>Seventeen years ago, in the midst of a market upturn, housing concerns for year-rounders reached a new height.</p>

Seventeen years ago, in the midst of a market upturn, and with high-end real estate sales stronger than ever, housing concerns for year-rounders reached a new height.

A public symposium in the spring of 2000 aired many longstanding concerns surrounding the shortage of year-round housing on the Island and pointed to some key solutions. Town and state leaders, housing experts and residents packed into the Grange Hall in West Tisbury. Free child care during the event was offered at the West Tisbury Congregational Church across the way.

Derrill Bazzy, a longtime housing advocate who now works for the nonprofit Island Housing Trust, said the gathering helped usher in a new era. “It was a watershed moment for housing on Martha’s Vineyard,” he recalled in a recent interview. Several community groups formed in the following months, and in 2001, Aquinnah and Chilmark became the first Vineyard towns to adopt the state Community Preservation Act, spurred largely by its provision of funds for affordable housing. Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury and West Tisbury followed suit in 2005.

West Tisbury complex off State Road features energy efficient affordable homes.
Alison L. Mead
West Tisbury complex off State Road features energy efficient affordable homes.
Alison L. Mead

Many of the problems that took center stage in 2000 were nothing new for the Island, and all of them persist to some degree — including a pressing need for year-round rental housing, a top-heavy real estate market with home ownership mostly out of reach for year-round residents, and a continuing struggle to maintain an essential workforce.

“I feel like Rip Van Winkle,” Cape and Islands Rep. Eric Turkington said in his opening remarks at the symposium. “Ten years ago when I was elected to the house of representatives, we had this same issue.”

Now in the midst of another market upturn after the national recession that began in 2007, housing issues have again taken center stage. “That’s actually an ebb and flow we are always going to have here,” said Mr. Bazzy, who also serves on the affordable housing committee and community preservation committee in Aquinnah. “In once sense it’s good,” he said, noting the renewed attention and sense of mission among residents. “But we’ve got to have a continuous effort between the crisis points.”

The all-Island planning board — which Mr. Bazzy said reflected a level of town commitment unheard of in 2000 — launched an initiative last year to produce state-certified housing production plans in every town and for the Island as a whole. A series of public workshops on housing issues wrapped up last fall, and draft reports are expected next week.

Meanwhile, conversations in town halls, on the street and online often turn to the issue of housing, with many, if not most, recognizing a need for more year-round rentals for low and moderate-income residents. As in many communities across the country, however, even those who support the idea of affordable housing may find themselves battling such projects in their own neighborhoods. But some advocates see opposition fading as economic cycles continue and more housing developments become part of the community.

Nab's Corner in Chilmark.
Alison L. Mead
Nab's Corner in Chilmark.
Alison L. Mead

“Everyone on this Island has an idea about how to solve the problem,” said Dean Rosenthal, the Dukes County associate commissioner for the homeless, ticking off a few examples: dormitory housing, a room occupancy tax, a housing bank akin to the Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank. People may not always fully understand the issues, he said, “but they are engaged.”

The public workshops last fall helped raise awareness, with reams of data condensed into bullet points and graphics for the public. But project managers also acknowledged the value of learning directly from residents. “You have to humble yourself when working on a project like this,” said Judi Barrett of the consulting firm RKG Associates, who is working on the plans along with JM Goldson. “The data do not tell the whole story.”

At least three official studies since 2000, and the Martha’s Vineyard Commission’s 2009 Island Plan, have shed light on the Island’s perpetual housing problem. In addition, a 2001 report by Development Cycles in Amherst included a major survey highlighting an Islandwide consensus in tackling the problem, and more recent efforts have also touched on the issue of public opinion.

In a survey of 521 residents conducted by the Vineyard Gazette and the market research firm Harris Interactive in 2013, coastal erosion, housing cost and pond pollution topped a list of Island concerns. Two years later, a smaller survey for the Martha’s Vineyard Transportation Plan placed housing third on a list of 10 priorities, behind transportation and coastal ponds. Interestingly, preserving the Vineyard character topped a list of seven priorities for the MVC in the Gazette-Harris poll, with housing second to last, ahead of data collection.

Some point to a shift in public perception surrounding affordable developments since the 1970s, when people with moderate incomes could still afford to buy land and build a house on the Vineyard. But even in 1973, on the heels of a housing survey by the Dukes County Planning and Economic Development Commission, the Gazette was reporting a “historical paradox,” with hundreds of houses vacant for much of the year and hundreds of Island families unable to find homes they could afford.

