After Brief Archeological Delay, Schifter House Move Progresses

<p>Work continues on a massive house moving project on Chappaquiddick following the discovery of an archeological site of interest that turned out to be an old refuse pit probably used by Native Americans centuries ago.</p> <p>Project engineer George Sourati said the tribe suspected there could be a significant archeological feature at one location.</p>

Work continues on a massive house moving project on Chappaquiddick following the discovery of an archeological site of interest that turned out to be an old refuse pit probably used by Native Americans centuries ago.

A project to relocate Richard and Jennifer Schifter’s 8,300-square-foot house and surrounding buildings, which are threatened by rapid coastal erosion, hit a snag a few weeks ago when monitors with the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) found what was called a feature of interest.

Project engineer George Sourati said the tribe suspected there could be a significant archeological feature at one location. Archaeologists with the Public Archaeology Lab (PAL) came to the Vineyard last week to investigate the site. The archeologists were contracted by Mr. Schifter at the request of the tribe.

During their two days on the site, the feature was found to be “nothing significant,” Mr. Sourati said. The area flagged, which was in the path of the main house move, could not continue to be excavated during that time, though excavation continued in other areas on the project site.

“It’s being moved and it ended up being nothing significant,” Mr. Sourati said.

PAL senior archeologist Holly Herbster said that during a visit to the site, archeologists did scaled mapping and took pictures of three dark soil stains that were exposed when top soil was stripped. “Two of the soil stains are located in areas where no additional ground disturbance needs to occur, so they will be left in place, protected during the construction, and preserved in the long term,” Ms. Herbster wrote in an email, adding that they are most likely old storage or trash pits.

The remaining soil stain was located in an area where additional soil removal needs to take place, she said, and PAL archeologists excavated that entire area at the request of the Wampanoag tribe to make sure there were no human remains or ceremonial objects. Based on the size and shape, she said, the function of the area was unclear and could have been used for ceremonial purposes or for burials.

No human remains or ceremonial objects were found, she said. The contents of the pit included fish and animal bones, broken shellfish fragments and some chipped stone flakes which are the byproduct of stone tool making. Ms. Herbster said the refuse pit was used by Native Americans living on Chappaquiddick sometime in the last 500 to 1,000 years.

“The density of these materials was relatively low, so we would call it a storage or refuse pit rather than a shell midden,” she said. Shell middens have a higher density of shell, she said, and this pit did not contain that type of density.

“Tribal monitors were present for all of the excavation,” Ms. Herbster said. “Once we had completely excavated the feature the area was cleared for construction to continue.”

The large-scale project, which was the subject of intense debate in town hall and continues to excite interest around the Island, has transformed the tip of Wasque into a work site marked by towering piles of fill and huge holes that dwarf their surroundings. International Chimney Corporation, which is overseeing the house move along with its subcontractor Expert House Movers, has shored up the main house and completed excavation in the area where the house will be moved, Mr. Sourati said, and footings have been lowered for the main house as well.

The guest house and garage on the property have already been moved, as has a neighboring house that was purchased to make way for the main house move.

Mr. Sourati said the main house is still on track to be moved sometime in July. Once the main house has been moved, it will be 275 feet away from the eroding shoreline, which has come as close as 40 feet away from the guest house.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 05/23/2013 - 21:41

Permalink

Tim Chappy

The carbon footprint caused by everything associated with this house is both ironic and shameful.

Christine Powers Waltham

Wasque looks like a strip mine in the above photo! When the seas encroach again in ten more years, will the Schifters attempt this travesty again?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 08:21

Permalink

Bari Edgartown

The true pornography of this decade is hyper-materialism as exemplified by this situation.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 10:12

Permalink

Steve F. Chilmark

I echo all the above comments. And to quote from "Cabaret" - Money, money, money, money, money, money, money!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 12:40

Permalink

Horrified Citizen Edgartown

Saw this site in person yesterday. Could not believe my eyes. Who is responsible for this tragic assault on nature.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 14:28

Permalink

Joe Edgartown

What a mess. That house should never have been approved in the first place. Hope some people learned a lesson, but I doubt it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 05/24/2013 - 16:13

Permalink

Teresa Edgartown

Awful. Everyone involved from the homeowners to the town should be ashamed of themselves. All this to save a bowling alley? Conspicuous Consumption at its worst.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 06:32

Permalink

Scott Edgartown

It's easy to be critical when it's not your house or your money. I guarantee you all would have a different perspective if it was your investment in danger of being washed into the ocean.

