Hall family spokesman Benjamin Hall Jr. at Edgartown town meeting Tuesday.
Maria Thibodeau

Edgartown Votes to Take Yellow House

<p>At annual town meetings Edgartown agreed to buy the Yellow House, Oak Bluffs refused to spend money to fix the Island Theatre, and West Tisbury played spoiler on roof replacement at the marine hospital.</p>

Edgartown agreed overwhelmingly to buy or take the Yellow House, Oak Bluffs said yes to a new town hall but refused to spend money to shore up the crumbling Island Theatre, and West Tisbury played spoiler on a roof replacement project at the old marine hospital owned by the Martha’s Vineyard Museum.

Color guard at Old Whaling Church.
Maria Thibodeau
Color guard at Old Whaling Church.
Maria Thibodeau

These were the highlights from annual town meetings in the three towns Tuesday night.

Edgartown and West Tisbury finished their meetings in a single night, but Oak Bluffs voters will return Wednesday for a second session at the high school Performing Arts Center.

The vote in Edgartown to spend $3 million to buy or take the Yellow House ended weeks of debate and discussion over the vacant, run-down Main street property owned by the Hall family. On Tuesday night an attempt by Benjamin Hall Jr. to amend the article on the town meeting floor failed, and following an hour of debate and 45 minutes of voting by Australian ballot, the article passed 217-34.

“What the town is trying to do is really not only to improve a negative situation that exists today, but improve the future for our community as a whole,” said Patrick Ahearn, a prominent town architect. “There’s basically a major hole in the middle of downtown.”

Approval is still needed in the ballot box Thursday for the project to go forward.

In all three towns Tuesday budgets sailed through and debate was wide-ranging.

A turnout of 248 voters in Edgartown approved a $34.6 million town budget with no fuss after zipping through a 12-article special town meeting. As voting began on the Yellow House, one voter had a medical emergency and was attended to by EMTs and volunteer firefighters.

Voters also finally gave a green light to the $2.5 million expansion project for the regional refuse district. The project has been in the works for three years but was sent back to the drawing board by Edgartown last year.

Most other articles were approved with little or no debate and the meeting adjourned at 11 p.m.

In West Tisbury 210 voters found themselves in an unexpectedly long and fractious meeting despite a relatively routine warrant.

West Tisbury meeting bogged down at times in unexpected places.
Tova Katzman
West Tisbury meeting bogged down at times in unexpected places.
Tova Katzman

Voters agreed to spend $100,000 to play catchup on town building maintenance and approved for a second time the town’s share of the refuse district expansion. An $18.2 million budget passed easily.

Voters also agreed to contribute $500,000 to the planned Scotts Grove affordable housing development near the old fire station, but not without debate.

Some questioned whether the town should spend so much money. Gary Montrowl, a member of the town finance committee, said there were broader issues to consider. “The state mandates that each community have a certain amount of affordable housing,” he said. “We are far from reaching that quota.” The article passed by a standing vote of 160-30.

But when it came to contributing a share of money to a roof replacement project at the old marine hospital owned by the Martha’s Vineyard Museum, voters balked. The Islandwide project originally called for a slate roof, but was amended this year to cedar shingles. Museum director Phil Wallis explained that wood was historically accurate, but more than one roofer stood to say said a wooden roof would not last. The article failed in a 63-68 vote.

The meeting bogged down at times, including over a lengthy personnel bylaw amendment.

An Islandwide initiative aimed at protecting undocumented, law-abiding immigrants from harassment saw strong support among citizens and law enforcement alike. Flanked by the county sheriff and the new Chilmark police chief, West Tisbury police chief Dan Rossi read a statement for the article that was originally drafted by We Stand Together, a grass roots advocacy group. (The question also won easy approval in Edgartown.)

A final article asking the town to provide child care for town meetings failed on a 38-38 tie vote just before 11 p.m. And weary West Tisbury voters adjourned.

In Oak Bluffs, 319 voters easily approved a $29.3 million budget and said yes to a $9.88 million request for a new town hall. In a presentation, capital improvements committee chairman Bill McGrath pointed out a long list of problems, including a rotting floor in the main entrance and inaccessible bathrooms.