John Abrams, co-founder of the South Mountain Company, which built some of the first income-restricted housing on the Island, including at Sepiessa Point in West Tisbury in the 1990s, said it took decades for Islanders (and banks) to fully accept the idea of perpetual deed restrictions to keep houses affordable. People called the idea un-American, he said, but with 10-year restrictions on youth lots expiring, and with continued growth in the high-end real estate market, many skeptics eventually came to embrace the concept.

Mr. Abrams said seasonal residents played a major role in advancing affordable housing, calling them the single best source of funding since the 1990s. “It was just a matter of making the case that people preservation is as important as land preservation,” Mr. Abrams said. “This was fundamentally unexplored territory 20 years ago. The seasonal community had no idea about the affordable housing problem. And now that’s changed dramatically.”

Others have also observed a shift, perhaps especially as the problem extends to employers who struggle to find year-round workers to staff their businesses.

Vineyard Haven apartment complex involved rehabbing a commercial building.
Alison L. Mead
Vineyard Haven apartment complex involved rehabbing a commercial building.
Alison L. Mead

Larry Shubert, an Island carpenter and chairman of the West Tisbury affordable housing committee, drew a connection between declining affordability and the summer vacations of President Bill Clinton and his family in the 1990s, which shined a national spotlight on the Island and indirectly boosted the seasonal real estate market. He said the days of $1,500 monthly mortgage payments for a house on the Vineyard were over, but that misperceptions surrounding the need for year-round housing remain.

Many people misconstrue affordable with low-income housing, he said, noting the troubled history of public housing in many U.S. cities. “I think that’s probably more of the older generations, because low-income housing had a sort of bad rap with the ‘projects,’” he said. But he also believes Islanders generally understand affordability as a challenge that cuts across income levels. “It’s all around us,” he said. “Things cost a lot more than they do on the mainland because of the cost of living here.”

Some residents see affordable housing as simply a matter of circumstance. Mr. Shubert recalled conversations with middle-aged homeowners who purchased land years ago at an affordable price and simply adopted the lifestyles their salaries would allow. Painted plywood floors and basic furnishings are enough for some to live comfortably. “People say, ‘That’s my affordable housing. I live in it every day,’” Mr. Shubert said.

As one consequence of the Island’s high-end real estate market (and stricter building codes), lifestyles have become less basic, Mr. Shubert said, with home buyers now expecting more in a house, including high-quality amenities. He noted some people’s surprise at the quality of income-restricted developments on the Island, which often include high-end materials, landscaping and solar panels. “There is the line between low-income housing and affordable housing,” he said. “The structures are nice.”

Some recent developments have come with a price that some many consider less than affordable. The Island Housing Trust’s six-unit apartment building on Water street in Vineyard Haven, completed last year, cost about $1.4 million, but a proposed 22-unit development at Kuehn’s Way in Tisbury is expected to cost about $6.3 million. Mr. Bazzy said higher up-front costs are necessary for meeting longer-term affordability goals, making buildings more efficient and durable. He also said high-quality buildings are more likely to attract funding and less likely to attract opposition from neighbors.

Sepiessa in West Tisbury was an early affordable home community.
Alison L. Mead
Sepiessa in West Tisbury was an early affordable home community.
Alison L. Mead

Most housing projects billed as affordable on the Island have faced at least some level of resistance, almost always from abutters. It’s a similar story around the country, where neighbors often equate such developments with undesirable tenants, environmental problems and declining property values. But experts and advocates say people’s fears about affordable housing rarely come to pass.

J. Rosie Tighe, an assistant professor at the Maxine Goodman Levin College of Urban Design in Ohio, who has lived on the Cape, said that despite people’s fears, affordable housing is unlikely to bring down property values in a neighborhood. “Overall, what we see is that if it is designed well and fits within the community as a whole, if it’s not super divergent from the building types, it actually increases property values,” she said. “At the very worst, it keeps them static.” Once a property is developed, she added, neighbors tend not to think about it, and may even come to appreciate the change. “It is common that the fear is greater than the reality,” she said.

John J. Ryan, a consultant and owner of Development Cycles who has issued multiple reports for the Island, said affordable housing tenants almost always come from within the same town or the next town over. “It’s always been the big bugaboo of affordable housing — that if you build it people are going to come,” he said. “And it never is true.”

