Tisbury voters head to the polls Tuesday for the second time in three years to determine the fate of a $55 million renovation and overhaul of their town school. Early voting was Thursday.
Tisbury voters head to the polls Tuesday for the second time in three years to determine the fate of a $55 million renovation and overhaul of their town school.
Early voting was Thursday at the Emergency Services building.
Polls will be open from noon to 8 p.m. Tuesday. Absentee voting in person is also available, with applications due June 21 at noon.
In the much-watched election, voters will also decide a two-way contest for the select board and a $5 million question to upgrade town roadways and sidewalks.
But topping the ballot is the $55 million borrowing request to renovate and expand the 92-year-old Tisbury School. The question asks voters to exempt the bond debt from the provisions of Proposition 2 1/2, the state tax cap. A simple majority vote is needed.
The project saw overwhelming support at a special town meeting last Sunday, passing 237-5.
Nevertheless, the second hurdle looms large for supporters of the project — who include a wide-ranging town building committee and all the leading town boards. In 2018 a $46 million school easily passed at town meeting and failed at the ballot box by 21 votes. After that, the town was forced to forfeit $14 million in state reimbursement money and start over.
“People need to get out and vote — and we hope they vote yes,” school committee chairman Amy Houghton told the Gazette by phone Wednesday.
“The school committee and select board were thrilled to see such strong support on the town meeting floor, but we recognize that a significant number of people did not come to the town meeting,” Ms. Houghton said. “We hope too to see a strong turnout . . . This has been a long process.”
The election marks the capstone moment in a winding, multi-year journey to renovate the old school building after months of planning, dozens of public meetings and the discovery of chipping lead paint in the building during the summer of 2019.
The new project looks to preserve the skeleton of the old building and rebuild the interior as an energy-neutral school. The town plans to borrow the $55 million in bonds over the next 30 years to fund the project, adding about $93 in yearly taxes for every $100,000 of assessed value.
Ms. Houghton bluntly acknowledged the financial realities for the town.
“This is a big lift,” she said. “That is not lost on the school committee or the select board.” She also reiterated that project leaders are “absolutely” committed to finding ways to reduce the cost, including through government grants and some form of property tax rebate program for senior citizens. “But before we can do any of that we need to have an approved project,” Ms. Houghton said.
A second question on the ballot seeks to exempt the debt for $5 million in improvements 30 town roadways in the coming decade, including repairing and replacing sidewalks and drainage.
Like the school project, the measure won a two-thirds majority at the annual town meeting last week and will require majority approval at the ballot box.
Voters will also decide a two-way race for a three-year seat of the select board. One-term incumbent James (Jim) Rogers, an electrician and retired firefighter, is seeking reelection. Roy Cutrer Jr., a real estate broker, is the challenger.
There are no other contested races.
Julia Wells contributed reporting.

Comments
If any Island town can snatch
Schools Out Oak BluffsIf any Island town can snatch defeat from the jaws of victory it's Tisbury.
After seeing the attacks on
meonMV TisburyAfter seeing the attacks on any critics of this design, particularly Rachel Orr, who worked tirelessly to gather materials and information for the building committee, and probably knows more than anyone about this project, I don't blame people for staying away from town meeting. This is not a renovation. It is a demolition of the entire school out to the studs. The plan was chosen without a word of community review. For the sake of the school community, and the immediacy of need, I hope it passes. For the sake of the taxpaying base, I'm not so sure. Good luck. I hope the price tag, and future related costs, are worth it. I hope we can finish paying for it before it needs to be replaced. They don't build schools like this any more.
As a member of this committee
Michael Watts TisburyAs a member of this committee we conducted 46 public meetings. Approximately one half of the public meetings were in person and the remainder were conducted by zoom and were all publicly posted by law. The public was asked for comment and questions repeatedly at these meeting. We held a visioning forum with the public in person. We had joint meetings with the select board, the school committee, the finance committee, the historic commission, the energy committee and the planning board, all in open meeting sessions. All groups supported this plan with a majority vote in public.