Plenty of ayes in Oak Bluffs for a new town hall.
Mark Lovewell
Plenty of ayes in Oak Bluffs for a new town hall.
Mark Lovewell

“Town hall is a mess. It needs to be replaced,” he said to applause.

The project still depends on a debt exclusion question to be decided at the annual town election Thursday.

A total of $167,200 in public safety spending requests, including $85,000 for new firefighting gear and $68,000 for refurbishing a town ambulance, passed unanimously. A $10,000 request by the police department for new exercise equipment was tabled indefinitely.

Voters appropriated $100,000 for a new master plan, to update the current plan from 1998. “Unless we have a master plan, we are trying to put a jigsaw puzzle together without having all the pieces,” Christine Todd said.

But voters rejected the idea of spending $200,000 to shore up the crumbling Island Theatre, owned by the Hall family. An amendment to use the money to demolish the long-shuttered Circuit avenue theatre also failed. Many voiced strong concerns about whether the article represented the best strategy.

“I think we are dithering around here and putting money in the Halls’ pocket with this kind of amendment for public safety,” Fred Hancock said. “The building needs to be demolished.”

More photos from annual town meetings.

Sara Brown, Alex Elvin and Jane Seagrave contributed reporting.

 

Comments

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 08:53

Permalink

Amy Oak Bluffs

It is embarrassing that our Selectmen have been watching this problem unfold for how many years? They did not come before the voters at town meeting with a realistic plan. The roof repair went on far to long and the Selectmen haven't gotten any further than they were a half dozen years ago! Maybe it IS time for a change.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 09:15

Permalink

Frances McGuire New York and Oak Bluffs

The Island Theater is not just some dilapidated building. The Island Theater is a landmark and a defining emotional and visual touchstone in the Town of Oak Bluffs and I would argue for the entire Island of Martha's Vineyard. The name of the building is ISLAND and that Island provides an anchor for a specific sense of place for Martha's Vineyard and Oak Bluffs. The Island Theater is as important a place as Alley's General Store in West Tisbury. The Island Theater is as important as the Cyclone Rollercoaster in Coney Island. Can you really imagine Oak Bluffs without that beautiful haunting facade? Since this appears to be more than just a town issue is there not another way to fund the stabilization of this historically significant building? Are there any notable theater, Hollywood, t.v. folks out there with $200,000. to spend to save this 'LAST PICTURE SHOW?" - Frances - an Oak Bluffs painter, including many of the Island Theater, because that building speaks and has soul.

Jason OB

Alley's is owned by the Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust (they bought it in 1993). The Cyclone was saved when New York City bought it in !971. Both "owners" had and have the foresight to care and the financial means to maintain their properties for the public good. The difference here is the Island Theater is in the hands of a private family. A family that either won't, or financially can't maintain their property. Until they change, or sell, or the State steps in this will continue to be a shameful crisis of their own making. Our selectmen are too timid, so I don't see them as part of the solution.

deshandra brown mv

The property is owned by multi-millionaires who can easily afford to maintain the properties they inherited. Perhaps their strategy is to let their visible properties fall into disrepair, so that a generous'concerned group of citizens' can open their wallets (as they did at the Strand Theater foundation) to spend the donated money to fix privately owned properties. I can't blame them, the strategy worked before. Its like putting out food to feed a stray cat. It will keep coming back lookin for free food as long as you leave the food out. Its time to stop putting the food out on this Island.

Alison Cohen Oak Bluffs

Beautiful facade? Have you seen it up close in the last 10 years? It is a crumbling, rotting hulk of what it once was. A new developer could recreate the look, but it is so far gone and at risk of collapse that the state is threatening to fence off the intersection and revoke occupancy permits of abutting buildings before the summer season gets underway. Even if the inside is shored up (a temporary fix), the exterior will remain a hideous eyesore to greet tourists and islanders alike.

