Time Running Out for House at Lagoon Pond Drawbridge

<p>On the morning of May 22, Charlotte Holloman packed up a few items, helped her 91-year-old mother into the car and drove away from their home at the edge of Lagoon Pond for what could be the last time.</p> <p>Barring a last minute reprieve by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, the house will soon be demolished to make way for the new Lagoon bridge.</p>

On the morning of May 22, Charlotte Holloman packed up a few items, helped her 91-year-old mother into the car and drove away from their home at the edge of Lagoon Pond for what could be the last time.

Barring a last minute reprieve by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation, the house where they have spent part of every summer entertaining friends and contemplating nature for more than half a century will soon be demolished to make way for the new Lagoon bridge.

The fate of the house, literally tucked under the drawbridge on Beach Road at the easternmost outskirts of Vineyard Haven, is the subject of a tangled decade-long standoff between the Hollomans and the state Department of Transportation. Now on her third lawyer and facing imminent eviction for the second time, Ms. Holloman is angry and tired of battling to keep her house or at least get what she considers fair market value for it.

“We’ve suffered in silence for much of this time, but I’m done with that,” she told the Gazette on Thursday. “I take it very personally because I don’t believe they need to do this, and I know they don’t need to do it now.”

A spokesman for the transportation department, which formally took over the property by eminent domain in February 2012, said two different appraisals put the value of the house and the 5,870-square feet of property it sits on at $267,000, the amount they have offered to pay. Ms. Holloman said an appraisal she commissioned put the value at between $1.2 million and $1.5 million. She was previously paid $267,000 in 2006 when the state placed a temporary easement on the property. The property was assessed for $447,000 in 2012, according to Tisbury town records.

Matthew Martin, a policy analyst for interim U.S. Sen. William Cowan, said late Thursday that he has been in touch on Ms. Holloman’s behalf with officials from the Mass. DOT who had asked for a copy of Ms. Holloman’s appraisal and expressed willingness to work on a resolution to the issue.

Michael Verseckes, a spokesman for the DOT, confirmed that the agency remained open to negotiating the matter, but noted that taking the property was necessary to deal with storm water runoff created by the new bridge.

“While we understand the appraised value may be disappointing to the property owners, the appraisals were conducted in strict compliance with acceptable industrywide standards. The house was valued at its highest and best use, with no deduction for its use as a vacation property,” he said.

The Hollomans bought the house in May 1962 from Henry Cronig. Built in 1949, it sits on the site once occupied by the Betty Benz Tea House, a 50-seat restaurant that was destroyed in the hurricane of 1938.

In an interview with the Gazette in 2004, Mrs. Holloman said her late husband, Harlem physician Dr. John L.S. Holloman Jr., was not interested in buying the house that they had rented for several summers, but that Mr. Cronig persisted.

“He’d come down here with his car and his cigar and they would talk for hours,” Mrs. Holloman said. “At the time very few black people owned homes in Tisbury. Of course they were here on the Island, but the concentration by and large was in Oak Bluffs.”

Located on a tiny spit of land, the four-bedroom house seemed more like a ship in the 1960s and 1970s, when friends would gather there to catch fish, observe boats, birds and other wildlife, and wade in the water.

“It’s a sort of landmark,” said Robert Tignor, a senior judge in Washington who also has a home in Oak Bluffs. “I could sit at her kitchen table and watch the boats coming in and out, the osprey and oystercatchers. I’ve caught striped bass off her back deck.”

“It’s always been an iconic house in the African American community because of its location and because of the stature of Dr. Holloman and Mrs. Holloman,” said Stephanie Phillips, a longtime family friend and Oak Bluffs seasonal resident who practices law in Washington, DC. “When you’re in the house, even though it’s right off the road, you thought you were in another world. You’re right on the Lagoon. It’s a magical place.”

Plans for a bridge over Lagoon Pond to replace one built in 1935 had been on the drawing board for years, but Ms. Holloman said the first she knew of its potential impact on her family home was in 2001, when Tisbury selectman Tristan Israel and public works director Fred LaPiana drove down to her Washington, D.C. home to talk about their options. Both urged her and her mother to get a lawyer, which they did, she said.

