New ticket office planned for Woods Hole has been redesigned after criticism from both Vineyard and Falmouth residents.
Louisa Hufstader

Lowered Building Raises Costs for Woods Hole Terminal

After more than two years and dozens of different designs, Steamship Authority governors voted Tuesday to develop a single-story ticket building at the Woods Hole terminal.

After more than two years and dozens of different designs, Steamship Authority governors voted Tuesday to develop a single-story ticket building at the Woods Hole terminal and convert the nearby freight storage shed to a two-story utility building.

“We’re hoping that will open up some additional views of the harbor,” boat line general manager Robert Davis said.

Board of governors met Tuesday in Falmouth.
Louisa Hufstader
Board of governors met Tuesday in Falmouth.
Louisa Hufstader

The single-story ticket office will stay within the footprint of previous designs, he added, and may be moved 15 to 20 feet to the north, depending on the location of existing storm water management pipes underground.

Falmouth and Martha’s Vineyard residents alike have consistently rejected more than two dozen two-story buildings proposed by BIA.studio architects. Many also requested the Steamship Authority add solar panels to the project.

The design concept approved Tuesday solves both issues by adding solar panels to the roofs of the single-story building and adjacent shuttle bus bays. Mr. Davis said an estimated 50 per cent of the building’s energy will come from the sun.

To keep the ticket building low, Mr. Davis said, the architects designed a behind-the-scenes room with a raised floor to protect the mechanical equipment electricity, telephone and other systems.

The two-story utility building nearby will house equipment, resources and activities that had been planned for the second floor of the ticket building, among them employee locker and break rooms, a lost and found room and a multi-purpose room for training.

Mr. Davis said change orders for the many revised building designs have already totaled about $750,000.

Including the change orders and converting the freight storage shed, the two-building solution will cost the boat line about $3.8 million more than if the SSA had gone ahead with one of the two-story concepts proposed in 2017, said Chris Iwerks of BIA.studio, architects of the sweeping $60 million Woods Hole terminal redesign.

“We have committed to this level of capital expenditure to satisfy our neighbors,” said New Bedford governor Moira Tierney.

“I think it would be nice if we got some recognition for the fact that we spent a lot of money hearing and implementing the requests, largely, of your constituency,” Ms. Tierney said, indicating Falmouth governor Kathryn Wilson.

“A lot of people are going to have to get on the boat to pay for that, but this is a 50-year project,” Mr. Davis said. “We need to be good neighbors.”

The vote authorizes the single-story building and two-story utility building for the Woods Hole terminal unless the boat line is unable to get the required permits for the change, in which case the SSA will proceed with a two-story design.

It will be at least three and a half more years before the terminal work is completed, Mr. Iwerks told the board and boat line officials.

Also Tuesday, treasurer/comptroller Mark Rozum told the board that boat line traffic numbers for October were sharply affected by last month’s northeasters.

Weather-related cancellations kept up to 20,000 people from traveling to the Islands, Mr. Rozum said, and 19,000 of them would have been Vineyard-bound.

Vehicle traffic for the month was down 5,000 cars and about 1,000 freight vehicles over 2018, Mr. Rozum said. “We’re probably looking at more than a million dollars in [lost] revenue.”

In other business, governors voted to adopt a new mission statement. The SSA’s first such guiding document since the 1990s, the statement outlining the boat line’s priorities was a top recommendation from last year’s comprehensive review of operations conducted by maritime consultants HMS/Glosten.

Crafted after a series of open house meetings in port towns and a public comment period in July and August, the new statement reads: “Our mission is to operate a safe, efficient, and reliable transportation system for the islands of Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket with a commitment to sustainability, accessibility, our port communities, and public engagement.”

Communications director Sean Driscoll said the statement will be added to the Steamship Authority website and letterhead and become the foundation for the strategic plan to be developed in 2020.

Governors granted a request from Hyannis Harbor Tours Inc., which operates the Hy-Line ferries, to add 16 more Nantucket trips to its winter schedule, and voted to allow the Island Commuter Corporation, which operates the Island Queen, to add more June sailings between Falmouth and Oak Bluffs.

Mr. Davis announced that ferry Capt. Paul Hennessy, a 29-year SSA veteran, has accepted the position of assistant port captain that was vacated when George Monteiro was promoted to port captain in August.

Board members heard an update on progress at the Woods Hole terminal and approved change orders for $301,581 to BIA.studio for additional engineering costs occasioned by complications in Slip 3 construction, including soil liquefaction that caused the bulkhead to shift, and $271,563 to terminal contractor Jay Cashman, Inc., for barges to stage construction equipment that won’t fit on the limited available space.

They also approved $400,727 for diesel engine parts and spares for the M/V Eagle, which is due for an engine overhaul. Board members also received, and made no changes to the boat line’s proposed timeline for 2020 and 2021 vehicle reservations.

Head start reservations for May 15 through Oct. 20 will be open by mail and internet only from Jan. 7 through Jan. 13. Active members of the Islander preferred or Islander preferred excursion program may make up to five reservations during this period. Up to three of those reservations are transferable, with transfers due to the SSA by May 15 or 30 days before travel, whichever is earlier.

Internet-only general reservations on the Martha’s Vineyard route open up from Jan. 21 through Jan. 27, one week later than those for Nantucket.

On the first two days of internet-only bookings (Jan. 21-22 for the Vineyard and Jan. 14-15 for Nantucket) the SSA is extending its reservation office hours. Normally open daily from 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., the offices will be staffed from 5 a.m. to 6 a.m. to assist customers making online reservations.

Telephone reservations for both routes open Jan. 28. Fall reservations, by telephone, mail and internet, open June 15 and bookings for early 2021 will open Oct. 25, 2020.

