The future of vehicle access to the sandy trails of Chappaquiddick – a hotly contested issue that has resulted in several appeals and hours of debate – is approaching a critical juncture this month.
The future of vehicle access to the sandy trails of Chappaquiddick – a hotly contested issue that has resulted in several appeals and hours of debate – is approaching a critical juncture this month.
The Edgartown conservation commission is considering new rules for the Trustees of Reservations, the nonprofit that manages 16 miles of oversand vehicle trails. At its meeting on Oct. 22, the commission will review draft conditions and a proposed memorandum of understanding that would set new limits on how many vehicles can drive out to the beaches.
Ahead of that hearing, the state Land Court is scheduled to visit the Island prior to a trial on Oct. 20 that would determine the legality of the Trustees selling permits for vehicles to drive out to Cape Pogue at the northern tip of Chappaquiddick.
Though the argument over vehicles on the trails has been going on for years, town officials, fishermen and the Trustees have all expressed optimism that the issue could be settled soon with the coming trial and commission hearing.
“I think we are cautiously optimistic,” said Richard Thompson, an avid fisherman who was on Chappy for the Striped Bass and Bluefish Derby last week. “It does seem that we are reaching some sort of conclusion, but until things are finalized there are a lot of twists and turns in this story.”
At the heart of the oversand vehicle debate is how many four-wheel drive SUVs and trucks should be driving onto the ever-shifting coastline of Chappaquiddick, and where they can legally and safely go.
In May 2024, the Edgartown conservation commission set the limit at 200 vehicles at a time on the Leland and Wasque properties managed by the Trustees. For Cape Pogue, the commission decided that no more than 30 vehicles should be allowed.
The decision ignited immediate pushback from both the Trustees, which thought the caps were too restrictive, and landowners on Chappaquiddick who felt the limits were too loose and threatened the health of the beaches.
Both groups filed appeals against the conservation commission’s orders, and those are currently both before the state Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). In an attempt to forge a path forward, the town and the Trustees began meeting to possibly hammer out limits that could be amenable to both parties.
The draft conditions and memorandum, a culmination of the discussions between attorneys for the town and the Trustees, were released by the town late last month and would make several changes to the existing rules.
Under the proposal, the commission would allow 275 vehicles across all of the Trustees properties – 45 more than the previous order – and would make no distinctions between Cape Pogue and the other parts of Chappaquiddick.
Kara Shemeth, the town’s conservation agent, said the DEP advised the town to look at any potential compromise. Some other pieces that were previously in the order of conditions, which are the official rules set by the conservation commission, were moved to the memorandum because they were not totally enforceable under the state statute that guides conservation commissions.
Ms. Shemeth said that the memo and the proposed orders were from the Trustees, and there were no initial red flags when reviewed by the town.
“When you look at the original orders of conditions and what’s coming now, there aren’t a lot of changes,” she said.
The new order and the memorandum will all be discussed by the commission in a public hearing, and would have to be voted on again. Ms. Shemeth expected robust discussion on the proposals, and all decisions would again be subject to appeals.
“It’s democracy in action,” Ms. Shemeth said.
The Trustees noted the work on the memorandum at the Edgartown planning board meeting last Tuesday. The Trustees also need a special permit from the board for its buildings on Chappaquiddick.
Members of the planning board were happy with the way things were shaping up.
“I want to thank everybody involved in ironing this out…I think it’s going to be a great plan overall once we get to the end,” said Mike McCourt, the chair of the planning board.
In a statement, Darci Schofield, the director of the Trustees’ Vineyard operations, said she was pleased to work with the town on the areas of concern.
“We want to thank many members of Town government for their hard work and investment of time on these issues,” she said. “And we look forward to our continued partnership and collaboration in the future protecting Edgartown’s special places and providing access for the community. ”
Not everyone is as thrilled, though. Some residents and landowners have criticized the Trustees’ management of Chappaquiddick beaches, and fear that too many vehicles could lead to further degradation of the fragile landscape.
“The MOU in its current form appears to be an extremely rough draft with significant factual inaccuracies,” said Rachel Self, a Chappaquiddick attorney who is representing a group of about 65 people in an appeal to the previous limits.
She argued that any agreement between the town and the Trustees should protect and preserve Chappaquiddick’s beaches, address concerns about the aging infrastructure of the Dike Bridge, and prevent overburdening the ferry to Chappy. She also called for enforcement provisions to ensure and motivate proper management of the trails.
“Those citizens who appealed the conservation commission’s orders of conditions did so out of a genuine concern for the natural resources of Chappaquiddick as a whole, not just Cape Pogue,” Ms. Self said. “These citizens were not merely abutters, but people from all over Chappaquiddick and Edgartown.”
She also noted that even if the town and Trustees come to an agreement, the DEP is still reviewing the matter.
“While a MOU between the Trustees of Reservations and the Town is a good idea, it is important to remember it is separate and apart from the appeals filed with DEP, which will still be the ultimate arbiter of the recreational activities that will be permitted on this fragile resource,” she said.
Hanging over the commission’s proceedings is a lawsuit over access to Cape Pogue. Victor and Dawn Colantonio, who own property on Cape Pogue, filed a lawsuit in 2022, claiming that the Trustees’ practice of selling permits to the area overburdens a shared easement.
A spit at the northern end of Chappy, the dunes and Trustees-owned wildlife refuge on Cape Pogue are some of the most remote and fragile parts of Martha’s Vineyard. Home to nesting shorebirds and prized fishing spots, the area is popular for bird lovers, fishermen and sightseers.