The state DOT announced plans in 2003 to replace the old bridge in two phases: with a temporary bridge, which was finally opened in January of 2010, and a permanent bridge, which is scheduled to begin construction sometime in late summer or fall of this year. The state plans to open bids on the $44 million project on June 4, Mr. Verseckes said. To begin constructing the current temporary bridge, the highway department in 2006 exercised its right of eminent domain to gain a seven-year easement on several lots along Beach Road, including the Holloman property. Ms. Holloman said she was paid $267,000 for the easement, $40,000 of which went to her first lawyer.

Joe Moniz, a friend and Connecticut lawyer who advised Ms. Holloman informally, said this week that Ms. Holloman understood the easement was to put trucks and equipment on the property. “No one knew it was going to go on this long or that it would be so intrusive. The traffic, the vibrations, it caused all kinds of structural damage,” he said.

“The bridge is 76 inches from the front door. If you are sitting in her home, you can literally hear people walking, talking, riding bikes or driving on the road. The traffic vibrations are intolerable,” he said. “People always ask, why would they build a house under the bridge, when it is really that they built a bridge over the house.”

In a 2009 letter to Gov. Deval Patrick, Ms. Holloman wrote that the bridge construction had created “the exact combination of annoyances, concrete, walls, construction, dust and noise that we regularly drive all the way up from Washington, D.C. to get away from . . . What would become of us during this construction, and how we would be compensated, seems not to have figured in the state’s calculations.”

Ms. Holloman, who worked in Democratic politics for many years, said she believes appealing to the governor proved to be more harm than help.

“I knew how things worked and I was a very strong believer in the value of constituent services, so I went to the top officials,” she said. “At that point, Mass. DOT got in touch with us, but it seemed to have hardened them.”

In February 2012, Mass. DOT took legal possession of the land through another eminent domain action, this time claiming the property was needed “for the purpose of laying out, constructing and maintaining Beach Road.”

When the Hollomans failed to voluntarily vacate the house, the transportation department sent a letter in January of this year giving them 30 days to leave. The order was extended until April 3, when Senator Cowan’s office intervened to stop the eviction. Since then, Mrs. Holloman said, she has received several calls asking her to leave.

What makes the Hollomans’ many Island friends most distressed is the effect on Mrs. Holloman, a European-trained opera singer who recently retired as a professor of classical voice at Howard University and still has 16 private students. Mrs. Holloman was diagnosed last year with stage four metastatic breast cancer. Her daughter says she can’t bring herself to tell her mother that eviction is imminent.

“This house is just part of her mother’s fabric,” Ms. Phillips said. “She believes that her time on the Vineyard is what has given her the ability to fight the cancer, and to have this happen at this point seems so sad.”

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/23/2013 - 22:43

Permalink

Bruce Stone Edgartown

Is the state crazy? A four bedroom house on the vineyard on the lagoon for $267,000? There isn't a single house on the Vineyard right now for that amount let alone on the water (granted being right on the road would detract some). And less than 60% of the assessed value which by state law is supposed to be the full fair market value and subject to strict review by the same state's own Department of Revenue? This is deplorable.

dennis rebello new bedford

you got that right they are deff screwing her out of thousands of dollars if she got what was fair,that would be diff,damn state always does what it wants 267,000 ha what a joke

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/23/2013 - 22:48

Permalink

Amy Robertson Goldson Turks&Caicos and Oak Bluffs

I am filled with emotion because I know how much the house, the location, and the memories mean to Charlotte Holloman and her Mother. I am also repulsed by the callous indifference of the State in failing to be forthright with thier plans and its denial of appropriate compensation to make the Holloman family whole. At the least, the Holloman family deserves the choice of another house with a comparable view. Though their home and the memories which it held could never be replaced , at least fair and equitable recompense would ease the pain and give Mother Holloman a place to heal and spend her final days. Also, whatever happened to historic preservation of this landmark ?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/23/2013 - 23:31

Permalink

George Stein Edgartown Ma

My dad's mom was a waitress at that teahouse as a teenager in 1918-20. The photo is quite fufilling to our legacy. No way the pricing on that house is accurate. Let's look at an appraisal for the unit just east of there. Another place I have slept, market value is significantly lower.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 09:32