Reservation-only periods for vehicles on the Vineyard route will be May 21 through May 26; Fridays through Mondays from June 19 through Sept 7; June 30 through July 2; August 25, Sept. 8, Oct. 9 and Oct. 12.

During reservation-only periods, the Martha’s Vineyard blue line standby program is open to active Islander preferred or Islander preferred excursion participants who do not already have confirmed reservations, or are willing to give up their confirmed reservations to go standby.

The next board meeting is Dec. 17 at 10 a.m. at the Falmouth administration building. It will be the final regular meeting of 2019.

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 11/20/2019 - 05:51

Permalink

Tisbury voter Vineyard haven ma

Any project that's being asked to change building plans and if changes made ,we should always keep in mind any cost changes will just be passed on to us the Consumer.

Dan Weiss Heart on-Island, bones presently away

Indeed. Let’s not loose sight of the benefits: no monstrous building; preservation of harbor views (see VH terminal as example of damage caused by over-height construction); reduced light pollution by eliminating 2nd story windows; and maintaining clear sight lines for local neighbors. Most importantly, the redesign serves as concrete evidence that SSA priorities have shifted back toward community interests based entirely on pressure from the community. This sets a firm standard going forward. Another $1.00 uptick in ticket prices sooner rather than later? Fine by me and, I suspect, most everyone who can imagine the gains by what would’ve been there!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 11/21/2019 - 01:02

Permalink

J rental

You know what woulda been pretty cool? Not demolishing the old building before all this was figured out...

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 06:08

Permalink

Thomas Hodgson wt

The SSA finally nears a better solution, at huge cost, from having to dump plans they persisted in making despite constant and well-reasoned opposition by the communities it serves. When (if?) this project is over, it just might be a textbook example of why planning and bringing people on board beforehand is a really good idea, and why barging ahead can lead to huge problems. Unfortunately, we Islanders (and those who come here) will be the ones on the hook for the millions and millions of dollars wasted.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 07:25

Permalink

Mark Edgartown

Has anybody thought about the additional $750k this design required? Am sure it will be passed on through increased fares. If that ends up being the case, not sure all the complaining was worth it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 07:59

Permalink

Helen West Tisbury

I'm still wondering why we Vineyarders care or have a say in whether the terminal is 2 stories. Always less expensive. Now we are going to pay for the added costs. I was never looking at the view while getting the ferry, just getting the ferry!!!

Ed Edgartown

Vineyarders supported our neighborhoods in Woods Hole/Falmouth that overwhelmingly hated the proposed terminal. They put up with a lot in terms of dealing with the SSA, it was good of us to support them in this.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 08:14

Permalink

Elise Chilmark

Is there anything wrong with the current location of the temporary terminal? It seems to be perfectly positioned and works well. I have used it in busy summer months and off season as well, and in all types of weather, and never seen anything but a smoothly operating system.

tom tulsa

Nice little shack, works well for the customer, better than the former blockhouse, "sustainable" pretty well for awhile now, less is more on the WH waterfront. Right on, Elise!

Islander Too

My thoughts entirely.
Glad to see someone else stating the obvious.

The SSA has a big new admin building at Palmer Avenue.
Why do they need another big new expensive building?

The "temporary" terminal has shown that it is perfectly adequate to provide the public with a ticket office, rest rooms, a place to sit that provides a clear view of departing and arriving ferries, and a snack bar. I am sure it also accommodates the lost and found. Why, actually, should we have higher ticket prices to pay for this, not to mention three years of our lives? It will be obsolete in 15 years anyhow.

In light of the high cost, it is appropriate to call an "emperor's clothes time-out" and discuss the option of scrapping this plan entirely and sticking with what is there.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 09:55

Permalink

Islander Too Tisbury

Re“I think it would be nice if we got some recognition for the fact that we spent a lot of money hearing and implementing the requests, largely, of your constituency,” Ms. Tierney said, indicating Falmouth governor Kathryn Wilson."

I think it would be nice if the SSA acknowledged that their original design(s) were ill thought out, instead of demanding to be congratulated for fixing their mistakes and having the wrong attitude. The money spent to fix their original mistake is their responsibility entirely---and of course it is the public's money, not theirs. The SSA did "barge ahead" with inappropriate plans and ignored solid input, and that is how they ended up where they are now. The communities they serve deserve an apology for this avoidable mess, not a demand for congratulations. The SSA has made too many such expensive mistakes (recall the dud VH passenger dropoff; boats that malfunction and are too big to begin with) for this to be considered a one-off. As I think the consultants' report stated.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 11/22/2019 - 10:06

Permalink

ECS ed

J Rental you are completely correct and this SHOUTS OUT to the horrendous management of the SSA over the years. It is costing an exorbitant amount, again, to correct the gross oversights - must be the same people making the decisions who were involved with managing the building of the Island Home and Woods Hole which have had numerous issues. Only an idiot would take delivery of vessel that had been under salt water for even a day much less a few weeks.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 05:54

Permalink

ecs Ft Lauderdale / Edgartown

Here, here!!!

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 11/23/2019 - 09:04

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

Why would anyone with a brain demolish an old but usable building before they had approvals to build a new one. And now it's going to be smaller and yet it will cost more. There is a serious stupidity problem here,or something is being done that should be investigated by the Inspector General

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 11/25/2019 - 05:43

Permalink

Charlie Callahan So Boston/Edgartown

One commentor was 110% right. Who in their right mind would demolish a perfectly usable building before they had permits and the go ahead for the new one. Sounds like there were a few dim lites in the board room or wherever these geniuses make decisions

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.