Mr. Colantonio maintains there is not enough beach to continue oversand vehicle passage to Cape Pogue and felt that it was improper for the town attorneys and the Trustees to go over a potential proposal together.
He said his lawsuit and the Trustees applications with the town were two distinct issues, but he didn’t see the acrimony ending any time soon.
“My land court dispute has nothing to do with [Trustees’] troubles,” he said. “Whatever resolves going forward, if anything, one thing is for sure… lots of billable hours for lawyers.”
Those who enjoy driving out to the area and town officials are keeping a close watch on the trial.
“That could have a lot of impact on the next few years,” Ms. Shemeth said.
As the trial goes on, Chappaquiddick has been buzzing with fishermen as part of the fishing derby.
Peter Sliwkowski, the owner of a Larry’s Tackle in Edgartown and a founder of a beach access group, said spirits are buoyed by the work to potentially settle the debate.
“We’re not fighting for OSV access because we think driving on the beach is great. It’s the only practical access,” he said. “It’s a fundamental part of the derby’s attendance as well as culture and history.”

Comments
Limit passes only to vineyard
Miki Dunn EdgartownLimit passes only to vineyard residents.
And during derby time issue passes to outsiders only during derby time
Can only imagine what the
George WinchesterCan only imagine what the beach situation will be in the summer when Norton is closed for birds, so much of the island is private and Cape Pogue is essentially closed to tourists (the parking areas can only accomodate a few vehicles). Where will all the tourists go? South Beach and State Beach - which are already total madhouses. When the tourists finally say - forget this Ill go to Nantucket where all the beaches are accessible - will people like you be happy?
I think limiting the number
me EDGARTOWNI think limiting the number of vehicles is key. Also not issuing stickers to day-trippers. Provide a set period of time in which people can reserve stickers for the year and no more after that. Folks who need and want stickers can purchase them in that time frame. That being said there has never been an instance where I've seen tons of vehicles, maybe at Norton Point but not Cape Pogue
Why? Why limit the number of
JaredN Boston/ChappyWhy? Why limit the number of vehicles? We have been visiting Chappy every year for the past 25 years. We come specifically for Cape Poge. Before the recent dispute started, we were usually able to find a spot on the beach where there was no vehicle within 100 yards of us. This idea that the number of vehicles needs to be limited on Cape Poge has come from a small number of homeowners who want a private reserve all for themselves. Beaches should be open to EVERYONE, not just a small number of homeowners, not just to town residents. The only practical way for most people to access 90% of the beach on Cape Poge is by overland vehicle.
This topic has been grossly
Over it EDGThis topic has been grossly over analyzed, poked, prodded and litigated to the point of stark numbness. What are we even fighting for, or over any more? Beach rights? Land use? Condtional review of non-profit operations? First it was to simply keep things as they were out there and now it's boiled down to car counting, easement over-loading disputes and how much weight a barrier beach can withstand from a 4,000lb vehicle. What a joke. Imagine if all the time and energy put into this "controversy" was simply sorted out over a coffee, like the neighbors we all are. Instead, the hysteria continues and we are messing this up for families, kids and stealing memories that should have been. Wake up. Do the right thing. Everyone.
Many a lovely quiet afternoon
Lorraine EdgartownMany a lovely quiet afternoon, decades ago, sitting in my little unassuming boat, reading a book, munching on an apple, serene, but alas and alack, no longer the same. Everyone is entitled. IMHO
After reading through some of
Peter Sliwkowski, President of MV Beachgoers Access Group (MVBAG) EdgartownAfter reading through some of the comments, I wanted to share a few clarifying facts that might help:
• There are no “day passes.” The Trustees only issue seasonal OSV permits—no single-day or temporary stickers.
• Resident-only access wouldn’t be legal. The beaches in question are owned by the Trustees of Reservations and the Commonwealth, not the Town, and must remain open to all members of the public.
• The new draft proposal sets a combined limit of 275 OSVs across all Trustees-managed beaches, excluding staff and essential vehicles.
• The draft Orders of Conditions and MOU also include stronger oversight—vehicle counters, seasonal reporting, and clearer public communication about closures and capacity.
Agreed. The island has
Emerson ChilmarkAgreed. The island has become a place where the privileged rule.
After spending 12 years
David Collins Vero Beach, FloridaAfter spending 12 years visiting Chappy for a spring fishing trip, our group no longer visits due to the restrictions placed on the OSV trails, we spent tens of thousands of dollars on house rentals, beach permits and food, enhancing a local economy during the shoulder season. It is unfortunate that these disputes are causing folks like us to spend our dollars elsewhere to fish. I hope that the powers that be and the Cape Pogue homeowners can come to a reasonable understanding so maybe one day we will return to Chappy. It is a special place that should be shared by all, not just the fortunate few.
Regardless of town or state
David Foster West TisburyRegardless of town or state decision about over sand vehicles all of the lands owned by The Trustees will remain open and accessible...by foot, boat, kayak and other means that many of us use regularly to enjoy them.
By foot, boat or kayak isnt
George EdgartownBy foot, boat or kayak isnt reasonable or even possible for those with young kids or handicapped people or those of a certain age. And by boat isnt possible for those without financial means. And by foot or kayak isnt possible in the summer unless you are one of the few lucky souls able to snag one of the parking spots in Wasque or by the Dyke Bridge. So being in favor of OSV access means being in favor of all people being able to enjoy these incredible spots and not just a select few.
Add new comment