Fate of solar projects in West Tisbury and Tisbury is unknown.
Ray Ewing

Builder Going Out of Business, Fate of Town Solar Projects Unknown

Broadway Electrical Co. Inc., based in Boston, will shutter its business operation, a spokesman for the Cape and Vineyard Electrical Cooperative (CVEC), confirmed yesterday.

The fate of two major solar projects on the Vineyard is uncertain following the news this week that the contractor hired to build the arrays is going out of business.

Broadway Electrical Co. Inc., based in Boston, will shutter its business operation, a spokesman for the Cape and Vineyard Electrical Cooperative (CVEC), confirmed yesterday.

“On Jan. 14 . . . [CVEC] became aware of rumors circulating about Broadway Electrical Inc. and its future. CVEC promptly contacted Broadway who has confirmed that it is winding down its operations,” CVEC special projects coordinator Liz Argo said in a statement emailed to the Gazette Thursday.

Representatives from Broadway Electrical could not be reached for comment. An exact time line for when the company will close is not known.

The company is under contract to build solar arrays in both Tisbury and West Tisbury, along with a number of towns on the Cape.

An energy cooperative affiliated with the Cape Light Compact, CVEC was founded in 2007 to oversee renewable energy projects on the Cape and Vineyard. Four of CVEC’s 20 members are Island towns — Edgartown, Oak Bluffs, Tisbury and West Tisbury. Dukes County is also a member.

The first round of solar projects began in November on eight sites on the Vineyard and the Cape.

Two of those sites are on the Vineyard, at the Farm Institute in Katama and at the Tisbury capped landfill.

Construction is underway at both sites and is expected to be completed by June.

The round one projects saw delays, as CVEC and contractor American Capital Energy worked to secure building permits and hook up to the NStar grid. In Tisbury, groundbreaking took place more than two years after the initial contract was signed with CVEC.

CVEC issued a request for proposals for round two in September 2011. The contract was awarded to Broadway Electrical in April 2012. In its annual report for fiscal year 2013, prepared in September, CVEC noted that Broadway “anticipates the initiation of construction for round two in fall 2013.”

The initial round two request for proposals consisted of 69 megawatts of energy production at 105 sites, including several at locations in Oak Bluffs, Tisbury and West Tisbury. That was narrowed down to just over 20 megawatts, produced by 22 sites. The 22 sites include the West Tisbury capped landfill and the Tisbury town compost pile, but not Oak Bluffs. The West Tisbury project was proposed at 883 kilowatts. The Tisbury array is much smaller at 63 kilowatts.

West Tisbury town administrator Jen Rand said Broadway had applied for a building permit for the site and that a public hearing is scheduled for next week to connect the site to the grid with NStar.

“So it’s in process,” she said.

The Tisbury project is also in the permitting process. Construction has begun on five other round two projects on the Cape, and is nearing completion at two others, Ms. Argo said.

Reached by telephone Thursday, she expressed confidence in the outcome despite the fact that the contractor is going out of business.

“We are optimistic and we’ll continue to protect both the projects and the CVEC members,” Ms. Argo said. She said company president John Checklick and vice president Charles McLaughlin began meeting with Broadway last week about the next steps, and that agreements allow for the transfer of projects to Broadway’s financial backers, G&S Solar Installers Inc. and RNK Capital LLC.

The optimism was not shared by Richard Knabel, chairman of the West Tisbury selectmen and a longstanding skeptic about the CVEC operation.

“I’m upset about it,” Mr. Knabel said, referring to the news that Broadway Electrical is going out of business. “In every instance when something happens, CVEC has not told the towns and it comes out of the blue. Of course it raises the question whether this project is ever going to happen,” he added.

He said the town has not heard from Broadway Electrical but received a statement from Ms. Argo at CVEC similar to the one emailed to the Gazette. Mr. Knabel said he first learned of the problem through media outlets.

“To what extent was this known in advance, did CVEC know it was about to happen? We don’t know,” the selectman said. “All I know is we’ve always been kept in the dark about these problems.”

Mr. Knabel said the project needs to be finished by June 30 in order to qualify for state energy credits.

“Should they default on that, the whole deal collapses, I believe,” he said.

Ms. Argo said the goal is to transfer project development to G&S Solar Installers and RNK Capital as soon as possible in order to meet the June deadline. The Massachusetts Solar Carve-Out Program was established in 2010 to develop 400 megawatts of solar photovoltaic projects across the commonwealth. The program offers tax credits to eligible projects.

