<p>As the North Bluff restoration project in Oak Bluffs comes under fresh public scrutiny, the Martha’s Vineyard Commission asked for more information and better drawings at a public hearing Thursday night.</p>
As the North Bluff restoration project in Oak Bluffs comes under fresh public scrutiny, the Martha’s Vineyard Commission asked for more information and better drawings at a public hearing Thursday night.
The commission is reviewing the project as a development of regional impact following a referral by the town planning board last month. Oak Bluffs selectmen, who have already awarded a bid for the project, are concerned that $5.6 million in state funding will be lost if work does not begin soon.
Plans to restore the crumbling bluff date to 2010; the original scheme called for replacing the concrete seawall from the harbor parking lot to the Steamship Authority wharf. But when funding options later shrank due to FEMA funds that did not come through, engineers scaled down the plans, which now call for installing sheet metal barrier in front of the seawall and building a timber walkway atop the steeply-banked bluffs.
A beach renourishment project is also planned in tandem with the seawall work, and the conservation commission is in the process of securing permits for bringing fresh sand to the thin ribbon of beach which has been ravaged by erosion and storms.
At a three-hour hearing before the commission Thursday night, project designer Carlos Pena of CLE engineering said replacing the seawall with another concrete structure would not only be prohibitively expensive but may not even be a good option because of unstable sand and soil around the old wall, built in the 1940s.
“It is well beyond its time when it should have been replaced,” Mr. Pena said of the wall. “The idea is to create a more stable coastal bank, come up with a more efficient design.”
Critics, including residents in the North Bluff neighborhood, are primarily concerned about protecting what’s left of the beach.
“We’re not even allowed, in Oak Bluffs, to go to the beaches up-Island, and we’re going to throw our beach away,” said Mark Wallace, a town businessman and North Bluff resident. “If a private person owned it, they wouldn’t suggest this. You could repair that wall for way less money and not affect the beach.”
Town officials said the complex process of obtaining permits for beach renourishment is underway, but they could not offer a firm date for the project. And they conceded there is no funding in place for that part of the project. The concerns resonated with several commissioners.
“I think we need to assure the townspeople and the Island people that beach is going to be back there in a reasonable amount of time,” said commissioner Jim Vercruysse. “Before I would approve any permit for this, I would need to have a specific timeline about getting that beach there.”
Town administrator Bob Whritenour said the town is facing a firm deadline to use the state grant money allotted for the project.
“The town’s current contract to complete this project expires on June 30,” Mr. Whritenour said. “If the project isn’t substantially complete, it’s unlikely those grants will be extended.”
Expressing sympathy for the looming deadlines, the commission continued the hearing to next Thursday (Dec. 17) with a request for more information and better drawings from engineers. Deliberations and a possible vote were also scheduled for next week, although hearing chairman Linda Sibley said with the Christmas holidays coming up, there could be some delay.
“We want to accommodate you,” Mrs. Sibley told town officials. But with more staff work and documents needed, she said:
“That probably means January.”

Comments
Monitor Active DRI 659 -
Ewell Hopkins - Member of the Oak Bluffs Planning BoardMonitor Active DRI 659 - North Bluff Sea Wall at the MVC web-site to stay current on this very complex discussion.
http://www.mvcommission.org/dri/summary/659/51539
Stop thinking of this project
Douglas F Korves AIA Always on IslandStop thinking of this project as an engineering problem only and resist rushing to judgement because of a state funding deadline. Plan this painting on a larger canvas. This is not just a bluff stabilization and sea wall project. The solution deserves to involve and be funded by all the targeted areas that the Intermodal Surface Transportation Enhancement Act (ISTEA - The Highway Bill) was created to accomplish.
The town dock at the point is the landing for all inter coastal passenger ferries to mitigate bringing passengers on foot and bikes to meet buses, all to reduce car traffic. Mopeds and bike rentals abound and congrat the dock. OB needs a well thought out wharf.
The roadway should be redesigned to intelligently accommodate the traffic to the ferries and buses and more importantly needs a separate and enhanced bike, walking and restive vantage points on a rebuilt bluff to mitigate the piecemeal planning hiccups over three centuries that includes: 1.) the steamship wharf, the original train/ferry dock of the 19th Century and its reconfiguration; 2.) the obsolescent knee-jerk 20th century planning of the dock and Atlantic Avenue for the automobile and the motor freight truck; the planning of the steamship office and toilets poorly conceived with town toilets; the traffic circulation issues and sea wall erosion that stretches from the the parking lot to the ponds and "Nessie"-all created by a road to a ferry originally built to accommodate a train to the Edgartown Junction; and lastly, and not least of all, 3.) is the 21st century unstudied affect of the changed ocean and tidal currents even the smaller sea wall project would have on the Inkwell, let alone this larger more reasonable focus.
So fellow planners, commissioners, SSA thinkers, DOT types, Friends of, Trustees of, Bikepathers, Chamber of, concerned this and thaters, and all types of all stripes; here is some winter homework.
Consider forming the coalition. Contact your Senator, congress person, state senator, governor, chair of that committee, mayors, selectmen and champion this Point to Pond Project.
Remember this aspect of the ISTEA act: "before you propose and build a new ISTEA project, money is there to pay for the study alternate mitigation solutions for previous poorly planned transportation projects. Then draw it, fund it and build it.
Make up P2P or PPP (point to pond or Point to Pond Project) buttons now, identify or became your leaders, and plan this P2P project for the 22nd Century.
Add new comment