The reality is that Question 2 is not about our school district, but rather a question of supporting our greater commonwealth.
Election day is nearing, and as we make our way to our polling locations across the Cape and Islands there are a number of critically important ballot questions that await us. Not the least among them is Question 2, the measure that seeks to lift the so-called cap on charter schools in Massachusetts.
Those in opposition have painted a picture of dire straits for local school districts if the measure passes. Of course, the truth is not as gloomy as they would have you believe. On the other hand, at this moment, there are children sitting in classrooms in at least nine cities across our state who are not receiving a high-quality education; now that’s a pretty gloomy picture. A Yes on 2 vote would change that.
Understandably, I’ve heard from throughout the region concerns about protecting district school budgets from charter school expansion. The reality is that Question 2 is not about our school district, but rather a question of supporting our greater commonwealth. The Vineyard and the peninsula of Cape Cod are home to great public school options for families, with both public charter schools and traditional school districts. It is also true that our community wouldn’t be affected by this ballot question, as we are not near the state-imposed cap. Here’s the truth: a Yes on 2 vote is not about us, it’s about thousands of children living in places like Boston, Springfield, Lawrence and Chelsea who deserve a better shot at a quality public education.
Opponents of Question 2 are effective at creating doubt about this measure. Don’t be fooled. We cannot let adult issues get in the way of providing access to better options for kids, the vast majority of whom live in poverty and are families of color.
Through my campaign for state representative, I was fortunate to get to meet thousands of residents across the district. This experience reminded me that we all share the same aspirations for our kids. Imagine our collective power for kids in communities across our state if we joined together. That advocacy is not without champions. In fact, here on the Vineyard, our most prominent summer visitor, President Obama, has been a leading voice for public charter schools, and if elected, Hillary Clinton will carry the torch further. As Democrats, we must be committed to expanding what’s working in our public schools and fixing what isn’t working for our students. No child should be stuck in an underperforming school or denied opportunities just because of what neighborhood they live in.
Massachusetts leads the nation with the best traditional and innovative public charter schools in the country, and we must work day in and day out to continue to earn that title. The choice we make in November will determine the options available to thousands of Massachusetts’ students and families, as well as our ability to continue delivering on the promise of a world-class education for every child. That seems like a pretty bright picture. Let’s paint that one. Vote Yes on 2.
Ewell Hopkins lives in Oak Bluffs.

Comments
A very well written and
Brian Packish Oak BluffsA very well written and thoughtful piece. I serve with Ewell Hopkins on a variety of boards and committees. He has my utmost respect, with that said, I will be voting No on Question 2. I will be voting No for many of the same reasons he has outlined as criteria for a Yes vote. I was originally planning on voting Yes and after much discussion and research it became very clear to me this is absolutely the wrong answer. The concept is well intentioned, the problem is there is a gap. To remove the cap on Charter schools, there needs to be a commitment to bolster the Public schools first. Without that funding built into the discussion I cannot support the further deterioration of our Public school system. Please do your research and develop a position on this important issue. This is about how we shape our future and nurture our most valuable resource, our children.
Agreed, Brian!
Joanne Lambert Oak BlufsAgreed, Brian!
Totally agree with Brian. The
Nathalie Woodruff Oak BluffsTotally agree with Brian. The funding planned for charter schools would be better spent on improving public schools, where every student deserves the best we can offer, not for just a few lucky ones.
I agree with you Brian.
Marie Doubleday Oak BluffsI agree with you Brian.
I guess we are reading a
tom rancichI guess we are reading a different question---MA general law already authorizes Charter Schools---as it does for alternative education for drop outs, truants, expelled suspended and votech. Question 2 sets the limit of Charter students at 1% of the general public school population. The PUBLIC Charter schools are public---what is it you want to bolster that charter schools do not bolster? Better science? Arts? Math? Charter schools do it. Keep in mind that though publicly funded Charter School children can not participate in Regional sports (except swimming)my tax dollars go to both. If we do not have alternative education opportunities we will diminish the futures of our children. At the regional, which is a great school, the children have 4 minutes between classes and 18 minutes for lunch--great plan--driven by driven by MA and Federal law---not the needs of our community. The limited number of seats at Charter Schools is driven by state law--it is not an exclusive institution.
As a current MVPCS student, I
Keith EdgartownAs a current MVPCS student, I see the benefit of a charter school education. Do not get fooled into thinking that charter school funding means worse public schools. Charter schools can be a great alternative and are also public schools themselves.
Charter Schools ARE public
tom rancichCharter Schools ARE public schools---thus the name Martha's Vineyard PUBLIC Charter School---if you want to increase the efficiency of funding for all public schools cut the state bureaucracy that hamstrings our excellent Regional Educators and adds enormous tax burden. Put two kids through the Regional, great education---but hampered by state regulations design to homogenize all school in the common wealth. Have had the pleasure of watching children excel in the Charter School---and beyond. We need alternative educational opportunities--whether it be VOTECH or Charter---voting yes on 2
Just for the record, Charter
Sam Berlow West TisburyJust for the record, Charter schools are public.
"Charter schools are unique public schools that are allowed the freedom to be more innovative while being held accountable for advancing student achievement. Because they are public schools, they are:
Open to all children;
Do not charge tuition; and
Do not have special entrance requirements.
The core of the charter school model is the belief that public schools should be held accountable for student learning. In exchange for this accountability, school leaders should be given freedom to do whatever it takes to help students achieve and should share what works with the broader public school system so that all students benefit."
From 'About Public Charter Schools' web site.
Add new comment