“Ultimately, we just don’t know exactly how it’s all going to work out,” Ms. Argo said.

Ms. Rand said her town has little control over the outcome. “My hope is that it transitions to someone else and [the project] goes charging forward,” she said.

Remy Tumin contributed reporting.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 08:31

Permalink

Bob Fargo Edgartown

Another example of the agenda of Dr Evil (Obama) and Mini Me (Patrick) being brought down by the reality that these Green Energy inititatives they are forcing on Massachusetts and the rest of the nation are simply not profitable or sustainable without being propped up and subsidized by massive injections of our tax dollars. Spend the money on making certain the Keystone Pipeline will be safe and on further exploration and production of the abundant natural gas and coal the US posesses within its own borders.

Thomas Hodgson wt

Dr. Evil and Mini Me? Please give us a break! Starting a comment with gratuitous political insults is not particularly helpful to any discussion of a very real issue, except from a comedic standpoint. Cape Wind's timeline starts well over fifteen years ago. Neither Obama nor Patrick were in office at that time. Propped up? The oil and gas industries have benefitted from billions of dollars in favorable laws, exemptions from environmental regulations, and they enjoy extraordinary tax breaks. That's subsidization, dressed in legalese. Given the amount of money the oil patch makes, all that special treatment is not very necessary.
"Abundant US Oil and gas"? Our current "abundance" is but a temporary and flash-in-the-pan bubble. A bubble with serious consequences, which will have to be dealt with. How would you propose to clean up the coming environmental disaster of shattered bedrock and poisoned water wells, which will the legacy of fracking. Fly over this country, over the fracking regions, and you will be gobsmacked at the extent of the webs and splotches of the oil and gas extraction industry. How will you remove the extraordinary added atmospheric CO2 burden from producing and using the tar sands oil? Fracking wells have a number of flaws, not the least of which is that their production rates taper off very quickly.
Spending money, even subsidization money, for energy sources that will not come back to bite us, or kill us off, is arguably a very wise use of funds, particularly if we wish to continue to exist as a civilized species.

Caroline New York

Thomas: Bob was quite right to include Patrick in his complaint. Go to Broadway's own website and click the link to News. Not only many photos with Patrick, but a news item that Patrick's own Green Communities Act gave a grant to Broadway and the company also received federal money from the Recovery Act.

While you may interpret Bob's comments as snark, he was spot-on accurate in his accusation that Patrick walks hand in hand with funding lame solar projects that are going nowhere fast.

Dan Chilmark

Perception vs. Reality is the issue here, and politics is the lens through which this is being viewed. If Obama told you that they had a new form of diesel that ran 90% cleaner and would put smiles on people's faces and inject Ozone back into the atmosphere the eco-maniacs would embrace Suburbans and semi-trucks as "fuel efficient". I'm all for green energy - I've used solar myself and I think that it's great - but stop saying things that just aren't true. Solar power installers are getting tons of Federal money and still shutting their doors. If solar truly paid for itself, that wouldn't be happening. Russia just overtook Saudi Arabia as the world's largest oil exporter on reserves that the Soviet's just found out about prior to their downfall. Canada is on track to becoming one of the largest oil exporters in the world too. Oil is being found and re-discovered in previously unprofitable regions at record-breaking rates. The question is not "does solar work?" or "is oil bad?". The question is how badly do you want it? If you were willing to raise the gas tax 50%, you'd see a flock of people "going green", regardless of whether they were Obamaphobes or heartless Republicans. Similarly, if the government invested more in making solar work for the consumer, rather than lining the pockets of "green" energy companies (that also give them campaign contributions) solar would work too. Stop the ignorant policy line propaganda and start reading the facts. Then let's have a serious conversation about whether we want to be energy-dependent on other countries for 30 more years, while destroying our natural resources and air quality, or are we willing to do what is logical and market-oriented to make solar work. And, no, plugging in your Prius to an outlet that gets it's power from a coal-powered power plant, even in part, doesn't make you a poster child for a Greener America.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 08:37

Permalink

deshandra brown ob

So the question is, what happens if the developer of offshore windmills suffers the same fate? I can only imagine the once pristine waters south of the Vineyard littered with rusting towers. Guess who gets stuck with the tab to clean it up?