Such projects on the Island rarely, if ever, generate the type of widespread resistance that occasionally faces projects seen as conflicting with the Island character. But housing projects have seen their fair share of setbacks resulting from neighborhood opposition. A 10-unit development on Jenney Lane in Edgartown saw fierce opposition from neighbors who unsuccessfully appealed the project’s approvals by the MVC and town planning board in the early 2000s. And the Kuehn’s Way project in Vineyard Haven was recently appealed by abutters. Ironically, both projects were initiated by landowners who wanted affordable housing on their land.

On the subject of Island character, Mr. Bazzy sees the Island characters themselves as more important than even the rural landscape. He said preserving the year-round community depends in large part on adequate housing, but that keeping up with market forces over time may require some reshuffling of priorities. Among other things, he cited a need for larger apartment buildings that can benefit from efficiencies of scale, but he acknowledged that many Islanders would prefer smaller — and ultimately more expensive — developments.

“Twenty apartments isn’t necessarily the traditional Island character,” Mr. Bazzy said. “But maybe it’s becoming if done right.”

Historically, at least, Islanders appear to be more accepting of land conservation than affordable housing, with more than 40 per cent of the Island now protected from development. As one indicator, sixty per cent of respondents to the 2013 Gazette-Harris survey said they had a great deal of confidence in conservation and environmental groups on the Island, while only 21 per cent said they felt the same way about groups dealing with affordable housing. As Mr. Bazzy points out, conservation land tends to have a much clearer future, compared to housing with its unknown tenants and other factors.

Rent-controlled apartments in Oak Bluffs were built with CPC funds.
Alison L. Mead
Rent-controlled apartments in Oak Bluffs were built with CPC funds.
Alison L. Mead

In some cases, however, conservation and housing advocacy find themselves in close company. Martha’s Vineyard Land Bank executive director James Lengyel said the public is largely unaware of the role his group has played in helping to address the housing problem through an affordable housing policy adopted in 1989. With every potential land acquisition, for example, the land bank considers whether it might want to urge the seller to set aside a portion for affordable housing. The land bank also does not prioritize acquisitions within high-density areas more suited to development, and it supported legislation in 2006 to create a housing bank for the purpose of funding affordable housing. (The legislation failed, but as a matter of policy, the land bank would not oppose such efforts in the future.)

“People think this is a problem that’s never going to be solved, but I hear the same thing said about conservation,” Mr. Lengyel said of the housing dilemma. But he added: “There are still plenty of very big properties left on Martha’s Vineyard where both affordable housing and conservation can be accommodated. And I can foresee that happening many more times.”

Comments

fishcrow

Thanks for this reminder. It is almost time to get out the classic DVD for Feb. 2. ("Put your little hand in mine" and "Don't drive mad!" etc.) Do you think we could get Bill Murray to one of the endless housing forums/discussions?

deshandra brown Edg

You are right on target. With the inflated wages paid here for unskilled workers, that boat would be full. Nobody has a right to live where they work. People off-island commute HOURS each way to work (such as PA-NYC) in order to get the big bucks. How come nobody mentions a 'trailer park'. Or is that too snobby for the island?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/20/2017 - 11:03

Permalink

Gina Menemsha/nyc

I find Mr. Bazzy's comments confusing.. Is he implying that the WaterSt project that was a modular buildout & fairly quick & efficient is less attractive /desirable that the Kuehn's Way building plan which justifies the higher upfront costs necessary to make it more attractive??
Why not consider a Modular buildout for Kuehn's Way?? It would be a lot less expensive aka affordable & reasonably fast to complete..

Doug Ruskin West Tisbury

I do think you infer where Mr. Bazzi did not imply. Please allow me to clarify (I am an IHT Director). Every project is different, so development costs can easily vary. In the case of Water street the site was donated; IHT had to purchase the Kuehn's Way site. Water Street is a single structure on a small, clear site with 6 one-bedroom units; Kuehn's Way is wooded, the design consisting of 20 Units in 10 duplexes containing 1- 2- and 3-bedroom units. So site development and construction is more complex. In addition many of the neighbors' concerns were directly addressed to mitigate impacts to their existing properties. And modular construction IS being seriously considered, for the reasons you state.

I would like to clarify one other point (made elsewhere) - IHT has been criticized for "overbuilding". But "Affordable" generally relates to the cost of occupancy, not the the cost of construction. It is certainly true that the construction is high-quality, though every effort is made to keep costs down. It has to be high-quality for 2 primary reasons: Renting (or buying) a home not only entails the monthly rent or mortgage cost, it also includes utilities. IHT works hard to keep those costs down so the units are truly affordable. Second, IHT is insuring perpetual affordability and is responsible for the lifetime of those structures; Higher quality lasts longer and costs less to maintain - in houses as with anything else. But if you walk through any IHT home, you will not see any "frills".