Frances McGuire New York and Oak Bluffs

I saw and photographed the facade two weeks ago. Before that I photographed it in December. I photograph it all the time in all seasons and for many years. I actually think, although it is in terrible shape, it still remains a very important building and has a beauty and elegance to it. I cannot disagree with you more regarding thinking it is "hideous."

Sara Piazza Edgartown

Frances - I agree with you. I love this place. It's iconic, and OB definitely wouldn't be the same without its domineering presence at the entrance to Circuit Ave. Except for the safety issues, I love this building even in its semi-dilapidated state - enough with sanitizing the island, already. I've been photographing her, too, so look at it this way: if they tear it down, our photos will skyrocket in value?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 12:09

Permalink

Frank Edgartown

Frances, the Island Theater is privately owned. Why should public money be used to make it safe when the owner refuses? Time for the town to knock it down, it's a matter of safety.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 16:41

Permalink

Frances McGuire New York and Oak Bluffs

Thank you all for your thoughtful replies. However, shouldn't public money (I too pay taxes in Oak Bluffs) be used in the interim to stabilize the building before it is too late to save it? I am not a lawyer but if the town funds the stabilization isn't there a way to collect the money from the owners via something???? This is truly an important structure and it would be heartbreaking to see it gone. Pictureland, hello??????

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 16:52

Permalink

Frances McGuire New York and Oak Bluffs

I also meant to respond to Jason. If the Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust purchased Alley's maybe they would also consider purchasing the Island Theater. The Island Theater is truly as important. Architecture is sometimes unfortunately appreciated after it's gone. Have people considered why this theater is so often photographed and painted and silkscreened? It is because it is a Martha's Vineyard landmark. It is also like art that is suddenly appreciated after the artist is dead If this goes down the images will appear in glossy coffee table books and all will be lamenting its demise. Trust me.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 16:57

Permalink

phil regan oak bluffs

Stabilizing the theatre is the smart move, like it or not. Aside from the building's architectural significance in town, the two most informed individuals, Town Administrator Bob Whritenour and Building Inspector Mark Barbadoro were clearly not heard, nor did their messages sink in. Money appropriated for this project is retrievable, by more than one means. Demolition would likely result in a law suit, as would imminent domain, never mind the cost of each. Demolition, as long as the Hall's maintain ownership of the property, would undoubtedly result in a greater eye sore than the current condition...maybe for years. The town is not in a position, nor is it prepared to move forward with imminent domain proceedings. Unfortunately, we voted to "do nothing", which places this matter in the hands of the state building inspector...not a good thing. For safety reasons, a closing of the lower end of circuit avenue, and several adjacent businesses, could be ordered, and is not out of the question. How is that going to look and feel as summer approaches?

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 04/12/2017 - 20:08

Permalink

chris Lamonica Edgartown

I am disgusted with Edgartown. We have a drug epidemic and we are taking private property. I hope its going to be a methadone clinic because we will need it.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2017 - 09:38

Permalink

Frances McGuire New York and Oak Bluffs

What a difference a town makes. Edgartown approves 3 million to buy a Yellow House owned by the Halls. Oak Bluffs disapproves an interim payment of $200,000 to stabilize a much, much bigger and architecturally significant Yellow (Island) House owned by the Halls. The glaring relationship of these two yellow structures did not hit me until today. Would Edgartown extend an interim payment of $200,000 to stabilize a town defining landmark on their Main Street? Without a doubt.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2017 - 10:48

Permalink

Edwin G West Katama

Halls are allowing the old liquor store building on main street next to Past and Presents to rot away as well. That's at least 3 properties on island that are not only an eyesore, but will at some point become a safety concern.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 04/13/2017 - 18:03

Permalink

Mark Lucier

I have no argument concerning mismanagement by the Halls on these properties, whatever their reasons. However, I do have concerns of we taxpayers in Edgartown spending millions to buy something as an investment in the town, . Not only is the town not in the business of landlord, but, whatever property taxes the Yellow House property generates will now be lost. The cost of taking this property must take that into consideration for the bottom line, as well as legal expenses that are sure to follow.

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.