Thomas Hodgson wt

Isn't the answer that bond has been posted to cover the cost of removal of these turbines, at the end of their useful lives?
Those funds should not be affected by any hypothetical or actual bankruptcy.

farmer5 chilmark

Your comments reveal how little you know about Cape Wind. As part of their licensing they must post a performance bond that will cover the cost of removal. Your fears are unfounded.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 11:34

Permalink

Jack Edgartown

The bottom line hear is that Solar panel technology has never been a proven winner.
Sure company's that install these panels will come out and give you all this great data and "green" talk and how you are going get all these great tax breaks and incentives and you must do it by the end of the year to start seeing your savings. Like the sky is going fall out of the sky. If its to good to be true then well.......
Company's that are installing manufacturing these things are like used car salesman. They would sell there mother for a grain of salt.
Why do you think all these big solar manufactures go under after a few years. They sell there pitch to people who buy it an then they are gone.....I bought into and I would NEVER do it again. Ask people who have has had the panels over 5 -10 years what they think???????
Also keep in mind the cost to get rid of the things when the don't work! Not cheap.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 11:34

Permalink

frackingmama CA

Can anyone say solyndra? stick with fossil fuels, more bang for the buck

Ken Esq Edgartown, MA

The best part about those fossil fuels is they're renewable...you just keep raising dinosaurs and an eon or so later...bingo!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 13:03

Permalink

Paul Pimentel Edgartown, MA

My, such vehemence. Photovoltaics (PV) is a technology, not a philosophy. Like most technologies, it isn't perfect and you can find anecdotes to support that it doesn't work and others that it's the best thing ever. Here's mine. The oldest PV my company installed has been running continuously for 29 years; it's had two inverters and three panels replaced during its unremarkable life. Including the cost of those repairs, it has paid the owner back many times over. Among the 38 PV systems we've installed, none have failed, few are performing perfectly and all are meeting financial objectives.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 01/24/2014 - 16:57

Permalink

frackingmama CA

The best engine ever invented for bang for the buck is the internal combustion engine. It brought us the life we have today which everyone enjoys, yes, even the solar people who take jet planes to meetings, etc. In addition, stepping on the pedal of a '69 roadrunner with hemi engine is a blast. No solar panel can do that.

Oh brother

Only in the United States... This is probably the only country where people are so uninformed and proud to be so. frackingmama is entitled to his opinions, and if we understand him correctly, driving a gas guzzling hot rod is his idea of a good time, renewable energy is dumb, fossil fuels are non-polluting and will be around forever, and - one last thing, gold falls out of the sky and eating ice cream for breakfast will make you a champion. God Bless America.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 01/26/2014 - 18:52

Permalink

BillyB OB

The good news is that like the dinosaurs, people like frackingmama are slowly passing away. Their memories of 6 mile per gallon beasts like the '69 roadrunner will go with them. Our generation of more eco-responsible people recognize that abusing fossil fuels is fools errand. Let's focus on renewables and let folks like frackingmama fade like their non-renewables.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/27/2014 - 16:52

Permalink

john grounded

frackingmama must have forgotten that the 69 Roadrunner was the first one with smog controls. Probably never even got to ride in the back seat of one

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 01/27/2014 - 21:22

Permalink

Stewart NY and West Chop

I could not agree more with Jack from Edgartown.. Here is my story I payed over 10k to install solar panels on my home about five years ago. I was very interested in the new "technology". I have to say five years later I do not see the "return" that I was promised.... Buyer beware that's all I can say.... These so called green company's make a crazy amount of money and they only care about is $$$.. They won't tell you the real facts about how these panels have a huge support failure. Major company's that supply the panels are dropping like flies. Do not waste your time or resources.
The company's that sell the panels will not tell you the failures and dealing with the bad customer service. They will tell you about how much you will save....
I would never do it again. Funny thing the company that sold me the panels are still pedaling these things.... After hey told me that my panels were obsolete....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 01/28/2014 - 23:27

Permalink

Meredith Mv, LA on the grid!

I guess the question here is to ask and not the company that profit considerably from solar panels does it work?? Plain and simple...ask people that have it and most important HAD IT!
Well I thought I was doing the right thing, and I based it on facts from green company's. I was sold a Pinto when I was told I was getting a Mercedes's
We installed a 2.6 million system in southern calif to supply a small neighborhood of 85 homes... The worst investment we ever did....
Also attorneys love it!!! They make a nice return as always.... They don't have it guarantee that!
Good luck but if you get solar panels lights out! It is not worth it!
Take it from me it cost me 30k

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 01/29/2014 - 07:12

Permalink

frackingmama CA

Dear me, please do not confuse the solar proponents with facts. Most of the money being spent on a large scale is "other people's money".

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.