Commonwealth Wind is planned for about 20 miles south of Martha's Vineyard
Tim Johnson

Commonwealth Wind Pushes Ahead, Despite Economic Turbulence

<p>A large offshore wind farm planned for south of Martha&rsquo;s Vineyard remains afloat, its leaders said last week, even as inflation and supply chain issues continue to threaten the development&rsquo;s financial viability.</p>

A large offshore wind farm planned for south of Martha’s Vineyard remains afloat, its leaders said last week, even as inflation and supply chain issues continue to threaten the development’s financial viability.

Commonwealth Wind, a 1,200 megawatt wind farm planned for about 20 miles south of the Island, said in a statement sent to the Gazette that it would forge ahead with the project despite the current economic climate, which has roiled global commodities markets and forced the large offshore infrastructure development to ask for a pause in its review.

Commonwealth Wind is owned by a renewable energy company called Avangrid, headquartered in Connecticut.

“Avangrid believes there is a path forward for this project, and…made a filing with the Department of Public Utilities so that we can continue to engage in ongoing discussion with all parties on these important issues,” said senior vice president for offshore projects, Sy Oytan, in a statement.

But Mr. Oytan acknowledged the challenges facing Commonwealth Wind as it attempts to tread water, and did not specify how the company plans to return the project to financial viability after requesting the state delay review earlier this year.

“We have been transparent and committed, at all times, to doing everything we can to move the project forward, including coming to the table with all parties to find a solution to the unprecedented economic challenges facing this major infrastructure project,” Mr. Oytan said in the statement.

Commonwealth Wind asked the state Department of Public Utilities for a pause in its review in October, requesting time to renegotiate its energy contracts after hikes in commodities prices, inflation and the war in Ukraine made the project no longer commercially viable, according to a court filing.

The company said that it needed “modest” energy price increases to return the project to viability. But those price increases would have to be renegotiated with utility companies — a complicated process that the state has thus far refused to reopen.

Offshore wind companies negotiate power purchase agreements with electric distribution companies prior to construction — a process overseen by the state. Commonwealth’s contract, signed in May of 2022, included a guaranteed commercial operation date of Nov. 1, 2027 and an energy price of about $72 per megawatt hour.

But in October, Commonwealth filed a motion with the Department of Public Utilities to suspend the proceedings, arguing that global economic winds had shifted, making the power price the company had agreed to back in May no longer feasible. Another offshore wind developer, Mayflower Wind, filed a motion in support of the suspension.

The state promptly rejected Commonwealth’s request, saying in a Nov. 4 response that the pause would lead to much longer-term delays, cause administrative inefficiency and disrupt a complicated agreement the company had already made with the utilities. The state also said that Commonwealth likely knew its project was no longer viable long prior to the filing.

“While the department will not speculate as to when Commonwealth Wind first determined its project was no longer viable under the terms of the [power purchasing agreements], it is evident that the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and war in Ukraine on its project became apparent some time before Commonwealth Wind notified the department,” a court filing reads.

In a letter sent to Avangrid about one week later on Nov. 13, state Energy and Environmental Affairs secretary Beth Card acknowledged the challenging economic climate, but said the recently-passed Inflation Reduction Act would expand tax credits for offshore wind development, encouraging Commonwealth Wind to stay the course.

“While the current macroeconomic conditions are challenging and many in the industry face inflationary pressures, actions at the federal and state level have been made to directly address these effects,” Ms. Card wrote.

Avangrid responded one day later on Nov. 14, saying that they would move forward with the project, although the company did not specify how the project would become economically viable, and suggested it may still need to renegotiate pricing.

Commonwealth Wind’s economic troubles come as the race for offshore wind south of Martha’s Vineyard has heated up in recent months.

Vineyard Wind, which plans to have the east coast’s first industrial-scale offshore wind farm online in 2023, has started construction on the undersea cable portion of its project. The undersea cable portion of a third project, called Park City Wind, is currently under review from the Edgartown conservation commission. Park City Wind has power purchasing contracts with Connecticut. 

Vineyard Wind, Park City Wind and Commonwealth Wind are all either partially or fully owned by Avangrid, and are all adjacent projects within the same federal lease area that stretches diagonally about 15-25 miles south of Martha’s Vineyard. Along with those three projects, the state has at least six additional offshore wind projects in the pipeline, covering hundreds of nautical square miles south of the Island.

The projects, including Commonwealth Wind, are an integral part of the state’s green energy goals, which seek a 50 per cent emissions reduction by 2030. The state hopes to have at least 3,200 megawatts of offshore wind energy in operation by 2030.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/07/2022 - 11:06

Permalink

Recreational Fisherman Wasque

So does this mean I won't see wind turbines while casting off wasque during the derby

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/07/2022 - 12:29

Permalink

Carol Edgartown

This project is not economically viable. I believe in alternative energy but the facts are the facts.
I bought into the solar program 8 years ago. I was told this would be a win win for my needs.
Forward 8 years I can barely light my home in the summer month with the panels, after spending 25k. Know I am told the “technology “is much better and I should replace the panels at a cost of $30-45k??

R Scott Patterson Edgartown

It’s my understanding that the electricity from solar panels is sold back to eversource to reduce your bills. Care to explain how you can barely light your house if you’re connected to the grid? Are you completely off the grid?

Ted VH

I don't know what's going on with your installation Carol, but I've made $7500 worth of electricity in 3 years with my system.

Albert Nau

If your system does not produce more power than your house consumes then you did not buy enough solar.
It is rare that single family property can not produce more electricity than it consumes.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/07/2022 - 14:38

Permalink

Michael edgartown

this is going be quite a disturbance for south beach residents. and that hangar? hello housing for the workers, with a restaurant next door....

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 12/07/2022 - 15:04

Permalink

Frank Brunelle Vineyard Haven

This is an exceptionally well written article. However, there is one detail that was missed and an important one. According to the UN and the World Economic Forum the idea that we will see 50% emission reductions by 2030 could not be further from the truth. In fact, emissions are projected to rise by 14% by the year 2030.

Global emissions need to be cut by 45% this decade, says
@antonioguterres @UN. However, these emissions are currently set to increase by 14% by 2030, 'defying reason and ignoring the impacts on people, economies and our planet. This is common knowledge within the environmental community but not part of mainstream media and so it is easy to miss it But all the rest of the article is correct and very well written.

Following up on this thread it would be important to report what increases if any are permitted would take place and what it would mean to users on Martha's Vineyard specifically. Also, I would like to suggest an article on the drawbridge and receding gates and how much Co2 is generated each summer by lines of vehicles hundreds long waiting for the bridge gates to dance slowly so the drawbridge can open and why we do not request they be replaced.

Does the Gazette know that these gates are defective (switches and relays not recommended for salt water environment) and cost $2 million dollars and cannot be controlled by one bridge tender?

Bob Edgartown

Frank, we do not have a chance of reducing the carbon until China and India get on board. Meanwhile the American taxpayers money is being wasted as usual.

Electrician Edgartown

The wind farm will never produce back the power it took to manufacture the turbines, transport the turbines, and maintain the turbines. THIS IS A HUGE WAISTE OF TIME AND MONEY! The push, push, push for electric cars and wind turbines is by people living in a pipe dream, they have very little understanding about how electricity really works. When 1 Charger installed at a dealership draws more power than the entire dealership(from office computers to lights, from air compressors, and everything else it takes to power a functional dealership) there's a problem....1 CHARGER!!!! Please explain to me, and Electrician, how this is going to work. Good luck, my diesel truck will make sure I get to my next job and on and on.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.