Kim Aquinnah

But, another perspective is that it's not actually about "your" house, or, "your" money, but about the earth, care, respect, resources, beauty - I could go on - what about that investment? Your guarantee is not garnered; I, for one, would cut my losses in reverence to greater forces.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 07:52

Permalink

allan edgartown

Who is responsible for this well lets see the edgartown conservation commission, the edgartown planning board , the edgartown selectmen, the mv commission , mass department of environmental protection, mass coastal management , and how about god.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 08:37

Permalink

Beth Vineyard Haven

I would bet that in a decade—if their house hasn’t washed away despite this quixotic exercise—that the Schifters will unload it and be done with the Vineyard without a second thought. But it’s not just a matter of a single family’s being desensitized or utterly unappreciative of the Vineyard’s heritage and beauty. We did this to ourselves by electing commissioners who are all that and worse because they should know better. Our neighbors on Nantucket and the Cape (where the equivalent of our MVC actually employs credible biologists) stand aghast at how anyone could be allowed to trash one of the few remaining precious natural resources this way, and marvel at the Vineyard’s inability to police its own mindless and shortsighted greed. This is the price we pay for putting our collective soul up for auction: sooner or later, someone’s bound to buy it. How sad that certain members of the MVC feel it's worth so little.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 16:45

Permalink

AJ

"Tragedy" is the word that immediately springs to mind. Irreplaceable natural resources squandered to benefit a single seasonal homeowner (or more probably, his insurance company). Given that most islanders seems to have a generally high level of environmental concern and consciousness, I'm surprised that there wasn't far more local opposition. And now it's too late. I'm just grateful I got to experience Wasque in all its jaw-dropping grandeur - something future generations will never know.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 18:51

Permalink

deshandra brown ob

I'm willing to give these folks the benefit of the doubt. These pictures show a massive project underway. I'm certain that the boards that approved this undertaking made certain that it will be restored to its natural state when its concluded. The pictures make it look like a west virginia strip mine, but I'd bet when its all finished it will be restored propertly and one would never be able to tell that this project was accomplished, or a house occupied that location. Had it been a simple house move without moving a foundation, it would have not been as controversial.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 05/25/2013 - 19:38

Permalink

Jason Gruner 1/4 mile away -Washque Ave

Wow...That photo is humbling to look at. I am not a geologist, but is digging a 40'x120’x 300' trench in beach sand along the Atlantic going to weaken the entire coastal foundation in that area? Do you need to be a geologist to know this answer? Do The Schifters not understand the responsibility that comes with having more money than 99% of Us? Do my fellow townsfolk know that ZERO $$$ are held in escrow to repair the roads that have been ravaged by 30 ton trucks? Do my fellow townsfolk know that the EBoS has allowed the moving companies free use of the parking lot area this past Spring for 10 days at no cost, causing my elderly neighbors to traverse a potholed dirt parking lot to get to the ferry? Do they get the same free ride $$$ when they pack up? How is that going to work in August? Is this free treatment use of the parking lot for All town citizens or just those that offer to donate money for fire trucks and the likes? Granted, The Schifters are in a no win situation, on one hand they should have the right to protect a family home on the other do they have the right to undermine an Island where hundreds call home? My home is a family home, granted it is a matchbox compared to Schifters home, but none more special. My Father in law built it, my wife got dressed for our wedding at the Edgartown lighthouse and we brought our daughter Ella back here after she was born . As a "former" supporter of this move, I can now say I was wrong to support this. Nothing can be called responsible about digging near the water table, at the end of an island where massive converging tides pull at the land constantly. I challenge anyone involved in this decision to take a drive out on the broken roads of Chappy (watch out for the 30ton trucks, blind corners, blind driveways, cars passing bikes with foliage growing past the shoulders and into the road) and take a look at this FUBAR situation you allowed to happen. They should have torn down the home and built a replica of the home back farther. Same Cost, they just did NOT want to lose the “entire” summer use of the home…

JaredN Chappy/Wayland

Jason:

I have three degrees in Civil and Geotechnical Engineering. No, excavating and replacing that soil will not weaken the area. In fact, if the sand is properly compacted when replaced it will be stronger than when before it was excavated. No, they are not undermining an island.

