Vineyard Complementary Medicine owner Susan Sanford hopes for state license.
Mark Lovewell

Island Conundrum: Medical Marijuana Legal, Transporting is Not

<p>Massachusetts law provides for a medical marijuana dispensary in Dukes County, but the U.S. Coast Guard says under federal law it won't permit marijuana to be transported to the Island by boat.

With the awarding of a state medical marijuana dispensary license for Dukes County still in flux, two leading Vineyard applicants are moving ahead with efforts to open a dispensary on the Island. But in addition to the need to clear a state licensure hurdle, another issue has surfaced around medical marijuana that is unique to the Island: how to get the product here.

State law allows for the sale of medical marijuana at approved dispensaries, but under federal law it is illegal to transport any form of marijuana by boat or plane.

Susan Sanford, the owner of Vineyard Complementary Medicine, received a special permit two weeks ago from the West Tisbury zoning board of appeals to operate a dispensary at her clinic, pending state license approval. It is the first special permit of its kind issued on the Vineyard.

And businessman Geoffrey Rose, doing business as Patient Centric of Martha’s Vineyard, has sued the state Department of Public Health over the license review process.

Other applicants are awaiting further information from the state Department of Public Health.

But if and when any applicants are awarded a license (to date 20 of 35 licenses have been awarded by the state with none for the Vineyard), getting marijuana to the Island could pose a challenge.

“The Coast Guard enforces federal law to include illegal possession or use of drugs, within all navigable waters of the U.S. regardless of any state medicinal marijuana laws,” Coast Guard spokesman Lieut. Joseph Klinker said this week.

“Use, sale or association with marijuana on navigable federal waters of the United States is illegal under federal law.”

And that was the message received by the Steamship Authority, general manager Wayne Lamson said.

“It cannot be transported,” Mr. Lamson said. “We checked this out with the Coast Guard to find out what their position was and they responded that it wasn’t allowed, so there’s a disconnect. There is no federal law that exempts shipment of medical marijuana. Whether they go through federal waters or not, the vessel is regulated by the Coast Guard and what can be carried is all under federal regulations,” he added.

Det. Sgt. Chris Dolby of Edgartown said he attended a training session on medical marijuana last week that covered a variety of topics, including the issuance of medical marijuana cards. But transportation is still a gray area, he said.

“The way it is right now, you’re not allowed to transport it,” he said. “It’s definitely not black and white.”

Last August, the U.S. Department of Justice said it will not challenge state laws that allow for medical and recreational use of marijuana as long as the state laws do not conflict with new federal enforcement priorities. Congress went one step further in May when it voted to stop the Drug Enforcement Agency from spending funds to prevent states from implementing their medical marijuana laws.

In 2012, Massachusetts passed a law that allows for up to 35 nonprofit, registered marijuana dispensaries. The law requires at least one but no more than five dispensaries in each county. Four counties were left out of the initial round of license approvals: Berkshire, Franklin, Dukes and Nantucket.

Four applicants from Dukes County had made it to the final application phase, including Ms. Sanford, Mr. Rose, Susan Wysocki (doing business as Kingsbury Group), and Michael Peters (doing business as MV Greencross).

DPH spokesman Dave Kibbe said there is nothing current to report on the counties where no provisional licenses have been issued.

Applicants were offered an opportunity to debrief with the department about the reasons why they were not selected, Mr. Kibbe said.

“Those meetings have concluded and the information from them is still being processed,” he said.

If approved for a license, Mr. Rose said he plans to cultivate and dispense on the Vineyard, getting around the transportation issue. The issue is a key point in his lawsuit against the state, Mr. Rose said.

“We feel that it is important that there be a dispensary with cultivation here on the Vineyard because that’s what federal law will allow,” he said.

Mr. Rose, who owns Our Island Club, a consumer savings program, is also considering a West Tisbury dispensary but has not applied for a special permit.

Ms. Sanford has secured her special permit from West Tisbury. She plans to cultivate, but in her application the location was not disclosed. She is partnering with a licensed medical marijuana dispensary and grower in Rhode Island.

At her hearing before the town zoning board of appeals last month, her proposal drew praise.

“If there’s going to be one it’s nice to have someone locally who has some medical and holistic training,” said board chairman Tucker Hubbell.

“It’s a really good application and you presented a good case for this,” added board member Bob Schwier.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/13/2014 - 08:48

Permalink

L. Peterson MN

Simple - have a plane fly over, then drop the shipment from low altitude into a field [owned by someone who is supportive of medical marijuana.]

TOM HODGSON wt

Since transport of pot by plane is illegal, your solution is illegal. With a good lawyer you might be able to split some hairs, and have the weed in a package suspended outside the plane, by a rope. The drug would not be "in" a plane. Whether that's transport "by" plane would be for the legal system to decide. Is it? That depends on what your definition of "is" is.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/13/2014 - 09:11

Permalink

Jerry Ross Nantucket

The sale, cultivation and use of cannabis is ALL federally illegal. That isn't stopping dispensaries from operating...so why would transportation be an issue.

TOM HODGSON wt

What's the problem? There are plenty of splendidly fit swimmers. Put a pack with five or ten pounds of weed on the back of a good swimmer, and they can swim the drug over from the Mainland. Neither boat nor plane would be involved. End of problem. Swimmers will of course well very well remunerated for their trouble.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 06/13/2014 - 23:15

Permalink

Thomas Payne In the past

What about States right ? Now is the time to secede from the tyrants in D.C.
Federal law has no jurisdiction in Mass or any other state except by permission from State legislature. Let's see the coast guard stop the transport of medical weed in Mass. The Coast Guard is blowing smoke no pun intended and
is testing the State of Massachusetts's right to make and enforce it's own laws.
I would like to see the coast guard bust the first cancer patient carrying legal medical weed on the ferry and see if there is or isn't public condemnation for doing so.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/14/2014 - 08:50

Permalink

Puh-leeeze.....

Throw it in a backpack and come on over on the SSA with it. After all, *no one* has ever successfully done that, right?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 06/14/2014 - 21:53

Permalink

Jeff Thompson Tisbury

How embarrassing for The Federal Government, Coast Guard and Law Enforcement to still be fighting this.

TOM HODGSON WT

Where there's a will, there's a workaround. Two more solutions, the product of a recent conversation with some friends: Fly it over by kite. Shoot it over with a cannon. Plus a definition question: is a submarine a boat?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 06/19/2014 - 17:19

Permalink

Brenda OB

How did they expect the patients or people who will be legally using the marijuana on MV and NAN to get it home??

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.