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/20/2017 - 12:23

Permalink

Abraham L. Seiman Oak Bluffs, MA

Without affordable housing, more medical and mental health service, super market, gas station, teachers. and infrastructure employees salaries will continue to rise. Employers, i.e., towns, retail and wholesale business employees will only work if their salaries increase to cover commutation and travel time.

BS OB

Are you arguing to keep wages low for these workers? Why shouldn't employers pay a wage that will provide workers with the housing they need instead of hitting up the taxpayers to pay for this housing? Affordable housing policy has failed here for decades. It's time for people to come to terms with thier ability to live here. We have no obligation to provide housing for those who don't have the skills necessary to be able to afford to live here.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/20/2017 - 17:04

Permalink

Brenda OB

Some people are hung up on providing houses yards etc but with limited space available we may need to tweak the space.
Maybe several rooming units with (1/2 bath in unit) and shared kitchen, laundry and full bath could work.
Granted it's not the condo/townhouse or SFD. You could tag on community service hours monthly as part of payment. Yard work, trash pick up or something.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/20/2017 - 20:51

Permalink

Sara Piazza Edgartown

Forty-plus years ago my family owned a piece of land that we ultimately ended up selling, all but two three-quarter-acre lots that we set aside for our as-of-then two young children. It was my husband's idea - he was prescient, or at the very least, wise. He knew that the day would come when Islanders would be hard pressed to make a home here and he wanted our kids to have that option. Ironically, the land we sold would create homes for many families, but my childrens' lots would not be available for their use - and not because of of the zoning that changed in the neighborhood, which we were able to work around thanks to a gracious and kind zoning board of appeals, and many advocates, but because of a couple of neighbors who blocked us. Weird, huh?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/23/2017 - 07:39

Permalink

charlie callahan so boston/edgartown

There is so much unused land here it's a disgrace that honest hardworking people have to do the housing shuffle every year and in the summer a lot of these HONEST HARDWORKING people have to live in their cars. The truth is most of the phoney rich here don't want affordable housing. It's the same in southie where house prices have gone wild, but the city makes sure that for every market rate project there is a certain percentage of affordable units. How the vineyard gets away without doing is is because of the good old boys running the show. And by the way IT IS A STATE LAW

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/23/2017 - 10:59

Permalink

EH

One rarely-stated reality:

Almost all "affordable ownership" units which were built with considerable taxpayer, CPA, and private money (and which received considerable consideration and exemptions with respect to zoning, MVC approval, and the like) are no longer *provably* occupied by affordable-qualified recipients. Which is to say, the occupants are no longer required to be financially screened; to report income and assets; or to qualify as needy. They may be poor, but there's no evidence to conclude that they are.

DCRHA rentals require a yearly qualification. But IHT purchases do not. Once people buy those units, they are permitted to make as much money as they want, and to save as much money as they want.

If you inherit half a million from your parents, get promoted to president of the company, or anything else... you still get to stay in the subsidized house. Say you're 30 years old, and you buy a house while you're making $50,000/year. Then you get married, and ten years later you and your spouse are each making $75,000. The extra $100,000 per year is not due as a repayment; it doesn't affect your ability to live there. Not only are you making enough to buy a normal house (you don't need a subsidy,) but the unusually low subsidized price means you're saving up more than anyone else can, per month.

If people in "affordable" housing seem to have more money than one might expect, that is why. That is why you'll see folks in "affordable" housing who go on vacation and drive fancy cars, while many taxpayers who didn't benefit from enormous largesse are unable to do those things. And that is why you'll see folks in "affordable" housing who are able to avoid making tough choices regarding finances (should I clean toilets at $25/hour, or start a philosophical yoga drum circle?), leaving those decisions to folks with other debts.

This may be a social benefit. It may be that every taxpayer is willing to fund people saving for extra for college and retirement, driving Volvos, and having freedom of economic choice in all things, while living in a house which was subsidized to the tune of $100,000-300,000 by public or charitable funds. And it may be that the taxpayers support leaving those units to one's kids, even if the kids themselves don't qualify at all (did you know that one?) but I doubt folks knew they were voting for that either...

I venture to say we'd feel better if that reality was acknowledged up front, and if we all had the chance to vote.

(That doesn't even account for the evidence of gaming the system, by artificially lowering incomes during the application process.)

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.