Also, tearing down the house and rebuilding it would likely have required more truck traffic than moving the existing house.

I'm certainly not a fan of the Schifter House, as it is grotesquely large. But the jealousy shown by so many towards them is just as ugly.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/26/2013 - 15:49

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

Beth Vineyard Haven

Jealousy? Of what? Having more money than taste? Does anyone honestly think jealousy is behind the widespread distaste for this scenario? Based on the above posts, it seems a more likely motivator is the realization that none of our descendants will ever experience this landscape again. Regardless of assurances that it's not "weakened," the bigger issues may include how many of the endangered plant species at Wasque will have to be seed-banked because one of the only places left for them is being lost to accelerated erosion. Natural areas don't grow back. This is permanent and will involve hidden long-term costs that most of us will never even hear about. There's nothing benign about it and no insidious undercurrent of jealousy for the Schifters' miss-spent wealth. This isn't about a house: the real erosion is in our collective awareness of the island's uniqueness.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 05/28/2013 - 15:46

In reply to by Anonymous (not verified)

Permalink

AJ

What a bizarre assumption Jared, to impute jealousy as the true motive here? No, believe it or not, we're all just genuinely aghast at the destruction of a site of unparalleled natural beauty (which, while it may be somehow structurally "stronger" will clearly never be the same, at least not in our lifetimes). The fact that the sole "beneficiary" is a single property owner (or their insurance company) merely adds to the outrage. But the pain of this loss would be just as acute even if the destruction were somehow in the public interest.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/26/2013 - 11:00

Permalink

concerned berlin nh.

TOLD YA......ARN'T YOU GLAD THE VOTE FOR MOVING THIS 'COTTAGE' WAS MADE FOR ALL...NATURE IS CALLING COLLECT...WONDER WHAT THE NEW 'ISLAND' ON CHAPPY WILL BE CALLED...'NOMANZONE'

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 05/26/2013 - 23:40

Permalink

Louise Boston/Edgartown

Oh my gosh! What a bunch of spoiled sports and sour grapers. Just imagine the excitement and anticipation... taking the steamship from Woods Hole, driving onto the On Time (bump, thump), finally approaching windswept Wasque and then (woo hoo!) running straight to the basement for some bowling and a couple episodes of Arrested Development!! I admit it--I am so totally jealous. I wish my grandparents had provided us with cool activities like that instead of sending us down to Lighthouse Beach to play with hermit crabs or row around in a dumb dinghy! I am glad to know that the house movers and engineers really know what they are doing and that not a single bowling pin will tip over during the move.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 05/27/2013 - 20:33

Permalink

Colin Truro, N.S.

I have been following this story for some time as I too have a great love for the Vineyard. Seeing this latest picture is truly unbeleivable!!!! This only words that come to mind is "The big dig Part 2"

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 05/29/2013 - 13:50

Permalink

Ken Garry NH

Don't take much of an imagination to develop a sense of what our ancestors would say to his fellow mate sailing by this debauchery. Jealousy of stupidity tisn't the theme of conversation that comes to mind.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/11/2013 - 16:44

Permalink

Kit Sears

My family were cottage owners at Wasque from 1964 to 2009. My parents were so in love with Chappy that they were buried there. Late at night, you when the wind is still, and the stars shine so brightly, you can hear a low rumble from the burying ground as they try to escape the devastation of unbridled greed.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 06/25/2013 - 14:51

Permalink

flounderbob chilmark

kit amen to both of them.
progress, with tons of money.
they had a great view...now they want more...whats next....10 more years...move it again...by then chappy will be 2-3 islands...got some names....greed isl...plenty isl...deboch isl...all in need of new draw bridges...

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.