Permalink

Victoria L. Thornton Durham, NC

The Holloman home is one of the first memories of my proper introduction to the Vineyard. I had visited there once before while in school at Simmons College, but having just come from the Mediterranean, I wasn't very impressed. When I relocated to Washington, DC and returned with Charlotte a few years later, I came to know what MV was really about, through the days spent at the Holloman house. I'll never forget those moments and the memories of magical time and friendship at the edge of the water. All of the comments above reflect our in-credulousness at the manner in which this entire episode has been handled. I am hopeful that some Mass official with common sense, fairness, and pride in family and historical landmarks will make this situation right.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 10:59

Permalink

Jan Nickerson

The State must offer to this family, the value of other similar homes, size, and proximity to water. I believe the State has been waiting this out due to age and health of the owner. I find the State's actions dispictable.I would like to see the entire community stand up to the State, and each one write a letter or place a call to the Governor.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 12:17

Permalink

deshandra brown ob

The state should provide a 'like kind' house=same size with the same proximity to the water.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 13:23

Permalink

Jill Nelson New York City & Oak Bluffs

Yet another awful decision by the state, this one heartbreaking and a pure rip-off of the Holloman family.
They should have been dealt with in a forthright manner from the beginning, clearly too much to ask. At this late date,
realistic compensation or relocation to a comparable house, site and view is a no brainer, something even the powers that be should be capable of.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 13:31

Permalink

Joe

Another example of innocent victims of Big Brother. The state needs to investigate the actions taken by the DOT. Sad case of bullying by the State of MA. As a real estate investor, would love to get any plot of land by the water for less than $700k.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 14:01

Permalink

Linda Calabrese Oak Bluffs Ma and Tolland CT

I once had to defend a sliver of my own MV land; it took five years and a great deal of money but I won it back in court. I know how deep seated is the need to defend one's home and place. I have a tattered copy of a poem written by Tom Sutherland which reads (in part) "Home is a high place in the head! Held for the virtues and the better way: There wisdom rules, Beauty and Truth are wed, And loyalty stands guard till break of day. Evil can stalk our path, lurk in holes. Home is the lighted sanctum of the soul." I have wondered what has taken so long in rebuilding this bridge. Now I know. Let's face it, this bridge and its predecessor are encroaching on the homeowner, not the other way around. But, alas, as we have followed this settler to her island our numbers have swelled. We do need a stronger and safer bridge. So, start by apologizing to this loyal Vineyarder. Beg her forgiveness. Then give her enough money to either move that house or relocate to a comparable property. You can't buy a tent site on MV for the money she's been offered. The Commonwealth has spent far more money disregarding and bullying this family than it would have cost to persuade her had they not offered such an insulting boyout in the first place. Be fair and get on with it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 14:20

Permalink

Kevin

$267,000 on the water in Martha's Vineyard?!?! The State is trying to steal this property from this poor woman! This property is worth more than the town's assessed value. Someone needs to step up and help this woman. Her appraisal number is closer to the market value.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 14:54

Permalink

Wayne Smith Wes Tisbury

The State needs to be fair. If in fact this home needs to be taken by eminent domain, the Holloman family needs to be compensated fairly for their loss. You can't buy anything on the island for $267K. This is a total rip off for this family.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 18:58

Permalink

Chill W.Tisbury

I'm going to write a note and send it to our Governor and then I'm going to show my friends and ask them to write a letter. Thanks Tom for the http link.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 05:06

Permalink

Peter C Rhode Island

I feel badly for the Hollomans as this is one of those situations where the public interest has overridden the interest of an indivdual land owner. Taking emotion out of the conversation what would you have the state do, pay more than the appraisal (this means you will pay more) and what type of precedent would that set, pay for another way over the waterway which is likely cost prohibitive?
Hopefully the Hollomans will be able to purchase a new home/land to create new memories and be thankful that they had the opportunity to live in such a unique habitat.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 08:08

Permalink

June Manning Aquinnah

I can sympathize with the Hollomon family. Our family recently dealt with a similar determination of value from the Commonwealth. It was not fair at all and yet we were informed that it was the value determined by the Dept of Revenue. Well, the people who have the property now will not rest in peace with it that is for sure. Imminent domain is archaic. Tom, thank you for the address for the governor. He will definitely hear from us this week. In the meantime, at least give the Hollomon their fair value of their waterfront property and allow Mrs. Hollomon to enjoy her days with peace of mind.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 08:53