Michael, you voted in
meonMVMichael, you voted in February to accept one of three designs presented by Tappe. I am referring to that vote. You will not be able to make major changes to that plan without incurring expensive change of order charges. After fifteen years of neglect, the building looks pretty sad, yet your own outside study shows it is structurally very sound. It needs work. It's too bad there was no consensus building in the community starting the day the decision was made to tear it down. That building is a beautiful, classic structure. I'll be sad to see it's interior demise, but if it passes, so be it. Good luck.
This comment is confusing and
Anna V Cotton VINEYARD HAVENThis comment is confusing and seems to ignore the the building committee process. Rachel's time volunteering on the committee is appreciated but the 8 other members including a contactor, building inspector, teachers and selectboard member all supported the proposed project. There have have been meetings with opportunity for community input for two years. The building committee along with professional architects made tough choices throughout that meant not everyone's feedback was not incorporated. It is uninformed, unfounded comments like this shedding doubt on the project that mislead voters. This happened too much the last time around. I only hope we make more informed decisions this time around and support this project.
Tisbury has the highest taxes
Rich Vineyard HavenTisbury has the highest taxes on the island, and now seeks to pile an additional large increase on its residents. Until Tisbury government gets its act together, and brings the tax rate into line with other island towns, I will be voting NO on this burdensome fiasco.
I'm not wealthy.I don't have
Not Rich Vineyard HavenI'm not wealthy.I don't have kids in the school.
I do know your house values, Rich, if you in fact do live in VH will not be good if you decide to sell.
Nobody wants a school that is sick. Hurts resale. Hurts taxes in the long run and it hurts future investment which helps reduce your taxes.
So all, stop being so selfish. Regardless of who did the work, what it looks like (cause it looks good) vote yes. move along people. Stop being the butt of this island with your rhetoric.
You know what hurts resale
Rich Vineyard HavenYou know what hurts resale values? Having the highest taxes in the County, by far. People have choices, on where they want to live. High taxes drive away buyers. Once again, until Tisbury gets its act together and brings the tax rate into line with other towns, I encourage everyone to vote NO on this fiasco.
That’s a funny comment about
Tis girl VHThat’s a funny comment about resale. The house next to us sold for over a million last summer, another second home. As more housing is sold at high prices to second home owners who don’t need the school, and houses are being taken off the rental market, I wonder if what you say is true. I also wonder if the commercial tax rate in Tisbury is still lower than the residential rate.
CHILDHOOD DOESN’T WAIT
Len Morris VINEYARD HAVENCHILDHOOD DOESN’T WAIT
I want all to understand that another pause for any reason will continue to expose our children to asbestos, lead and a failed school without the scale footage needed to meet educational needs or a campus that is ADA compliant.
You are my neighbors and I respect our disagreements and differing points of view but
this upcoming vote on June 22nd is not about design differences anymore -it is about a 91year old- failed building and Tisbury is only town on the island that doesn’t meet the basic needs of ALL of its students and residents.
Let’s turn our attentions to raising 15 million dollars in the next 3 years as a single community. There are state, local and private funds we can raise. We can cut the cost and protect our residents living on fixed incomes, reduce what we borrow and be proud of what we’ve done together for the betterment of Tisbury and the entire island.
If I have learned anything in traveling our country and the world working for children these past 30 years it us that for a child, their childhood is NOW. I will VOTE yes on the 22nd and I urge everyone to come out and vote!
Len Morris
Media Voices for Children
I guess state rules are you
Ken Edg.I guess state rules are you cant rebuild a school. The choice is a new school partially funded by the state or rebuild what you have at your own expense. We dont make the rules. It would be nice if we did.
When did schools become
Gaey VhWhen did schools become museums? Do we really need all this? How about back to the basics.
Lack of falling down asbestos
Anna V Cotton VINEYARD HAVENLack of falling down asbestos and lead paint, working ventilation and heating, spaces for instruction, a cafeteria in compliance with health codes seem pretty basic to me. I everyone to look at the plan for this school. The architect has explained clearly how choices were made to reduce cost and utilize existing space. It is hard when all the systems in a building are not up to code.
Gaey -- what does your
Boss Hogg VHGaey -- what does your comment even mean? What school is a museum? And what "basics" do you want to go back to? Seems you're just spewing steaming nonsense.
Add new comment