Permalink

john burton vermont

the house is appraised for $447K. it is worth at least that for the sake of the owner and the people of massachusetts.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 09:19

Permalink

Chip Coblyn OB

Apparently in this case (from the comments) the public interest and the individual are walking hand in hand. That is a good thing, because the public interest cannot be well served when an individual's rights are being trampled. The state should make a true good faith offer, so this family can actually afford to relocate. You absolutely cannot find a house anyplace on Martha's Vineyard for $267K.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 15:15

Permalink

Caroline Taylor Edgartown

I have been a Martha's Vineyard Real Estate Agent for over 30 years. I know the values of Vineyard real estate all too well. This is the kind of unfair treatment by the Commonwealth that needs to be ended immediately. $267,000 is a ridiculous number for almost every house on the Vineyard. The assessed value also has nothing to do with the fair market value - that price which a buyer is willing to pay. That is the value the Hollomans should be reimbursed. That can be determined by a fair assessment of recently sold properties. I can assure you that anything waterfront will come in double to triple the number offered by the state - even with bicyclists, vibrations, etc. AND that is considerably lower than the price would have been in 2006. The state should also be held liable for drop in fair market value on the house, due to the botched bridge planning operations. Oh and really, they could have done a good thing for the entire community by building the bridge just once - permanently where it is right now! If the Hollomans would like a Comparative Market Analysis showing current sales or 2006 sales, I would be happy to help support their case.

In the Know VH

You really try to sound like an expert ( 267.00 is a ridiculous price for almost any house on MV) Yes it normally is. Why not talk to the State Real estate evaluators who did their job, Do You not know that this house has only a small TIGHT TANK for a septic? In other words, no one could live there in any normal kind of fashion without getting pumped out 1-2 times a week. Would you like to know what that would cost? Call any septic hauler on MV, its a lot. No other alternative exists for this structure regarding septic. Yep, that makes it unique for sure. Although I am not a real estate expert, assessed value seems fair. The reporting is only for the actual taking at this point. Perhaps further reporting on the amount of $$$ they have received from the State prior to this would make you see this story differently. 2 sides to every story, and to be fair, this is just a partially factual one sided report.

Ken Edgartown

Well it might be worth 500k to a septic hauler then. Anyway the state always disregards the benefits to one person over the benefits of the majority. I guess its collateral damage. This happened with the building of the nations super highways. She should at least get appraised value.

Reality Dose

"small TIGHT TANK for septic" - Really? This sounds like it was posted by someone who works for the State. New septic technologies have been emerging over the past several years. If the situation were different a septic solution could readily be found. This is not adequate justification for the State to offer a grossly under-market value for this property. Disgusting Government Abuse of Power - AGAIN. Every homeowner should be outraged by the State's action because this could happen to ANY ONE OF US

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 17:14

Permalink

Debra Atlanta, GA

This house is a touchstone for me. The DOT's action is an affront to this fine family, and portends what could happen to us no matter the location. Ms. Holloman's fight is admirable in light of what appears to be selective imminent domain.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/26/2013 - 10:52

Permalink

concerned berlin nh.

since we are in the mood to move SOME homes on mv, why not move it for this 90/yo lady she would love it in her last years,then do what you want to do with it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/27/2013 - 10:16

Permalink

Ellen Christopher Sistare Bowie, Maryland

I have visited the Holloman's home on the Vineyard. While memories can never be replaced there has to be an acceptable solution for both the Holloman family and the State. Clearly, the State has other options and can come to a fair compromise with the Hollomans. Fix and relocate the home to a nearby water front location would a fair settlement. It is sinful to take advantage of an elderly person, especially one who is critically ill. This should not be allowed to happen!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/28/2013 - 22:29

Permalink

Ellen Wells Silver spring, md

I am surprised there has not been a strong response from the governor's office....the disregard and disrespect shown this family and its history on the Vineyard appears almost criminal.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/11/2013 - 14:38

Permalink

Edward J Gilmartin Salem Ma.

Massachusetts at it again. This state is sending welfare checks to the dead but can't do the right thing and pay fair market value. Its simple have three Real Estate brokers do an appraisal, take the average and give it to the woman. For gods sake !!!

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.